BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 207339 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#155318 May 11, 2013
Grand Birther wrote:
WHITE HOUSE PRESS ROOM EVACUATED -- FOR SMOKE!
Yep, where there's smoke there is FIRE!
nebka wrote:
<quoted text>
You idiot it was a over heated transformer that caused the smoke!!!
You idiot. When he wrote that, that was all that was known.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#155319 May 11, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
??????????
It this your way of admitting that you're out of ammo?
And you never had any ammo!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#155322 May 11, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
13 fingers and toes? Er, slug, that would be twenty. College, eh? LMAO (LRS tm reg'd).
And once again you miss the point entirely!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#155323 May 11, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Anybody, even you, can counter with a pointless and unexplained statement. It's what you do all the time. You are both illiterate and ignorant. You cannot logically address any subject except to cry out obscenity and t*rds out of mouths. And then, out comes "boy, did I clownstomp them". And, amazingly, you actually believe that you did. LMAO (LRS tm reg'd).
What part did you miss, jackfish? I said having a huge, state-of-the-art carrier armed to the teeth DOES impact a region by its mere presence. You seem to think people never even notice. Right! LMAO! squidlips

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#155324 May 11, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
If you read my last post on the UK's new carriers, you'll note that I reported the Economist's comment that at the point where they were now in construction, it would be more expensive to cancel than finish. I predicted they'd mothball them first thing when completed, you'll see. And, if carriers are so important as you point out, why has the UK decided to go without for 8 to 13 years? The Chinese have been building that carrier for decades almost now. And for what? No other carrier on the horizon. As to India, Italy, Spain, supposedly allies, their carriers are jokes. Only France has one modern nuclear carrier.
As to carriers off the shores of rogue nations, tell me what that accomplished in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, in the Middle East etc. Very little or Zilch. In the Cuban missile crisis, double zilch. It's all about guerilla warfare, insurgency and terrorism now, Rogue. We'd best find solutions to those. Might be cheaper too.
During the Falklands War they had only a few very small carriers and the Argentines almost kicked their butts.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#155325 May 11, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Still afraid to defend your fable Dufus?
LMAO!!! No, are you afraid to counter my posts, all you have are diatriber!!
HELLO, STUPID!!!
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#155326 May 11, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
And Dufus Dale fails law logic 101
CJ Roberts "you may call that a fine but it is really a tax"
Dufus Fale: "all taxes are fines"
Talk about terminal dumarse
LMAO!!! So everyday we live in the the US and pay taxes we are violating some law, this is Justice Roberts contention. Now if you are saying that Roberts is saying that tax means the burden of the Constitution, then this isn't correct either, because a fine as the bill was written is a penalty for not obeying a law, so a Roberts has stated him position, each citizen of the US is a law breaker.
Now are all taxes fines, or all fines taxes. Now if all fines are taxes, then they are deductible, on the other hand, if all taxes are fines we are all law breakers! Now as Roberts has plainly stayed, we are a nation of criminals.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#155327 May 11, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
If that were the case, why were not forces deployed to Ben Ghazi?
Oh, where did the A-6s, A-7s and F?A-18 come from? Hint, THREE U.S. aircraft carriers (USS Saratoga, USS America and USS Coral Sea)
Oh, we had 12 operation combat carriers and one training carrier in 1986.
What forces deployed to Benghazi? From where? It's been pretty well established that no forces could've made it on time. Did you want a carrier task force stationed off Libya to protect the US cultural centre in Benghazi IN CASE it was attacked? Is that what you're trying to say?

You didn't need the carriers to air bomb Libya. Canada, France and the UK all operated their missions from mainland Europe, no carriers. And incidentally, just for the record, it was a stupid mission

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#155328 May 11, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
And once again you miss the point entirely!
The point being that you can't count to 10? I know.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#155329 May 11, 2013
..and even less to 20?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#155330 May 11, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
During the Falklands War they had only a few very small carriers and the Argentines almost kicked their butts.
You don't know much about the Falkland (or Malvinas) war , do you? Carrier with Harriers or not, the outcome would have been the exact same. The Argentines were ill-equipped, shortage of rations, no winter uniforms, poor weapons and local hostility. Exocet missiles were the bane of the Brits, but even after the sinking of one of their ships by said Exocet, the Brits pretty easily prevailed. What you don't know is the subtle support they received, mostly from Chile (hence Thatcher's support for tyrant Pinochet to the end) and Brazil who both gave the Brits port facilities, refuelling and supplies. I'd tell you more, but you're not interested.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#155331 May 11, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
What part did you miss, jackfish? I said having a huge, state-of-the-art carrier armed to the teeth DOES impact a region by its mere presence. You seem to think people never even notice. Right! LMAO! squidlips
Sorry, it does NOT impact a region any more. Used to. No more.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#155332 May 11, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
What forces deployed to Benghazi? From where? It's been pretty well established that no forces could've made it on time. Did you want a carrier task force stationed off Libya to protect the US cultural centre in Benghazi IN CASE it was attacked? Is that what you're trying to say?
You didn't need the carriers to air bomb Libya. Canada, France and the UK all operated their missions from mainland Europe, no carriers. And incidentally, just for the record, it was a stupid mission
LMAO!!! Boring, boring, boring, you havn't any idea what you are talking about, you just like to talk and of course we love to laugh (laff) at you!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#155333 May 11, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
..and even less to 20?
And you still remain clueless! LMAO
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#155334 May 11, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, it does NOT impact a region any more. Used to. No more.
It's amazing, simply amazing! Now, jackfish feels like he is able to answer for entire nations. Amazing! LMAO! doglip
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#155335 May 11, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't know much about the Falkland (or Malvinas) war , do you? Carrier with Harriers or not, the outcome would have been the exact same. The Argentines were ill-equipped, shortage of rations, no winter uniforms, poor weapons and local hostility. Exocet missiles were the bane of the Brits, but even after the sinking of one of their ships by said Exocet, the Brits pretty easily prevailed. What you don't know is the subtle support they received, mostly from Chile (hence Thatcher's support for tyrant Pinochet to the end) and Brazil who both gave the Brits port facilities, refuelling and supplies. I'd tell you more, but you're not interested.
BINGO!!!
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#155336 May 11, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
It's amazing, simply amazing! Now, jackfish feels like he is able to answer for entire nations. Amazing! LMAO! doglip
I really do feel sorry for Jock, all of those words he posts everyday and all are boring, boring, boring!! He really must be mentaly unstable, hope he doesn't come to my town!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#155337 May 11, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
It's amazing, simply amazing! Now, jackfish feels like he is able to answer for entire nations. Amazing! LMAO! doglip
Am I? What about you, loud lout? Did you not write "What part did you miss, jackfish? I said having a huge, state-of-the-art carrier armed to the teeth DOES impact a region by its mere presence. "

Well, I wrote countries, you go further, why, whole regions. What makes YOU think you can speak for entire regions?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#155338 May 11, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>I really do feel sorry for Jock, all of those words he posts everyday and all are boring, boring, boring!! He really must be mentaly unstable, hope he doesn't come to my town!
Well, who hasn't noticed that learning is indeed very boring for you.

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

#155341 May 12, 2013
Jacques,
I knew all along that Hillary Clinton was lying about the role of the "Innocence of Muslims" video in the coordinated Benghazi attack on the anniverary of 9/11, and now it appears the Democrats will sacrifice their queen in desperation.
Check Mate.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min USAsince1680 1,345,727
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr The Mule 57,153
last post wins! (Dec '10) 1 hr They cannot kill ... 1,561
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 2 hr Perrie Winkle 7,267
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 2 hr Sublime1 101,396
News In February, Chicago goes crazy for 'paczki' as... 2 hr Christsharians on... 3
Word (Dec '08) 2 hr PEllen 5,631
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages