BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 196932 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#154041 May 2, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! The only thing that sucks, is you inability to understand what you read.
Says the moron that runs for cover everytime his fable is challenged
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#154042 May 2, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, a non-judicial opinion. Worthless!
Rogue Moron again proves he is too dumb and has too little an attention span to read the WKA decision. The words are used interchangeably throughout.

There is only citizenship or alien status.

Citizenship is only distinguished between naturalized and natural born. Anyone born in the country not to an invading force or diplomat parents is a natural born citizen.

This is law that has been settled for over 100 years. It's not going to be overturned for the like of a few birfoons, and soon you'll see the requirements to become president loosened to include those wholly foreign born, but probably not within the lifetimes of elderly and idiotic birfoons.

Boo hoo hoo.
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#154043 May 2, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! The only thing that sucks, is you inability to understand what you read.
Justice Dumbarse, too bad you're unable to actually support your inanities.

You're a strict constructionalist, whoop de doo.

All you need now is to actually be right and to get four more Justices on the SC that have similar forms of interpretation.

Too bad neither of those things is happening, huh?

Boo hoo hoo
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#154044 May 2, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Says the moron that runs for cover everytime his fable is challenged
LMAO!!! You a challenge, surly you jest!! You better learn to read, first!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#154045 May 2, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Evangelicals? What's that go to the with the Constitution?
What does this" "What's that go to the with the Constitution?", mean?
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#154046 May 2, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! You a challenge, surly you jest!! You better learn to read, first!!!
Duck and cover Dufus. Duck and cover

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#154047 May 2, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
The MD Court disagrees. They say that SCOTUS clearly held that born here = natural born citizen.
So did the AZ Court ...
Allen v. Obama (Arizona 2012) ruling:“Most importantly, Arizona courts are bound by United States Supreme Court precedent in construing the United States Constitution, Arizona v. Jay J. Garfield Bldg. Co., 39 Ariz. 45, 54, 3 P.2d 983, 986(1931), and this precedent fully supports that President Obama is a natural born citizen under the Constitution and thus qualified to hold the office of President
Ah, states can not rule on the constitutionality of any federal law! Only federal courts can do that.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#154048 May 2, 2013
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Justice Dumbarse, too bad you're unable to actually support your inanities.
You're a strict constructionalist, whoop de doo.
All you need now is to actually be right and to get four more Justices on the SC that have similar forms of interpretation.
Too bad neither of those things is happening, huh?
Boo hoo hoo
LMAO!!! I don't have to support anything, that is all accomplished by the framers of the Constitution and its amendments.
I don't need the USSC, they do not have the final say, that is left to the US Constitution, its amendment and those that framed both.
The US Constitution has jurisdiction over all three branches of our government and precedents can not be set with Unconstitutional rulings.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#154049 May 2, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
You wrote : "At the time of the assault, no one knew how long it would last. What if it had gone on for a few days?" Thanks for answering my question. So, nothing COULD be done. Why have you been constantly blaming Obama for not taking action? And why do you suppose he or Sec of State Clinton would've been informed from the very beginning of the attack?
Preventing witnesses? What about Clinton and CIA head testimonies? Can you go much higher than that? How is Obama preventing other witnesses from testifying? Any inside info about that? ALL networks report what or what they don't want to report. That is why trash like foxnews.com is still allowed to function. Oh, I don't hate Foxnews.com . You invented that. Show me where I said I hated foxnews.com . Hate is a strong word. I hardly ever use it except to say I hate green peas.
Oh, you don't have an embassy in Benghazi. Embassies can only be located in capital cities. That would be Tripoli.
Ah, Hillary Clinton and the "CIA head" were not in Benghazi at the time of the attack. Let's say you get pulled over for drunk driving and when you go to court, you refuse to testify. But you friend who was not with you the night of the DUI claims you were not drunk. How would he know, he was not there? Oh, he asked you and you were not drunk, so that was why he was qualified to answer for you?!?
Now, you say networks only have to report what they want to and not report what they want to be but did not Poopo bash Fox News two weeks ago because they did not cover Obama's award ceremony in Israel?
And if they do not report on a particular subject because someone at the White House told them not to , OR ELSE, is that okay?
You Libtardian Logic is showing!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#154051 May 2, 2013
How/s that twit out west that is being tried for murdering her boy friend and that seems to be a very big issue with ABC, CBS, NBC,,,,, and Fox News. But only Fox News is covering the Dr. Gosnell murder trial and the Gosnell trial potentially will have a very big impact on the whole country will little miss twit will not.
I don't know the name of the twit and I am not sure if the trial is in California or Nevada or another state. And I don't care either. But a low of low-IQ people seem interested in it!
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#154052 May 2, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Duck and cover Dufus. Duck and cover
LMAO!!! Your post is just like you, irrelevant!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#154054 May 2, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
I have already stated my interests. Poopo thinks Obama's award ceremony was far more important that this murder trial. And apparently the LSM also feels that way.<quoted text>
Not one of you Libtards has ever explained what Obama did in 2008 to win the 2008 Nobel Peace Prize? Being the first half-black to be elected president is not a reason to be even recommended for the Nobel Peace Prize.
In other words, the Nobel Peace Prize has become a Liberal political football
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
You really need to do something about your senility Rogue as it appears to be getting worse and I do believe they have medication that can at least slow the progression.
Liberals need not explain anything the Nobel committee does as they have their own proficient spokes persons who are very capable of explaining their own decisions whether you agree with them or not.
That said, I’ll post the same explanation and video I posted a couple of weeks ago when you posited the same question. However in short he was awarded the prize for his vision.
“The president has produced an entirely new international climate since taking office, which is a concrete achievement in and of itself”
http://www.truthdig.com/avbooth/item/20091009...
Zoom, right over your head. What does,“The president has produced an entirely new international climate since taking office, which is a concrete achievement in and of itself”, mean?
Okay, I will type slow----ly sooooo you miiiight betttter under----stand. Thw award was for what he did in 2008, right? No, go to the video and pick up at 1:08 where he says, "the preceding year", which means DURING that year.
And last,“produced an entirely new international climate since..." is NOT an accomplishment!
And one final comment, why is this Nobel idiot trying to explain this? If it is so evident he was the best selection, they no one would have questioned it much less tens of thousands of people from all over the world.
To me, the Nobel Peace Prize has become a, "Hey, I am more Socialistic than you are", which makes it meaningless.
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#154055 May 2, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! I don't have to support anything, that is all accomplished by the framers of the Constitution and its amendments.
I don't need the USSC, they do not have the final say, that is left to the US Constitution, its amendment and those that framed both.
The US Constitution has jurisdiction over all three branches of our government and precedents can not be set with Unconstitutional rulings.
Yeah, you're crazy. Sorry you're an idiot and crazy.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#154056 May 2, 2013
Any person with the slightest amount of integrity would have aks that his name withdrawn from consideration and if he did win would graciously decline the Nobel Peace Prize. If he had, he would have won over many more people's RESPECT and that is far more important than winning a popularity contest.
But Obama is an egomaniac who thinks the Sun revolves around him.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#154057 May 2, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Duck and cover Dufus. Duck and cover
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! Your post is just like you, irrelevant!
He sooo stupid he does not realize he is just a piss ant.
Well, got to take my girl out to diner. Check back in tomorrow.

“zero nuclear weapons”

Since: Sep 08

Perryville

#154059 May 2, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
We, at no time, carpet bomb any populated area. We did carpet bomb the tunnel area of Cu Chi and the Ho Chi Minh Trail in Cambodia and Laos.
Cu Chi tunnels
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cu_Chi_tunnels
Oh, and the Phoenix Program started in 1965 under LBJ but continued until 1972 under Nixon. That is like if we today murdered every village chief in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Phoenix Program was by and large, just plain murder.
Phoenix Program
The program was in operation between 1965 and 1972, and similar efforts existed both before and after that period. By 1972, Phoenix operatives had "neutralized" 81,740 suspected NLF operatives, informants and supporters, of whom 26,369 were killed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenix_Program
BTW, the VC and NVA were doing the same thing but two wrongs do not make a right. In any event, Kissinger may have know about it but he had nothing to do with it.
At no time, carpet bomb any populated area then Rouge what about this then!!

The Christmas bombings of Hanoi December 1972, US president Richard Nixon ordered a brutal intensive bombing campaign against the capital city of Hanoi, using a large number of B-52 strategic bombers and tactical aircraft.


This was the biggest, bloodiest bombardment conducted by the US Air Force since the end of World War II, on the pretext of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam “refusing” to resume the Peace Conference in Paris.



During the 12-day-and-night campaign, codenamed Operation Linebacker II, starting on December 18, the US Air Force and Navy dispatched 729 B-52 sorties and nearly 4000 tactical aircraft sorties to drop 80,000 tonnes of bombs onto military and industrial targets in North Vietnam, especially Hanoi and Haiphong. Hanoi alone suffered 40,000 tonnes of bombs, many of which hit the centre and densely populated areas

2,300 civilians, including nearly 1,500 people in Hanoi.

So explain that then.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#154060 May 2, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Evangelicals? What's that go to the with the Constitution?
Beautiful use of the English language! Brilliant! LMAO!
Nasrat

Jacksonville, FL

#154061 May 2, 2013
Obama Finds Out Gun Control Failed In The Senate
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#154062 May 2, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey stupid, that is NOT the findings of United States v. Wong Kim Ark. Show us in the ORIGINAL findings of United States v. Wong Kim Ark and no other interpretations of it.
But the fact is a no place in United States v. Wong Kim Ark does it mention "natural born citizen" and neither is it mentioned in the Fourteen Amendment!
You have a bad habit of calling others stupid simply because they and everyone else finds the birfoon interpretation of what constitutes a NBC both odd and fringe to say the least.

First off there are only two classes of citizen in this country and they are natural born and naturalized. A born citizen is in fact a natural born citizen and Wong Kim Ark was found to be a born citizen.

It doesn’t matter that you “think” the court should have spelled out NBC in their decision or the 14 amendment should have spelled it out because to date there were and are only two classes of citizen from which to choose and only one of those could possibly a NBC.

The point being no court or amendment has added your two parent third citizenship class and because you believe it should be so don’t make it so and it certainly is no cause for you to call those who disagree with you (which is every legal scholar in the country) stupid.

You’ll also note that absolutely no one has questioned Obama’s NBC status save the ignorant birfoon so that alone should tell something
Nasrat

Jacksonville, FL

#154063 May 2, 2013
Seattle police fight protesters arresting 15 Tea Partiers

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 8 min An NFL Fan 1,276,765
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 21 min Prince Reebus 100,641
Word (Dec '08) 45 min boundary painter 5,426
Ask Amy 9-1-15 51 min Mrs Gladys Kravitz 11
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr IB DaMann 54,541
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 1 hr boundary painter 6,428
Dear Abby 9-1-15 1 hr boundary painter 7
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages