BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 197133 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#161145 Jun 25, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
I see you still haven't m]learned how to posy a link that works.
Don't try to skirt around this one. I suspected it would not work, so I reproduced the first lines of the article. Fact is, that is where you got your plagiarized item. Have you no pride, reproducing stuff you didn't write? Did you think for a second we thought you "wrote" this? Did you "forget" the reference? Suuuuuure. Second time in a row you forget it.
JBH

Richmond, Canada

#161147 Jun 25, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Highly unlikely.
'Highly unlikely' defined: A physical chemistry professor once remarked to his class, during a lecture on quantum chemistry, that all of the matter of which he was composed could rearrange itself at the other end of the lecture hall in the form of a gorgeous blonde, but it would be "highly unlikely".
==========

Have you never seen blondes in a class studying physical chemistry, or you HAVE NEVER BEEN TO ONE chemistry class with women?

So if you have, just tell all you know about quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, diffusion, mass transfer, kinetic reaction, catalytic reaction, homogeneous and hetero chain reactions and simulation , etc., as these may exceed more than just basic chemistry, but are physical chemistry related.

Don't you know some blondes do pretty good in these things too, as more women are getting in science and engineering class more and more?

Who would have to look at some blonde at end of hall, but instead, just whisper to the blonde sitting next to one in the same class?

That is your inflation of obsession of blondes since you didn't get to tell what chemistry do you know by thinking you have good chemistry with blondes as you the day-dreamer.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#161148 Jun 25, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
No. Because facts trump fables
In Birfoonistan if you repeat a fable three times it becomes true.
Justice LRS wrote:
Oh that's right, because Dr. Ukulele said it was so. LMAO!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#161149 Jun 25, 2013
JBH wrote:
<quoted text>
==========
Have you never seen blondes in a class studying physical chemistry, or you HAVE NEVER BEEN TO ONE chemistry class with women?
So if you have, just tell all you know about quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, diffusion, mass transfer, kinetic reaction, catalytic reaction, homogeneous and hetero chain reactions and simulation , etc., as these may exceed more than just basic chemistry, but are physical chemistry related.
Don't you know some blondes do pretty good in these things too, as more women are getting in science and engineering class more and more?
Who would have to look at some blonde at end of hall, but instead, just whisper to the blonde sitting next to one in the same class?
That is your inflation of obsession of blondes since you didn't get to tell what chemistry do you know by thinking you have good chemistry with blondes as you the day-dreamer.
I think this dude needs to have his medication adjusted.

BTW, I was a student in the P. chem class when the professor made that comment. I still recall how amazed we were when he would calculate logarithms in his head to five decimal places.

BTW, I used to teach a biochemisty class for nursing students at a university, as well as graduate classes for chem majors. One student, Renee, who was built like Christie Brinkley and had a face to match would wear short skirts and flash her panties just to get my attention. What a show it was!
wojar wrote:
Highly unlikely.'Highly unlikely' defined: A physical chemistry professor once remarked to his class, during a lecture on quantum chemistry, that all of the matter of which he was composed could rearrange itself at the other end of the lecture hall in the form of a gorgeous blonde, but it would be "highly unlikely".
JBH

Richmond, Canada

#161150 Jun 25, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
I think this dude needs to have his medication adjusted.
BTW, I was a student in the P. chem class when the professor made that comment. I still recall how amazed we were when he would calculate logarithms in his head to five decimal places.
BTW, I used to teach a biochemisty class for nursing students at a university, as well as graduate classes for chem majors. One student, Renee, who was built like Christie Brinkley and had a face to match would wear short skirts and flash her panties just to get my attention. What a show it was!
<quoted text>
===

Ahha, no one would not wonder why you are still addicted to say that was what a show in class with some woman wearing a skirt?

Because that seems to be a big deal for you seeing women wearing skirts, you are still showing the immature self in so speaking, by even talking that you did teach a chemistry class.

Yeah, that is what a joke, for how could they learn something, as you appeared to be studying blondes, instead of studying some new medication as a change from that you have been taking all along, in order to modify the pattern of your immature behavior, in addition that you do too much day dreaming, since you speak for yourself needing taking medication?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#161151 Jun 25, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep, I knew you disposed of your Chinooks at bargain prices in 2001. Can you tell us who was in control of your government in 2001? PM Jean Chrétien! And what party was he a member of?
It seems the Liberals always gut their military!!!
Be patient, Rogue, I already answered the above, too long a reply as usual, but I hit the "Post comment" key and poof, nothing. Lost. Damn Topix is censoring me before even reading my post!! Just kidding, some kink somewhere I guess. I will just resume my too-long reply from memory.

Yes, Chrétien the Liberal sold the Chinooks.
Yes, Chrétien inherited the biggest deficit ever on record from the Conservative (read : Republican equivalent) gov't,$45 billion, and 7 successive ones before that.

Chrétien had to cut somewhere. He had choices, social security and health care or the military. He cut the military. Good for him, as spending taxpayers' money to save people, he figured, trumped military spending.

After 12 years, Chrétien and his successor Paul Martin created 6 successive surpluses, and the national debt was greatly, and I mean greatly reduced. In come the "small gov't" "non-deficit conservatives, 2006, and to imitate his hero GWB, our Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, immediately squanders all surpluses and comes up with a huge, and I mean huge deficit, understated at least five times. He's been PM six years now, has produced 5 deficits in a row and going strong.

Health care, social security, ahead of military spending. YES. Otherwise, you have all those weapons and nothing to defend, like the USSR in 1989.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#161152 Jun 25, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Well, I was watching Fox news and when Obama started to speak, I decided it was a good time to walk my dogs!
MSNBC CUTS OFF OBAMA'S CLIMATE CHANGE SPEECH AFTER 41 SECONDS
After 15 years of no increase in global temperatures -- which decimates a huge majority of Climate Change models -- our anti-science president took to the stump today for what was promised as a major speech on what he was going to do by executive fiat to save the world. Of all three cable news networks, though, it was his own peanut gallery at MSNBC who bailed first, broadcasting only 41 seconds of the speech.
Fox News gave the president nearly five minutes. CNN covered the event for about eight minutes.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/...
GHo back in time , Rogue, and see how much TV time 2nd term presidents were allowed, unless there was a bad, huge, disaster. And, specially when climate change or whatever is the subject. Hey, that would cut into TV programs and the outcry, well, the outcry would be something to behold. Be fair, no one wants the president or any other politician cutting in to their wrasling or extreme fighting or Judge Judy or NASCAR.

Anyhow, Obama's not that good a speaker. He's too windy, too LONG in his responses and statements. No one's perfect, I suppose.
wojar

Bristol, CT

#161153 Jun 25, 2013
JBH wrote:
<quoted text>
===
Ahha, no one would not wonder why you are still addicted to say that was what a show in class with some woman wearing a skirt?
Because that seems to be a big deal for you seeing women wearing skirts, you are still showing the immature self in so speaking, by even talking that you did teach a chemistry class.
Yeah, that is what a joke, for how could they learn something, as you appeared to be studying blondes, instead of studying some new medication as a change from that you have been taking all along, in order to modify the pattern of your immature behavior, in addition that you do too much day dreaming, since you speak for yourself needing taking medication?
Huh?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#161154 Jun 25, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote: Bob: "Did you hear about the Obama administration scandal?" Jim: "You mean the Mexican gun running?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "You mean SEAL Team 6 Extortion 17?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "You mean the State Dept. lying about Benghazi?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "You mean the voter fraud?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "You mean the military not getting their votes counted?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "You mean that 3 or 4 of Obama's friends were mysteriously murdered when they came forward with claims he was gay?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "You mean the president demoralizing and breaking down the military?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "You mean the Boston Bombing?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "You mean the president wanting to kill Americans with drones without the benefit of the law?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "Giving 123 Technologies $300 Million and right after it declared bankruptcy it was sold to the Chinese?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "You mean the president arming the Muslim Brotherhood?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "The IRS targeting conservatives?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "The DOJ spying on the press?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "Sebelius shaking down health insurance executives?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "Giving SOLYNDRA $500 MILLION DOLLARS and right after they declared bankruptcy the Chinese bought it?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "The NSA monitoring our phone calls, e-mails and everything else?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "The president's ordering the release of nearly 10,000 illegal immigrants from jails and prisons and falsely blaming the sequester?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "The president's threat to impose gun control by Executive Order in order to bypass Congress?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "The president's repeated violation of the law requiring him to submit a budget no later than the first Monday in February?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "The 2012 vote where 115% of all registered voters in some counties voted 100% for Obama?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "The president's unconstitutional recess appointments in an attempt to circumvent the Senate's advise-and-consent role?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "The State Department interfering with an Inspector General investigation on departmental sexual misconduct?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "HHS employees being given insider information on Medicare Advantage?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "Clinton, the IRS, Clapper and Holder all lying to Congress?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "I give up!... Oh wait, I think I got it! You mean that 65 million low-information voters stuck us again with the most corrupt administration in American history?" Bob: "THAT'S THE ONE" Enjoy life!
Read more at http://www.topix.com/forum/who/barack-obama/T...
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Another summer TV re-run. Don't you get tire of repeating the same old unattributed and plagiarized stale jokes? At least, credit :
thestolzreport.blogspot.com/.../did-you-hear-... ;
Jun 17, 2013 – Person B:“You mean about the setting up of Seal Team 6?” Person A:... Did You Hear About the Obama Administration Scanda... Ben Long: A ...
Second time I have to link it.
But I did not get it from that source! I got it in an email from a friend. You do have friends, don't you?
And this source did not give credit to an author!
http://www.jeffersonreview.com/2013/06/did-yo...
Grand Birther

Cleveland, OH

#161155 Jun 25, 2013
Pretty sad to witness all this undiagnosed mental illness among the birthers.

Get some help, people.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#161156 Jun 25, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote: Well, I was watching Fox news and when Obama started to speak, I decided it was a good time to walk my dogs! MSNBC CUTS OFF OBAMA'S CLIMATE CHANGE SPEECH AFTER 41 SECONDS After 15 years of no increase in global temperatures -- which decimates a huge majority of Climate Change models -- our anti-science president took to the stump today for what was promised as a major speech on what he was going to do by executive fiat to save the world. Of all three cable news networks, though, it was his own peanut gallery at MSNBC who bailed first, broadcasting only 41 seconds of the speech. Fox News gave the president nearly five minutes. CNN covered the event for about eight minutes. http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/ ...
Read more at http://www.topix.com/forum/who/barack-obama/T...
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
GHo back in time , Rogue, and see how much TV time 2nd term presidents were allowed, unless there was a bad, huge, disaster. And, specially when climate change or whatever is the subject. Hey, that would cut into TV programs and the outcry, well, the outcry would be something to behold. Be fair, no one wants the president or any other politician cutting in to their wrasling or extreme fighting or Judge Judy or NASCAR.
Anyhow, Obama's not that good a speaker. He's too windy, too LONG in his responses and statements. No one's perfect, I suppose.
I did not know that MSNBC had "wrasling or extreme fighting or Judge Judy or NASCAR".

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#161157 Jun 25, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Be patient, Rogue, I already answered the above, too long a reply as usual, but I hit the "Post comment" key and poof, nothing. Lost. Damn Topix is censoring me before even reading my post!! Just kidding, some kink somewhere I guess. I will just resume my too-long reply from memory.
Yes, Chrétien the Liberal sold the Chinooks.
Yes, Chrétien inherited the biggest deficit ever on record from the Conservative (read : Republican equivalent) gov't,$45 billion, and 7 successive ones before that.
Chrétien had to cut somewhere. He had choices, social security and health care or the military. He cut the military. Good for him, as spending taxpayers' money to save people, he figured, trumped military spending.
After 12 years, Chrétien and his successor Paul Martin created 6 successive surpluses, and the national debt was greatly, and I mean greatly reduced. In come the "small gov't" "non-deficit conservatives, 2006, and to imitate his hero GWB, our Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, immediately squanders all surpluses and comes up with a huge, and I mean huge deficit, understated at least five times. He's been PM six years now, has produced 5 deficits in a row and going strong.
Health care, social security, ahead of military spending. YES. Otherwise, you have all those weapons and nothing to defend, like the USSR in 1989.
And the privatization of Petro-Canada and it's subsequent public sale had nothing to do with the economy while PM Chrétien was in office?

From Wiki: In his 2004 federal budget, Finance Minister Ralph Goodale pledged to sell the government's remaining stake in the company and by the end of the year it had sold its 19% stake, 49 million shares in all, for net proceeds of $3.2 billion.
JBH

Richmond, Canada

#161158 Jun 25, 2013
---------MOSCOW — Russia's foreign minister on Tuesday said that U.S. demands to extradite U.S. spy leaker Edward Snowden were "ungrounded and unacceptable." Interesting how Obama has ZERO influence and is the laughing stock of the world. Obama has lost all credibility, as the NY Times has said in writing. Obama said he was against all this spying when he was lying to get elected. Now he is a spying fascist on steroid. I'm glad Snowden embarrassed the jive-ass punk obama. Obama's policies are so misguided, this really doesn't matter in the big scheme of things. The man is a wimp.---------

=========

Obama is lacking the realization of the ramification of world reality.

When he extends the hacking of civilians in and out, it is difficult to find pals around the world.

He still doesn't understand today is 2013, not even 2003, that people of the globe have grown in big numbers and quantities of wishes wanting more righteous rights and liberty than 10 years ago.

From his so doing, it not only puts back rights of freedom backward, the immense purposeless direction to ask Russia to give back Snowden , looks like a fantasy and a fallacy.

Why would Russia extradite Snowden as it has popularity from the world demand to give Russians lots of credits to protect people from insane manipulation of events based on falsehood and groundless stand?
Besides, that is Russia which is a better deal while US makes its own bad, as the world looks on.
JBH

Richmond, Canada

#161159 Jun 25, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote: Bob: "Did you hear about the Obama administration scandal?" Jim: "You mean the Mexican gun running?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "You mean SEAL Team 6 Extortion 17?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "You mean the State Dept. lying about Benghazi?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "You mean the voter fraud?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "You mean the military not getting their votes counted?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "You mean that 3 or 4 of Obama's friends were mysteriously murdered when they came forward with claims he was gay?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "You mean the president demoralizing and breaking down the military?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "You mean the Boston Bombing?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "You mean the president wanting to kill Americans with drones without the benefit of the law?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "Giving 123 Technologies $300 Million and right after it declared bankruptcy it was sold to the Chinese?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "You mean the president arming the Muslim Brotherhood?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "The IRS targeting conservatives?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "The DOJ spying on the press?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "Sebelius shaking down health insurance executives?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "Giving SOLYNDRA $500 MILLION DOLLARS and right after they declared bankruptcy the Chinese bought it?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "The NSA monitoring our phone calls, e-mails and everything else?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "The president's ordering the release of nearly 10,000 illegal immigrants from jails and prisons and falsely blaming the sequester?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "The president's threat to impose gun control by Executive Order in order to bypass Congress?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "The president's repeated violation of the law requiring him to submit a budget no later than the first Monday in February?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "The 2012 vote where 115% of all registered voters in some counties voted 100% for Obama?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "The president's unconstitutional recess appointments in an attempt to circumvent the Senate's advise-and-consent role?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "The State Department interfering with an Inspector General investigation on departmental sexual misconduct?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "HHS employees being given insider information on Medicare Advantage?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "Clinton, the IRS, Clapper and Holder all lying to Congress?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "I give up!... Oh wait, I think I got it! You mean that 65 million low-information voters stuck us again with the most corrupt administration in American history?" Bob: "THAT'S THE ONE" Enjoy life!
Read more at http://www.topix.com/forum/who/barack-obama/T... text>
But I did not get it from that source! I got it in an email from a friend. You do have friends, don't you?
And this source did not give credit to an author!
http://www.jeffersonreview.com/2013/06/did-yo...
==========

This says Obama has tons of scandals as they tell them.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#161160 Jun 25, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
And the privatization of Petro-Canada and it's subsequent public sale had nothing to do with the economy while PM Chrétien was in office?
From Wiki: In his 2004 federal budget, Finance Minister Ralph Goodale pledged to sell the government's remaining stake in the company and by the end of the year it had sold its 19% stake, 49 million shares in all, for net proceeds of $3.2 billion.
Yes, all of that to bring down the debt. And even the Liberals believed that the gov't should not be in the business of exploring and selling oil and gas. This time I strongly disagree, we should've kept Petro Canada, enlarged it even and eventually nationalize the whole industry at fair acquisition prices, have it run by "franchisees" (could be Exxon, or Shell, why not?) but with all energy policies set by the gov't. And a guarantee of lower prices at the pump.

I believe we sold Petro Canada for a total of $13 billion. How stupid. Imagine how much we would have earned since the damn thing was sold, and kept on earning. Stupid that was.

Nice, though, that you seem to know something of your Northern neighbour. Most Americans know squat about Canada, except for those damn cold fronts and snow that come down on the US from here, lol. The other day, CNN spelled Ottawa Ottowa. I must say, though, not always a bad thing to be unknown and ignored. We go our way, we are doing sort of okay, all we need to do now is kick those conservatives outa there and restore a real Liberal gov't.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#161161 Jun 25, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote: Bob: "Did you hear about the Obama administration scandal?" Jim: "You mean the Mexican gun running?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "You mean SEAL Team 6 Extortion 17?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "You mean the State Dept. lying about Benghazi?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "You mean the voter fraud?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "You mean the military not getting their votes counted?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "You mean that 3 or 4 of Obama's friends were mysteriously murdered when they came forward with claims he was gay?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "You mean the president demoralizing and breaking down the military?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "You mean the Boston Bombing?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "You mean the president wanting to kill Americans with drones without the benefit of the law?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "Giving 123 Technologies $300 Million and right after it declared bankruptcy it was sold to the Chinese?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "You mean the president arming the Muslim Brotherhood?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "The IRS targeting conservatives?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "The DOJ spying on the press?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "Sebelius shaking down health insurance executives?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "Giving SOLYNDRA $500 MILLION DOLLARS and right after they declared bankruptcy the Chinese bought it?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "The NSA monitoring our phone calls, e-mails and everything else?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "The president's ordering the release of nearly 10,000 illegal immigrants from jails and prisons and falsely blaming the sequester?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "The president's threat to impose gun control by Executive Order in order to bypass Congress?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "The president's repeated violation of the law requiring him to submit a budget no later than the first Monday in February?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "The 2012 vote where 115% of all registered voters in some counties voted 100% for Obama?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "The president's unconstitutional recess appointments in an attempt to circumvent the Senate's advise-and-consent role?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "The State Department interfering with an Inspector General investigation on departmental sexual misconduct?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "HHS employees being given insider information on Medicare Advantage?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "Clinton, the IRS, Clapper and Holder all lying to Congress?" Bob: "No, the other one." Jim: "I give up!... Oh wait, I think I got it! You mean that 65 million low-information voters stuck us again with the most corrupt administration in American history?" Bob: "THAT'S THE ONE" Enjoy life!
Read more at http://www.topix.com/forum/who/barack-obama/T... text>
But I did not get it from that source! I got it in an email from a friend. You do have friends, don't you?
And this source did not give credit to an author!
http://www.jeffersonreview.com/2013/06/did-yo...
So you plagiarized a plagiarized text. Okay. You said I'm not too good on links. Well, I just copied and pasted your first sentence, googled it and up it came.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#161162 Jun 25, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote: Well, I was watching Fox news and when Obama started to speak, I decided it was a good time to walk my dogs! MSNBC CUTS OFF OBAMA'S CLIMATE CHANGE SPEECH AFTER 41 SECONDS After 15 years of no increase in global temperatures -- which decimates a huge majority of Climate Change models -- our anti-science president took to the stump today for what was promised as a major speech on what he was going to do by executive fiat to save the world. Of all three cable news networks, though, it was his own peanut gallery at MSNBC who bailed first, broadcasting only 41 seconds of the speech. Fox News gave the president nearly five minutes. CNN covered the event for about eight minutes. http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/ ...
Read more at http://www.topix.com/forum/who/barack-obama/T... text>
I did not know that MSNBC had "wrasling or extreme fighting or Judge Judy or NASCAR".
You're right, birthers and tea partyer4s don't watch MSNBC, a few notches above their station.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#161164 Jun 25, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>Huh?
I think he said you're FOS. Just a guess. He's right too. Even Dr. Ukulele agrees! LMAO!
Therealnews com

West Sayville, NY

#161165 Jun 25, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep, Congress and the FISA judges rely on NSA to be truthful but who is making sure the NSA is honest? The administration???
Now you finally got a taste of how liberals felt for 8 years of Bush/Cheney.

The prostitutes in Congress never cared about the average Joe and Jane.

http://www.commondreams.org/video/2013/06/25-...
Therealnews com

West Sayville, NY

#161166 Jun 25, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Highly unlikely.
'Highly unlikely' defined: A physical chemistry professor once remarked to his class, during a lecture on quantum chemistry, that all of the matter of which he was composed could rearrange itself at the other end of the lecture hall in the form of a gorgeous blonde, but it would be "highly unlikely".
Truth is stranger than fiction.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 18 min Grey Ghost 1,278,305
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 30 min Patriot AKA Bozo 54,604
I Remember Mel Reynolds. 3 hr Indicted Again 1
News Should prostitution be less illegal-or more? 9 hr robert 4
"Slave clothes" My New, Original Work by Patric... 10 hr Outlaw Entitlements 2
Kim K has such a large azz, it turns me OFF. 10 hr Condoms unnecessary 1
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 14 hr contrary opinion 100,673
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages