BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

#152031 Apr 20, 2013
Poppo,
The Christian Science Monitor? I thought you were better than that.
Let me remind you Pops, in case you don't know....I am too busy working to follow the news as closely as others. Too busy contributing to the welfare of the nation to keep up with warm and fuzzy feel good polls that sample less than 2,000 people nationwide.
loose

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#152032 Apr 20, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
How can I lose when I'm not playing? LMAO You poor SAP. Go spread your special hatred elsewhere. squidfin
You're right. The only time you DON'T lose is when you don't play. My bad.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#152033 Apr 20, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
This, coming from you, the most anti and UnAmerican traitor and violator of the constitution along with American traitor Pravda lady. What a joke.
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
You're the best joke on Topix, jackfish! You're just too flat-out stupid to know it! Really. You poor SAP.
So you don't deny it. Thank you.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#152034 Apr 20, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
1. I merely repeated what was being broadcast on the news. It was not an article. No reason for me to apologize. LMAO dumbdumb
You passed on hateful and ignorant propaganda from an ignorant and hateful right-wing source and you knew it. Error still to be acknoweldged and apology required after which we will proceed to the other errors and apologies you owe this forum and its posterz.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#152035 Apr 20, 2013
posters

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#152036 Apr 20, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>Jack, what do you want me to apologize for, let me see!
How about having a moniker that in no way resembles a Justicde. Then, how about your non-respect of the constitution, for example, the legal election of Obama which you do not respect, based on looney-tooney interpretation of the constitution particularly as refers to the 14th. Lastly, for now at least, for being so ignorant, boorish, and anti-American.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#152037 Apr 20, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
We are sorry to inform you that the information you have requested is top secret. You may re-submit your request in six months.
Okay, I accept your roundabout admission of ignorance.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#152038 Apr 20, 2013
LRS wrote:
Oh jackfish, where's that post, in which you claim, I admitted to being lol? LMAO! And the explanation on how I can change my location. In your words, prove it all now! LMAO!
Was it you who said that the injured Saudi (finish line, Marathon) should be arrested, that there was a meeting between the Saudi Amb and Obama after which this suspect was to be spirited out of the US and his country flattened? Not accusing,just asking.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#152040 Apr 20, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
You passed on hateful and ignorant propaganda from an ignorant and hateful right-wing source and you knew it. Error still to be acknoweldged and apology required after which we will proceed to the other errors and apologies you owe this forum and its posterz.
Will you apologize for demanding an apology about the claim that the Boston Marathon bombers were Muslims??? We claimed there were and YOU denied that they were Muslims but you had the gault to demand an apology for YOUR error!
Libtards never apologize!
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

#152042 Apr 20, 2013
Robert Laity wrote:
<quoted text>
The Judge is delusional. Obama is a usurper.
No Obama really was born in Hawaii, as his birth certificate and the confirmation of the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii and the Index Data files and the birth notices sent to the papers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961 all show. And the meaning of Natural Born Citizen really does refer to the place of birth, not to the citizenship of two or even one parent.
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

#152043 Apr 20, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! I see you are still trying to use 115+ years of Unconstitutional court rulings to make a point!
"This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are (*foreigners, aliens,) who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons." (Congressional Globe, 2890)
(*) Would you please explain to us how this could be, since you say all children born in the US are citizens.
It is very simple and easy to explain. The Congressman you quote was giving his OPINION, which is not what the US Supreme Court---which is the final authority---RULED. The opinion of one congressman, even a prominent one, is not the final decision on the matter. The US Supreme Court IS.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#152044 Apr 20, 2013
This sounds like Jacques: "Here was my personal favorite by one reader: "Hey dumbass, he's not islamic, but he was russian.""

Is Everyone Afraid to say Islamic Extremist?

The entire storyline of the two men responsible for the horrible terrorist attack during the Boston Marathon has me completely stunned. These two radicals, picked a very public event and a location they knew would be filled with people, including children, and decided they wanted to kill Americans. Yet, in all the coverage, the phrase all media avoided like the plague, was the one that was the most obvious and readily known: they were Islamic extremists.
First here's a little bit of history just to refresh the minds of the media and those others out there who think these very public acts of terror are somehow NOT motivated by a religion whose extremist wing is hell bent on destroying America:

* 18 April 1983 – The April 1983 U.S. Embassy bombing, Beirut, Lebanon by the Islamic Jihad Organization, 63 dead, 120 injured

* 26 February 1993 – World Trade Center bombing, in New York City. 6 killed.

* 7 August 1998 – United States embassy bombings in Tanzania and Kenya. 224 dead. 4000+ injured.

* October 12, 2000 - USS Cole bombing at a Yemen port. 17 American sailors were killed, 39 injured.

* 11 September 2001 – 4 planes hijacked by 19 al-Qaeda hijackers: two planes crashed into World Trade Center and one into the The Pentagon. Nearly 3000 dead.

* 22 December 2001 - Richard Reid attempted shoe bombing on American Airlines Flight 63

* 11 September 2012 - On the anniversary of the 2001 September 11th attacks in the United States, Islamist militants killed 4 and wounded 7 in the Benghazi U.S. Consulate attack

Just talk a look at the expanded list to see what's been going on around the world over the past few decades.

And yet, when the reports started flowing in following the terrorist attack in Boston, it appeared the media all followed a two-step process.

* Step 1 -- Blame a far right, white, extremist man or Organization

* Step 2 -- Keep quiet about the real background of the bombers

Let's look at Step 1. As I watched the initial coverage, I switched back and forth between Fox and CNN. At one point on CNN (and this was on the day of the bombing when the only thing that was going on was replaying the bombing videos over and over again), Wolf Blitzer was talking to a guest who brought up the idea that it could be a member of a white supremacist group. He brought this up simply because, "We've been hearing about that in the news a lot lately."

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#152045 Apr 20, 2013
As reported in Politic.com , MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell blamed the NRA for delays in the Boston Marathon investigation. MSNBC's Chris Matthews immediately tried to link the bombing to a far right group.

I could go on and on, but let's move to Step 2. NO ONE, not even Fox News, was reporting that these guys... these terrorist bombers... were Islamic extremists. Why? Is it politically incorrect to identify them for what they are?

It was quite amazing on Friday when GOPUSA ran it's lead story with the headline: One Islamic Bomber Dead, One on the Run; Boston Suburbs Locked Down. It was amazing, because some people actually wrote in and complained that we used the word "Islamic." Some accused us of spreading rumors. Others blamed us for "poor reporting." And why? Simply because they hadn't heard it anywhere else.

Here was my personal favorite by one reader: "Hey dumbass, he's not islamic, but he was russian."

There's so much I could say about that one sentence. I guess this guy doesn't know the difference between a religion and a nationality.

The fact is that even while most of the media were silent, the information was EASILY available. They guys were Islamic extremists. One posted a video with an "Extremist Religious Prophecy Associated with Al Qaeda" on YouTube.

All of this information was out there, and yet even conservative web sites avoided the obvious.

I guess the media was just too upset that it wasn't a freaked-out white guy. Instead, it's one more chilling example, just like we saw in Benghazi, of a strain of humanity that is clearly inhuman.

http://www.gopusa.com/theloft/2013/04/20/is-e...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#152048 Apr 20, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
You're right. The only time you DON'T lose is when you don't play. My bad.

So you don't deny it. Thank you.

You passed on hateful and ignorant propaganda from an ignorant and hateful right-wing source and you knew it. Error still to be acknoweldged and apology required after which we will proceed to the other errors and apologies you owe this forum and its posterz.

How about having a moniker that in no way resembles a Justicde. Then, how about your non-respect of the constitution, for example, the legal election of Obama which you do not respect, based on looney-tooney interpretation of the constitution particularly as refers to the 14th. Lastly, for now at least, for being so ignorant, boorish, and anti-American.

Okay, I accept your roundabout admission of ignorance.
Jacques, you are sounding like a sad little troll these days. Tell us, are the Boston Marathon bombers Muslims, Christians or Jews?

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

#152050 Apr 20, 2013
Poppo,
I do not doubt that 90% of Americans favor stringent background checks for firearms purchases. However, let it be known, I do not think legislation will curb the culture of violence that is present in some segments of society.
loose

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

#152052 Apr 20, 2013
Poppo
Do you think the Boston Bomber will be Mirandized and tried in open court, or will he be secreted off to Guantanimo Bay, never to be seen or heard from again?

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

#152053 Apr 20, 2013
Poppo,
It is a pivotal moment for the president and the country wether or not he is read his Miranda rights.
The ultimate decision will come from the Oval Office, which puts Barack Obama in a pickle considering his campaign pledges.
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

#152054 Apr 20, 2013
SHEEPLE Buster wrote:
<quoted text>
We know, his accomplices and stupid SHEEPLE like you have said so, SO IT MUST BE TRUE, Right?
Yep, I'm SMellen1, SHEEPLE!
No, the facts say so.

For Obama to have been born in a foreign country:(1) Obama’s relatives would have had to have been rich enough (and they weren't) and dumb enough to send their daughter to a foreign country to give birth----—despite there being fine hospitals in Hawaii; (2) Obama’s mother would have had to have traveled overseas ALONE and somehow got Obama back to the USA without getting him entered on her US passport or getting a visa for him (which would have had to have been applied for in a US consulate in that country and the records would still exist); (3) got the officials in Hawaii to record his birth in Hawaii despite (as birthers claim) his being born in another country and somehow got the teacher who wrote home to her father, named Stanley, about the birth in Hawaii of a child to a woman named Stanley to lie (and since the woman’s father's name really was Stanley, she would have had to have found one of the very few women with fathers of that name to do it).

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#152055 Apr 20, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
The purpose of the Federal Government is to protect and uphold the Constitution of the United States.
Then why do you and your birther ilk constantly fight parts of said constitution?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#152056 Apr 20, 2013
SHEEPLE Buster wrote:
...Ratings Prove Fox 'Most Trusted Name In News'
Proof please.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 12 min Yeah 1,124,792
Chicago a model city 13 min Just me 6
Father Of Hans Peterson Speaks Out (Oct '07) 1 hr Getagrip 44
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 1 hr Boy G 50,587
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 1 hr casting director 98,497
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 3 hr Eric 69,964
Birth mother 3 hr It is me 3
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago Jobs

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]