How dare you conclude that Martin was NOT the aggressor!!!<quoted text>
How you love to conclude that Martin was the aggressor,even though Good only saw the ensuing fight, NOT the beginning. Who's to say who attacked who and just because Martin was on top and winning , you conclude he was the aggressor? How do you know that? Good never said he saw the beginning of the altercation. So, if you're attacked, you reply, you get the physical advantage, you deserve to get shot?
Wait, Rogue, wait for the end of the trial. Reasonable people do not take racial sides the way you do. I don't. I have no idea who is guilty. But you do.
4th request : Was Zimmerman employed by the condo owners to patrol the area and if not, what was he doing there with a gun?
Wait, wait, we KNOW what the truth is. Angela Corey knows what the truth is. Why would the PROSECUTOR put on a two witness on that make their case look BAD?!? The prosecutor has no case!
Next, George Zimmerman had a CCP and had the right to carry that handgun. Next, he had every right to follow a suspect while talking to the 911 operator. AGAIN I ASK YOU WHAT CRIME DID ZIMMERMAN COMMIT prior to the shooting???