BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 207603 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#154959 May 8, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:

<quoted text>
You didn't write "fishlip's". Did you get lucky?
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Your memory is gone and now you're blind! Looks like I wrote "fishlips" to me. You make no sense. Or, in other words, nonsense! LMAO! fishlips (fishlips doesn't really appear in this post)
Cue up the Twilight Zone theme!
Re-read my post s l o w l y , you'll surely understand...NOT. Then grab that worn-out cone and go join KFC GB and Rogue in corner. And if you're good, you can later visit nice old caretaker in the school basement. Tell him you've been a very bad boy and you need to be severely punished.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#154960 May 8, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Very, very sick individual right here! Very sick. We all knew that though. You need serious help, jackfish. cownostril
As inspired by your "turds in mouth",(LRS tm reg'd) "kerplunks" (LRs tm reg'd) obsessive and exessive anal and defecation references.

Oh, please point out my "bad words" then I'll point yours out. Oh, I already did yesterday morning, remember? Now point one, ONE bad word of mine. Just one please.

I will never lower myself to using your kind of filthy dirty sex-laden language and profanities. You're one of the inmates Rogue mentioned that was let loose. Although I approve of the program in general terms, you would certainly be the exception and should have remained institutionalized. I would not let anyone I cherish, well, not even strangers, near you.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#154961 May 8, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Far from being a scientist at all, but then neither are you, Einstein was talking UNIVERSE, not the earth. BIG difference, and whatever's expanding NOW from the nucleus or in incomprehensible scientific terms,(to me anyhow, maybe not to you)boundary is 6,500 years old, why maybe even less, but the earth, not the universe, is billions of years old and hurtling further out in the Milky Way. The universe and the earth are two sets of things, Rogue.
Except for generalities, I will not tackle the theory of relativity. It was well explained in layman's terms in McIsaac's biography of Albert Einstein, which was most interesting but I confess to not have understood it all that well. I could use wojar's vast knowledge of the matter.
Rouge's misrepresentation of relativity has been previously discussed. There is no need to repetitiously debunk his ignorance ad nauseam.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#154962 May 8, 2013
LRS wrote:

<quoted text>
How utterly petty! And that's your A-game. Sad. fishlips

jackfish wrote:
You didn't write "fishlip's". Did you get lucky?

It looks to be there to me! LMAO! fishlips (this really doesn't appear in this post) R U on drugs? R U on LSD? R U stupid? Hee Hee Hee

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#154963 May 8, 2013
Truth Detector wrote:
<quoted text>
So SHEEPLE can't tell the difference between Louisville and Danville, right?
We know, what difference does it make, right?
We shall see.
Back to the Benghazi beat-down.
The Fox Entertainment Channel, aka Fox News has moved on to more important things, Jodi Arias.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#154964 May 8, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
As inspired by your "turds in mouth",(LRS tm reg'd) "kerplunks" (LRs tm reg'd) obsessive and exessive anal and defecation references.
Oh, please point out my "bad words" then I'll point yours out. Oh, I already did yesterday morning, remember? Now point one, ONE bad word of mine. Just one please.
I will never lower myself to using your kind of filthy dirty sex-laden language and profanities. You're one of the inmates Rogue mentioned that was let loose. Although I approve of the program in general terms, you would certainly be the exception and should have remained institutionalized. I would not let anyone I cherish, well, not even strangers, near you.
What do bad words have to do with being a very, very sick individual?
Nothing. jackfish, your residence is on the seafloor! The only way you CAN go is up! You poor SAP. LMAO! fishlips (this really doesn't appear in this post)

BTW....jackfish, did you know that there is a poster here that knows who you really are? LMAO!!!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#154965 May 8, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Rouge's misrepresentation of relativity has been previously discussed. There is no need to repetitiously debunk his ignorance ad nauseam.
And POOF, within minutes of jackfish mentioning slowpuke, look who pops (or should I say "pups") up! LMAO!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#154966 May 8, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
And POOF, within minutes of jackfish mentioning slowpuke, look who pops (or should I say "pups") up! LMAO!
And yesterday my appearance was a mirage?

Moron.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Rouge's misrepresentation of relativity has been previously discussed. There is no need to repetitiously debunk his ignorance ad nauseam.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#154967 May 8, 2013
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
He gave up on religion because he knows an entity capable of creating billions of universes would hardly know you exist let alone communicate or reveal anything to you.
It may be that ministers really think that their prayers do good and it may be that frogs imagine that their croaking brings spring.
-- Robert Green Ingersoll, "Which Way?" (1884)
So you know God has the same intellectual capacity you do? I won't dare compare my brain to some one like Dr. Einstein but you seem to thing God is as stupid as you are?
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#154968 May 8, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
And yesterday my appearance was a mirage?
Moron.
<quoted text>
Oh, it was right on cue also! LMAO! puppster
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#154969 May 8, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>And yesterday my appearance was a mirage?

Moron.

wojar wrote, "
<quoted text>
Rouge's misrepresentation of relativity has been previously discussed. There is no need to repetitiously debunk his ignorance ad nauseam."
Careful - Romper may threaten to call you a troll if you agitate him

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#154970 May 8, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Far from being a scientist at all, but then neither are you, Einstein was talking UNIVERSE, not the earth. BIG difference, and whatever's expanding NOW from the nucleus or in incomprehensible scientific terms,(to me anyhow, maybe not to you)boundary is 6,500 years old, why maybe even less, but the earth, not the universe, is billions of years old and hurtling further out in the Milky Way. The universe and the earth are two sets of things, Rogue.
Except for generalities, I will not tackle the theory of relativity. It was well explained in layman's terms in McIsaac's biography of Albert Einstein, which was most interesting but I confess to not have understood it all that well. I could use wojar's vast knowledge of the matter.
Is an Elephant BIG? To a mouse, yes! To a whale, NO! Is the Earth big? Compared to our Moon, yes! Compared to our Sun, NO!!!
Einstein was in a trolley moving away from city hall he he noticed the clock on the tower and he visualized what would happen if he accelerated to the speed of light.
At the speed of light, the clock which was stationary, would appear to freeze. But what if you were in the clock and you saw the trolley accelerate away from you? It all depends with relativity!!!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#154971 May 8, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
So you know God has the same intellectual capacity you do? I won't dare compare my brain to some one like Dr. Einstein but you seem to thing God is as stupid as you are?
But Rouge has no problem misrepresenting relativity over and over.

Does LRS fantasize this comment was made by Jacques?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#154972 May 8, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, it was right on cue also! LMAO! puppster
Yesterday was right on cue? Dolt. You even replied to one of my comments yesterday.

Got Alzheimer's?
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#154973 May 8, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Careful - Romper may threaten to call you a troll if you agitate him
Kerplunk! Lunch time Barfer! LMAO!!!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#154974 May 8, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Careful - Romper may threaten to call you a troll if you agitate him
I'm shakin' in my boots. Hee hee.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#154975 May 8, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Yesterday was right on cue? Dolt. You even replied to one of my comments yesterday.
Got Alzheimer's?
No kidding! Damn you're sharp! LMAO squidlips

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#154976 May 8, 2013
LRS wrote:
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
How utterly petty! And that's your A-game. Sad. fishlips
jackfish wrote:
You didn't write "fishlip's". Did you get lucky?
It looks to be there to me! LMAO! fishlips (this really doesn't appear in this post) R U on drugs? R U on LSD? R U stupid? Hee Hee Hee
OMG

I will give you a 2nd grade explanation. You wrote it correctly, in the proper plural. I inferred, which no one should do with you, that you ACCIDENTALLY wrote it correctly. You could've as well written "fishlip's" in the possessive form but you got lucky and chose the correct spelling.

The thing with you, slug,, well, it does not easily translate as it is a French colloquial expression but the expression fits you to a T : "Tu comprends vite mais il faut t'expliquer longtemps".

Okay, here goes " You understand quickly so long as we explain a long time".

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#154977 May 8, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
What do bad words have to do with being a very, very sick individual?
Nothing. jackfish, your residence is on the seafloor! The only way you CAN go is up! You poor SAP. LMAO! fishlips (this really doesn't appear in this post)
BTW....jackfish, did you know that there is a poster here that knows who you really are? LMAO!!!
Tell him/her to join me on the sea floor.

Oh, you have my real name, my home town, and my profile. I'm who I am and if this person really knows who I am, bully for him/her, as unlike you I'm not ashamed of who I am. But what really irks you is you know nothing of who and what I am and was, family, what I did for a living. I may throw a carrot here and there, make you wonder why the hell I've been to all these places but hey, that's for me to know (and that poster LMAO LRS tm reg'd) and you to find out.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#154978 May 8, 2013
As a jet approaches the speed of sound, what part of the jet reaches the speed of sound first? If no said the nose, you'd be WRONG. It is the top of the wings and it is all caused by Bernoulli's Theorem!
First, the nose separates the air and the air has to get back to the tail at the same time from all sides. To do that, the air that travels the furthest has to speed up. As it speeds up the air pressure drops. Then the air is split again, this time by the wings.
Again the air must speed up to meet at the trailing edge of the wing. And again, as the air speeds up, the air pressure drops. UNTIL you hit the speed of sound. And then the air pressure does not drop in pressure but suddenly increases!!!
Kelly Johnson, who would go on to design the SR-71, did not understand that in 1938 when he designed the P-38 Lightning. They called it the Lightning as it was the first fighter plane to exceed 400 mph in level flight.
But something started to happened when they got over 480 mph, which was far below the speed of sound. The P-38 would nose-tuck and then break up killing the pilot! SOUND BARRIER? NO!!!
What would happen was the air on top of the wing would hit the speed of sound before the bottom of the wing would. Normally the air pressure on top of the wing would drop in relation to the bottom and provide lift but once the top when sonic, that changed to HIGH PRESSURE and caused what we found out later to me mach tuck.
Mach tuck
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mach tuck is an aerodynamic effect, whereby the nose of an aircraft tends to pitch downwards as the airflow around the wing reaches supersonic speeds. The aircraft will be subsonic, and traveling significantly below Mach 1.0, when it first experiences this effect
Now I have never flown any aircraft that flies more than 200 mph, I am a helicopter pilot! But I was reading up on the P-38 and wondered why the P-51` and P-47 could dive faster than the P-38 so I did my own research.
I had never heard of "mach tuck' but all by myself I figured it out. The P-51 as symmetrical airfoil wings so both the top and bottom of the wing goes sonic at the same time. Whereas the wings on the P-47 had a smaller chord to pitch ratio of the P-38 and would not get the same effect until a much higher speed.
Oh, by 1943 Kelly Johnson knew the P-38 problem and to keep the pilots from going faster than 480 mph he designed a high-speed airbrake. So they put this airbrake kit together and put them on a C-54 heading to England and two British fighter pilots that it was a German Condor and shot it down (Ooops!!)
Like I said, Kelly Johnson was one of the top ten aeronautics engineers but back in 1938, he did not understand transonic flight!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 6 min woodtick57 1,347,556
News Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 16 min Carl 72,024
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 33 min Sublime1 101,419
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr IBdaMann 57,312
abby2-11-16 1 hr PEllen 2
Harassed Again @ Walmart (Jan '12) 2 hr Det Harry Callaha... 50
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 3 hr RACE 7,312
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages