BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#154049 May 2, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
You wrote : "At the time of the assault, no one knew how long it would last. What if it had gone on for a few days?" Thanks for answering my question. So, nothing COULD be done. Why have you been constantly blaming Obama for not taking action? And why do you suppose he or Sec of State Clinton would've been informed from the very beginning of the attack?
Preventing witnesses? What about Clinton and CIA head testimonies? Can you go much higher than that? How is Obama preventing other witnesses from testifying? Any inside info about that? ALL networks report what or what they don't want to report. That is why trash like foxnews.com is still allowed to function. Oh, I don't hate Foxnews.com . You invented that. Show me where I said I hated foxnews.com . Hate is a strong word. I hardly ever use it except to say I hate green peas.
Oh, you don't have an embassy in Benghazi. Embassies can only be located in capital cities. That would be Tripoli.
Ah, Hillary Clinton and the "CIA head" were not in Benghazi at the time of the attack. Let's say you get pulled over for drunk driving and when you go to court, you refuse to testify. But you friend who was not with you the night of the DUI claims you were not drunk. How would he know, he was not there? Oh, he asked you and you were not drunk, so that was why he was qualified to answer for you?!?
Now, you say networks only have to report what they want to and not report what they want to be but did not Poopo bash Fox News two weeks ago because they did not cover Obama's award ceremony in Israel?
And if they do not report on a particular subject because someone at the White House told them not to , OR ELSE, is that okay?
You Libtardian Logic is showing!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#154051 May 2, 2013
How/s that twit out west that is being tried for murdering her boy friend and that seems to be a very big issue with ABC, CBS, NBC,,,,, and Fox News. But only Fox News is covering the Dr. Gosnell murder trial and the Gosnell trial potentially will have a very big impact on the whole country will little miss twit will not.
I don't know the name of the twit and I am not sure if the trial is in California or Nevada or another state. And I don't care either. But a low of low-IQ people seem interested in it!
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#154052 May 2, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Duck and cover Dufus. Duck and cover
LMAO!!! Your post is just like you, irrelevant!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#154054 May 2, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
I have already stated my interests. Poopo thinks Obama's award ceremony was far more important that this murder trial. And apparently the LSM also feels that way.<quoted text>
Not one of you Libtards has ever explained what Obama did in 2008 to win the 2008 Nobel Peace Prize? Being the first half-black to be elected president is not a reason to be even recommended for the Nobel Peace Prize.
In other words, the Nobel Peace Prize has become a Liberal political football
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
You really need to do something about your senility Rogue as it appears to be getting worse and I do believe they have medication that can at least slow the progression.
Liberals need not explain anything the Nobel committee does as they have their own proficient spokes persons who are very capable of explaining their own decisions whether you agree with them or not.
That said, I’ll post the same explanation and video I posted a couple of weeks ago when you posited the same question. However in short he was awarded the prize for his vision.
“The president has produced an entirely new international climate since taking office, which is a concrete achievement in and of itself”
http://www.truthdig.com/avbooth/item/20091009...
Zoom, right over your head. What does,“The president has produced an entirely new international climate since taking office, which is a concrete achievement in and of itself”, mean?
Okay, I will type slow----ly sooooo you miiiight betttter under----stand. Thw award was for what he did in 2008, right? No, go to the video and pick up at 1:08 where he says, "the preceding year", which means DURING that year.
And last,“produced an entirely new international climate since..." is NOT an accomplishment!
And one final comment, why is this Nobel idiot trying to explain this? If it is so evident he was the best selection, they no one would have questioned it much less tens of thousands of people from all over the world.
To me, the Nobel Peace Prize has become a, "Hey, I am more Socialistic than you are", which makes it meaningless.
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#154055 May 2, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! I don't have to support anything, that is all accomplished by the framers of the Constitution and its amendments.
I don't need the USSC, they do not have the final say, that is left to the US Constitution, its amendment and those that framed both.
The US Constitution has jurisdiction over all three branches of our government and precedents can not be set with Unconstitutional rulings.
Yeah, you're crazy. Sorry you're an idiot and crazy.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#154056 May 2, 2013
Any person with the slightest amount of integrity would have aks that his name withdrawn from consideration and if he did win would graciously decline the Nobel Peace Prize. If he had, he would have won over many more people's RESPECT and that is far more important than winning a popularity contest.
But Obama is an egomaniac who thinks the Sun revolves around him.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#154057 May 2, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Duck and cover Dufus. Duck and cover
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! Your post is just like you, irrelevant!
He sooo stupid he does not realize he is just a piss ant.
Well, got to take my girl out to diner. Check back in tomorrow.

“zero nuclear weapons”

Since: Sep 08

Perryville

#154059 May 2, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
We, at no time, carpet bomb any populated area. We did carpet bomb the tunnel area of Cu Chi and the Ho Chi Minh Trail in Cambodia and Laos.
Cu Chi tunnels
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cu_Chi_tunnels
Oh, and the Phoenix Program started in 1965 under LBJ but continued until 1972 under Nixon. That is like if we today murdered every village chief in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Phoenix Program was by and large, just plain murder.
Phoenix Program
The program was in operation between 1965 and 1972, and similar efforts existed both before and after that period. By 1972, Phoenix operatives had "neutralized" 81,740 suspected NLF operatives, informants and supporters, of whom 26,369 were killed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenix_Program
BTW, the VC and NVA were doing the same thing but two wrongs do not make a right. In any event, Kissinger may have know about it but he had nothing to do with it.
At no time, carpet bomb any populated area then Rouge what about this then!!

The Christmas bombings of Hanoi December 1972, US president Richard Nixon ordered a brutal intensive bombing campaign against the capital city of Hanoi, using a large number of B-52 strategic bombers and tactical aircraft.


This was the biggest, bloodiest bombardment conducted by the US Air Force since the end of World War II, on the pretext of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam “refusing” to resume the Peace Conference in Paris.



During the 12-day-and-night campaign, codenamed Operation Linebacker II, starting on December 18, the US Air Force and Navy dispatched 729 B-52 sorties and nearly 4000 tactical aircraft sorties to drop 80,000 tonnes of bombs onto military and industrial targets in North Vietnam, especially Hanoi and Haiphong. Hanoi alone suffered 40,000 tonnes of bombs, many of which hit the centre and densely populated areas

2,300 civilians, including nearly 1,500 people in Hanoi.

So explain that then.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#154060 May 2, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Evangelicals? What's that go to the with the Constitution?
Beautiful use of the English language! Brilliant! LMAO!
Nasrat

Jacksonville, FL

#154061 May 2, 2013
Obama Finds Out Gun Control Failed In The Senate
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#154062 May 2, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey stupid, that is NOT the findings of United States v. Wong Kim Ark. Show us in the ORIGINAL findings of United States v. Wong Kim Ark and no other interpretations of it.
But the fact is a no place in United States v. Wong Kim Ark does it mention "natural born citizen" and neither is it mentioned in the Fourteen Amendment!
You have a bad habit of calling others stupid simply because they and everyone else finds the birfoon interpretation of what constitutes a NBC both odd and fringe to say the least.

First off there are only two classes of citizen in this country and they are natural born and naturalized. A born citizen is in fact a natural born citizen and Wong Kim Ark was found to be a born citizen.

It doesn’t matter that you “think” the court should have spelled out NBC in their decision or the 14 amendment should have spelled it out because to date there were and are only two classes of citizen from which to choose and only one of those could possibly a NBC.

The point being no court or amendment has added your two parent third citizenship class and because you believe it should be so don’t make it so and it certainly is no cause for you to call those who disagree with you (which is every legal scholar in the country) stupid.

You’ll also note that absolutely no one has questioned Obama’s NBC status save the ignorant birfoon so that alone should tell something
Nasrat

Jacksonville, FL

#154063 May 2, 2013
Seattle police fight protesters arresting 15 Tea Partiers
Nasrat

Jacksonville, FL

#154064 May 2, 2013
nebka wrote:
<quoted text>
At no time, carpet bomb any populated area then Rouge what about this then!!
The Christmas bombings of Hanoi December 1972, US president Richard Nixon ordered a brutal intensive bombing campaign against the capital city of Hanoi, using a large number of B-52 strategic bombers and tactical aircraft.
This was the biggest, bloodiest bombardment conducted by the US Air Force since the end of World War II, on the pretext of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam “refusing” to resume the Peace Conference in Paris.
During the 12-day-and-night campaign, codenamed Operation Linebacker II, starting on December 18, the US Air Force and Navy dispatched 729 B-52 sorties and nearly 4000 tactical aircraft sorties to drop 80,000 tonnes of bombs onto military and industrial targets in North Vietnam, especially Hanoi and Haiphong. Hanoi alone suffered 40,000 tonnes of bombs, many of which hit the centre and densely populated areas
2,300 civilians, including nearly 1,500 people in Hanoi.
So explain that then.
How do you know they were civilians? Because the commies told you they were. Then maybe the also lied about the total number. Besides, if they 80,000 tons of bombs on Hanoi and Haiphong they would have killed 230,000, not just 2,300. And even if they were civilians and they were working in a war plant, they are a legitimate target.

In addition to the minimum figure given in the Strategic bombing survey the number of people killed by Allied bombing in Germany has been estimated at between 400,000 and 600,000. In the UK 60,595 British were killed by German bombing, and in France 67,078 French were killed by US-UK bombing
Nasrat

Jacksonville, FL

#154065 May 2, 2013
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
You have a bad habit of calling others stupid simply because they and everyone else finds the birfoon interpretation of what constitutes a NBC both odd and fringe to say the least.
First off there are only two classes of citizen in this country and they are natural born and naturalized. A born citizen is in fact a natural born citizen and Wong Kim Ark was found to be a born citizen.
It doesn’t matter that you “think” the court should have spelled out NBC in their decision or the 14 amendment should have spelled it out because to date there were and are only two classes of citizen from which to choose and only one of those could possibly a NBC.
The point being no court or amendment has added your two parent third citizenship class and because you believe it should be so don’t make it so and it certainly is no cause for you to call those who disagree with you (which is every legal scholar in the country) stupid.
You’ll also note that absolutely no one has questioned Obama’s NBC status save the ignorant birfoon so that alone should tell something
That is just your opinion and you can show us no where in the constitution of any supreme court ruling that says other wise.

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#154067 May 2, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
I know how you Libtards read between the lines but in no place in U.S. vs. Wong Kim Ark nor the Fourteenth Amendment does it mention "natural born citizen"! NOWHERE!!!
Bet you don’t assume your right to bear arms only gives you a right to a knife or a club simply because you can’t find Glock in the second amendment.

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#154068 May 2, 2013
LRS wrote:
If you want to pass a US citizenship test I suggest you study from this link Mr. Liars. Otherwise never mind.
http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_citi.h...

“Reduce immigration levels”

Since: Dec 06

Kings Mountain, NC

#154069 May 2, 2013
Benghazi Special Ops Whistleblower: Signal Went Out From Special Ops On Ground For All Available Assets To Assist, No Aid Came
http://weaselzippers.us/2013/05/02/benghazi-s...

Chicago Law Prof on Obama: "The Professors Hated Him because he was Lazy, Unqualified & Never Attended any of the Faculty Meetings"
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2010/03/chica...

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#154071 May 2, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
What does this" "What's that go to the with the Constitution?", mean?
Look at the background and see under whose auspices...
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

#154072 May 2, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm sorry, what's a boo hoo? A U.S. citizen will be one of the following; natural born, native born or naturalized. Unfortunately for you though, Obumbler is/was none of the above as he was a Brit when born thanks to his father. Too bad you little girls insist on being stupid. Hmm, maybe it comes naturally for ya. Hey, makes it easier for the rest of us to succeed! What-A-Dumbazz! LMAO LTR opened his mouth today and two turds fell out! Are ye full? LMAO!!!
There are only two kinds of citizens. Naturalized (not citizens at birth) and Natural Born (citizens at birth, mainly due to birth in the USA).

Obama was born in the USA, in Hawaii, as his BC and the confirmation of the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii, etc, etc, etc---all show. Therefore Obama is a Natural Born Citizen. The citizenship of Obama's father has no effect at all.

I have already quoted the Wong Kim Ark supreme court ruling, and it says that the meaning of NBC refers to the PLACE of birth. And since there has been no Supreme Court ruling to the contrary, and since on October 1 of last year the Supreme Court turned down an appeal which would have given it the chance to overturn the ruling, the Wong Kim Ark decision is the legal definition of Natural Born Citizen. That is why, duh, not a single member of the 535 members of Congress voted not to confirm Obama in the 2008 or the 2012 elections, and not a single elector in the 356 Electoral votes that Obama won in 2008 or the 332 he won in 2012 changed her or his vote from Obama to McCain or from Obama to Romney or did not vote. Why not? Because, duh, not a single one of those 690 or so electors thought that Obama is not a Natural Born Citizen.

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#154073 May 2, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Rogue : "All three network newscasts on Monday and Tuesday ignored the shocking assertions made by a whistleblower who told Fox News that special forces could have responded to the 2012 terrorist attack on Benghazi". What BS. What utter speculative BS. Were there US troops on the ground? How far offshore were the ships that carried helicopters? How long to prepare the men, the machines and flight time to the site? Is there a close place where they can land? You know if this whistleblower has the answers to these questions? FBI and CIA turning on Obama? Can you indicate where you got that? You cite Foxnews.com and http://conservativebyte.com ...could you even be more biased?
You would think the birfoon would have had enough of quoting Fox by now.

Fox News ‘Expert’ Outlines Benghazi Rescue Plan That Would Have Worked Great Except For The Time Travel Part
HTTP://WONKETTE.COM/514824/FOX-NEWS-EXPERT-OU...

“Birdzell sums up the quality of Fox’s top-secret anonymous source (who, incidentally, is very worried that the Obama administration may assassinate him for speaking out):“The person in the interview is a clown and I am incredibly disappointed in the news for not using Google.”

On the other hand, we’re pretty sure that if that Special Forces group had made it to Benghazi just in time for a few of its members to be killed as well, then Fox News and Republicans would be praising President Obama for giving a rescue mission the best possible try”

Yeah right, of course they would.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 17 min RoxLo 1,115,129
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 18 min JOEL 69,495
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 19 min Mandela 68,560
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 24 min LessHypeMoreFact 47,002
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 1 hr reality check 50,036
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 2 hr RACE 98,345
Last word + 2 (Mar '12) 2 hr RACE 639

Chicago Jobs

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]