BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#155455 May 12, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>If the children's parents are citizens of N. Korea, yes the children will be a citizens of their parents nation of origin, which would make those children ineligible for citizenship in the US. The US Constitution has never recognized a dual-citizenship status, also the US Government can not remove a citizenship from anyone unless requested under the naturalization process.
I did not comment on this discussion before. But, given the above judgement by "Justice OMG ha ha Dale", please remove "justice" forthwith from your moniker and adopt a new one like "LMAO (LRS tm reg'd) Dale".

I rest my case.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#155456 May 12, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Why don't you tell one and all what you mean by "kerplunk, kerplunk, LRS?
No way, it turns you (and Barfer) on way too much! LMAO! squidiot

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#155457 May 12, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
No way, it turns you (and Barfer) on way too much! LMAO! squidiot
It does? Timid, are we? Embarrassed? Remember, YOU thought it up, you typed it. One of your many fantasies. Will you ever fulfil your dearest most secret wish in your lifetime?
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#155458 May 12, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>And you think anyone born on U.S. soil can run for President! LMAO!!! squid
SCOTUS, Congress and the overwhelming majority of the American people know that I am right and laugh at your hate fueled fable
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#155459 May 12, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>If the children's parents are citizens of N. Korea, yes the children will be a citizens of their parents nation of origin, which would make those children ineligible for citizenship in the US. The US Constitution has never recognized a dual-citizenship status, also the US Government can not remove a citizenship from anyone unless requested under the naturalization process.
Your fable doesn't depend on their patents' citizenship
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#155460 May 12, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
I did not comment on this discussion before. But, given the above judgement by "Justice OMG ha ha Dale", please remove "justice" forthwith from your moniker and adopt a new one like "LMAO (LRS tm reg'd) Dale".
I rest my case.
Why have you rested your case, you haven't presented one yet.

LMAO!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#155461 May 12, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
I'll grant you that. You had written 200 years, I said 300. But, Rogue, what's a give-or-take mere 100 years' difference when we know our earth to be 6,500 years old? LMAO (LRS tm reg'd). So, that was women, they've always been shortchanged, 1300 years to today with Muslims, since time immemorial by others. When did slavery end? 200 years ago? Nope. 150 years. And we all know, don't we, that oppression towards the blacks lasted a long time after the Emancipation Declaration and end of he civil war, thus end of slavery in the south or so we think. Women, blacks, latinos, immigrants, all badly treated, some recently, many still. You, I, we , can hardly preach to others if we contemplate OUR past, our recent past and our present. The stewardess, civil servants and teachers I mentioned in my other post, well, I forgot to say this situation existed until the 1960s for female cabin crew, 1948 for civil servants and teachers. Not exactly 200 years ago and clear abject discrimination based on gender and macho values. Certainly, we can observe and comment and yes, I agree with you to the point that no intelligent woman would choose to be an Arab or Muslim anymore than anyone would choose to be homosexual or lesbian. Even today.
Jacques, I have explained to you several times now how it is possible for the Earth to be both 6.4 billion EARTH years old and at the same time be 6,500 Universal years old. It is sort of like 1.61 km being the same as 1 sm. They are different measures but the same distance.

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

#155462 May 12, 2013
Jacques,
You can perish the thought right now of a Hillary Clinton presidency.
It is time for America to heal and both the Clinton's to bow out.
Their names may as well be Mudd.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#155463 May 12, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
I'll resist the temptation and will choose not to comment. But it's not easy.
LMAO!!! Good choice and I won't endup call you a boring fucher.
Mooslime Beater

Lady Lake, FL

#155464 May 12, 2013
Impeachment time is a coming
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#155465 May 12, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
SCOTUS, Congress and the overwhelming majority of the American people know that I am right and laugh at your hate fueled fable
Your ignorance knows no bounds.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#155466 May 12, 2013
Mooslime Beater wrote:
Impeachment time is a coming
and Obastard is going home(kenya).
LMAO!!! The devil made me do that!

“zero nuclear weapons”

Since: Sep 08

Perryville

#155467 May 12, 2013
loose cannon wrote:
Jacques,
You can perish the thought right now of a Hillary Clinton presidency.
It is time for America to heal and both the Clinton's to bow out.
Their names may as well be Mudd.
Do you know where that phrase came from??
Dr.Samuel Alexander Mudd who was falsey accused in the asassination of President Lincoln All he did was set Booth's leg
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#155468 May 12, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Your fable doesn't depend on their patents' citizenship
LMAO!!! Sorry that is just a fact that you can't stop. It is N. Korea's right as a nation to say who are their citizens, especially children born to their citizens, weather born in N. Korea or some other country.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#155469 May 12, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>so it is correct, just pay the fine for not having insurance and get it when you need it.
Whether you are taxed for being a free-rider or for smoking cigarettes, you are assesed a punitive tax.

So it is incorrect to call it a fine because as C J Roberts said, "it's really a tax."
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Fruit flies like a banana, right over Dufus Dale's head.
You are assessed a tax penalty for being a free-rider.
The point was that a sin tax is not a fine, it's a tax. Paying a tax does not mean you are necessarily a law breaker. Capisce?
Because so-called "sin taxes" are levied on purchases, that does not mean all taxes and tax penalties require a purchase. Duh!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#155470 May 12, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Whether you are taxed for being a free-rider or for smoking cigarettes, you are assesed a punitive tax.
So it is incorrect to call it a fine because as C J Roberts said, "it's really a tax."
<quoted text>
You're forgetting one important point, as usual. Smoking is a choice. A mandate in the form of a tax? Not so much!

“Relax”

Since: May 11

Siesta, Mexico

#155471 May 13, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Not so. Every "inactive" nuclear ship has a nuclear crew on board both to maintain the reactor but also keep it secure!
The difference between and Inactive and a Deactive plane, ship, etc. it that is any Deactivate plane, ship, etc. the major components are removed or disabled.
Case in point was the WWII Victory ships which have been periodically put in "mothballs" (inactive). Sure they were dusted off for the Korean War and then the Vietnam War but in the Persian Gulf War they were in bad condition they had to be scrapped. You see, once a year the Inactive ships are suppose to be run up and every system tested. But we don't.
The USS Enterprise is being mothballed right now but it will take about three months to get it ready for sea. Now, don't ever forget it is just ONE aircraft carrier. It is a whole Carrier Task force consisting of over a dozen ships, two submarines, and an air wing (aircraft, crews, etc.) Oh, the "crew" of the USS Enterprise consisted of about 3,000 ship's crew and 1,800 aircrew. But in the whole carrier task force you need over 10,000 trained men and women.
You seem to be fixated on task forces centered around Aircraft Carriers. Destroyers and Cruisers can operate independently or in smaller task forces and they require fewer personal to operate. The primary job of Aircraft Carriers is Air Supremacy. Deny enemy air operations.

“Relax”

Since: May 11

Siesta, Mexico

#155472 May 13, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Since the Ben Ghazi attack, you are correct. They had no ready reaction plan last year!!!
By the way, our forces in Africa come under our Africa Command whereas our people in Italy, Spain, etc. come under USAREUR whose headquarters is now in Wiesbaden, Germany. They were in Heidelberg but they moved a few years ago.
Before the Benghazi attack.
Italy and Spain are not our bases. We are allowed access to those bases under rules regarding NATO.

“DC Police Complaint #T14002751”

Since: Nov 08

Swift Water,NY

#155473 May 13, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Did you escape from jail?
2. Or are you out on bail?
3. Or is the police not doing its job and you're somehow free?
4. Or are the men in white looking for you?
5. Or how did you manage to break out of your padded cell and straightjacket?
None of the above. I didn't think there WERE Canadian Obamatoids.

“Relax”

Since: May 11

Siesta, Mexico

#155474 May 13, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
All of them attacked simultaneously? Apart from Russia and China, which country has the means to attack those bases? Name it. Russia and China have no interest any more in attacking the US or its bases anywhere (come to think of it, they never did) but should they so desire, it'd be much easer, with the weapons they have, to target a big fat 100,000 ton carrier than bases. Bases may be damaged badly, but can be repaired or moved. Not so a sitting duck carrier.
N. Korea, India, Pakistan, Iran, Egypt, Libya, and Syria.
It would be kind of hard to use a base if a missile destroys a nuclear powered ship or a ship that has nuclear weapons on it, in the harbor.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 6 min Hole open wides 49,878
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 6 min mdbuilder 1,110,214
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 14 min Grau 68,513
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 46 min Twisted Nixon 46,740
Amy 9-20 1 hr Kuuipo 6
Word (Dec '08) 2 hr texas pete 4,723
Song Titles Only (group/artist in parenthesis m... (Mar '10) 4 hr _Zoey_ 7,785
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••