BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 231099 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#159374 Jun 12, 2013
Nazrat wrote:
Well, just why should Pres. Obama help out those poor Republicans in Texas. Why they will never vote for him so they can do f-themselves!
UPDATE 1-FEMA [OBAMA] denies West, Texas, bid for more disaster aid
Jun 12, 2013 By Karen Brooks
(Reuters)- The federal government's disaster agency rejected a request for aid to replace infrastructure destroyed near West, Texas, by an April fertilizer plant explosion that killed 14 people, Texas Governor Rick Perry's office said on Wednesday.
President Barack Obama issued an emergency declaration for the area and the state after the April 17 explosion, releasing funds for individuals, cleanup of the site and emergency responders.
But in a June 10 letter to Perry, the Federal Emergency Management Agency said the state of Texas and local governments could provide the additional money needed to rebuild public infrastructure.
Additional funds were being sought to rebuild roads, water systems and other public property damaged in the blast. Local officials said costs are approaching $100 million for city and school repairs.
A spokesman for Perry said in a statement that the governor was "very disappointed" that the town of West would not get "the assistance they need, qualify for, and deserve."
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/12/usa...
I don't think anyone will be voting for him again! Duh....
American Lady

Danville, KY

#159375 Jun 12, 2013
Attorney General Eric Holder: Biography
usgovinfo.about.com ›...› The President and Cabinet

Family Life
Holder is married to obstetrician Dr. Sharon Malone. The Holder’s have three children. Dr. Malone’s sister Vivian Malone Jones, is known for her role in the 1963 integration of the University of Alabama.

http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/thepresidentand...
Linktv org

Oakdale, NY

#159376 Jun 12, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes and NO, Obama has continued most of Bush's plans but some he has EXPANDED! Take for instance Homeland Security which has grown from a $3.7B a year budget in FY2008 (Bush's last budget) to around $70B today.
Oh, and Obama hired several of the people who gave Bush FALSE informatin of Iraq's WMD? What a hoot!
In 2016 Jeb Corporate Bush or Hillary Corporate Clinton will continue over 90% of all Obama/Biden failed policy.

Could be Gov. Chris Christie or Governor Cuomo.

Does not matter who the person is because the whole System is Corrupt.

Linktv org

Oakdale, NY

#159377 Jun 12, 2013
American Lady wrote:
Prog Revisionist History – Example #924,236
What’s wrong with this MSNBC screen shot?
http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2013/06/1...
F.D.R. in Hell says:
June 12, 2013 at 5:04 pm
The guy on the right is Lieutenant Gerard, who is searching for Dr. Richard Kimble in 1963.
That guy at the podium was a Democrat.
sundance says:
June 12, 2013 at 5:19 pm
Not only was he a Demonrat – but one of the two girls in the *incident* was Vivian Malone Jones. Mrs. Jones is Eric Holder’s sister-in-law.
Mrs. Jones worked to establish ... wait for it ... The CRS. Funny that ...
MSNBC falsely identifies segregationist George Wallace as a Republican
http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jun/12...
NO wonder they've been TRYING to REVISE our History books ...
So they can FILL THEM with lies!...
The proprietor of the Washington Times is the notorious cult leader Republican Rightwinger Rev. Sun Myung Moon.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#159378 Jun 12, 2013
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Another illiterate birfoon can't read the New Testament and figure it out for himself that his actions are counter to what Jesus teaches.
Sorry, birfoon.
Amazing! Now he knows what I think and why I think it! Amazing I tell ya. Can you even lift your soiled obese azz off the toilet anymore or have you grown roots? nasty skank
Linktv org

Oakdale, NY

#159379 Jun 12, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
You wrote : "Obama is a criminal in the same mold as Bush."
I agree and disagree, as events and power must be taken in context here.
Bush enacted some of those policies. Not all. Some were based on precedents. Those that he did adopt, he HAD to , in order to counter his disastrous decisions, to wit, not take 9/11 threats seriously, invasion of Afghanistan and , worst, Iraq. Then, having no choice in order to counter outrage by dissenting peoples and nations and from within, the patriot act and incredible surveillance.
Now, Obama inherited all of that. What's a president to do? Dismantle all of it, specially in view of the fact that some is useful, in spite of GWB? Intelligence is conducted by white house intelligence services, the CIA and FBI. What president is going to buck those three, all of them in superb position to blackmail him, what with the information they have on him, on his family, on his associates, political and judicilal appts , friends, etc, all info that can be tailored to the intelligence services' needs. Now, this harks back to the blackmailing days of ever-powerful J.Edgar Hoover. No president, not even General Eisenhower, that all-powerful military man could bring him to heel. Same for the CIA, FBI, white house intelligence services. Now, Obama can try to reform these agencies. Good luck. He'll either be impeached, with info gleaned from guess where or simply rubbed off. Much like Pope John Paul I, who can forget?
Give him time, as he tries to revamp the leadership of these organizations, though I doubt his first appointment to that end, Brennan, was not exactly a "coup de maître".
Feel free to correct me, I did no research on this.
Spying on the world does not stop terrorist attacks proven by attacks in Russia, attacks in Iraq, attacks in Afghanistan, Boston, 9/11/01.

al Qaeda is similar to La Cosa Nostra.

They only speak face to face and they do NOT used any type of electronics.

In recent years The government of Italy did not invade and occupy Sicily with planes and tanks to crack down on Mafioso.

Iraq was the wrong war at the wrong time.

==========

How Terrorist Groups End
Implications for Countering al Qa'ida / http://tinyurl.com/5honun
The United States cannot conduct an effective counterterrorism campaign against al Qa'ida or other terrorist groups without understanding how such groups end. While it is clear that U.S. policymakers will need to turn to a range of policy instruments to conduct such campaigns — including careful police and intelligence work, military force, political negotiations, and economic sanctions — what is less clear is how they should prioritize U.S. efforts.
A recent RAND research effort sheds light on this issue by investigating how terrorist groups have ended in the past. By analyzing a comprehensive roster of terrorist groups that existed worldwide between 1968 and 2006, the authors found that most groups ended because of operations carried out by local police or intelligence agencies or because they negotiated a settlement with their governments. Military force was rarely the primary reason a terrorist group ended, and few groups within this time frame achieved victory.
These findings suggest that the U.S. approach to countering al Qa'ida has focused far too much on the use of military force. Instead, policing and intelligence should be the backbone of U.S. efforts.
http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB93...
Grand Birther

Fairfax, VA

#159381 Jun 12, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Amazing! Now he knows what I think and why I think it! Amazing I tell ya. Can you even lift your soiled obese azz off the toilet anymore or have you grown roots? nasty skank
Louisiana Loser confuses "actions" with "thoughts" because s/he is not very smart, thus explaining the birfoonery.

L O L O L O L O L O L O L
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#159382 Jun 12, 2013
Linktv org wrote:
<quoted text>
Spying on the world does not stop terrorist attacks proven by attacks in Russia, attacks in Iraq, attacks in Afghanistan, Boston, 9/11/01.
al Qaeda is similar to La Cosa Nostra.
They only speak face to face and they do NOT used any type of electronics.
In recent years The government of Italy did not invade and occupy Sicily with planes and tanks to crack down on Mafioso.
Iraq was the wrong war at the wrong time.
==========
How Terrorist Groups End
Implications for Countering al Qa'ida / http://tinyurl.com/5honun
The United States cannot conduct an effective counterterrorism campaign against al Qa'ida or other terrorist groups without understanding how such groups end. While it is clear that U.S. policymakers will need to turn to a range of policy instruments to conduct such campaigns — including careful police and intelligence work, military force, political negotiations, and economic sanctions — what is less clear is how they should prioritize U.S. efforts.
A recent RAND research effort sheds light on this issue by investigating how terrorist groups have ended in the past. By analyzing a comprehensive roster of terrorist groups that existed worldwide between 1968 and 2006, the authors found that most groups ended because of operations carried out by local police or intelligence agencies or because they negotiated a settlement with their governments. Military force was rarely the primary reason a terrorist group ended, and few groups within this time frame achieved victory.
These findings suggest that the U.S. approach to countering al Qa'ida has focused far too much on the use of military force. Instead, policing and intelligence should be the backbone of U.S. efforts.
http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB93...
Of course you realize they have a magazine online called Inspire! No electronics involved in that....naw. LMAO
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#159385 Jun 12, 2013
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Louisiana Loser confuses "actions" with "thoughts" because s/he is not very smart, thus explaining the birfoonery.
L O L O L O L O L O L O L
Your legs can no longer support your massive weight, can they? Have you tried rolling? Disgusting and nasty! Wasn't your Mom a mule deer? LMAO! tokentwit
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#159388 Jun 12, 2013
Why are IRS agents training with AR-15s??? Expecting trouble?
American Lady

Danville, KY

#159389 Jun 12, 2013
Navy SEAL Team 6 Tragedy
Families BLAME 0 for 2011 Crash!
Parents of one ...

http://video.foxnews.com/v/2371845812001/fnc-...

Heartrending!

Praying for America & It's *Patriots*...

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#159393 Jun 12, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Burn brightly lil ember!
Grateful for explanation, please.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#159394 Jun 12, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't think anyone will be voting for him again! Duh....
DUH yourself. Not that you'd be wrong again, as per Nov 6 2012. He cannot have a third term, slug. Vote for who?

Oh, did you mean Perry. Was he not anointed by God to be president?
Nazrat

Jacksonville, FL

#159400 Jun 13, 2013
Yep, it defines Obama's Administration all right!

ineptocracy
Wiktionary

Noun
ineptocracy (countable and uncountable; plural ineptocracies)
(countable, pejorative) A government characterized by incompetent leaders.
(uncountable, pejorative) The phenomenon of governance or leadership by the incompetent.
Ellen1

Dedham, MA

#159401 Jun 13, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
We'll keep it simple slowpuke. Zullo knows Obumbler wasn't born in Hawaii. No Obumbler documents exist. All were "manufactured". It's really odd how not one person from his past has ever come forward to say, yea, I remember him or yea I went on a date with him, no? Did this self-proclaimed "leader" (LMAO) not have ANY friends growing up? LMAO! Doesn't look like it. That might be because he is a fraud!
Re Zullo, Sheriff Joe and the Cold Case Posse:

http://www.nationalreview.com/content/conspir...

Re Friends:

http://swampland.time.com/2013/05/23/time-exc...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#159402 Jun 13, 2013
Hummm, but I wonder what you Libtards think about Bush TODAY? I don't ever expect you Progressives to change your minds because you are bigots!

Why Americans — including many Democrats — are warming up to George W. Bush By Harold Maass | The Week – 23 hrs ago

Bush's poll numbers are in positive territory for the first time in eight years. And his support among Dems has more than doubled since 2009
For the first time since 2005, more Americans view former President George W. Bush favorably (49 percent) than unfavorably (46 percent), according to a new Gallup poll. That amounts to a huge swing from Bush's low point in 2008, when only 32 percent gave Bush positive marks compared to 66 percent who gave him an unfavorable rating.
His improvement has actually been strongest among Democrats — 10 percent of whom viewed him favorably in March 2009, compared to 24 percent when this new survey was taken in early June.
Why the big change? There are a host of possible explanations. One is simply that Bush's poll numbers were so low when he left office that he had nowhere to go but up.
Or perhaps time has healed old wounds. Gallup notes that some degree of improvement was to be expected "given Americans' generally positive views of former presidents, and it would not be out of the question for Bush's image to continue to improve in future years." Bill Clinton, George H.W. Bush, Ronald Reagan, and Jimmy Carter are all viewed favorably by more than 60 percent of Gallup respondents.
Ellen1

Dedham, MA

#159403 Jun 13, 2013
Truth Detector wrote:
Hmm, Senators urge Obama to stay on sidelines of immigration debate
Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/305033-bac...
Follow us:@thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook
Obama has his own citizenship problems!
1. How can a document that contains no raised seal of authentication be a valid legal document?
2. How can a PDF file with a one of s kind error in the registrars stamp, that was created on a computer, proven as fact by a registrars stamp that can be moved, be considered as a valid legal document?
What say the SHEEPLE?
Re: "1. How can a document that contains no raised seal of authentication be a valid legal document?"

Answer: Because, duh, it DOES have the raised seal, and a reporter stated that she felt it.

Re: "2. How can a PDF file with a one of s kind error in the registrars stamp, that was created on a computer, proven as fact by a registrars stamp that can be moved, be considered as a valid legal document?"

Answer: It is not a one of a kind error, and the document was not created on a computer, nor can the registrar's stamp be moved.

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/01/ame-o-...
Ellen1

Dedham, MA

#159404 Jun 13, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Spamming is against the rules. hsp LMAO!!!
Rational people will notice that the above is not an answer to the question.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#159406 Jun 13, 2013
Ellen1 wrote:
Oh my, the only one who did not get laid is Kelli!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#159407 Jun 13, 2013
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Re: "1. How can a document that contains no raised seal of authentication be a valid legal document?"
Answer: Because, duh, it DOES have the raised seal, and a reporter stated that she felt it.
Re: "2. How can a PDF file with a one of s kind error in the registrars stamp, that was created on a computer, proven as fact by a registrars stamp that can be moved, be considered as a valid legal document?"
Answer: It is not a one of a kind error, and the document was not created on a computer, nor can the registrar's stamp be moved.
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/01/ame-o-...
1] A reporter is not a document expert and how do we know if this reporter is non-partisan?
2] This issue has been addressed many times and even the Hawaiian government will not confirm whether or not the jpeg image is a copy of any State of Hawaii document! All they have commented on is the "information" which they say is correct. But they did not mention whether or not there was any deleted information.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min flack 1,458,941
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 48 min tina anne 62,335
ex chicago police woman 2 hr Jmb 9
Are democrats destroyed? 3 hr DEAD 4 30 Years 5
Standing Ovation at Carnegie Hall. 3 hr Kemo Sabbe 1
News Scientists say they have proved climate change ... (Dec '08) 8 hr Dudley 7,943
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 9 hr Laughing Out Loud 104,527

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages