I'm sorry a bunch of bible thumping hillbillies, some with bible college degrees, spouting pseudoscience does not qualify as a scientific community. The consensus of the scientific community says you're FOS.<quoted text>
There's a scientific community just as large that says there is evidence supporting a great flood theory. Sorry, that's just the way it is.
I see you're using your ESP again.
I never said the Earth was 6,000 years old. That's what you read into it.
Only the arrogant are foolish enough to think they have all the answers.
If I believe otherwise, I'm p*ssing into the wind? Says who? You? Pfft.
It appears you are stuck in "tunnel vision" mode.
Still name-calling? It's very immature of you, you know? Why is your soul so full of anger?
I'll say a prayer for your soul tonight, if you want me to.
Secondly, I never read into you comment that you said the earth is 6000 years old. I concluded that you **believe** the earth is 6000 years old, and you do.
First sentence of your "scientific" web site that you posted as the source of the true evidence about the great BIBLICAL flood:
“Let's not kid ourselves. What this is all about is whether or not the Old Testament book of Genesis (along with the rest of the Old Testament, and the New Testament) is an accurate account of what happened around 4600 years ago with regard to a worldwide flood, and about 6000 years ago, with regard to Creation itself.”
So don't kid yourself. No one believes you are not head over heels in love with creationism, Noah, the Ark, Adam the first man created immortal who became mortal after "sin," evidence be damned.
There is NO EVIDENCE FOR ANY OF THAT. You are welcome to believe it, but puh-lease don't call it science.
Sorry, loser, not merely my opinion but the opinion of the consensus of the scientific community world wide.
Sorry loser, I referred to what you believe, not to what you claimed. LEARN HOW TO EFFING READ. You posted a link to an infantile pseudoscience site that supports young earth fantasies. That's not science.
Your posting a pseudoscience link was YOUR ACTION AND IT SPEAKS VOLUMES ABOUT YOUR BELIEF IN A YOUNG EARTH - 6000 years old.
No one but a young earth buffoon would post a link to a young earth site asserting it's claims were scientific if he didn't believe that claptrap. If you believe otherwise, you're pissing in the wind.
Thanks for the laughs.