BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story

“The sun also rises”

Since: Mar 11

Dubtown Ohio

#156585 May 22, 2013
what a waste of time and space poor trolls can get over Obama getting elected and THEN GETTING RE-ELECTED
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#156586 May 22, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Says the stupidest Birfoon of them all. Never never land - isn't that where Birfoon fables come true?
LMAO!!! No, that is where queers like you live.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#156587 May 22, 2013
Tisdale v. Obama (Virginia federal court 2012) ruling:“It is well settled that those born in the United States are considered natural born citizens.”

Gee Rouge - another Federal Court rejected the Birfoon fable?
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#156588 May 22, 2013
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>The only way to amend The Constitution is to conduct a Constitutional Convention.
No reason for a Constitutional Convention, the USSC violated the Constitution with the ruling of Wong Kim Ark, violations of the Constitution does not make precedence!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#156589 May 22, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
State court can not rule on the constitutionality issue. Only state issues!
UR fos. Totally ignorant.

In fact, see US v Ark, where Lynch v. Clarke is cited. See also US v Rhodes, 1866, citing the NY state case, and there are so many other cases. UR so ignorant it is laughable.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#156590 May 22, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
No, the target of the housing was in urban areas that had been Red Lined! Mostly in minority areas. When Bill Clinton entered the White House he, and the Democrat controlled Congress, pushed through legislation that made it very easy for MINORITIES to sue banks based on the color of their skin.
Lawyers like Barack H. Obama represented these individuals and the banks, who knew they would lose, settled out of court. Obama represented 220 of these minority home loan applicants and as of 2008 only 18 were still in their homes. The rest having been foreclosed upon or sold short.
But meanwhile many of these solded their inflated value homes and moved to the burbs. And many in the burbs sold their inflated homes and moved to places like Florida. And that caused the Housing Bubble fo 2004-2006 which, like all bubbles, burst and the rest is history!
As a Typical Libtard who have A.D.D. and can't seem to blame either Carter or Clinton which caused the Housing Bubble. I also blame the Country Club RINO who had to opportunity to put the brakes on but turned a blind eye to the problem.
If you want a house, first save up 20% of the value of the home you want to buy!!! Sure, that is the Conservative way but the Conservative way did not cause the bubble nor cause it to bust!!!
So, I must conclude that all those loans that that were made on overvalued houses, without credit checks, without even verifying if applicants were gainfully employed, were made to blacks almost exclusively. At least, this is what your post implies. Carter and then Clinton,(Obama represented 220 people - and you blame the bubble on him!) And those blacks, representing 13% of the total US population, ALL defaulted and caused the crash. That's it?

Rogue, easier lending practices were instituted to give less favoured folks a break. Banks, mortgage institutions, brokers, broke the rules, cheated. How is that the fault of those who passed those laws?
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#156591 May 22, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Says the stupidest Birfoon of them all. Never never land - isn't that where Birfoon fables come true?
LMAO!!! Put your prayer rug on the floor and face DC five times a day, you stupid Obama idiot!!!
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#156592 May 22, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! No, that is where queers like you live.
Gee. Homophobic and a bigot. A true double threat.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#156593 May 22, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>No reason for a Constitutional Convention, the USSC violated the Constitution with the ruling of Wong Kim Ark, violations of the Constitution does not make precedence!
Proof that Precedent is just another legal term Dufus Dale doesn't comprehend
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#156594 May 22, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! Put your prayer rug on the floor and face DC five times a day, you stupid Obama idiot!!!
Your ignorance knows no bounds you racist moron
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#156595 May 22, 2013
Purpura v. Obama (New Jersey 2012) ruling:“No court, federal, state or administrative, has accepted the challengers’ position that Mr. Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” due to the acknowledged fact that his father was born in Kenya and was a British citizen by virtue of the then applicable British Nationality Act. Nor has the fact that Obama had, or may have had, dual citizenship at the time of his birth and thereafter been held to deny him the status of natural born.

Gee - another court rejecting play law? Poor Dufus - how will he ever reform the Reich?
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#156596 May 22, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Gee. Homophobic and a bigot. A true double threat.
Yep, I am a BIGOT, you commies are a waste of good air!!
Queers! Every civilization has them, but that doesn't mean we have to swap spit with them or be friends with them, does it!!!
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#156597 May 22, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>Yep, I am a BIGOT,
And Dufus finally gets one thing right

How sad it must be to be Dufus Dale
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#156598 May 22, 2013
Psssst. Dufus. What does your homophobia have to do with your fable?
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#156599 May 22, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
Purpura v. Obama (New Jersey 2012) ruling:“No court, federal, state or administrative, has accepted the challengers’ position that Mr. Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” due to the acknowledged fact that his father was born in Kenya and was a British citizen by virtue of the then applicable British Nationality Act. Nor has the fact that Obama had, or may have had, dual citizenship at the time of his birth and thereafter been held to deny him the status of natural born.
Gee - another court rejecting play law? Poor Dufus - how will he ever reform the Reich?
The British Nationality Act of 1948 made Junior a citizen of the UK, therefore at the moment of his birth he was a subject of a foreign power and not eligible to be "and subject to the jurisdiction, thereof", the US Constitution!
Of course if you can find in the Constitution where it recognizes a dual-citizenship, you win!!!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#156600 May 22, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
UR fos. Totally ignorant.
In fact, see US v Ark, where Lynch v. Clarke is cited. See also US v Rhodes, 1866, citing the NY state case, and there are so many other cases. UR so ignorant it is laughable.
No, slowpuke, it is you who is FOS. At best Ark was a "deserved" exception. The ruling still was a violation of the Constitution, however. That's plain as day and even a completely brainwashed idiot, such as yourself, should (and does) see that! You really show your ignorance when you speak on this subject. You know that don't ya? LMAO! squidlips
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#156601 May 22, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
And Dufus finally gets one thing right
How sad it must be to be Dufus Dale
LMAO!!! I am very proud of my bigotry against commies!! Does that make you feel uneasy, Comrade?
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#156602 May 22, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
Psssst. Dufus. What does your homophobia have to do with your fable?
LMAO!!! What fable?
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#156603 May 22, 2013
LTR: It is about time you pulled your head out of your ass so we can chop it off!!! It has been nice executing you tonight!!!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#156606 May 22, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
No, slowpuke, it is you who is FOS. At best Ark was a "deserved" exception. The ruling still was a violation of the Constitution, however. That's plain as day and even a completely brainwashed idiot, such as yourself, should (and does) see that! You really show your ignorance when you speak on this subject. You know that don't ya? LMAO! squidlips
Bang on correct, according to Play Law.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 7 min sonicfilter 1,189,700
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 9 min scirocco 51,374
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 55 min Red_Forman 5,702
last post wins! (Apr '13) 56 min Red_Forman 506
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 57 min GayleWood 51,330
Couple of goodies. What say you? 2 hr Hussim Acbar 1
When Keith Haring painted Chicago 2 hr Ghengis 2
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 3 hr Go Blue Forever 99,158
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 7:18 am PST

Bleacher Report 7:18AM
Best Options to Replace Briggs This Offseason
Bleacher Report 8:12 AM
Buzz: Colts Eyeing Trades for Veteran WRs Including Marshall
Bleacher Report 1:14 PM
Could Bears Ever Get Fair Trade Value for Forte?
Bleacher Report 1:40 PM
Wayne Undergoes Surgery on Triceps
NFL 2:44 PM
Reggie Wayne had surgery, mulling Colts future