I deem Ellen to be right. Why? Her judgement is based on jurisprudence and both letter and spirit of the law.<quoted text>
I already posted the ruling, and no matter how you twist it, the court in it's declaration simply stated Wong was a citizen.
""The evident intention, and the necessary effect, of the submission of this case to the decision of the court upon the facts agreed by the parties were to present for determination the single question stated at the beginning of this opinion, namely, whether a child born in the United States, of parent of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicil and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China, becomes at the time of his birth a citizen of the United States."- United States v. Wong Kim Ark
If you would like to see where the SCOTUS has in fact ruled someone a "NATURAL BORN CITIZEN" one must look to a case where BOTH parents where US CITIZENS at the time of birth:
"The court below, properly recognizing the existence of an actual controversy with the defendants(Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Haworth, 300 U. S. 227), declared Miss Elg "to be a natural born citizen of the United States," and we think that the decree should include the Secretary of State as well as the other defendants."-Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939)
See the difference Ellen?
I deem you to be wrong. Why? Your judgement is based on an obsessive hatred of the president, said hatred having no basis of law.