BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story
Learn to Read

Greenwood, IN

#155503 May 13, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>Kerplunk! LTR thinks anyone born on U.S. soil can run for President! What a dumbazz! LMAO! filthy lil rodent
Blather on WussBoy. Sucks to be Romper
Learn to Read

Shelbyville, IN

#155504 May 13, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>Kerplunk! LTR thinks anyone born on U.S. soil can run for President! What a dumbazz! LMAO! filthy lil rodent
The facts say I am correct. Romper the pathetic fool and his hero Dufus choose to ignore facts and embrace each other in a bigoted fantasy. Sad. Very sad

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#155505 May 13, 2013
loose cannon wrote:
Jacques,
You can perish the thought right now of a Hillary Clinton presidency.
It is time for America to heal and both the Clinton's to bow out.
Their names may as well be Mudd.
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
And that was why he was convicted. If he had a more palatable last name, he probably wouldn't have been convicted.
nebka wrote:
<quoted text>
He mainly was convicted because his last name was Mudd??? Man where do you get your info from??
I can not believe you are that dense. No, it was not his last name. He was a known Southern sympathizer as were many in Maryland. It was assumed he knew. That does not make it right to convict him but you must remember that this was the crime of the century at the end of our bloodiest war.
From Wiki: Many historians agree that President Abraham Lincoln's future assassin, John Wilkes Booth, visited Bryantown, Maryland, in November and December 1864, claiming to look for real estate investments. Bryantown is about 25 miles (40 km) from Washington, D.C., and about 5 miles (8.0 km) from Mudd’s farm. The real estate story was merely a cover; Booth’s true purpose was to plan an escape route as part of a plan to kidnap Lincoln.[citation needed] Booth believed the federal government would ransom Lincoln by releasing a large number of Confederate prisoners of war.
Historians agree that Booth met Mudd at St. Mary's Catholic Church in Bryantown during one of those visits, probably the November visit. Booth visited Mudd at his farm the next day, and stayed there overnight. The following day, Booth purchased a horse from Mudd's neighbor and returned to Washington. Some historians[who?] believe that Booth used his visit to Bryantown to recruit Mudd to his kidnapping plot, although others[who?] believe that Mudd would have had no interest in such a scheme.

A short time later, on December 23, 1864, Mudd went to Washington where he met Booth again. Some historians believe the meeting had been arranged, but others disagree. The two men, as well as John Surratt, Jr. and Louis J. Weichmann, had a conversation and drinks together, first at Booth’s hotel, and later at Mudd’s.
..........
Due in part to the influence of his defense attorney, Thomas Ewing Jr., who was influential in the President's administration, on February 8, 1869, Mudd was pardoned by President Andrew Johnson. He was released from prison on March 8, 1869 and returned home to Maryland on March 20, 1869.
Yep, he spent almost four years in prison but he was pardoned by a Southerner, Pres. Andrew Johnson.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#155506 May 13, 2013
Hummm, Pres. Obama to have a live press conference 'soon' to discuss Ben Ghazi and the IRS!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#155507 May 13, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
The facts say I am correct. Romper the pathetic fool and his hero Dufus choose to ignore facts and embrace each other in a bigoted fantasy. Sad. Very sad
Hey, it's not our fault if you're too dense understand what the law says. Do you know how easily we would have been taken over if your interpretation were correct? That's the main reason behind the law; to keep people with allegiances elsewhere out of our gov. You should have learned that in Jr. High! Then again, you're probably just another refugeeboy. How sad it must be to remain so insignificant and irrelevant. You've already stunk the place up, might as well go ahead and drop another one! LMAO! fishlips

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#155508 May 13, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Hummm, Pres. Obama to have a live press conference 'soon' to discuss Ben Ghazi and the IRS!
Hummm, first question were given to AP who asked for explanations on Ben Ghazi and the IRS AND THEN asked Cameron a question on Syria. This, more or less, gave the football to Cameron and then to a British reporter who would not do a follow up on Ben Ghazi.
Of course, this was all set up Friday when the Obama administration leaked the IRS story in an attempt to get Ben Ghazi off the weekend TV shows and then help deflect todays press conference.
And it is over. Once again Obama ran, dodged and jumped the issues.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#155509 May 13, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Rogue : "But they are deterred by our overwhelming presence." No,they're not. Why would they wage war on the US anyhow?
As to the war in the Pacific with Japan, it matters not how many carriers the US may have had, Japan, commodity and energy-starved, no doubt would've done the same. Don't forget, the Japanese thought the US carrier fleet was anchored at Pearl Harbor. Mistake. Grave mistake. Had they been anchored there, the war would've totally, well, almost, been altered (US and allies, released from the European theatre, would've won eventually), and I say almost almost because it would have lasted longer is all. 17 or 7, they were all supposed to be in Pearl Harbor. Instead, soon-to-be useless heavy cruisers and battleships were destroyed or disabled.
Well, Iran wants to wage war with us to bring back the twelfth Imam which would bring back Homahhed! Remember, Iran is run by theocrats and to them, killing the Great Satan (the U.S.) is what must be done.
There is a good chance the next bomb that goes off in New York City, will be a nuke from Iran!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#155510 May 13, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, Iran wants to wage war with us to bring back the twelfth Imam which would bring back Homahhed! Remember, Iran is run by theocrats and to them, killing the Great Satan (the U.S.) is what must be done.
There is a good chance the next bomb that goes off in New York City, will be a nuke from Iran!
You wrote , and it (again) proves my point : "There is a good chance the next bomb that goes off in New York City, will be a nuke from Iran!"

And, you intend stopping this terrorist bomb in NYC with aircraft carriers, tanks, B2s, B52s, ICBMs. H-bombs? Told you, warfare is all changed. YOU just unwittingly proved it. Start by buying sophisticated hardware and software that can detect bombs in ships' containers. Cheaper than aircraft carriers and much more relevant to today's needs.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#155511 May 13, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey, it's not our fault if you're too dense understand what the law says. Do you know how easily we would have been taken over if your interpretation were correct? That's the main reason behind the law; to keep people with allegiances elsewhere out of our gov. You should have learned that in Jr. High! Then again, you're probably just another refugeeboy. How sad it must be to remain so insignificant and irrelevant. You've already stunk the place up, might as well go ahead and drop another one! LMAO! fishlips
LTR's interpretation? How about the Supreme Court, the Congress, the Electoral College, the Federal and State Courts, and the most eminent legal scholars throughout the history of this nation?

Then there is the Dufus-Romper delusion, which they fantasize is law. Hee hee.
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
The facts say I am correct. Romper the pathetic fool and his hero Dufus choose to ignore facts and embrace each other in a bigoted fantasy. Sad. Very sad
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#155512 May 13, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>Hey, it's not our fault if you're too dense understand what the law says. Do you know how easily we would have been taken over if your interpretation were correct? That's the main reason behind the law; to keep people with allegiances elsewhere out of our gov. You should have learned that in Jr. High! Then again, you're probably just another refugeeboy. How sad it must be to remain so insignificant and irrelevant. You've already stunk the place up, might as well go ahead and drop another one! LMAO! fishlips
Poor Romper. Ranting about what should be learned in 3rd Grade yet unable to make it through

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#155513 May 13, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey, it's not our fault if you're too dense understand what the law says. Do you know how easily we would have been taken over if your interpretation were correct? That's the main reason behind the law; to keep people with allegiances elsewhere out of our gov. You should have learned that in Jr. High! Then again, you're probably just another refugeeboy. How sad it must be to remain so insignificant and irrelevant. You've already stunk the place up, might as well go ahead and drop another one! LMAO! fishlips
Romper: "Do you know how easily we would have been taken over if your interpretation were correct?"

When you consider that persons born in this country were never excluded from natural born citizenship because of parentage (except children of foreign ambassadors and a few other exceptions), Romper's premise that a parentage rule is responsible for preventing the country from a "take over" crashes and burns.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#155514 May 13, 2013
Tisdale v. Obama (Virginia federal court 2012) ruling:“It is well settled that those born in the United States are considered natural born citizens.”

Gee look, just another Federal Judge that failed Dufus Law
mr dan

Ashburn, VA

#155515 May 13, 2013
Upgrade your jamb result call 08141691103
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#155516 May 13, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>LTR's interpretation? How about the Supreme Court, the Congress, the Electoral College, the Federal and State Courts, and the most eminent legal scholars throughout the history of this nation?
Well I AM very persuasive ...
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#155517 May 13, 2013
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
EXCEPT for the children of foreign diplomats, anyone born on US soil over the age of 35 and with 14 years of residence in the USA can become president if elected. Yes, ANYONE, and that includes the children of two foreigners visiting the USA and even two illegal immigrants in the USA.
Black's Law Dictionary (9th Edition) defines "Natural Born Citizen" as "A person born within the jurisdiction of a national government".
"Every child born in the United States is a natural-born United States citizen except for the children of diplomats.”---Senator Lindsay Graham (December 11, 2008 letter to constituents)
“What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.”(Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004)--Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT).
“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President ..."---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005)[Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]
The US Supreme Court defined the term Natural Born Citizen in the Wong Kim Ark case, which btw, was AFTER Minor v. Happersett. And it said that the term comes from the common law (hence not Vattel), and that it refers to the place of birth and that every child born in the USA except for the children of foreign diplomats is a Natural Born Citizen.
LMAO!!!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#155518 May 13, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
You wrote , and it (again) proves my point : "There is a good chance the next bomb that goes off in New York City, will be a nuke from Iran!"
And, you intend stopping this terrorist bomb in NYC with aircraft carriers, tanks, B2s, B52s, ICBMs. H-bombs? Told you, warfare is all changed. YOU just unwittingly proved it. Start by buying sophisticated hardware and software that can detect bombs in ships' containers. Cheaper than aircraft carriers and much more relevant to today's needs.
You DoDo bird! Those weapons are for retaliation!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#155519 May 13, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
LTR's interpretation? How about the Supreme Court, the Congress, the Electoral College, the Federal and State Courts, and the most eminent legal scholars throughout the history of this nation?
Then there is the Dufus-Romper delusion, which they fantasize is law. Hee hee.
<quoted text>
Then go ahead and make the statement, fishlips; "anyone born on U.S. soil can be President". How utterly stupid! LMAO!!!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#155520 May 13, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey, it's not our fault if you're too dense understand what the law says. Do you know how easily we would have been taken over if your interpretation were correct? That's the main reason behind the law; to keep people with allegiances elsewhere out of our gov. You should have learned that in Jr. High! Then again, you're probably just another refugeeboy. How sad it must be to remain so insignificant and irrelevant. You've already stunk the place up, might as well go ahead and drop another one! LMAO! fishlips
Poor ignoramus xenophobe . Herewith a very incomplete list of "refugeeboys" (LRS tm reg'd) who were welc0med to the US and contrbuted to its science and art world :

Werner Von Braun, Albert Einstein, Enrico Fermi, George §olti, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Marlene Dietrich, Maria Von Trapp, Joseph Conrad, etc

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#155521 May 13, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
You DoDo bird! Those weapons are for retaliation!
Dodo? Me? The trick, poor dodo, is to avoid having to retaliate by preventing the very reason for a retaliation. No carriers or B-2s or any "space-age weaponry" will prevent a Rogue Scholar scenario nuclear terrorist strike in NYC. THAT has been proven since Vietnam up 'til today, with crude roadside bombs, suicide attacks and box-cutters more effective than any sophisticated modern weapons. Wake up, put your stupid arsenal away and start thinking for a change.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#155522 May 13, 2013
Hey, did you hear about when G.W. went to New Orleans to check out the disaster relief for Hurricane Katrina? Well he was down in the old French Quarter and he was getting a little hungry and he saw this woman put out an "Open" sign in front of this French restaurant so across the street he went with his entourage.
He went in and was immediately seated and the waitress asked him what he wanted and G.W. said, "Ah, could you bring me a coffee and a quickie, please"? And the waitress turned white saying, "How dare you and I thought you would be nicer than Clinton". With that she started to cry and she ran back into the kitchen.
A Secret Service Agent walk over to Pres. Bush and said, "Excuse me Mr. President but I think it is pronounce 'quiche'"!

Now Liberals seem to think that the joke is about G.W. not being able to pronounce some words correctly whereas most Conservatives think the joke is really about Bill Clinton's loose zipper.

I think I read this joke in Readers Digest some ten-twelve years ago so I do not claim credit and do not know who should get the credit.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 6 min flack 1,156,111
Double Word Game (Dec '11) 12 min Roxie Darling 1,537
laptop online shopping singapore 29 min Tan 1
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 37 min Earthling-1 49,345
Triple Word Game (Dec '11) 43 min boundary painter 968
Word (Dec '08) 56 min boundary painter 4,794
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 1 hr JOEL 71,263
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 6:00 am PST

Bleacher Report 6:00AM
Bears vs. Vikings: What Experts Are Saying About Chicago
NBC Sports 6:03 AM
Jim Caldwell: No concerns about starting a rookie center
Bleacher Report 8:46 AM
What Are Experts Saying About Vikings?
NBC Sports11:28 AM
Bears extend Roberto Garza through 2015
NBC Sports 7:32 AM
Full-blown Bears house-cleaning could be coming