BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 233851 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Truth Detector

Louisville, KY

#154166 May 3, 2013
QUEER Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
derrière, KFC GB, not derriere.
Why does spell-check red-line your spelling, BUT NOT MINE?
Interesting, huh?

Funny, I thought it ended up in your mouth after it had been in your derriere!
We know that you like the natural chocolate flavor, right?

So, you must agree that you love the natural chocolate flavor of shit, right QUEER?
Truth Detector

Louisville, KY

#154167 May 3, 2013
INSIDE EDITION: "Oh look his name is Barry Soetoro!"...and his religion is Islam and his nationality is Indonesian! Geeeez...anyone in this country paying attention?...BTW when did Barry ever change his name legally to Barack Hussein Obama?....Guess what? NEVER!...More importantly when was he EVER an American citizen?...Also NEVER!...

Tell us SHEEPLE, on what date did Barry ever change his name legally back to Barack Hussein Obama?
Surely you know, right?

On what date did Barry ever legally become a US citizen again after being an Indonesian citizen?
Surely you know, right?

Damn, 5 years later and you still can't say, huh?
Truth Detector

Louisville, KY

#154168 May 3, 2013
QUEER Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Sinking deeper and deeper.
The deeper the better, right QUEER?
More chocolate on the dick, huh?
Truth Detector

Louisville, KY

#154169 May 3, 2013
QUEER Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Did someone forget to switch monikers? Somehow sounds familiar.
Proof that you are delusional???
It is still me, QUEER!
Convinced now?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#154170 May 3, 2013
Truth Detector wrote:
<quoted text>
Why does spell-check red-line your spelling, BUT NOT MINE?
Interesting, huh?
Funny, I thought it ended up in your mouth after it had been in your derriere!
We know that you like the natural chocolate flavor, right?
So, you must agree that you love the natural chocolate flavor of shit, right QUEER?
Because spell-check is English language-based. DOH. Try Alt 138 to the è, derrière face LMAO (LRS tm reg'd) Oh, reg'd is red-lined? Wonder why that is? Sigh.

The way you describe, well, your very words: "We know that you like the natural chocolate flavor, right? So, you must agree that you love the natural chocolate flavor of shit, right QUEER?".

Seems you're familiar with what is to most people disgusting stuff but very appetizing to you. And the "queer" thing resurfaces once more. Ever hear of sick kinky, like mixing up feces with derrière and "queer" (KFC GB tm reg'd).
Truth Detector

Louisville, KY

#154171 May 3, 2013
Looks like the QUEER has run off, tired of being clown-stompped once again.
Truth Detector

Louisville, KY

#154172 May 3, 2013
QUEER Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Because spell-check is English language-based. DOH. Try Alt 138 to the è, derrière face LMAO (LRS tm reg'd) Oh, reg'd is red-lined? Wonder why that is? Sigh.
The way you describe, well, your very words: "We know that you like the natural chocolate flavor, right? So, you must agree that you love the natural chocolate flavor of shit, right QUEER?".
Seems you're familiar with what is to most people disgusting stuff but very appetizing to you. And the "queer" thing resurfaces once more. Ever hear of sick kinky, like mixing up feces with derrière and "queer" (KFC GB tm reg'd).
Now you seem to be pissed-off that the Truth Detector is telling the truth about you, huh?
Good QUEER!

Better to be pissed-off than pissed on, but I'll bet that happens to you regularly, huh?

You just don't like the truth being told about your disgusting lifestyle, huh?

I am an American citizen so I spell the English language like an American, Canadian QUEER!

Time to get yourself another dick because YOU STILL SUCK!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#154173 May 3, 2013
Truth Detector wrote:
Looks like the QUEER has run off, tired of being clown-stompped once again.
Run off? He has? Look just above you, post number 154170, whilst your post is number 154171, a mere 3 minutes apart. Foolish man as the griot would say about a sorry specimen like you.

If you think you clown-stomped me, if you really think that, then you REALLY need urgent attention. I recommend you seek help right away. Not pretty to watch. I'm sorry.

Notice "griot" is red-lined. You haven't quite understood the concept of spell-check yet, have you?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#154174 May 3, 2013
QUEER Jacques from Ottawa wrote:

<quoted text>
Did someone forget to switch monikers? Somehow sounds familiar
Truth Detector wrote:
<quoted text>
Proof that you are delusional???
It is still me, QUEER!
Convinced now?
I just posed a question. Touchy, are we not? Defensive too? Wonder why?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#154176 May 3, 2013
Truth Detector wrote:
<quoted text>
Now you seem to be pissed-off that the Truth Detector is telling the truth about you, huh?
Good QUEER!
Better to be pissed-off than pissed on, but I'll bet that happens to you regularly, huh?
You just don't like the truth being told about your disgusting lifestyle, huh?
I am an American citizen so I spell the English language like an American, Canadian QUEER!
Time to get yourself another dick because YOU STILL SUCK!
KFC GB wrote : "I am an American citizen so I spell the English language like an American, Canadian "

How strange. I was having that American/English vs English exchange with laughingstock birfoon LRS. Why are YOU replying in kind? Hmmm, wellllll, let's not get into that. But do try to be careful whilst juggling all those monikers lest you appear even more clownish and depravingly disgusting.
Ellen1

Dedham, MA

#154178 May 3, 2013
Truth Detector wrote:
<quoted text>
The Founding Fathers included the Presidential eligibility clause for one reason, and one reason only.
It was to prevent STUPID Americans from electing and allowing a person with divided loyalties and allegiances to gain access to the Nations top office, later expanded to include the VP office since that person could also gain access to the Nations top office.
The best way to prevent this from happening was requiring that elected person to have TWO US parents at birth and to thereby eliminate all possibility of that person having divided loyalties and allegiances before entering the Nations top office.
The Presidential eligibility clause was created specifically to keep usurpers with divided loyalties and allegiances at birth, like Obama, from ever being elected to the office to begin with.
You really are this STUPID, huh Poopoo stain?
No wonder you are still a Dumbocrat.
Can you say President Cruz?
There is nothing either in the Constitution or the Federalist Papers about two citizen parents being required to be a Natural Born Citizen, or even one, and the AMERICANS (not Swiss) who knew the founders personally and wrote at the time use the term Natural Born Citizen to refer to the place of birth and not the parents.

"Prior to the adoption of the constitution, the people inhabiting the different states might be divided into two classes: natural born citizens, or those born within the state, and aliens, or such as were born out of it. The first, by their birth-right, became entitled to all the privileges of citizens; the second, were entitled to none, but such as were held out and given by the laws of the respective states prior to their emigration....St. George Tucker, BLACKSTONE'S COMMENTARIES: WITH NOTES OF REFERENCE TO THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA.(1803)

"Therefore every person born within the United States, its territories or districts, whether the parents are citizens or aliens, is a natural born citizen in the sense of the Constitution, and entitled to all the rights and privileges appertaining to that capacity."---William Rawle, A VIEW OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 2d ed.(1829)

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#154181 May 3, 2013
I know, I know, you Libtards think the hotter it gets, the more it snows! But to get snow you not only need moisture but you also need freezing temperatures!
Yep, when was the last time it snowed in Arkansas during the month of May? NEVER in recorded history!
Now Libtards, explain that if you can!

Shocking cold and snow in central U.S., first May snow on record in Arkansas
Posted by Jason Samenow on May 3, 2013

The third day of a brutal snap of wintry weather – in May – is shattering records in the central U.S. After the biggest snows ever observed in the month of May in Iowa, Minnesota, and Wisconsin Thursday, Arkansas experienced its first May snowflakes in history today.
The National Weather Service in Little Rock broke the news about the historic flakes with a tweet noting snow and/or sleet had been reported at 3 airports in the northwest part of the state.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-w...

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#154182 May 3, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
I know, I know, you Libtards think the hotter it gets, the more it snows! But to get snow you not only need moisture but you also need freezing temperatures!
Yep, when was the last time it snowed in Arkansas during the month of May? NEVER in recorded history!
Now Libtards, explain that if you can!
Shocking cold and snow in central U.S., first May snow on record in Arkansas
Posted by Jason Samenow on May 3, 2013
The third day of a brutal snap of wintry weather – in May – is shattering records in the central U.S. After the biggest snows ever observed in the month of May in Iowa, Minnesota, and Wisconsin Thursday, Arkansas experienced its first May snowflakes in history today.
The National Weather Service in Little Rock broke the news about the historic flakes with a tweet noting snow and/or sleet had been reported at 3 airports in the northwest part of the state.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-w...
All over Ontario and Québec, which combined are three times the size of Texas, temps are 20F + over the norm. Whatever can it mean, Rogue? Hotter and dryer than usual in Southern Cal, Rogue. Whatever can it mean?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#154183 May 3, 2013
It is fun watching Libtards try and explain why Climate Change does not seem to be working out as they thought it would.
Yep, the Chicken Littles are afraid the sky will not fall.

"However, the inter-annual variability is large—the ice extent by the end of the summer varies by several million square kilometres from year to year. The underlying processes driving this year-to-year variability are not well understood. Here we demonstrate that the greenhouse effect associated with clouds and water vapour in spring is crucial for the development of the sea ice during the subsequent months. In years where the end-of-summer sea-ice extent is well below normal, a significantly enhanced transport of humid air is evident during spring into the region where the ice retreat is encountered."
http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/n...

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#154184 May 3, 2013
PS : And I see in Northern Europe North Sea are, temps are 17F above normal, Rogue. Whatever can it mean?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#154185 May 3, 2013
What Medieval Warm Period? Prior to 1990 EVERYONE agreed about the Medieval Warm Period and then around 1995 the Medieval Warm Period .... disappeared! And that is a Convenient Truth two!!!

A Peer-Reviewed Deception
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#154187 May 3, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
It is fun watching Libtards try and explain why Climate Change does not seem to be working out as they thought it would.
Yep, the Chicken Littles are afraid the sky will not fall.
"However, the inter-annual variability is large—the ice extent by the end of the summer varies by several million square kilometres from year to year. The underlying processes driving this year-to-year variability are not well understood. Here we demonstrate that the greenhouse effect associated with clouds and water vapour in spring is crucial for the development of the sea ice during the subsequent months. In years where the end-of-summer sea-ice extent is well below normal, a significantly enhanced transport of humid air is evident during spring into the region where the ice retreat is encountered."
http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/n...
When will you quit cutting and pasting scientific treatises that suit your Non-scientific birther mind only? What does it serve if you don't understand studies aimed at the scientific community, the latter having stated unequivocally that there is climate change and we are warming?

I am old enough to have lived both global warming and change. No more springs here in Ottawa - we go straight from winter to summer. We were freezing last week, now close to 80F last 3 days. We had snow 25 days ago for heaven's sake! Fog has almost abandoned London and the Benelux, Northern France. Dry hot weather all over have created havoc in our forests worldwide (makes for good business for Canada selling its water bombers...). We'll soon have a free Arctic passage - 30 years more or less they say. I'll go with the majority of scientists on this. You stick with the Petroleum and mining-sponsored scientists. And I'll pit my lack of scientific knowledge on the issue against yours any time at all.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#154188 May 3, 2013
Pope Francis 1 was finishing his sermon. He ended it with the Latin phrase,"Tuti Homini" - Blessed be Mankind.

A Woman's Rights Group approached the Pope the next day. They noticed that the Pope blessed all Mankind, but not Womankind.

So the next day, after his sermon, the Pope concluded by saying, "Tuti Homini, et Tuti Femini" - Blessed be Mankind and Womankind.

The day after, a Gay Rights Group approached the Pope. They said that they noticed that he blessed Mankind and Womankind and asked if he could also bless gay people.

The Pope said, "Sure."

The next day the Pope concluded his sermon with, "Tuti Homini, et Tuti Femini, et Tuti Fruiti."
Truth Detector

Louisville, KY

#154189 May 3, 2013
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
There is nothing either in the Constitution or the Federalist Papers about two citizen parents being required to be a Natural Born Citizen,
How could a person who was only born here of Foreign 2 foreign parents not have divided loyalties and allegiances due to their parentage?
Could you see them launching an attack against the country that their their parents were still CITIZENS of?

House Report No. 784, dated June 22, 1874, stated,“The United States have not recognized a ‘double allegiance.’ By our law a citizen is bound to be ‘true and faithful’ alone to our government.

This national rule prevents us from interpreting natural-born citizen under common law rules because it eliminates the possibility of a child being born with more than one claim of allegiance.

This remark by Howard puts his earlier citizenship clause remark into proper context:“This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.

The Founding Fathers included the Presidential eligibility clause for one reason, and one reason only.
It was to prevent STUPID Americans from electing and allowing a person with divided loyalties and allegiances to gain access to the Nations top office, later expanded to include the VP office since that person could also gain access to the Nations top office.
The best way to prevent this from happening was requiring that elected person to have TWO US parents at birth and to thereby eliminate all possibility of that person having divided loyalties and allegiances before entering the Nations top office.
The Presidential eligibility clause was created specifically to keep usurpers with divided loyalties and allegiances at birth, like Obama, from ever being elected to the office to begin with.
You really are this STUPID, huh Poopoo stain?
No wonder you are still a Dumbocrat.
Can you say President Cruz?
Truth Detector

Louisville, KY

#154190 May 3, 2013
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
There is nothing either in the Constitution or the Federalist Papers about two citizen parents being required to be a Natural Born Citizen,
How could a person who was only born here of 2 Foreign parents not have divided loyalties and allegiances at birth due to their parentage?
Could you see them launching an attack against the country that their their parents were still CITIZENS of?

House Report No. 784, dated June 22, 1874, stated,“The United States have not recognized a ‘double allegiance.’ By our law a citizen is bound to be ‘true and faithful’ alone to our government.

This national rule prevents us from interpreting natural-born citizen under common law rules because it eliminates the possibility of a child being born with more than one claim of allegiance.

This remark by Howard puts his earlier citizenship clause remark into proper context:“This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.

The Founding Fathers included the Presidential eligibility clause for one reason, and one reason only.
It was to prevent STUPID Americans from electing and allowing a person with divided loyalties and allegiances to gain access to the Nations top office, later expanded to include the VP office since that person could also gain access to the Nations top office.
The best way to prevent this from happening was requiring that elected person to have TWO US parents at birth and to thereby eliminate all possibility of that person having divided loyalties and allegiances before entering the Nations top office.
The Presidential eligibility clause was created specifically to keep usurpers with divided loyalties and allegiances at birth, like Obama, from ever being elected to the office to begin with.
You really are this STUPID, huh Poopoo stain?
No wonder you are still a Dumbocrat.
Can you say President Cruz?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min ritedownthemiddle 1,478,884
News AP Exclusive: Union members appointed after $10... (Mar '08) 44 min WTK 7,581
last post wins! (Dec '10) 51 min They cannot kill ... 2,884
Free at last 1 hr former democrat 1
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 2 hr Patriot AKA Bozo 62,874
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 2 hr Ize Found 71,306
Review: B52 Van Lines (Apr '15) 3 hr yenrand 32

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages