Like every birfoon Kerchner pays no heed to previous judicial rulings and equally ignores the ones given to him personally. And what the birfoon in general never seems to grasp is the fact that his alternate Obama birth narrative has always been a piece of harmless internet fiction until his deluded mental state advanced it to the level of a court proceeding. Your fable is now termed “frivolous filings” GB.A warning from the past — some conspiracies are very real and also really big and well organized. The target is to destroy our U.S. Constitution and Republic. Remember this quote from history:“We must now face the harsh truth that the objectives of communism are being steadily advanced because many of us do not recognize the means used to advance them.… The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a Conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst.” Quote by: J. Edgar Hoover former FBI director. Source: Elks Magazine (August 1956).
When will we return to the rule of law and enforce our identity theft protection laws and the U.S. Constitution in regards to the usurper and Fraud-in-Chief residing in the White House?
CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E.(Retired)
Let’s hear it for Kerchner and by all means let’s give a loud shout out to Alabama
“In the past,“we cautioned counsel that a finding by a District Court that a lawsuit is frivolous should serve as notice to the parties and their attorney to exercise caution, pause, and devote additional examination to the legal validity and factual merit of his contentions.” Beam, 383 F.3d at 109 (quotation omitted). Although the District Court did not explicitly state that Appellants’ claims were frivolous, the finding of other district courts that plaintiffs who filed complaints based on similar legal theories violated Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 should have served as meaningful notice that the appeal here would be frivolous. We therefore will order Appellants’ counsel to show cause why he should not pay just damages and costs for having filed a frivolous appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 38.”