BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Full story: Chicago Tribune

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...
Comments
132,221 - 132,240 of 176,915 Comments Last updated 26 min ago
American Lady

Danville, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#150324
Apr 11, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

obama scandal justia gate

About 404,000 results (0.18 seconds)
https://www.google.com/search...
Jamestown org

West Sayville, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#150325
Apr 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
*Hummm, can you name just one state that has ever gone bankrupt?
*You do know that the United Nations does not remove countries from the Human Right Commision. Each year new members are voted in. Now tell us, is the United States currently in the Human Rights Commision? WHY NOT?
*Same goes for the "elections monitoring board"!
Well Tootzie, you stuck out three for three. YOU LOSE!
You seem to like Dumbya Bush, so why do you hate Obama who is continuing 90% of all Bush/Cheney policies including Obamacare/Romneycare and the Bush/Cheney Senior Citizen Prescription Drugs, which all Americans are still paying the highest medicine prices in the world.

----------

Business as usual
Bush's strong support of the Dubai ports deal isn't so surprising in light of his family's many financial ties to Arab sheikdoms.
/ Feb. 24, 2006 http://tinyurl.com/h9yah
The president's shift in tone is as remarkable as his threat to use his first veto in five years to protect the Dubai deal in the face of bipartisan congressional opposition.

But Bush's passionate defense of the United Arab Emirates and the ports deal inevitably raises questions -- not only about the due diligence of his administration in this instance but about his and his family's long-standing ties to the Persian Gulf sheikdoms, and specifically to the UAE's rulers. His insinuation that skepticism is equivalent to bigotry cannot deflect such concerns, which first arose in the months after the 9/11 attacks.

By now, everyone paying attention to the furor over the Dubai ports deal should be aware of the UAE's mixed record with regard to terror and global security. The Emirates' ruling families formerly maintained close relationships with the Taliban and Osama bin Laden, whose hunting camps in Afghanistan they frequented; two of the 20 hijackers in the 9/11 plot were UAE nationals who used safe houses and banks in Dubai; and the A.Q. Khan nuclear smuggling network also used facilities there to mask its operations. Since 9/11, however, the Emirates have cooperated with U.S. operations against al-Qaida, and their state-owned corporations have eagerly participated in American attempts to improve transportation security.

What seems worrisome even to some who might ultimately accept the Dubai ports deal is the "casual attitude" of the Bush administration in vetting the company, as Sen. Carl Levin put it. Considering the history of Bush entanglement with the oil despots of the Gulf, that lax indulgence was bad policy and worse politics.
Jamestown org

West Sayville, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#150326
Apr 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>You do know that Bush is no longer in office, don't you? But for some reason you are very upset by him. Do you want to talk about it?
Excerpt from "Why We Didn't Remove Saddam" by George Bush [Sr.] and Brent Scowcroft, Time (2 March 1998):
While we hoped that popular revolt or coup would topple Saddam, neither the U.S. nor the countries of the region wished to see the breakup of the Iraqi state. We were concerned about the long-term balance of power at the head of the Gulf. Trying to eliminate Saddam, extending the ground war into an occupation of Iraq, would have violated our guideline about not changing objectives in midstream, engaging in "mission creep," and would have incurred incalculable human and political costs. Apprehending him was probably impossible. We had been unable to find Noriega in Panama, which we knew intimately. We would have been forced to occupy Baghdad and, in effect, rule Iraq. The coalition would instantly have collapsed, the Arabs deserting it in anger and other allies pulling out as well. Under those circumstances, furthermore, we had been self-consciously trying to set a pattern for handling aggression in the post-cold war world. Going in and occupying Iraq, thus unilaterally exceeding the U.N.'s mandate, would have destroyed the precedent of international response to aggression we hoped to establish. Had we gone the invasion route, the U.S. could conceivably still be an occupying power in a bitterly hostile land. It would have been a dramatically different--and perhaps barren--outcome.

==========

James Baker: Don't go it alone with Iraq
http://tinyurl.com/9xxb8 /August 26, 2002
CRAWFORD, Texas (CNN)-- Former Secretary of State James Baker Sunday warned President Bush not to "go it alone" against Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. http://archives.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/08/2...

Don't Attack Saddam
It would undermine our antiterrorism efforts
BY GENERAL BRENT SCOWCROFT
August 15, 2002 / http://tinyurl.com/44u2d
http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/featu...

Cheney 1994: Invading Baghdad Would Create Quagmire C-SPAN
http://tinyurl.com/3d6x5b


General Norman Schwartzkopf : Iraq Quagmire For USA
Iraq Quagmire: That, George Bush, knew!
http://tinyurl.com/2q9ex6
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#150327
Apr 11, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL, according to Rogue Moron's Rules of Birfirstani Proof, no link, IT'S TOTALLY FAKE.
Sorry, you failed miserably again.
Not a failure. I jerked your chain and you are jumping up and down like a money.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#150329
Apr 11, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Jamestown org wrote:
<quoted text>
You seem to like Dumbya Bush, so why do you hate Obama who is continuing 90% of all Bush/Cheney policies including Obamacare/Romneycare and the Bush/Cheney Senior Citizen Prescription Drugs, which all Americans are still paying the highest medicine prices in the world.
----------
Business as usual
Bush's strong support of the Dubai ports deal isn't so surprising in light of his family's many financial ties to Arab sheikdoms.
/ Feb. 24, 2006 http://tinyurl.com/h9yah
The president's shift in tone is as remarkable as his threat to use his first veto in five years to protect the Dubai deal in the face of bipartisan congressional opposition.
But Bush's passionate defense of the United Arab Emirates and the ports deal inevitably raises questions -- not only about the due diligence of his administration in this instance but about his and his family's long-standing ties to the Persian Gulf sheikdoms, and specifically to the UAE's rulers. His insinuation that skepticism is equivalent to bigotry cannot deflect such concerns, which first arose in the months after the 9/11 attacks.
By now, everyone paying attention to the furor over the Dubai ports deal should be aware of the UAE's mixed record with regard to terror and global security. The Emirates' ruling families formerly maintained close relationships with the Taliban and Osama bin Laden, whose hunting camps in Afghanistan they frequented; two of the 20 hijackers in the 9/11 plot were UAE nationals who used safe houses and banks in Dubai; and the A.Q. Khan nuclear smuggling network also used facilities there to mask its operations. Since 9/11, however, the Emirates have cooperated with U.S. operations against al-Qaida, and their state-owned corporations have eagerly participated in American attempts to improve transportation security.
What seems worrisome even to some who might ultimately accept the Dubai ports deal is the "casual attitude" of the Bush administration in vetting the company, as Sen. Carl Levin put it. Considering the history of Bush entanglement with the oil despots of the Gulf, that lax indulgence was bad policy and worse politics.
And Obama is right now as I write, support al Qaeda in Syria!!! Oh, we have to deal with OPEC because you environmental whackos won't let us develop our resources.
Tell us, do you support fracking?!? We have been doing it for over forty years now.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#150330
Apr 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

American Lady wrote:
obama scandal justia gate
About 404,000 results (0.18 seconds)
https://www.google.com/search...
I have noticed that some sites have changed the wording to the Civil Rights Act of 1866, they leaveout "not subject to a foreign power".
What next, will they burn the Congressional Globe and blame it on the Republicans?
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#150334
Apr 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Not a failure. I jerked your chain and you are jumping up and down like a money.
Lol, another of Rogue Bumpkin's Greatest Hits: The Make a Fool Out of Yourself and Then Pretend You Were Trolling Waltz.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#150335
Apr 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Damn, just got an email from a black friend of mine. Hannity had a show a few days ago and all the audience members were black conservatives and he was there.
I usually do not watch Hannity as he is to predictable but I would have liked to have seen that one.
Jamestown org

West Sayville, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#150337
Apr 11, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
A new Wall Street Journal/NBC poll finds Obama's job approval continuing to slip in the months after his successful reelection. Today, only 47% of Americans approve of the job Obama is doing, while 48% disapprove.
Obama is a corporate hack loser just like Bush and Cheney.

Reagan and Clinton too IMO.

==========

Americans need a viable third and fourth party who will represent “We The People” instead of the wealthy few who own Congress!

Progressive Democrats / http://pdamerica.org/

Green Party / http://gp.org/index.php

Ralph Nader / http://www.votenader.org/

Ron Paul / http://www.campaignforliberty.com/

Libertarian Party / http://www.lp.org/
Jamestown org

West Sayville, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#150338
Apr 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Damn, just got an email from a black friend of mine. Hannity had a show a few days ago and all the audience members were black conservatives and he was there.
I usually do not watch Hannity as he is to predictable but I would have liked to have seen that one.
Trent Lott, Ronald Reagan and Republican Racism
Dec. 14, 2002 / http://tinyurl.com/d9w75
Southern Strategy: The race question has haunted Reagan and the GOP for decades
The same could be said, of course, about such Republican heroes as, Barry Goldwater, Richard Nixon or George Bush the elder, all of whom used coded racial messages to lure disaffected blue collar and Southern white voters away from the Democrats. Yet it's with Reagan, who set a standard for exploiting white anger and resentment rarely seen since George Wallace stood in the schoolhouse door, that the Republican's selective memory about its race-baiting habit really stands out.
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,859...

No tears for Reagan
June 8, 2004 / http://tinyurl.com/558r6l
Excuse me if I don’t shed any tears over the passing of former President Ronald Reagan. While the news of the 40th president’s death brought on a flood of sentimentality over the nation’s media this past weekend, I could not help but recall what the Reagan presidency really meant for Black Americans. Similar to what occurred upon the death of Richard Nixon, amnesia has set upon journalists as they recall Reagan’s era; choosing to indulge in idol worship rather than serious reflection on the former president’s policies.
http://www.blackamericatoday.com/article.cfm...

Ronald Reagan: The Great White Redeemer
http://tinyurl.com/6jljhm / June 10 2004
Only 12 years elapsed between the glorious military victory over the Confederate Slave States in 1865 and the definitive defeat of Reconstruction in 1877. In many important respects, the Reconstruction period was even briefer than that. By 1870, when the last of the southern states ratified the 15th Amendment to the Constitution, Tennessee had already rejected biracial democracy and installed an all-white “Redeemer” government.“Redemption” then swept through Georgia, North Carolina and Virginia.
http://www.blackcommentator.com/94/94_cover_r...

Reagan's heart of darkness
June 9, 2004 / http://tinyurl.com/28ytj
PRESIDENT Bush proclaimed: "Ronald Reagan believed that God takes the side of justice and that America has a special calling to oppose tyranny and defend freedom." In the first three days of news reports on the death of the former president, not a single major American newspaper, television station, or politician has dared to exhume this counterpoint to the Reagan's legacy: "Immoral, evil, and totally un-Christian."
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_op...

Reagan, White As Snow
http://tinyurl.com/6lujee
Last week, as we’ve heard, the Republican presidential candidates praised the name and heritage of Ronald Reagan 40 times during the televised Show and Tell at the Reagan Presidential Library. That none of them mentioned Reagan’s legacy of white supremacy and support for apartheid is a little like invoking Jefferson Davis and not mentioning treason or slavery. Actually, a lot like it.
Ronald Reagan was a white supremacist to his very core, and left enough traces over his lengthy political career so that it’s evident for anyone who cares to look—which apparently few do.
Domestically, he opposed every legislative remedy for African Americans, betraying a meanness of spirit and an open racism. As Sidney Blumenthal wrote in The Guardian in 2003:/ http://www.tompaine.com/articles/2007/05/08/r...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#150339
Apr 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Well, he is actually a friend of my daughter but I have met him a few times. He is an Architect in Atlanta. We both love barbecue.

African American Conservative Speak Out On their treatment On Hannity
&fe ature=youtube_gdata_player

Oh, there is a black barbeque joint near me and I usually eat there about once a month. It is not a chain restaurant and is family owned. It is near the airport where I keep my plane.
Jamestown org

West Sayville, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#150340
Apr 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
And Obama is right now as I write, support al Qaeda in Syria!!! Oh, we have to deal with OPEC because you environmental whackos won't let us develop our resources.
Tell us, do you support fracking?!? We have been doing it for over forty years now.
I think you have been watching too many Cowboy & Indian movies.

=========

How to turn Congress Inc. back to just Congress
May 12, 2010 / http://tinyurl.com/23u8stc
What is the biggest scandal of 2010 so far?
Allegations of fraudulent misrepresentation from Goldman Sachs? An oil spill that poses a threat to our environment and economy for generations? Mining operators freely ignoring safety violations and treating workers as disposable?
Each of these is bad. But perhaps the biggest political scandal is the one that aids and abets these others -- the pay-to-play system that buys up Congress, pollutes our political system with special-interest cash and deep-sixes the kind of bold reform agenda that we voted for and need.
The health-care industry has contributed more than $200 million to congressional candidates in the 2008 and 2010 election cycles, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Is it any wonder that there was no public option in the final bill, or that Medicare isn't able to negotiate lower drug prices for seniors the same way the Veterans Administration does for veterans?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#150342
Apr 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Oh, I just ordered an electronic ignition system for my plane. They were just approved by the FAA a few months ago and are approved for four and six cylinder Lycoming engines.
But the FAA also requires a STC for every plane type so I will have to install it, test fly it and then wait for the FAA to bless it. Until it is blessed I can fly my plane in the experimental category which means I can not fly for hire (commercially)(but I don't anyway) and I can have only one passenger so the other two seats will have to remain empty.
They will replace just one of the magnetos with the electronic ignition system but I still expect a 2-3% gain in horsepower, a 2-3 knot gain in cruise speed and a 15% increase in fuel milage.
Right now my plane has a no-wind range of about 900 miles and I should have about a 1035 mile range and still have a 45 minute fuel reserve. It is right at 1000 miles from Jacksonville, FL to Salina, KS so unless I have a head wind I should be able to fly none stop.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#150344
Apr 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Oh, my plane runs on 100LL (Low Lead) AvGas. they also have an 80/87UL but I can't use it. Now Lycoming has just approved my engine for 91/98UL but there is no 91/98UL AvGas yet.
They have been trying to get the lead out of AvGas but there are to many planes that will never be able to use fuel that is under 100 octane. My engine is not turbocharged and those that are may have to de-tune their engines so a plane with a turbocharged 350 hp may end up with only 325 hp and then that may also reguire you to reduce the plane's weight.
Auto gas usually has too high of a vapor pressure because it has to much napthan in the mix. And of course it will also have to be alcohol free.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#150346
Apr 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

You may remember this airliner crash at Heathrow back in 2008.
Heathrow crash plane 'just dropped'
LONDON, England (CNN)-- Air crash investigators are trying to work out why a Boeing 777 landed short of the runway at London Heathrow airport, skidding on grass and ripping apart sections of the aircraft.

An investigator who has been briefed on the incident told CNN the plane's captain "is claiming there wasn't power when he needed it."

Passenger Paul Venter told the UK Press Association: "The wheels came out and went for touchdown, and the next moment we just dropped. I couldn't tell you how far."

London ambulance services said 17 people suffered minor injuries, and the number could increase as several others are still being assessed.

Images showed the Boeing 777 -- BA flight 38 from Beijing, China -- grounded on tarmac after touching down several hundred meters short of the airport's south runway, close to a perimeter road, with its emergency chutes deployed and white fire-fighting foam covering the engines.
http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/europe/01/17/he...
Both engines stall on short final and it touched down just short of the runway. The accident board blamed Rolls Royce saying the engine fuel filters were clogged with ice. But not long after that they had another jet, also with the same engines, also stalled but at a higher altitude and they regained full power just before landing.
But these two planes had more in common than just the same engines. They had both come out of .... China!!! I think they had fuel with to much water in it!
Yep, you can't park on a cloud and wait for the mechanic!
Jamestown org

West Sayville, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#150347
Apr 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Still waiting for you to explain SR 511!
McCain was born in Panama.
McCain’s Constitutional Dilemma: Native Son But Not Natural Born?
February 29, 2008 / http://tinyurl.com/2am7hd
John McCain’s possible election could trigger review under an obscure part of the Constitution: the birth eligibility provision of Article II. The requirement that an American be “natural-born” has long been controversial, but few associated John McCain with the problem as opposed to other leaders like Arnold Schwarzenegger. McCain, however, may be a foreign born citizen given his birth in the Canal Zone. Due to the bar on advisory opinions, this issue might not be ripe for review until after the general election, triggering another Bush v. Gore moment in the high court. Ted Olson has even been retained for the possible fight to complete the scene for a Supreme redux.
McCain was born in 1936 in the Panama Canal Zone while his father was stationed there as a naval officer. In 1787, however, the framers insisted that any president be natural born — that is, born within the United States. It is a requirement that some of us have long criticized as counter to our tradition as a nation of immigrants
http://jonathanturley.org/2008/02/29/mccains-...

Jonathan Turley Constitutional Law
http://jonathanturley.org/

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#150348
Apr 11, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Subject: LIST OF TRAITORS
Over the weekend, we came four votes away from the United States Senate giving our Constitutional rights over to the United Nations. In a 53-46 vote, the senate narrowly passed a measure that will stop the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.
The Statement of Purpose from the bill read:
To uphold Second Amendment rights and prevent the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.
The U.N. Small Arms Treaty, which has been championed by the Obama Administration, would have effectively placed a global ban on the import and export of small firearms. The ban would have affected all private gun owners in the U.S., and had language that would have implemented an international gun registry on all private guns and ammo.
Astonishingly, 46 of our United States Senators were willing to give away our Constitutional rights to a foreign power.
Here are the 46 senators that voted to give your rights to the U.N.
Baldwin (D-WI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bennet (D-CO)
Blumenthal (D-CT)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brown (D-OH)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Coons (D-DE)
Cowan (D-MA)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Franken (D-MN)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Harkin (D-IA)
Hirono (D-HI)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kaine (D-VA)
King (I-ME)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
McCaskill (D-MO)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Merkley (D-OR)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murphy (D-CT)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sanders (I-VT)
Schatz (D-HI)
Schumer (D-NY)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Udall (D-CO)
Udall (D-NM)
Warner (D-VA)
Warren (D-MA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wyden (D-OR)




Hello All, here is the list of all the TRAITORS in the U. S. Senate-Thank God there was none listed for OK, AR, TX




People this needs to go viral. These Senators voted to let the UN take our guns. They need to lose the election. We have been betrayed.
46 Senators Voted to Give your 2nd Amendment Constitutional Rights to the U.N.

Since: Apr 13

Franklin Park, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#150349
Apr 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

What if he's an alien?! Hmmm.. That'd be pretty cool if he was!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#150350
Apr 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Oh, only a few refineries make leaded aviation fuel. They usually make it when the are switching to and from winter/summer blends. Because after they make the leaded fuel they must purge (clean) it out of the whole system before they resume making auto gasoline.
I too would like to see leaded fuel to be phased out but it does not look like if will be 100%
Oh, and 91/98 octane is 94.5 averaged octane. Almost gone are the very big piston aircraft engines used during and after WWII. Many used 115/145 octane which was very high in lead. So much that the spark plugs would have to be changed once a month. And they had some plane that had four 27 cylinder engines each one with two spark plugs and that means there was 216 spark plugs and these days aviation spark plugs are $25 a piece or $5,400 just for new plugs not to mention the mechanics fees!!! Yep, once a month!!!!
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#150353
Apr 11, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Jamestown org wrote:
<quoted text>
McCain’s Constitutional Dilemma: Native Son But Not Natural Born?
February 29, 2008 / http://tinyurl.com/2am7hd
John McCain’s possible election could trigger review under an obscure part of the Constitution: the birth eligibility provision of Article II. The requirement that an American be “natural-born” has long been controversial, but few associated John McCain with the problem as opposed to other leaders like Arnold Schwarzenegger. McCain, however, may be a foreign born citizen given his birth in the Canal Zone. Due to the bar on advisory opinions, this issue might not be ripe for review until after the general election, triggering another Bush v. Gore moment in the high court. Ted Olson has even been retained for the possible fight to complete the scene for a Supreme redux.
McCain was born in 1936 in the Panama Canal Zone while his father was stationed there as a naval officer. In 1787, however, the framers insisted that any president be natural born — that is, born within the United States. It is a requirement that some of us have long criticized as counter to our tradition as a nation of immigrants
http://jonathanturley.org/2008/02/29/mccains-...
Jonathan Turley Constitutional Law
http://jonathanturley.org/
You are right McCain was born in the Canal Zone (A US Territory) to US Citizens, but Obama was born in the US as a citizen of his father's nation, the United Kingdom. This made Obama ineligible for citizenship in the US.
Has Obama ever been naturalized, I don't think so, this would mean we have an alien sitting in the White House.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••

Flood Warning for Cook County was issued at August 22 at 8:29PM CDT

•••
Chicago Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••