BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 230928 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#155282 May 11, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
For Rogue :
www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-18237029&#820... ;
May 29, 2012 – Computer-generated image issued by the MoD of an aircraft carrier ... By contrast, Spain and Italy have miniature carriers with around a dozen ...
Ironic. The UK had no crane that could lift the QEII components so it bought one from...China LOL. Ironic. Think of the purpose of the ship and which country it could be used against. Ironic indeed. But money has no colour.
Well, prior to about 1930, Japan bought all their large caliber naval artillery from England and Germany!
And yes, a miniature carrier is better than none.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#155283 May 11, 2013
The U.K. had relied on U.S. aerial tankers like our KC-135. Sure they had "Buddy" tankers which were Vulcan bombers fitted with a kit but they were inferior to the U.S. tankers.
To get one Vulcan bomber to attack the airfield at Port Stanley during the Falkland War it took eleven buddy tankers to get ONE vulcan bomber to and from the Falklands and their base on the Ascension Islands which had a round trip of 7,800 miles.

XM607 - Falklands' Most Daring Raid


We regularly fly our B-1s, B-2s and B-52s all of this world are far greater distances using our fleet of aerial tankers. Recently a B-2 flew from its base in Missouri round trip to S. Korea.

REASSURING ALLIES

While the 20-year-old B-2 often flies for long durations - 44 hours is the record - Thursday's flight of approximately 37-1/2 hours was the plane's first non-stop mission to the Korean peninsula and back from Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri, Air Force officials said.

With Pyongyang threatening missile strikes on the U.S. mainland, as well as U.S. bases in Hawaii and Guam, the flight seemed designed to demonstrate how easy it would be for the United States.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/30/us-...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#155284 May 11, 2013
Grand Birther wrote:
Democrats in decline?
“Since Obama was elected President, the Democrats have lost nine governorships, 56 members of the House and two Senate seats,” Doug Sosnik, the political director in Bill Clinton’s White House, writes in a new memo.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/05/dem-str...
Yep, and 2014 looks like it will be a bad election for the Dems in Congress. They forgot that the rewon both Houses of Congress in the election of 2006 which was the midterm of Bush's second term in the White House. And 2014 will also be a midterm in Obama's second term in the White House.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#155285 May 11, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
That's FoxNews.com for you. If they have a doubt, you can bet your bottom dollar it'll be Obama-negative.
So you don't have carriers in the Mediterranean. No one except the French with their one carrier has any in the Mediterranean. How many carriers do China and Russia have? ZERO! Et alors?
Spark plugs? What kind of analogy is that? And if you're talking about badly-planned long-term maintenance, why don't you start with the Navy, not the president. They have a budget, up to them to work it out.
Since the 2nd WW, how many wars have aircraft carriers helped to win? Aircraft carriers are like dinosaurs, Rogue. With missiles of all kinds, all ranges, multiple warheads, long-range bombers, air-refuelling-able fighter bombers, forward bases in the Atlantic, the Pacific, Indian Ocean, West and Eastern Europe, in the Middle East (Bahrain, etc) and Alaska, sophisticated drones, what you are short of but need more than aircraft carriers, I figure, are landing crafts that can disembark troops and equipment rapidly. Just as battleships became obsolete after WW1, so are aircraft carriers quickly becoming so and that is no doubt why other world powers are eschewing them.$6 billion per ship plus manning, maintenance, equipment, etc, and what a target! Can you really afford that? In the final analysis, what's going to be left to protect? The USSR is a case in point. Armed to the teeth in 1989, they nevertheless collapsed like a house of cards. All they could manufacture were armaments. No need to emulate them.
Well, is is not difficult to beat the bottom dollar out of Obama. It is like Clinton jokes. If you tried the same joke of Barack and Michelle or G.W. and Laura, it would not be funny. Examply;

Did you hear Hillary had a heart attack? Bill made a pass at her.
or;
Did you hear Michelle had a heart attack? Barack made a pass at her.
or
Did you hear Laura Bush had a heart attack? G.W. made a pass at her.
only the joke about the Clintons is funny as a joke mst be based on reality to be funny. We all know Hillary "The Boner Shrinker" Clinton and Bill "The Bent Crank" Clinton, don't we!!!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#155286 May 11, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Link not found! I am no computer wizard but most of my links work!
By the way, we too have eight small carriers which are Wasp-class amphibious assault ships and then normally carry only SIX AV-8 Harriers! But I don't think any where in the area at the time.
They would have just a few Harriers but could also carry a SEAL team and they also have the helicopters to deploy them.
But Obama has cut back on deployments and training so he can divert money to his social programs.
Also, the Wasp-class ships are 40,000 tones and we need ones that are closer to 75,000 tons.
If, if if, Rogue. If my aunt had balls, she's be my uncle. AV-8 Harriers can only carry one pilot, no seals. And if the US has eight of those, where were they? Well, Rogue, even if you have 50 of them, they cannot be all over the map.

Social programs vs military? You'd put the military ahead of health care, pensions, social security, education and other programs? What will you have left to protect? As it is, the US defence budget is bigger than that of Russia, China and the UK combined. How much do you need? How do all those armaments prevent and defeat the biggest threat of them all, terrorism? Who you gonna attack with all those weapons? Big arsenals used to impress rogue states. No more.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#155287 May 11, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Link not found! I am no computer wizard but most of my links work!
By the way, we too have eight small carriers which are Wasp-class amphibious assault ships and then normally carry only SIX AV-8 Harriers! But I don't think any where in the area at the time.
They would have just a few Harriers but could also carry a SEAL team and they also have the helicopters to deploy them.
But Obama has cut back on deployments and training so he can divert money to his social programs.
Also, the Wasp-class ships are 40,000 tones and we need ones that are closer to 75,000 tons.
You wrote : "Link not found! I am no computer wizard but most of my links work"

I'm sorry, but I can't figure why none of them work. Very frustrating, but knowing this, it's why I post the link AND the ensuing paragraph to help you locate it should you so desire. But you certainly do not have to, up to you, as I know I've got my evidence or proof or confirmation or whatever. I'm even less a computer expert than you are.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#155288 May 11, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
The U.K. had relied on U.S. aerial tankers like our KC-135. Sure they had "Buddy" tankers which were Vulcan bombers fitted with a kit but they were inferior to the U.S. tankers.
To get one Vulcan bomber to attack the airfield at Port Stanley during the Falkland War it took eleven buddy tankers to get ONE vulcan bomber to and from the Falklands and their base on the Ascension Islands which had a round trip of 7,800 miles.
XM607 - Falklands' Most Daring Raid
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =40knj0qg_UsXX
We regularly fly our B-1s, B-2s and B-52s all of this world are far greater distances using our fleet of aerial tankers. Recently a B-2 flew from its base in Missouri round trip to S. Korea.
REASSURING ALLIES
While the 20-year-old B-2 often flies for long durations - 44 hours is the record - Thursday's flight of approximately 37-1/2 hours was the plane's first non-stop mission to the Korean peninsula and back from Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri, Air Force officials said.
With Pyongyang threatening missile strikes on the U.S. mainland, as well as U.S. bases in Hawaii and Guam, the flight seemed designed to demonstrate how easy it would be for the United States.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/30/us-...
That's what I meant by air-refuelling and long-range bombers making aircraft carriers almost obsolete. And, don't forget, in case of conflict with N.Korea, B2s and all other fighters and bombers don't have to deploy from the U.S. Cripes, like during the Korean war, from Japan and South Korea for starters, no mid-air refuelling required or very little.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#155289 May 11, 2013
PS : Vulcan have been replaced by A-330 Airbuses. Vulcans, VC10s and retrofitted Comets were used as military refuellers and transports and British-kind AWACS just to keep their military local and foster employment in the defence sector. They were ridiculously old and the maintenance!

I did loved the VC10, flew it many times - what an aircraft. Too bad it never had much success. It was made for short-field operations, specially in developing countries, but longer runways were built in any case and the short-field requirement was not necessary. That's when the 707 and DC87 killed the Comet and VC10.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#155290 May 11, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
That's FoxNews.com for you. If they have a doubt, you can bet your bottom dollar it'll be Obama-negative.
So you don't have carriers in the Mediterranean. No one except the French with their one carrier has any in the Mediterranean. How many carriers do China and Russia have? ZERO! Et alors?
Spark plugs? What kind of analogy is that? And if you're talking about badly-planned long-term maintenance, why don't you start with the Navy, not the president. They have a budget, up to them to work it out.
Since the 2nd WW, how many wars have aircraft carriers helped to win? Aircraft carriers are like dinosaurs, Rogue. With missiles of all kinds, all ranges, multiple warheads, long-range bombers, air-refuelling-able fighter bombers, forward bases in the Atlantic, the Pacific, Indian Ocean, West and Eastern Europe, in the Middle East (Bahrain, etc) and Alaska, sophisticated drones, what you are short of but need more than aircraft carriers, I figure, are landing crafts that can disembark troops and equipment rapidly. Just as battleships became obsolete after WW1, so are aircraft carriers quickly becoming so and that is no doubt why other world powers are eschewing them.$6 billion per ship plus manning, maintenance, equipment, etc, and what a target! Can you really afford that? In the final analysis, what's going to be left to protect? The USSR is a case in point. Armed to the teeth in 1989, they nevertheless collapsed like a house of cards. All they could manufacture were armaments. No need to emulate them.
And when a carrier task force arrives off the coast of a rogue country, they notice. And then why is the U.K. building two new carriers? And why is China working to deploy their first carrier?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#155291 May 11, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, is is not difficult to beat the bottom dollar out of Obama. It is like Clinton jokes. If you tried the same joke of Barack and Michelle or G.W. and Laura, it would not be funny. Examply;
Did you hear Hillary had a heart attack? Bill made a pass at her.
or;
Did you hear Michelle had a heart attack? Barack made a pass at her.
or
Did you hear Laura Bush had a heart attack? G.W. made a pass at her.
only the joke about the Clintons is funny as a joke mst be based on reality to be funny. We all know Hillary "The Boner Shrinker" Clinton and Bill "The Bent Crank" Clinton, don't we!!!
??????????

It this your way of admitting that you're out of ammo?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#155292 May 11, 2013
Britain has only two helicopter carriers, their Harriers were retired in 2010. They are about 1/8th the size of our Nimitz class carriers.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons...
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#155293 May 11, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
13 words and not one single profanity or filth. Losing your touch?
And that ladies and gentlemen required every finger and toe the squidboy has!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#155294 May 11, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
You really have no substantial/intelligent reply, do you? As has once more been shown, don't you think it would be preferable to keep quiet?
And slithering under a rock does not make one a geologist.
I see you didn't like my point. Good. Four carriers is plenty...LOL! I just countered your BS and as usual you have no comeback. squidboy LMAO!
Justice Dale

United States

#155295 May 11, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
You call yourself a justice and you label your president "Obastard"? Scum.
You still owe the people of the USA an apology!
Yep, he will remain Obastard until we see a real LFBC!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#155296 May 11, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
That's what I meant by air-refuelling and long-range bombers making aircraft carriers almost obsolete. And, don't forget, in case of conflict with N.Korea, B2s and all other fighters and bombers don't have to deploy from the U.S. Cripes, like during the Korean war, from Japan and South Korea for starters, no mid-air refuelling required or very little.
Reaction time? How long would it take for a special ops time to fly from Fort Campbell, KY to Africa?
It take a B-2 37 hours to fly round trip from the U.S. to Korea. You could have an aircraft carrier launch, recover, relaunch, etc. ten times in the same period!
Justice Dale

United States

#155297 May 11, 2013
truman wrote:
<quoted text>Yes but your wrong.
At some point Birthers are going to have to accept that or just break with reality completly.
LMAO!!! Look who voted for an alien, you people don't know what reality is!!
Justice Dale

United States

#155298 May 11, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Dufus never gradiated 2nd Grade so how can he pretend to know more about the Constitution than CJ Roberts?
Pathetic fool
LMAO!!! Justice Roberts thinks a fine is a tax, we have been paying taxes for years, what law did we break!!!
Davey

Singapore, Singapore

#155299 May 11, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
VC10, flew it many times - what an and AWACS just to keep their military. Too bad it many case and the sector. That and for shorts and VC10s an have built in the VC10, flew it never runways were used the VC10, flew it made foster had much success. Vulcans, VC10. PS : Vulcan have built in the maintenance shorts and requirement was military refuellers and AWACS just to keep the Comet and the defence!

I did local and the shorts any times - what and their military local and AWACS just to keep the VC10
Are you Canadian? Your post makes no sense, like a Canadian.
Justice Dale

United States

#155300 May 11, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
And with no regard for Dufus' fables
LMAO!!! You get dumber day by day!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#155301 May 11, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! You get dumber day by day!
I don't think that is possible! LOL

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 7 min sonicfilter 1,457,747
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 3 hr Sam 104,501
Word (Dec '08) 3 hr PEllen 6,836
Double Word Game (Dec '11) 3 hr PEllen 3,443
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 3 hr PEllen 9,839
Four letter word game (Dec '11) 3 hr PEllen 2,272
Why does Chicago want to harbor illegal criminals 5 hr ThomasA 10

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages