BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 20 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#161265 Jun 26, 2013
Ben Ghazi wrote:
<quoted text>
If you noticed, Mitt Romney's is a photo copy and you can see "VOID" all over it.
And if you notice the article challenged George Romney's NBC status but both of George Romney's parents (Mitt's grandparents) were both U.S. citizens which makes George Romney a NBC.
My younger sister was born in Germany to two US citizen parents and she has an DS-1350 so I assume Geo. Romney had one too!
http://www.travel.state.gov/passport/faq/faq_...
And John McCain did not have a DS-1350 as he was a born to two US citizen parents and in a US Territory!
"And if you notice the article challenged George Romney's NBC status but both of George Romney's parents (Mitt's grandparents) were both U.S. citizens which makes George Romney a NBC."

Sorry, George was never the Republican candidate and his status was never established. Secondly, George Romney's parentage would have been immaterial if he had been born in the US. See Perkins v. Elg., and US v. Ark.

Similarly, McCain's parentage would have been immaterial if he had been born in the US.

Focus on the immaterial is the province of the fool.
Poppo wrote:
Itís because you allow your imagination to run wild is the reason you assert such nonsense. You have no idea what kind of envelope the HDoH mailed to the Obama campaign in 07 and the long form was picked up at the DoH. Did you see any folds in Stigís BC? No you didnít so why should Obamaís BC necessarily have folds because yours did? How many folds do you see in Romneyís BC? http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/29/us -... Or Donald Trumpís? http://www.mediaite.com/online/donald-trump-r ... Oh Lord! Itís a certification as well. And your point was?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#161266 Jun 26, 2013
Ben Ghazi wrote:
<quoted text>
My younger sister was born in Germany to two US citizen parents and she has an DS-1350 so I assume Geo. Romney had one too!
http://www.travel.state.gov/passport/faq/faq_...
And John McCain did not have a DS-1350 as he was a born to two US citizen parents and in a US Territory!
Ummm, two citizen parents are not required for a DS-1350. Neither is being born in a US territory.

"A child born **abroad to a U.S. citizen parent** or parents may acquire U.S. citizenship at birth if certain statutory requirements are met."

Got a clue what 'born abroad to a U.S. citizen parent' means?

And that has nothing to do with citizenship of a person born in the US.

DS-1350 is immaterial for a person born in the US.

Focus on the immaterial is the province of the fool.
Ben Ghazi

Topeka, KS

#161267 Jun 26, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
"And if you notice the article challenged George Romney's NBC status but both of George Romney's parents (Mitt's grandparents) were both U.S. citizens which makes George Romney a NBC."
Sorry, George was never the Republican candidate and his status was never established. Secondly, George Romney's parentage would have been immaterial if he had been born in the US. See Perkins v. Elg., and US v. Ark.
Similarly, McCain's parentage would have been immaterial if he had been born in the US.
Focus on the immaterial is the province of the fool.
<quoted text>
Yep, "Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that a child born in the United States to naturalized parents on U.S. soil is a natural born citizen" but only one of Barracks parents was a US citizen!
And "United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that practically everyone born in the United States is a U.S. citizen" only says US Citizen and never mentions "Natural Born Citizen".
To be a Natural Born Citizen BOTH parents had to be US citizens.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#161268 Jun 26, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, I'm surer he's seen quite a few. On the other hand, how are tricks like opening your long coat at an elementary school, exposing your frilly pink panties at the poor hapless, helpless forever-shocked-numbed-affecte d-for-life children. Picture the NIGHTMARES!!
You're surer? Overlooking your awful typing skills, exactly how would you know what panties toesap has seen? LMAO!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#161269 Jun 26, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't support you. I mock you
You don't mock anyone bonehead. That would require writing more than two sentences and you've proven that to be beyond you abilities. If you're mocking, try something else because you're no good at this. I pity you, really!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#161270 Jun 26, 2013
Ben Ghazi wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep, "Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that a child born in the United States to naturalized parents on U.S. soil is a natural born citizen" but only one of Barracks parents was a US citizen!
And "United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that practically everyone born in the United States is a U.S. citizen" only says US Citizen and never mentions "Natural Born Citizen".
To be a Natural Born Citizen BOTH parents had to be US citizens.
Sorry Rougie, in Perkins v. Elg, it was held that Marie Elg was a natural born citizen because she was born in the United States, without regard to parentage. In Ark the USSC ruled that Ark was born a citizen because persons born in the US (with rare exceptions) are NATURAL BORN CITIZENS.

And, sorry Rougie, the USSC in Ark mentioned "natural born" several times in regard to persons born in this country, leaving no doubt that Ark was a natural born citizen. Even the United States admitted that if Ark was born a citizen in the US he would be eligible to be President. Duh!

If you want the direct citation and quote I will give it to you, but I have posted it several times. Got Alzheimer's?
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
"And if you notice the article challenged George Romney's NBC status but both of George Romney's parents (Mitt's grandparents) were both U.S. citizens which makes George Romney a NBC."
Sorry, George was never the Republican candidate and his status was never established. Secondly, George Romney's parentage would have been immaterial if he had been born in the US. See Perkins v. Elg., and US v. Ark.
Similarly, McCain's parentage would have been immaterial if he had been born in the US.
Focus on the immaterial is the province of the fool.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#161271 Jun 26, 2013
Ben Ghazi wrote:
<quoted text>Yep, "Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that a child born in the United States to naturalized parents on U.S. soil is a natural born citizen" but only one of Barracks parents was a US citizen!
And "United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that practically everyone born in the United States is a U.S. citizen" only says US Citizen and never mentions "Natural Born Citizen".
To be a Natural Born Citizen BOTH parents had to be US citizens.
And your play law source is ...?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#161272 Jun 26, 2013
Ben Ghazi wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, in 2007 most of you Dems thought Hillary would be the Dems Pres. choice but you was wrongeau!
It was awfully close, unlike the Nov 6 2012 presidential. And hey, the right party won in 2008 and 2012, no?
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#161273 Jun 26, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>You don't mock anyone bonehead. That would require writing more than two sentences and you've proven that to be beyond you abilities. If you're mocking, try something else because you're no good at this. I pity you, really!
It takes very few words to mock a boi as small as Romoer

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#161274 Jun 26, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
You're surer? Overlooking your awful typing skills, exactly how would you know what panties toesap has seen? LMAO!
Petty, no reply, falls on typos. Poor loser. I'm pretty "surer" you've got nothing.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#161275 Jun 26, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Petty, no reply, falls on typos. Poor loser. I'm pretty "surer" you've got nothing.
It comes with the territory. Some give a show, others will do "anything to get an A." However, as a professional, I grade students on merit.(But I did enjoy Renee's show, and Crystal's (you should have seen her G-string)). On the other hand, I discouraged such conduct, despite the cheap thrill factor. I had many hot babes before I was married, and I rejected many more after, as I was faithful to my beautiful (now ex) wife after I was married. C'est la vie. And I have a gorgeous young fiancee, so I'm not about to lust after students, though if they give a show, I will discourage it, despite the cheap thrills. Hee hee.
Justice LRS wrote:
You're surer? Overlooking your awful typing skills, exactly how would you know what panties toesap has seen? LMAO!

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

#161276 Jun 26, 2013
Act of God.

An act occasioned exclusively by forces of nature without the interference of any human agency....

Black's Law Dictionary

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#161277 Jun 26, 2013
sorry, when I was married.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#161278 Jun 26, 2013
loose cannon wrote:
Act of God.
An act occasioned exclusively by forces of nature without the interference of any human agency....
Black's Law Dictionary
Wow! Your point?

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

#161279 Jun 26, 2013
Jacques,
I think I just won that argument.
loose

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

#161280 Jun 26, 2013
Wojar,
See above.
loose
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#161281 Jun 26, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
It takes very few words to mock a boi as small as Romoer
You're laughable. LMAO! Sic 'em Mr. KKK! LMAO!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#161282 Jun 26, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Ummm, two citizen parents are not required for a DS-1350. Neither is being born in a US territory.
"A child born **abroad to a U.S. citizen parent** or parents may acquire U.S. citizenship at birth if certain statutory requirements are met."
Got a clue what 'born abroad to a U.S. citizen parent' means?
And that has nothing to do with citizenship of a person born in the US.
DS-1350 is immaterial for a person born in the US.
Focus on the immaterial is the province of the fool.
Unfortunately, as soon as little Obumbler hit the dirt he was a Brit. Never an American citizen. Not even for a second!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#161283 Jun 26, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Petty, no reply, falls on typos. Poor loser. I'm pretty "surer" you've got nothing.
Lovely for a grammarian! LMAO!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#161284 Jun 26, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
It comes with the territory. Some give a show, others will do "anything to get an A." However, as a professional, I grade students on merit.(But I did enjoy Renee's show, and Crystal's (you should have seen her G-string)). On the other hand, I discouraged such conduct, despite the cheap thrill factor. I had many hot babes before I was married, and I rejected many more after, as I was faithful to my beautiful (now ex) wife after I was married. C'est la vie. And I have a gorgeous young fiancee, so I'm not about to lust after students, though if they give a show, I will discourage it, despite the cheap thrills. Hee hee.
<quoted text>
Who in the world do you expect to believe that pile of crap? LMAO!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 min Grey Ghost 1,223,646
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr OzRitz 52,999
Are Jews Robbing America (May '10) 4 hr joey 5
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 5 hr TRD 69,782
abby may 3-15 8 hr mrs gladys kravitz 3
Amy May 3-15 10 hr mrs gladys kravitz 2
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 10 hr Doug77 5,946
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]