BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story
American Lady

Danville, KY

#151865 Apr 19, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Not until you tell me how yours performed. Oops, firsr, you have to get a date LMAO (LRS wing man tm reg'd).
Wingman

SOUNDS
more
"enticing"

Than you & your ILK ... put "together!"

)8~D>

ALL in a "single - 1 - one" ... MAN!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#151866 Apr 19, 2013
For you, Rogue. The " I don't want to join the Euro club" UK has just lost its AAA credit rating. It's not good news for them or for us, and nothing to rejoice about, but just goes to show, once mroe, how wrong you constantly are.

FYI, have a gander at this link, will suprise you when you see who has good and bad reviews and how few Triple As there are.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_cr...

If link does not work, as it often does not, just click "list of AAA countries"

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#151867 Apr 19, 2013
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
Wingman
SOUNDS
more
"enticing"
Than you & your ILK ... put "together!"
)8~D>
ALL in a "single - 1 - one" ... MAN!
Stop the hem and haw, tell me, how'd it work?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#151868 Apr 19, 2013
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
Wingman
SOUNDS
more
"enticing"
Than you & your ILK ... put "together!"
)8~D>
ALL in a "single - 1 - one" ... MAN!
Why do you like a liar, an ignorant birfoon buffoon birther, a "person" who constantly makes death threat, a tratior (oops, guess alikes attract), a foul-mouthed boor who spews profanities by the barrel and an undependable wing man that crashes all the time? Strange.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#151869 Apr 19, 2013
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
No, every child born in the USA except for the children of foreign diplomats is born "subject to the jurisdiction."
This court ruling is right, and you are wrong:
Mustata v. US Dept. of Justice, 179 F.3d 1017 (6th Cir. 1999)(children born in US to two Romanian citizens described as “natural born citizens” of the US):
“Petitioners Marian and Lenuta Mustata are citizens of Romania. At the time of their petition, they resided in Michigan with their two minor children, who are natural born citizens of the United States.”
And this court ruling is right, and you are wrong:
Diaz-Salazar v. INS, 700 F.2d 1156 (7th Cir. 1983)(child born in US to Mexican citizen is “natural born citizen” of US):
“Petitioner, Sebastian Diaz-Salazar, entered the United States illegally [from Mexico] in 1974 and has been living and working in Chicago since that time.*** The relevant facts which have been placed before the INS, BIA, and this court can be summarized as follows: The petitioner has a wife and two children under the age of three in Chicago; the children are natural-born citizens of the United States.”
And:
Nwankpa v. Kissinger, 376 F. Supp. 122 (M.D. Ala. 1974)(child born in US to two Biafra citizens described as “natural born citizen” of the US):
“The Plaintiff was a native of Biafra, now a part of the Republic of Nigeria. His wife and two older children are also natives of that country, but his third child, a daughter, is a natural-born citizen of the United States.”
And this:
Ankeny v. Governor of Indiana (Indiana 2008 – Appellate Court) ruling:“Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”
And this:
Tisdale v. Obama (Virginia federal court 2012) ruling :“It is well settled that those born in the United States are considered natural born citizens.”
And this:
Hollander v. McCain (New Hampshire 2008) ruling:“Those born “in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” U.S. Const., amend. XIV, have been considered American citizens under American law in effect since the time of the founding, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 674-75 (1898), and thus eligible for the presidency..."
And here is the US Supreme Court in the Wong Kim Ark case:
"It thus clearly appears that, by the law of England for the last three centuries, beginning before the settlement of this country and continuing to the present day, aliens, while residing in the dominions possessed by the Crown of England, were within the allegiance, the obedience, the faith or loyalty, the protection, the power, the jurisdiction of the English Sovereign, and therefore every child born in England of alien parents was a natural-born subject unless the child of an ambassador or other diplomatic agent of a foreign State or of an alien enemy in hostile occupation of the place where the child was born.
III. The same rule was in force in all the English Colonies upon this continent down to the time of the Declaration of Independence, and in the United States afterwards, and continued to prevail under the Constitution as originally established."
They are right, and you are wrong.
LMAO!!! I see you are still trying to use 115+ years of Unconstitutional court rulings to make a point!

"This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are (*foreigners, aliens,) who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons." (Congressional Globe, 2890)

(*) Would you please explain to us how this could be, since you say all children born in the US are citizens.

“zero nuclear weapons”

Since: Sep 08

Perryville

#151870 Apr 19, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
But Adam Lanza should not have been? How about the guy who shot Gabby Giffords or the nice guy who shot up that theater in Aurora, CO?
They were nuts and they had no connections to any black op at all.
Only nuts like Alex Jones sees conections well he sees them in his warped mind
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#151871 Apr 19, 2013
Here we are on the verge of granting amnesty to 11,000,000+ criminals, from what has happen this week, we need a good dose of xenophobia, it is well overdue.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#151872 Apr 19, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! I see you are still trying to use 115+ years of Unconstitutional court rulings to make a point!

"This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are (*foreigners, aliens,) who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons." (Congressional Globe, 2890)

(*) Would you please explain to us how this could be, since you say all children born in the US are citizens.
More blather from the Dufus I see you're sTill dodging that low hanging fruit
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#151873 Apr 19, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
Here we are on the verge of granting amnesty to 11,000,000+ criminals, from what has happen this week, we need a good dose of xenophobia, it is well overdue.
LOL, you'd think a wise and learned justice like Justice Dumbarse would know which body of law to apply instead of his racist fantasies.

Under what federal criminal statue are you prosecuting these "criminals?"
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#151874 Apr 19, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
NRA Members strongly oppose new gun restrictions, poll finds: Posted by Scott Clement on January 25, 2013
Strong majorities of National Rifle Association members reject newly proposed gun restrictions, according to a survey released Thursday by the gun advocacy organization.
The poll finds more than eight in 10 NRA members oppose bans on high-capacity ammunition clips and semi-automatic assault weapons, with at least seven in 10 opposing each “strongly.” At the same time, 91 percent support changing laws to stop people with a mental illness from acquiring guns, and 82 percent favor placing armed guards in every school, a central proposal of the advocacy organization.
While some survey questions ask about gun restrictions that go beyond what President Obama laid out in a news conference last week — such as bans on private sales and confiscation of previously purchased high-capacity clips — the poll may provide the clearest look at where NRA members stand on new gun restrictions.
Who cares what NRA members want?

There are only has a purported 4.5 million members, and probably actually significantly less than that.

That's a tiny fraction of the US population (0.014%), and a tiny fraction of registered voters too (0.03%)

The NRA's sole function is to help gun manufactures sell more guns, and they only represent a tiny fraction of the US population. To say anything otherwise is to lie, which is the specialty of birfoons.
American Lady

Danville, KY

#151875 Apr 19, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you like a liar, an ignorant birfoon buffoon birther, a "person" who constantly makes death threat, a tratior (oops, guess alikes attract), a foul-mouthed boor who spews profanities by the barrel and an undependable wing man that crashes all the time? Strange.
Uncle Tab wrote:
<quoted text>
One million people in Boston are staying in there homes, a suburb is closed down, law enforement agencies are doing house to house searches for terrorists..... And you say get chips and dip for a weekend while we track down terrorists.
Figure Thunder Over Louisville is of higher priority than terrorists.
Coming from the crazy catlady with the mentally unstable daughter she raised claiming to be a true American Patriot.
Womder how long it wil take you unstable republicans to say this is a practice exercise to take guns?
LMMFAO@you idiots
Nuff said!---- END of quote!
``````````

yeah ...

HOW do "you" THINK
those boys FATHER "feels" ...???

With the obot admin ...

PLAYING

"Call of DUTY"

out
on
LIVE TV

SUCH "in your FACE"
violence

just

CREATES
MORE
in your FACE ... V-I-O-L-E-N-C-E ....

you "ignorant" peeps!
``````````

MORE from uncle "spewy" ...

His father is in Russia, one thing I can bet on.... Russia will make sure his father is taken care of. They don't want an international incident.

Truth be told, Russia may well have already killed the father.

You love your doom, gloom, and fear!!

Kinda funny that you call yourself a brave patriot as you cower in fear.

Idiot!

==========

AL posts:
Bomber’s Father[In a telephone interview from the Russian city of Makhachkala]

Issues Warning To U.S.:

If My Son Is Killed,‘All Hell Will Break Loose’

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/bombers-father-iss...
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#151876 Apr 19, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
More blather from the Dufus I see you're sTill dodging that low hanging fruit
LMAO!!! You are irrelevant!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#151877 Apr 19, 2013
nebka wrote:
<quoted text>
They were nuts and they had no connections to any black op at all.
Only nuts like Alex Jones sees conections well he sees them in his warped mind
And you aren't warped? What does this week in Boston mean to you? The Muslims love us? Tell us, do Americans "target" women and children"? You need to slither back under the rock from whence you came.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#151878 Apr 19, 2013
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
Uncle Tab wrote:
<quoted text>
One million people in Boston are staying in there homes, a suburb is closed down, law enforement agencies are doing house to house searches for terrorists..... And you say get chips and dip for a weekend while we track down terrorists.
Figure Thunder Over Louisville is of higher priority than terrorists.
Coming from the crazy catlady with the mentally unstable daughter she raised claiming to be a true American Patriot.
Womder how long it wil take you unstable republicans to say this is a practice exercise to take guns?
LMMFAO@you idiots
Nuff said!---- END of quote!
``````````
yeah ...
HOW do "you" THINK
those boys FATHER "feels" ...???
With the obot admin ...
PLAYING
"Call of DUTY"
out
on
LIVE TV
SUCH "in your FACE"
violence
just
CREATES
MORE
in your FACE ... V-I-O-L-E-N-C-E ....
you "ignorant" peeps!
``````````
MORE from uncle "spewy" ...
His father is in Russia, one thing I can bet on.... Russia will make sure his father is taken care of. They don't want an international incident.
Truth be told, Russia may well have already killed the father.
You love your doom, gloom, and fear!!
Kinda funny that you call yourself a brave patriot as you cower in fear.
Idiot!
==========
AL posts:
Bomber’s Father[In a telephone interview from the Russian city of Makhachkala]
Issues Warning To U.S.:
If My Son Is Killed,‘All Hell Will Break Loose’
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/bombers-father-iss...
Hummm, ox News just reported that the suspect that is on the run, was wounded in last night's shootout. Hopefully he crawled into a ditch and died.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#151879 Apr 19, 2013
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL, you'd think a wise and learned justice like Justice Dumbarse would know which body of law to apply instead of his racist fantasies.
Under what federal criminal statue are you prosecuting these "criminals?"
Treaty violations.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#151880 Apr 19, 2013
World's Fastest BizJet Crown Claimed (Again) By Cessna's New Citation X / Mark Patiky, BusinessAviation 4/18/2013

For nearly 16 years, Cessna’s Citation X, with a top speed slightly less than the speed of sound at Mach .92 (705 mph), held the title of world’s fastest business jet. Then in 2012, Gulfstream’s new G650 clipped Cessna’s wings by notching up the record to Mach .925 (710 mph). That glory didn’t last long. Cessna’s latest speedster, the new Citation X, at Mach .935 (717 mph) just regained the top speed crown together with bragging rights that go with it. Keep in mind that the Gulfstream G650 can fly more than twice as far as its speedy rival.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/businessaviation/...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#151881 Apr 19, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
NRA Members strongly oppose new gun restrictions, poll finds: Posted by Scott Clement on January 25, 2013
Strong majorities of National Rifle Association members reject newly proposed gun restrictions, according to a survey released Thursday by the gun advocacy organization.
The poll finds more than eight in 10 NRA members oppose bans on high-capacity ammunition clips and semi-automatic assault weapons, with at least seven in 10 opposing each “strongly.” At the same time, 91 percent support changing laws to stop people with a mental illness from acquiring guns, and 82 percent favor placing armed guards in every school, a central proposal of the advocacy organization.
While some survey questions ask about gun restrictions that go beyond what President Obama laid out in a news conference last week — such as bans on private sales and confiscation of previously purchased high-capacity clips — the poll may provide the clearest look at where NRA members stand on new gun restrictions.
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Who cares what NRA members want?
There are only has a purported 4.5 million members, and probably actually significantly less than that.
That's a tiny fraction of the US population (0.014%), and a tiny fraction of registered voters too (0.03%)
The NRA's sole function is to help gun manufactures sell more guns, and they only represent a tiny fraction of the US population. To say anything otherwise is to lie, which is the specialty of birfoons.
Well Tootzie, the Democrats in the Senate heard the NRA loud and clear.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#151882 Apr 19, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! You are irrelevant!
Now that's what a Birfoon calls substance

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#151883 Apr 19, 2013
Yep, Dirty Hairy Reid heard the NRA loud and clear.

Senate Democratic leader Reid hits "pause" on gun-control bill

By John Whitesides and David Lawder
WASHINGTON | Thu Apr 18, 2013 7:55pm EDT
(Reuters)- One day after suffering a crippling defeat on gun-control legislation, Senate Majority Leader Dirty Hairy Reid on Thursday set aside President Barack Obama's plan to curb gun violence but promised to keep searching for a compromise.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/18/us-...
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#151884 Apr 19, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! You are irrelevant!
Speaking of irrelevant, any one adopt play law yet? No?! Shocking

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 2 min TRD 68,875
Deat Abby 12-16 7 min cheluzal 48
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 11 min RealDave 1,152,952
sexting on whatsapp 56 min cute_bwoy 1
14-Year-Old Boy Shot In Head On Far South Side 1 hr Taint Shield 4
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 2 hr kal 49,174
best joke (Oct '09) 3 hr Always Smile 526
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 11:41 am PST

NFL11:41AM
Trestman: There's accountability in Bears' building
NBC Sports12:41 PM
Bears' Trestman aware of speculation about future - NBC Sports
Yahoo! Sports 1:20 PM
Chicago sportscaster apologizes for tasteless joke in Cutler pun
NFL 1:47 PM
One Preview: Passing and rushing yardage leaders meet in Big D
NBC Sports 1:57 PM
Marc Trestman: It's evident I haven't gotten best from Jay Cutler