BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 20 comments on the Jan 8, 2009, Chicago Tribune story titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#159822 Jun 15, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Geologists have identified strata in several parts of the world that correlate with each other. Same time periods. Same organisms. The strata show these areas to have been underwater at the same time. This isn't anything new. I never made any comment about "where" the water came from or where it went. Your welcome.
Sorry, but some places underwater long ago in the same geological strata (which cover thousands of years) is not evidence of a worldwide flood that occurred in all of those places simultaneously over a period in which Noah could have sailed his supercalifragilistic yacht. And it certainly is not evidence of a worldwide flood that wiped out humanity and all land mammals, except for Noah and his family and his animals on the ark. Indeed there is no evidence for any such nonsense. If that were true, all of the species collected on Noah's nuclear powered warp speed yacht would show genetic diversity with a recent population bottleneck of two. That is simply not the case and your fantasy goes to the trash pile.

Three areas? Three areas ain't a worldwide immersion of the land mass of the world and die-off of nearly all land species in the past 10,000 years or so. The evidence shows that your fantasy is FOS.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
pathetic.
“Geologists who have studied upright fossils found in sedimentary rocks exposed in various outcrops for the last 30 years have described the upright fossil trees as being deeply rooted in place and typically rooted in recognizable paleosols. This is in sharp contrast to the claims made by creationists such as Harold Coffin and N. A. Rupke. Geologists, such as Falcon[10][11][12][13][14] and Rygel et al.,[15] have published detailed field sketches and pictures of upright tree fossils with intact root systems, which are rooted within recognizable paleosols. In case of the upright fossil trees of the Yellowstone petrified forests, geologists – again in sharp disagreement with creationists like Harold Coffin – found that the upright fossil trees, except for relatively short stumps, are rooted in place within the underlying sediments.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polystrate_fossi ...
DUH!
"Dick and Jane find the Ark" is not science.
Now again, where did all that water come from? And where did it go? Where is the divine fire hose and Divine wet vac?
A simple answer will do. A link to "The Muppets go sailing on the Ark" will not do.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#159823 Jun 15, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh now lil one, settle down. If you had kept up, you would have seen the link yesterday (we know you did but go ahead and pretend). I don't claim to have a link. I posted a link. Put up or shut up? Why that's downright rude of you!
A link to "Dick and Jane find Noah's Ark" is not a rebuttal.

Now how is it that any two lowland gorillas show genetic diversity far greater than between any two humans of diverse races? If all were practically wiped out by the mythical flood, all would have suffered a similar population bottleneck dating to the same fairly recent period of time. The biblical great flood and Noah's ark preserving all species is a myth. An effing myth. Busted.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
A link? Then where is it loser?
Or did you post a link to Dick and Jane stumbled into the Ark?
And, LOSER, why are you incapable of articulating a rebuttal?
I gave you arguments, facts, evidence. You claim to have 'a link.'
Put up or shut up.
EXPERT

Cottonwood, CA

#159824 Jun 15, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, but some places underwater long ago in the same geological strata (which cover thousands of years) is not evidence of a worldwide flood that occurred in all of those places simultaneously over a period in which Noah could have sailed his supercalifragilistic yacht. And it certainly is not evidence of a worldwide flood that wiped out humanity and all land mammals, except for Noah and his family and his animals on the ark. Indeed there is no evidence for any such nonsense. If that were true, all of the species collected on Noah's nuclear powered warp speed yacht would show genetic diversity with a recent population bottleneck of two. That is simply not the case and your fantasy goes to the trash pile.
Three areas? Three areas ain't a worldwide immersion of the land mass of the world and die-off of nearly all land species in the past 10,000 years or so. The evidence shows that your fantasy is FOS.
<quoted text>
Who told you all of that cr@p?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#159826 Jun 15, 2013
EXPERT wrote:
<quoted text> Who told you all of that cr@p?
Really, if you think every species of squirrel, rat, and woodchuck were collected by Noah, and then repopulated the earth, each in their own habitat, please show your data.

The notion is absurd. Only an ignorant fool believes in the Noah myth.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, but some places underwater long ago in the same geological strata (which cover thousands of years) is not evidence of a worldwide flood that occurred in all of those places simultaneously over a period in which Noah could have sailed his supercalifragilistic yacht. And it certainly is not evidence of a worldwide flood that wiped out humanity and all land mammals, except for Noah and his family and his animals on the ark. Indeed there is no evidence for any such nonsense. If that were true, all of the species collected on Noah's nuclear powered warp speed yacht would show genetic diversity with a recent population bottleneck of two. That is simply not the case and your fantasy goes to the trash pile.
Three areas? Three areas ain't a worldwide immersion of the land mass of the world and die-off of nearly all land species in the past 10,000 years or so. The evidence shows that your fantasy is FOS.
<quoted text>
EXPERT

Cottonwood, CA

#159827 Jun 15, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Really, if you think every species of squirrel, rat, and woodchuck were collected by Noah, and then repopulated the earth, each in their own habitat, please show your data.
The notion is absurd. Only an ignorant fool believes in the Noah myth.
<quoted text>
So who told you all of that cr@p?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#159828 Jun 15, 2013
EXPERT wrote:
<quoted text>
So who told you all of that cr@p?
The bible tells us all that mythology about Noah collecting every species on earth.

Duh! Too bad it's been proven FALSE.

The Noah story is less probable than Santa Claus delivering presents to all the children of the world on Christmas Eve.

Nobody had to tell me that. It's COMMON SENSE.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Really, if you think every species of squirrel, rat, and woodchuck were collected by Noah, and then repopulated the earth, each in their own habitat, please show your data.
The notion is absurd. Only an ignorant fool believes in the Noah myth.
EXPERT

Cottonwood, CA

#159829 Jun 15, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
The bible tells us all that mythology about Noah collecting every species on earth.
Duh! Too bad it's been proven FALSE.
The Noah story is less probable than Santa Claus delivering presents to all the children of the world on Christmas Eve.
Nobody had to tell me that. It's COMMON SENSE.
<quoted text>
The Bible does not make that claim so how could it be proven false?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#159830 Jun 15, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
Actually wojar, it's getting a bit humorous watching you behave like a spoiled child. You seem to be very good at it.
Look, you've brought zilch to the religion debate. Nothing. When stumped, which is every single time you write, you come back with worthless gormless insipid irrelevant replies that show you have never done any serious reading or study of any sacred book. Well, of any book except maybe Soldier of Fortune, Superman and Captain Marvel.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#159831 Jun 15, 2013
wojar wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorry, but some places underwater long ago in the same geological strata (which cover thousands of years) is not evidence of a worldwide flood that occurred in all of those places simultaneously over a period in which Noah could have sailed his supercalifragilistic yacht. And it certainly is not evidence of a worldwide flood that wiped out humanity and all land mammals, except for Noah and his family and his animals on the ark. Indeed there is no evidence for any such nonsense. If that were true, all of the species collected on Noah's nuclear powered warp speed yacht would show genetic diversity with a recent population bottleneck of two. That is simply not the case and your fantasy goes to the trash pile.
Three areas? Three areas ain't a worldwide immersion of the land mass of the world and die-off of nearly all land species in the past 10,000 years or so. The evidence shows that your fantasy is FOS.
<quoted text>
EXPERT wrote:
<quoted text> Who told you all of that cr@p?
At long last, after all this debating, we get the EXPERT'S opinion. How edifying LMAO (LRS tm reg'd)

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#159832 Jun 15, 2013
EXPERT wrote:
<quoted text>
The Bible does not make that claim so how could it be proven false?
Sorry, EXPERT, it does make that claim. And to some fundamentalist creationists like you, the dinosaurs suffered extinction because they were either too big to get on the Arch or ole Man Noah just plain forgot 'em.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#159833 Jun 15, 2013
EXPERT wrote:
<quoted text>
The Bible does not make that claim so how could it be proven false?
Nonsense.

"Of all clean beasts take seven and seven, the male and the female.[3] But of the beasts that are unclean two and two, the male and the female. Of the fowls also of the air seven and seven, the male and the female: that seed may be saved upon the face of the whole earth.[4] For yet a while, and after seven days, I will rain upon the earth forty days and forty nights; and I will destroy every substance that I have made, from the face of the earth.[5] And Noe did all things which the Lord had commanded him."
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
The bible tells us all that mythology about Noah collecting every species on earth.
Duh! Too bad it's been proven FALSE.
The Noah story is less probable than Santa Claus delivering presents to all the children of the world on Christmas Eve.
Nobody had to tell me that. It's COMMON SENSE.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#159834 Jun 15, 2013
EXPERT wrote:
<quoted text>
The Bible does not make that claim so how could it be proven false?
"Of the fowls also of the air seven and seven, the male and the female: that seed may be saved upon the face of the whole earth."

Really, Noe collected every species in the Amazon rain forests?

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!

Not even Santa with all his helpers could do that.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#159835 Jun 15, 2013
Forty days and forty nights of rain submerged the earth? Killed all animals, except for those on the magical ark?

"I will rain upon the earth forty days and forty nights; and I will destroy every substance that I have made, from the face of the earth."

Sorry, no such die off occurred after humans were on Earth. In fact, no such massive die-off ever occurred.

And where did all that water to submerge the earth come from? The Divine Fire Hose? And where did it go? The Divine Wet Vac?

Get real!
Pdamerica org

West Sayville, NY

#159836 Jun 15, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
When it's used in vain, as it was then, small "g"
Duly noted.
Pdamerica org

West Sayville, NY

#159837 Jun 15, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
What about the babies and pre-pub children. Were those two town without babies and children? Why did THEY have to perish? And turned into a salt pillar! Overkill maybe?
GODs reasons are way above our small brains.

Why did GOD have to give Pharaoh 10 plagues before He freed the Hebrews?

Pdamerica org

West Sayville, NY

#159838 Jun 15, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
When the Roman centurion came to Jesus and asked him to heal his servant (read : slave), what did Jesus do? He healed him. Did he tell the centurion to set his slave free? Slavery is inhuman, no? He didn't.
Who invented slavery? Abraham. And so it goes. The Bible (Paul), New Testament, not Old, even tells slaves that are well treated to be grateful to their masters and those that are not well treated to endure and they may earn heaven. All from memory, but if you want the references, I'll get 'em for you.
NO, Slaves in the New Testament are to be treated honestly and fairly just like a family member.

Fair Pay. Fair Shelter, Fair Everything.

Same is true of a Wife. Love and Respect her just as she loves and respects you.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#159839 Jun 15, 2013
How sad, poor old Jimmy Carrey just found out what happens when you dance on the grave of someone like Ronald Reagan. Ya know, actors should just act.
It is one thing to disagree with people but you you try and make them look like an idiot, all you do is make yourself look like dumb and dumber!
Rogue

'Dumb And Dumber 2' In Trouble After Farrelly Brothers' Film Gets Dropped By Warner Bros.: 06/11/2013 8:53 am EDT |

There's still a chance? According to THR, Warner Bros. has passed on the opportunity to make a sequel to "Dumb and Dumber" with original stars Jim Carrey and Jeff Daniels. It's not all bad news: Directors Peter and Bobby Farrelly are free to take the film, which THR reports has a budget of around $30 million, to other studios and companies. According to Deadline.com , financing company Red Granite could step up to back the film, with another studio -- possibly Universal -- cutting a deal for the sequel's release.

That Warner Bros. was lukewarm on "Dumb and Dumber To," the sequel's intentionally daft title, should come as little surprise. Last June, Carrey momentarily stepped away from the project citing a lack of interest from the studio.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/11/dumb...
Pdamerica org

West Sayville, NY

#159840 Jun 15, 2013
Proverbs 25:21-22

21 If your enemy is hungry, give him food to eat;
if he is thirsty, give him water to drink.

22 In doing this, you will heap burning coals on his head,
and the Lord will reward you.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#159841 Jun 15, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
What about the babies and pre-pub children. Were those two town without babies and children? Why did THEY have to perish? And turned into a salt pillar! Overkill maybe?
Pdamerica org wrote:
<quoted text>
GODs reasons are way above our small brains.
Why did GOD have to give Pharaoh 10 plagues before He freed the Hebrews?
Jacques said he use to be an altar boy, etc. but I have no idea why he lost his religion. He seems to give Muslims a pass while bashing Christians in general and Catholic specifically. He may have been molested by a priest or something.
Pdamerica org

West Sayville, NY

#159842 Jun 15, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
And did you know that the Jews who came out of bondage (slavery) from Egypt had their own slaves? And so it goes.
And did you know that new archeological digs around the Pyramids and Luxor have shown evidence that workers that built them and many monuments were, perhaps, not slaves at all. Encampments were found, whole cities where Jewish "slaves" may have lived.
Thank you for proving that new archeological digs shows the bible to be correct.

See, Now Was That So Hard.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 7 min sonicfilter 1,220,909
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 15 min red and right 52,897
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 1 hr Cold Front 69,715
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 2 hr Whiny1 5,919
Important! 3 hr Vote 1
Dear Abby 4-27-15 4 hr mrs gladys kravitz 10
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 5 hr Michael Satterfield 99,364
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]