BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Full story: Chicago Tribune

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...
Comments
132,201 - 132,220 of 177,493 Comments Last updated 2 hrs ago
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#150300 Apr 11, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Fox News Flash, A Democrat Party member has named two other Democrats, who are in a Demoract PAC, who are complicit in the bugging of Mitch McConnell's office!!!
BREAKING: Moron birfoon believes unsubstantiated claim as doctrine.

Normal people claim to be "not shocked, because birfoons are raving idiots."

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#150301 Apr 11, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
What if the bugged Obama's office? Wood you get upset? What part of felony do you not understand???
It would be upsetting, IF Obama had been bugged, but if the bugged contents were as damaging if they are for McConnell, then someone should ask Obama for comments, as they should McConnell, no? And is it really true McConnell was bugged? And by who, really? If true, yes, a felony, but what about what he said?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#150302 Apr 11, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Fox News Flash, A Democrat Party member has named two other Democrats, who are in a Demoract PAC, who are complicit in the bugging of Mitch McConnell's office!!!
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
BREAKING: Moron birfoon believes unsubstantiated claim as doctrine.
Normal people claim to be "not shocked, because birfoons are raving idiots."
Please notice Rogue gives no names of the so-called democrats and NO SOURCE. He probably has a source, but he's too embarrassed to reveal it, probably WND.com , foxnews.com , Globe.com or Pravda.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#150303 Apr 11, 2013
Hating and anti-Obama-Dem Foxnews.com , as has happened so often, is totally unreliable and no doubt has producxed another made-up story. Give us A source, Rogue, a REAL source.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#150304 Apr 11, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure Alice. Don't forget to click your heels together while you chant.
Your fable ended a long time ago. Perhaps mommie forgot to wake you?
LMAO!!! You are so confused, Dorthy was the one that clicked her heals together!!
Looks like your credibility has diminished, since you didn't know about Dorthy and her red slippers. How do we know you are right about anything? Hell, the Constitution has proven you wrong, with every post you write.
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

#150305 Apr 11, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! I see you are still floating down denial! The next stop on your trip is Wonderland, please say hello to Alice!!!!!
The meaning of Natural Born Citizen comes from the common law, and it refers to the place of birth.

“What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.”(Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004)--Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT).

"Prior to the adoption of the constitution, the people inhabiting the different states might be divided into two classes: natural born citizens, or those born within the state, and aliens, or such as were born out of it. The first, by their birth-right, became entitled to all the privileges of citizens; the second, were entitled to none, but such as were held out and given by the laws of the respective states prior to their emigration....St. George Tucker, BLACKSTONE'S COMMENTARIES: WITH NOTES OF REFERENCE TO THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA.(1803)

"Therefore every person born within the United States, its territories or districts, whether the parents are citizens or aliens, is a natural born citizen in the sense of the Constitution, and entitled to all the rights and privileges appertaining to that capacity."---William Rawle, A VIEW OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 2d ed.(1829)

“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President ..."---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005)[Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]

Hollander v. McCain (New Hampshire 2008) ruling:“Those born “in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” U.S. Const., amend. XIV, have been considered American citizens under American law in effect since the time of the founding, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 674-75 (1898), and thus eligible for the presidency,

Ankeny v. Governor of Indiana (Indiana 2008 – Appellate Court) ruling:“Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”

Tisdale v. Obama (Virginia federal court 2012) ruling:“It is well settled that those born in the United States are considered natural born citizens.”

Voeltz v. Obama (Florida 2012) ruling:“However, the United States Supreme Court has concluded that ‘[e]very person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, becomes at once a citizen of the United States.‘Other courts that have considered the issue in the context of challenges to the qualifications of candidates for the office of President of the United States have come to the same conclusion."
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

#150307 Apr 11, 2013

“zero nuclear weapons”

Since: Sep 08

Perryville

#150308 Apr 11, 2013
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>Barack Hussein Obama is not an African American,he is a Kenyan American,who lived in Indonesia before going to live with his grand parents in Hawaii and starting his education at an exclusive private school prior to attending other exclusive private schools.
Still believing what whacked out birthers like Orly Taitz and Corsi are spewing???
They are mental unbalanced nut cases. Tell me this have many cases has Taitz won

Look at
Keyes v. Bowen

Lightfoot v. Bowen

Barnett v. Obama
Taitz filed a lawsuit on behalf of Pamela Barnett, Alan Keyes, other candidates in the 2008 federal elections, several military personnel, and some legislators from various states alleging that Obama is ineligible to be president. On October 29, 2009, U.S. District Court Judge David O. Carter dismissed the lawsuit. The dismissal criticized Taitz's legal abilities, stated her behavior was "unethical", and suggested that Taitz "may have suborned perjury". On December 22, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal. On June 11, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court declined, without comment, a request by litigants not represented by Taitz to hear the case.

Citing new evidence, on August 14, 2012, Taitz filed a motion in Judge Carter's court to re-open the case.

Judge David O. Carter dismissed the lawsuit. The dismissal criticized Taitz's legal abilities, stated her behavior was "unethical", and suggested that Taitz "may have suborned perjury this shows what type of person she is

Cook v. Good

Rhodes v. MacDonald

Attorney misconduct

I would go on but what is the use.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orly_Taitz#Keyes...
Learn to Read

Camby, IN

#150309 Apr 11, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! You are so confused, Dorthy was the one that clicked her heals together!!
Looks like your credibility has diminished, since you didn't know about Dorthy and her red slippers. How do we know you are right about anything? Hell, the Constitution has proven you wrong, with every post you write.
Blather on Alice. And keep clicking those heels.
John

Idabel, OK

#150310 Apr 11, 2013
Where can you get a fake Id? Passport?

badddawg@rocketmail. com
IDs -$140
Passport -$200
Paypal accepted
Learn to Read

Camby, IN

#150312 Apr 11, 2013
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>The meaning of Natural Born Citizen comes from the common law, and it refers to the place of birth.

“What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.”(Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004)--Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT).

"Prior to the adoption of the constitution, the people inhabiting the different states might be divided into two classes: natural born citizens, or those born within the state, and aliens, or such as were born out of it. The first, by their birth-right, became entitled to all the privileges of citizens; the second, were entitled to none, but such as were held out and given by the laws of the respective states prior to their emigration....St. George Tucker, BLACKSTONE'S COMMENTARIES: WITH NOTES OF REFERENCE TO THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA.(1803)

"Therefore every person born within the United States, its territories or districts, whether the parents are citizens or aliens, is a natural born citizen in the sense of the Constitution, and entitled to all the rights and privileges appertaining to that capacity."---William Rawle, A VIEW OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 2d ed.(1829)

“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President ..."---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005)[Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]

Hollander v. McCain (New Hampshire 2008) ruling:“Those born “in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” U.S. Const., amend. XIV, have been considered American citizens under American law in effect since the time of the founding, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 674-75 (1898), and thus eligible for the presidency,

Ankeny v. Governor of Indiana (Indiana 2008 – Appellate Court) ruling:“Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”

Tisdale v. Obama (Virginia federal court 2012) ruling:“It is well settled that those born in the United States are considered natural born citizens.”

Voeltz v. Obama (Florida 2012) ruling:“However, the United States Supreme Court has concluded that ‘[e]very person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, becomes at once a citizen of the United States.‘Other courts that have considered the issue in the context of challenges to the qualifications of candidates for the office of President of the United States have come to the same conclusion."
You forget. Dufus Fale has declared all Court decisions, legislation or testimony that runs afoul of his delusion to be null and void. And since he clicked his slippers together as he repeated this claim, we know it must be true
American Lady

Danville, KY

#150314 Apr 11, 2013
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
The meaning of Natural Born Citizen comes from the common law, and it refers to the place of birth.
“What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.”(Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004)--Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT).
"Prior to the adoption of the constitution, the people inhabiting the different states might be divided into two classes: natural born citizens, or those born within the state, and aliens, or such as were born out of it. The first, by their birth-right, became entitled to all the privileges of citizens; the second, were entitled to none, but such as were held out and given by the laws of the respective states prior to their emigration....St. George Tucker, BLACKSTONE'S COMMENTARIES: WITH NOTES OF REFERENCE TO THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA.(1803)
"Therefore every person born within the United States, its territories or districts, whether the parents are citizens or aliens, is a natural born citizen in the sense of the Constitution, and entitled to all the rights and privileges appertaining to that capacity."---William Rawle, A VIEW OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 2d ed.(1829)
“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President ..."---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005)[Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]
Hollander v. McCain (New Hampshire 2008) ruling:“Those born “in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” U.S. Const., amend. XIV, have been considered American citizens under American law in effect since the time of the founding, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 674-75 (1898), and thus eligible for the presidency,
Ankeny v. Governor of Indiana (Indiana 2008 – Appellate Court) ruling:“Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”
Tisdale v. Obama (Virginia federal court 2012) ruling:“It is well settled that those born in the United States are considered natural born citizens.”
Voeltz v. Obama (Florida 2012) ruling:“However, the United States Supreme Court has concluded that ‘[e]very person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, becomes at once a citizen of the United States.‘Other courts that have considered the issue in the context of challenges to the qualifications of candidates for the office of President of the United States have come to the same conclusion."
The below IS just an opinion dipstick!
NOT law! This was during a 'hearing' to change the law!
Didn't HAPPEN!

“What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.”(Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004)--Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT).
American Lady

Danville, KY

#150315 Apr 11, 2013
A "natural born citizen
IS
from TWO parent citizens!

That simple ...

NO OTHER WAY!
Learn to Read

Camby, IN

#150317 Apr 11, 2013
American Lady wrote:
A "natural born citizen
IS
from TWO parent citizens!

That simple ...

NO OTHER WAY!
Talk about "just an opinion dipstick"
Learn to Read

Camby, IN

#150318 Apr 11, 2013
American Lady wrote:
A "natural born citizen
IS
from TWO parent citizens!

That simple ...

NO OTHER WAY!
BTW - Dufus Dale has declared your opinion to be invalid.

Sorry to break the news
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#150319 Apr 11, 2013
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
The meaning of Natural Born Citizen comes from the common law, and it refers to the place of birth.
“What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.”(Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004)--Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT).
"Prior to the adoption of the constitution, the people inhabiting the different states might be divided into two classes: natural born citizens, or those born within the state, and aliens, or such as were born out of it. The first, by their birth-right, became entitled to all the privileges of citizens; the second, were entitled to none, but such as were held out and given by the laws of the respective states prior to their emigration....St. George Tucker, BLACKSTONE'S COMMENTARIES: WITH NOTES OF REFERENCE TO THE CONSTITUTION AND LAWS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA.(1803)
"Therefore every person born within the United States, its territories or districts, whether the parents are citizens or aliens, is a natural born citizen in the sense of the Constitution, and entitled to all the rights and privileges appertaining to that capacity."---William Rawle, A VIEW OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 2d ed.(1829)
“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President ..."---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005)[Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]
Hollander v. McCain (New Hampshire 2008) ruling:“Those born “in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,” U.S. Const., amend. XIV, have been considered American citizens under American law in effect since the time of the founding, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 674-75 (1898), and thus eligible for the presidency,
Ankeny v. Governor of Indiana (Indiana 2008 – Appellate Court) ruling:“Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”
Tisdale v. Obama (Virginia federal court 2012) ruling:“It is well settled that those born in the United States are considered natural born citizens.”
Voeltz v. Obama (Florida 2012) ruling:“However, the United States Supreme Court has concluded that ‘[e]very person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, becomes at once a citizen of the United States.‘Other courts that have considered the issue in the context of challenges to the qualifications of candidates for the office of President of the United States have come to the same conclusion."
You can't show me where English common law was used by Howard, while framing the Citizenship Clause, can you! But, I can show you where he didn't.
Yes, all people born in the US are Natural Born Citizens, but there is a stipulation, they must be "and subject to the jurisdiction, thereof", meaning not "subject to any foreign power".
The only truth to come out of the WKA v. US, pertaining to citizenship was in para 34, something like, "it is the right for all nations to decide for themselves who they will give citizenship to" and we did just that.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#150320 Apr 11, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! You are so confused, Dorthy was the one that clicked her heals together!!
Looks like your credibility has diminished, since you didn't know about Dorthy and her red slippers. How do we know you are right about anything? Hell, the Constitution has proven you wrong, with every post you write.
Justice ha ha Dale has just confirmed his thorough knowledge of...fairy tales. Jury believes it best Justice ha ha Dale stick to fairy tales and let go of things constitutional.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#150321 Apr 11, 2013
WelbyMD wrote:
<quoted text>FOX is owned and controlled by the exact same evil cabal(Freemasons/Illuminati) which also owns C-Span, BBC, NPR, PBS, NBC, the DNC, the GOP, CIA, IMF, CFR, Skull&Bones, etc.
It is? All the above are Murdoch-owned? Care to show some proof of that? BBC is British-state-owned by the way. NBC, is that not GE? Publicly-owned PBS is Murdoch-owned? Cable-channel-owned Cspan is same owner as foxcrap.com , namely Smutty Murdoch? As for the rest- well, I agree, what with his probable contribtions to the GOP,Murdoch probably does own it. And it shows.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#150322 Apr 11, 2013
American Lady

Danville, KY

#150323 Apr 11, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Talk about "just an opinion dipstick"
Rule~

It is in the United States of America Constitution!
The natural born part!

Too bad they have taken down all the sites of law that explain that!

Justia-gate! DID just that!
About 293,000 results (0.25 second
https://www.google.com/search... !&rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS530US530 &aq=f&oq=Justia-gate! &aqs=chrome.0.57&sourc eid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#hl=en &rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS530US530 &sclient=psy-ab&q=Just ia-gate&oq=Justia-gate &gs_l=serp.12..0i13j0i13i3 0l2j0i8i30.0.0.1.716.0.0.0.0.0 .0.0.0..0.0.crnk_ir..0.0...1.. 8.psy-ab.PuvryrcEvhE&pbx=1 &bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm =bv.45107431,d.dmg&fp=16f3 fda0c583ca1f&biw=1032& bih=761

Justia gate -spelled without the dash
About 290,000 results (0.23 seconds)

https://www.google.com/search... !&rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS530US530 &aq=f&oq=Justia-gate! &aqs=chrome.0.57&sourc eid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#hl=en &rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS530US530 &sclient=psy-ab&q=Just ia+gate&oq=Justia+gate &gs_l=serp.12..0i13j0i13i3 0l2j0i13i5i30.8655.9242.2.1141 1.2.2.0.0.0.0.96.187.2.2.0.crn k_ir..0.0...1.1.8.psy-ab.EshFw ws3f-c&pbx=1&bav=on.2, or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.45107431,d .dmg&fp=16f3fda0c583ca1f &biw=1032&bih=761

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 7 min JOEL 69,051
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 8 min TSM 1,101,070
Music Artists A to Z (Feb '14) 25 min _Zoey_ 301
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 2 hr gcaveman1 46,361
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 2 hr TRD 68,393
12 wounded in city shootings 3 hr reality is a crutch 1
ISIS Plans to Blow Up an Entire American City a... 3 hr boo ya 53
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••