BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 230987 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Therealnews com

Oakdale, NY

#161055 Jun 25, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah VoteVets, I have a personal question. Are you a military vet? Only about 5% of all members of VoteVet.org are and I wonder why you call your organization VoteVets if most of you are not military vets?
Read more at http://www.topix.com/forum/who/barack-obama/T... text>
They are not really for our men and women. I remember when Carter was president and we were running out of toilet paper. And that is not a joke either. Ever see a thousand dollar roll of toilet paper. Well, that is what it cost us when a private sent a receipt for the TP he had to buy at the PX for the barracks. Back in 1980 a typical Congressional Inquiry cost $1,000!
Oh, and Obama is doing it to our men and women in uniform right now and I sure hope we did not have to send them off to war without the proper equipment again!
Mr. Bush and the G.I. Bill
May 26, 2008 / http://tinyurl.com/69thm5
President Bush opposes a new G.I. Bill of Rights. He worries that if the traditional path to college for service members since World War II is improved and expanded for the post-9/11 generation, too many people will take it.
He is wrong, but at least he is consistent. Having saddled the military with a botched, un-winnable war, having squandered soldiers’ lives and failed them in so many ways, the commander in chief now resists giving the troops a chance at better futures out of uniform. He does this on the ground that the bill is too generous and may discourage re-enlistment, further weakening the military he has done so much to break.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/26/opinion/26m...

=========

SENATE “D LIST”
4 Republican Senators against funding our troops & GI Bill in 2008
Below you will find a complete list of Senators
who earned a D or lower from IAVA Action
this year. These legislators must improve their voting records if they are to legitimately claim that they support our troops and veterans.
Tom Coburn OK
Michael Enzi WY
John McCain AZ
Jim DeMint SC
Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America
http://www.iava.org/
http://www.veteranreportcard.org/reportcard.p...

2008 Congressional Report Card
Find out who in Washington really supports our troops and veterans.
Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America
http://www.iava.org/
http://www.veteranreportcard.org/reportcard.p...

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

United States

#161056 Jun 25, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem is that done of Obama's documents, are real documents. You show us any Hawaii BC or CoLB that looks like Obama's? They aren't any!!!
Nonsense.

"When the official documents were questioned, we went looking for more answers. We circled back to the Department of Health, had a newsroom colleague bring in her own Hawaii birth certificate to see if it looks the same (it's identical)."

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/artic...

wojar wrote:
wojar: A certified birth certificate is the correct document.
Idiotic Twit (LRS): See, if Obumbler had his original it would be proof.
Ellen1: You are lying when you say that the original is required. It isn't. An official copy of either the short form birth certificate or the long form birth certificate is legal proof of birth in a state.
Idiotic Twit: Show me the post where I said it was required.
If, in the mind of the Idiotic Twit, two certified birth certificates are not proof, but the certified BC given to the mother would be, then it is evident that the latter is REQUIRED according to the irrational reasoning of the Idiotic Twit.
Ellen paraphrased the Idiotic Twit - not a direct quote. Apparently the Idiotic Twit does not understand the significance quotation marks, or the absence thereof. He needs to go back to middle school where his potty humor can be appreciated.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#161057 Jun 25, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep, a president can declassify ANYTHING and it is legal. When Clinton was in office NASA was having rocket problems and could not keep up with the demands of civilian satellites so he allowed our commercial companies to have the Chinese put their sats in orbit.
The only problem is that the Chinese lacked the ability to put them in an accurate orbit so Chiton gave the LASER RING GYROSCOPES!!!
Do you know what a laser ring gyroscope is? It is a gyroscope without any moving parts!!! Now, do not ask me how they work as all I know is what I have read.
Ring laser gyroscope
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_laser_gyros...
The same technology that allows us to put a satellite in an accurate orbit will allow a NUCLEAR warheaded missile to hit the very center of Los Angeles!!! And Bill Clinton gave it to the Chinese!!!
IMHO, Clinton has done for more damage to our national security than Ed Snowden has!!!
That was more than 15 years ago that Clinton supposedly gave the gyro technologies to China. Don't you think that by now, China, no technological twirp by any means, would not have developed its own by now? Your comment is as relevant as saying that Iran is dangerous today because you sold them F-14s in the 70s.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#161058 Jun 25, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Eye nose, eye nose, Jacqueau will demand a link so here it is Jacqueau;
Clinton Defends China Satellite Waiver
White House delivers papers to Congress in support of the deal
WASHINGTON (May 22)-- President Bill Clinton on Friday defended a controversial satellite deal with China, even as White House officials delivered documents to the House International Relations Committee about the arrangement.
The president said the deal to launch U.S. satellites on rockets owned by other nations was "correct" and "based on what I thought was in the national interest and supportive of our national security."
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/05/22/chi...
Yep, giving China the technology to accurately target our cities is in OUR best national security!!!
See above. Also, China's now your biggest trading partner, passing Canada. What 's the problem? If China's you sworn enemy, why's it your biggest trading partner? How could that gyro hurt you?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#161059 Jun 25, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
We use to have nuclear landmines!!! They were called "suitcase nukes" but we phased them out under Reagan. Why? Well we had developed the Pershing II tactical missile system.
Oh the Libtards protested. You see, the Pershing I had a LARGER warhead and the Pershing II had a smaller one but because of improved accuracy, do to laser ring gyroscopes, we could destroy the target with a smaller bomb!!!
And isn't a REDUCTION in collateral damage a good thing?!?
Oh, suitcase bombs had to be dropped behind enemy lines (by parachute teams) and then carried to the target. And during this time it has a very high risk of being ... captured by the enemy and then what? They use it on us?!?
The Pershing II could fly 1,500 miles and hit within 100 years of the target so we no longer needed the suitcase bombs!!!
What the...?

You are obsessed with Clinton's appendage, climate NO-change, guns and nuclear weapons. Shouldn't you take some kind of break?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

United States

#161060 Jun 25, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem is that done of Obama's documents, are real documents. You show us any Hawaii BC or CoLB that looks like Obama's? They aren't any!!!
The problem is that proof is not proof in Birfoonistan.

The only difference between Obama's certified long form and any other long form for a 1961 birth is that 1. It says Obama. 2. The copy was made in 2013 on modern security paper.

Every birth fact has been certified by the State of Hawaii. That's as much proof as anyone can *reasonably* demand. But proof is not proof in Birfoonistan.

However, Rouge, like all birfoons, doesn't understand the meaning of 'reasonable'.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

United States

#161061 Jun 25, 2013
Correction made in 2011 on modern security paper.
Brad

Manchester, CT

#161062 Jun 25, 2013
Scrutiny wrote:
It seems the IRS has found themselves not guilty.
Yet another Government agency that slipped nicely into Chicago style business/politics when the flim flam Oblamer rose to power.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#161063 Jun 25, 2013
wojar wrote:
wojar: A certified birth certificate is the correct document.
Idiotic Twit (LRS): See, if Obumbler had his original it would be proof.
Ellen1: You are lying when you say that the original is required. It isn't. An official copy of either the short form birth certificate or the long form birth certificate is legal proof of birth in a state.
Idiotic Twit: Show me the post where I said it was required.
If, in the mind of the Idiotic Twit, two certified birth certificates are not proof, but the certified BC given to the mother would be, then it is evident that the latter is REQUIRED according to the irrational reasoning of the Idiotic Twit.
Ellen paraphrased the Idiotic Twit - not a direct quote. Apparently the Idiotic Twit does not understand the significance quotation marks, or the absence thereof. He needs to go back to middle school where his potty humor can be appreciated.
Still can't find where I said it was a requirement, can you? LMAO! You're a goofball, man. Get along now spanky.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#161064 Jun 25, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Now Jacqueau is wonder how a stupid helicopter pilot knows about this. Well Jacqueau, Chinook helicopters are the prime movers of "special munition" and I flew Chinooks.
In fact my last Chinook assignment was with the 205th ASHC., The Geronimos, in Mainz Germany in the mid-late 1980s and we specialized in transporting .... special munitions. Now the movement of special munitions is classified so I can neither confirm nor deny the movement of SMs but in 2017 it will be thirty years and that is when, and only then, that is when can I go into any details.
Until then, mumms the word!
http://www.chinook-helicopter.com/history/uni...
If you look carefully, you might even see a picture of me!
Thank you. Interesting. Incidentally, Canada took delivery of its first of 15 new Chinooks yesterday from Boeing. Incredibly, and oh how we love to be screwed, each example costs over $300 million, as much as a fully-equipped B-747. Nuts. How the lobbyists and Boeing officials must be laughing all the way to their offshore banks.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

United States

#161065 Jun 25, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Eye nose, eye nose, Jacqueau will demand a link so here it is Jacqueau;
Clinton Defends China Satellite Waiver
White House delivers papers to Congress in support of the deal
WASHINGTON (May 22)-- President Bill Clinton on Friday defended a controversial satellite deal with China, even as White House officials delivered documents to the House International Relations Committee about the arrangement.
The president said the deal to launch U.S. satellites on rockets owned by other nations was "correct" and "based on what I thought was in the national interest and supportive of our national security."
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/05/22/chi ...
Yep, giving China the technology to accurately target our cities is in OUR best national security!!!
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
See above. Also, China's now your biggest trading partner, passing Canada. What 's the problem? If China's you sworn enemy, why's it your biggest trading partner? How could that gyro hurt you?
Rouge: "Yep, giving China the technology to accurately target our cities is in OUR best national security!!!["

Evidently Rougie didn't read the entire article.

"But Loral says the Chinese never got their hands on the satellite itself. And Pentagon officials confirm sensitive technology was encased in a metal "black box" and watched over from factory to launch pad by Department of Defense employees."

As usual, Rouge, in his 'Alice in Wonderland' mode thinks anything he says is true just because he says so.
Therealnews com

Oakdale, NY

#161066 Jun 25, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
But that is not what the United Nation says. And the UN says nothing about "economic" asylum. Only political asylum.
Just like the Geneva Accords only covers LAWFUL combatants and not illegal ones like the Taliban and al Qaeda who can be tortured and summarily executed!
Read more at http://www.topix.com/forum/who/barack-obama/T ... text>
Nonsense, and you can not prove me wrong either?
And you can not prove that the Geneva Accords protect ILLEGAL combatants either! All the Geneva Accords is establish who is, and who is not, a legal combatant and how you will treat legal combatants!
Read more at http://www.topix.com/forum/who/barack-obama/T... text>
And where did I say anything about AMERICAN laws? Oh, and Enhanced Interrogation is not torture!!!
Two Clues For You:

1. Spying on all Americans has nothing to do with al Qaeda. Ayman Mohammed Rabie al-Zawahiri and his top echelon do not use any electronics to communicate. They speak face to face similar to La Cosa Nostra.

2. On the record, or if you prefer off the record, The United States military are against using Enhanced Interrogation ( Torture ), because it does not work.

----------

http://www.democracynow.org/2011/5/4/former_m...

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

#161067 Jun 25, 2013
Jacques,
Boeing is a big contriubutor the world's woes.
They don't solve problems, they aggravate them.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#161068 Jun 25, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
RU on LSD? Or do you have Alzheimer's? Your comment, "if Obumbler had his original it would be proof," was in response to my comment. Ellen responded with"You are lying when you say that the original is required." LRS retorts: "Show me the post where I said it was required."
So the idiotic twit thinks I'm butting into "other's conversations"?
What a jagoff.
I have a record of the entire thread. Go ahead loser, make a fool of yourself.
<quoted text>
"Go ahead loser, make a fool of yourself."

LMAO (LR tm reg'd). He did that from day ONE. Since then, has never paused.
Learn to Read

United States

#161069 Jun 25, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>Still can't find where I said it was a requirement, can you? LMAO! You're a goofball, man. Get along now spanky.
I think it was right after that phantom post where you claim I offered to buy you a drink.

Good Morning Romper - Tuesday, just another day it must really suck to be a Birfoon

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

United States

#161070 Jun 25, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Still can't find where I said it was a requirement, can you? LMAO! You're a goofball, man. Get along now spanky.
Ellen1: You are lying when you say that the original is required. It isn't.

A twit reads this as: You are lying when you say that "the original is required". It isn't.

Quotation marks and standard punctuation are deep mysteries in Birfoonistan.
wojar wrote:
wojar: A certified birth certificate is the correct document.
Idiotic Twit (LRS): See, if Obumbler had his original it would be proof.
Ellen1: You are lying when you say that the original is required. It isn't. An official copy of either the short form birth certificate or the long form birth certificate is legal proof of birth in a state.
Idiotic Twit: Show me the post where I said it was required.
If, in the mind of the Idiotic Twit, two certified birth certificates are not proof, but the certified BC given to the mother would be, then it is evident that the latter is REQUIRED according to the irrational reasoning of the Idiotic Twit.
Ellen paraphrased the Idiotic Twit - not a direct quote. Apparently the Idiotic Twit does not understand the significance quotation marks, or the absence thereof. He needs to go back to middle school where his potty humor can be appreciated.

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

#161071 Jun 25, 2013
Boeing is very good at what they do.
And primarily that is polluting my environment.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#161072 Jun 25, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
RU on LSD? Or do you have Alzheimer's? Your comment, "if Obumbler had his original it would be proof," was in response to my comment. Ellen responded with"You are lying when you say that the original is required." LRS retorts: "Show me the post where I said it was required."
So the idiotic twit thinks I'm butting into "other's conversations"?
What a jagoff.
I have a record of the entire thread. Go ahead loser, make a fool of yourself.
<quoted text>
What kind of nutjob keeps a record of this entire thread? I suppose when you use as many monikers as toesap, you have to keep a copy of the entire thread so you can keep up with what all your puppets are saying. Nutjob! BTW, I still haven't seen the word requirement! LMAO!!! Get along now spanky.

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

#161073 Jun 25, 2013
I will never fly on a commercial aircraft again,
Packed in like sardines and groped by TSA agent on the dole for minimum wage,
Anyone who flys today qualifies for the fool-of-the-year award.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

United States

#161074 Jun 25, 2013
A paraphrase /&#712;pær&#601;fre &#618;z/ is a restatement of the meaning of a text or passage using other words.

In Birfoonistan, this is an unsolvable riddle.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min Grey Ghost 1,458,034
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 14 min Ize Found 71,233
Four letter word game (Dec '11) 1 hr GEORGIA 2,274
Double Word Game (Dec '11) 1 hr GEORGIA 3,444
Johnny Murray a/k/a Johnny's Marine 1 hr Deren sawyer 37
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 1 hr SweLL GirL 9,841
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 3 hr IB DaMann 62,303
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 4 hr CrunchyBacon 104,506

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages