ANOTHER HOPE-FOR USA BIRTHER FAILUREPJM EXCLUSIVE: Ex-Diplomats Report New Benghazi Whistleblowers with Info Devastating to Clinton and Obama May 21st, 2013 -
More whistleblowers will emerge shortly in the escalating Benghazi scandal, according to two former U.S. diplomats who spoke with PJ Media Monday afternoon.
These whistleblowers, colleagues of the former diplomats, are currently securing legal counsel because they work in areas not fully protected by the Whistleblower law.
According to the diplomats, what these whistleblowers will say will be at least as explosive as what we have already learned about the scandal, including details about what really transpired in Benghazi that are potentially devastating to both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.
The former diplomats inform PJM the new revelations concentrate in two areas — what Ambassador Chris Stevens was actually doing in Benghazi and the pressure put on General Carter Ham, then in command of U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) and therefore responsible for Libya, not to act to protect jeopardized U.S. personnel.
Stevens’ mission in Benghazi, they will say, was to buy back Stinger missiles from al-Qaeda groups issued to them by the State Department, not by the CIA. Such a mission would usually be a CIA effort, but the intelligence agency had opposed the idea because of the high risk involved in arming “insurgents” with powerful weapons that endanger civilian aircraft.
Hillary Clinton still wanted to proceed because, in part, as one of the diplomats said, she wanted “to overthrow Gaddafi on the cheap.”
This left Stevens in the position of having to clean up the scandalous enterprise when it became clear that the “insurgents” actually were al-Qaeda – indeed, in the view of one of the diplomats, the same group that attacked the consulate and ended up killing Stevens.
Yep, Sounds like another fantabulous exclusive first-ever Trump pre-election November announcement. Watch it fizzle.
You're a little weasel, Rogue, an unpatriotic treacherous un-American agitator. You're forever wishing ill tidings on your country just to embarrass your president and his sec of state. Funny, how we are different. For example, I was, still am, against US intervention in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Canadian intervention in Afghanistan and Libya also. Yet, I would never wish failure as no one would've been happier than me to be wrong and for these operations to have a happy ending, even though I'm not a fan of conservatives. I figure the common good trumps (pun NOT intended) my personal feelings towards elected officials. You, on the other hand, want failure for your country, at a terrible cost, just to hammer and humiliate the democrat administration. Sad.