Ah, Hillary Clinton and the "CIA head" were not in Benghazi at the time of the attack. Let's say you get pulled over for drunk driving and when you go to court, you refuse to testify. But you friend who was not with you the night of the DUI claims you were not drunk. How would he know, he was not there? Oh, he asked you and you were not drunk, so that was why he was qualified to answer for you?!?<quoted text>
You wrote : "At the time of the assault, no one knew how long it would last. What if it had gone on for a few days?" Thanks for answering my question. So, nothing COULD be done. Why have you been constantly blaming Obama for not taking action? And why do you suppose he or Sec of State Clinton would've been informed from the very beginning of the attack?
Preventing witnesses? What about Clinton and CIA head testimonies? Can you go much higher than that? How is Obama preventing other witnesses from testifying? Any inside info about that? ALL networks report what or what they don't want to report. That is why trash like foxnews.com is still allowed to function. Oh, I don't hate Foxnews.com . You invented that. Show me where I said I hated foxnews.com . Hate is a strong word. I hardly ever use it except to say I hate green peas.
Oh, you don't have an embassy in Benghazi. Embassies can only be located in capital cities. That would be Tripoli.
Now, you say networks only have to report what they want to and not report what they want to be but did not Poopo bash Fox News two weeks ago because they did not cover Obama's award ceremony in Israel?
And if they do not report on a particular subject because someone at the White House told them not to , OR ELSE, is that okay?
You Libtardian Logic is showing!!!