BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story

Since: Apr 13

Saint Paul, MN

#150173 Apr 10, 2013
test

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#150174 Apr 10, 2013
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Just be a QUEER and go suck a big one!
Here we go again. Allusions to "queers". Very Rush and LRS-like. Related by any chance? Getting crowded in that birther-filled closet? Imagine a bunch of right-wing closet gays armed to the teeth, all cleaning their loaded rifles at the same time, BANG, BANG BANG. Ha ha, LMAO (LRS tm reg'd).
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

#150176 Apr 10, 2013
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Ooh, that hurts so bad, ha, ha, ha!
Yep, I'm SMellen1, SHEEPLE!
Savannah Guthrie is a lying Obot and there is no seal to be seen in that photo, SHEEPLE!
Where exactly do you think you see it at with your delusional brain?
Psst, just because a SHEEPLE said it doesn't mean it is true, especially when you can't see it with your own eyes!
Why don't you post a a link to a copy of the LFBC where your LYING EYES think you see it and tell us exactly where on the copy your delusional brain thinks it is located, HOLLA!
Too bad that your lie can't be proven with a fraudulent birth certificate that contains no raised seal of authentication and a one-of-a-kind error in the registrars stamp.
The original has NEVER been produced in any court!
The fraud was born in Kenya, Poopoo stain!
Obama is not even American, much less Black or Natural Born.
YOU are a lying SHEEPLE!
You are a lying birther.
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

#150177 Apr 10, 2013
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep, I'm SMellen1, SHEEPLE!
Savannah Guthrie is a lying Obot and there is no seal to be seen in that photo, SHEEPLE!
Where exactly do you think you see it at with your delusional brain?
Psst, just because a SHEEPLE said it doesn't mean it is true, especially when you can't see it with your own eyes!
Why don't you post a a link to a copy of the LFBC where your LYING EYES think you see it and tell us exactly where on the copy your delusional brain thinks it is located, HOLLA!
Too bad that your lie can't be proven with a fraudulent birth certificate that contains no raised seal of authentication and a one-of-a-kind error in the registrars stamp.
The original has NEVER been produced in any court!
The fraud was born in Kenya, Poopoo stain!
Obama is not even American, much less Black or Natural Born.
YOU are a lying birther.
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#150178 Apr 10, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Oh, the guy who was knifing people at the Lone Star Community College in Houston stopped when his knife broke! He should have bought a better knife!
<quoted text>
Suppose you are carving on a piece of wood with a knife and the blade breaks? You could be injured. I have a few knives and none are fancy but all are of high quality and are used for what they are intended. An example of improper use of a knife would be using a knife as a pry bar. Yet I have seen people do that and often the blade breaks.
Rogue Moron as usual misses the point and instead blabbers about whittling.

He wonders why no one takes his brilliance seriously.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#150179 Apr 10, 2013
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>You are a lying birther.
Lying. Birther. Kind of redundant

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#150180 Apr 10, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
PS : You know, Rogue, most of the mass killers of school children, theatre goers, workplace colleagues, university students and staff, most of those nuts pretty much describe you to a "T". Frustrated, unknowing ultra-right-wing blind followers, non-achieving envious loners, gun adorators, yes, gun adorators, that is the key. Were I living in your neighbouring, Rogue, I'd steer clear.
Ultra right? Try Looney-Lefties!!!
Next, they were all crazy? And some of the victims where college students. Why most of the shooters where college students!!!
Wrond, wrong and wrong. Three strikes, your out!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#150181 Apr 10, 2013
Huuummmm, this is another Obama scheme which is intended to go after the rich people but will actually go after the average-Joes trying to get ahead.
Now, suppose Rush Limbaugh flies his business jet to Las Vegas and it costs him $10,000 for the trip. So now it is $10,010?!?
But let's say you are trying to get a commercial pilots licence and you rent a Cessna 152 at $75 an hour. And then you add another $100?!? Who do you think can easily pay the $100 per flight?
Or how about the person who likes in Alaska and there are no roads, to hike 100 miles through the snow may take over a week, but now a $100 flight in your Maule M-7 is now $200!!!
Obama has a brain the size of a Shitcago rat!

AOPA warns user fee proposal could cripple GA
Association pledges to work with Congress, GA community to oppose fees - By AOPA Communications staff

The White House on April 10 released a budget proposal that includes a $100-per-flight user fee—a charge AOPA warns could be disastrous for general aviation.
http://www.aopa.org/advocacy/articles/2013/13...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#150182 Apr 10, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Care to tell us what happened between Feb 2008 and April 2009, Rogue? That little bottom falling out, called a recession, remember? How much of that budget increase did GWB himself account for by signing the first 500 billion dollar bailout WHILE STILL PRESIDENT in October-November 2008?
You think people are like you, that they don't read, that they don't get to the bottom of things, that their sole interests are guns and waffle houses, why, cultured extreme fighting and "wrassssling", why not?
The hard times came, Rogue, and they are still around and you can thank your idol GWB for 95% of it.
Yes, Bush signed it into law, so. Bill Clinton signed four of Newt Gingrich's balanced budgets into law, seven of the points of the Contract with America into law as well as the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 into law. Bush-41 also signed the law banning CFC into law. It does not mean he approved of the law, but he had little choice.
Now, you say GWB is responsible for 95% of it. Can you expand that a little? You know, like cause and effect. Ya know, like the eruption of Mount Pinatubo in June 1991 caused the larger than normal Ozone Hole over the North Pole!!!
No president can sign any law that is not first approved by ..... Congress!!!
If the Republicans had controlled Congress from 2007 until 2011, we would be far better off than we are now!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#150183 Apr 10, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
American er hmm Lady : "In a Christian world this would NEVER have happened".
You mean the inquisition, just to mention one of a thousand horrors, would never have happened in a Christian world? Was that not a Christian world then? Do you know of Isabel la Catolica?
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
MY mistake.
I "thought" WE had grown MORE "civilized" since then!
Since there has been FREE education in America!
Jacques is anti-Christians. Muslims .... good, Christians .... badddd. I wonder if Jacques can figure out why there are no gays in Muslim countries? Why in Mali, if you even look gay, you get executed!!!

French Troops Save 2 Gay Mali Men From Execution
by Jason St. Amand / Staff Writer / Feb 6, 2013

Two men from Mali who were scheduled to be executed for allegedly having gay sex were saved by the French military, Gay Star News reports.

Islamist extremists took over northern territories .........
http://www.edgeboston.com/...

Eye nose, eye nose, Jacques will claim Mali is a Christian nation but the Muslims control the Northern territories!!!!
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#150184 Apr 10, 2013
Ellen1 wrote:
Replying to "Justice Dale."
Re: "As you know Howard was the father of the citizenship clause and I would like for you to find me one indication that he used english common law for his framing.(ratified in 1868) "
Answer: Dream on about Howard being "the father of the citizenship clause. At most he was ONE of the fathers.
Over on the Senate side, the author of the citizenship clause was Senator Lyman Trumball.
And here is what Lyman Trumball said:
“By the terms of the Constitution he must have been a citizen of the United States for nine years before he could take a seat here, and seven years before he could take a seat in the other House ; and, in order to be President of the United States, a person must be a native-born citizen. It is the common law of this country, and of all countries, and it was unnecessary to incorporate it in the Constitution, that a person is a citizen of the country in which he is born. I read from Paschale's Annotated Constitution, note 274:‘All persons born in the allegiance of the king are natural born subjects, and all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural born citizens. Birth and allegiance go together.’ Such is the rule of the common law, and it is the common law of this country as well as of England. There are two exceptions, and only two, to the universality of its application. The children of ambassadors are, in theory, born in the allegiance of the powers the ambassadors represent, and slaves, in legal contemplation, are property, and not persons.”—Sen. Trumbull, Cong. Globe. 1st Session, 42nd Congress, pt. 1, pg. 575 (1872)
Irrelevant! The law was put in place and ratified in 1868 and not one mention of English common law was indicated.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#150185 Apr 10, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
What happens if you have only one good hand? Military aircrews are issued automatic knives because of that very reason. And that is also why traditionally aircrews are armed with revolvers.
Ever try and charge an autoloading pistol with one hand? I know you haven't, but if you had ever handled, let's say a M1911A1, how would you manipulate the slide with only one good hand?
Can you show us anywhere in the Second Amendment that gives anyone the right to decide what arm you can or can not own/carry?
What does "shall not be infringed." mean to you? As far as I am concerned, most weapon laws passed after about 1920 are unconstitutional no matter what our Supreme Court has ruled.
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
The military is the military, Rogue. We are talking ordinary civilians here now. Infringed? Are you part of a militia?
What is this fascination with human-killing weapons? Ever tried reading a book, going to a concert, movie, theatre, watch an opera, a symphony orchestra, a rock or rap or folk or C&W show? A sporting event, the Marlins maybe or Dolphins or Heat? A bit of a change from your penis proxies, the guns.
Have you ever scene a one handed civilian before? And where does it say in our Second Amendment you must be in a militia to own any "arm"? And do you think a one-armed woman has a penis problem?
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#150186 Apr 10, 2013
Therealnews com wrote:
<quoted text>
This PROVES that the Republican Conservative Supreme Court are Activist Jurist.
==========
No other future Supreme Court or any court is allowed to use Bush v Gore as precedent. Bush is truly an illegitimate President. http://tinyurl.com/2ps3e3
George W. Bush's January 20, 2001 inauguration was unconstitutional. This isn't because Bush lost the popular vote. Nor is it because he lost Florida and thus the electoral vote. The U.S. Supreme Court's decision to hear the Florida recount lawsuit, Bush v. Gore, violated the U.S. Constitution. It's a states' rights issue. Elections fall under state law; the highest court that may resolve a legal challenge about an election is a state supreme court. The U.S. Supreme Court--a federal body--didn't have jurisdiction in the case.
http://yalelawjournal.org/2006/11/07/flanders...
==========
Has Bush v. Gore Become the Case That Must Not Be Named?
August 15, 2006 / http://tinyurl.com/qbx2s
At a law school Supreme Court conference that I attended last fall, there was a panel on “The Rehnquist Court.” No one mentioned Bush v. Gore, the most historic case of William Rehnquist’s time as chief justice, and during the Q. and A. no one asked about it. When I asked a prominent law professor about this strange omission, he told me he had been invited to participate in another Rehnquist retrospective, and was told in advance that Bush v. Gore would not be discussed.
The ruling that stopped the Florida recount and handed the presidency to George W. Bush is disappearing down the legal world’s version of the memory hole, the slot where, in George Orwell’s “1984,” government workers disposed of politically inconvenient records. The Supreme Court has not cited it once since it was decided, and when Justice Antonin Scalia, who loves to hold forth on court precedents, was asked about it at a forum earlier this year, he snapped,“Come on, get over it.”
There is a legal argument for pushing Bush v. Gore aside. The majority opinion announced that the ruling was “limited to the present circumstances” and could not be cited as precedent. But many legal scholars insisted at the time that this assertion was itself dictum — the part of a legal opinion that is nonbinding — and illegitimate, because under the doctrine of stare decisis, courts cannot make rulings whose reasoning applies only to a single case.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/15/opinion/15t...
The USSC has been overstepping the boundaries of the US Constitution for over 114+ years, the latest one was when Roberts interpreted that a fine was a tax, this is not how the bill was written.
The USSC is conservative?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#150187 Apr 10, 2013
Oh, do you know who Jack Roosevelt "Jackie" Robinson was named after? No, not the DEMOCRAT FDR but the Republican Teddy Roosevelt!!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#150188 Apr 10, 2013
Therealnews com wrote:
<quoted text>
This PROVES that the Republican Conservative Supreme Court are Activist Jurist.
==========
No other future Supreme Court or any court is allowed to use Bush v Gore as precedent. Bush is truly an illegitimate President. http://tinyurl.com/2ps3e3
George W. Bush's January 20, 2001 inauguration was unconstitutional. This isn't because Bush lost the popular vote. Nor is it because he lost Florida and thus the electoral vote. The U.S. Supreme Court's decision to hear the Florida recount lawsuit, Bush v. Gore, violated the U.S. Constitution. It's a states' rights issue. Elections fall under state law; the highest court that may resolve a legal challenge about an election is a state supreme court. The U.S. Supreme Court--a federal body--didn't have jurisdiction in the case.
http://yalelawjournal.org/2006/11/07/flanders ...
==========
Has Bush v. Gore Become the Case That Must Not Be Named?
August 15, 2006 / http://tinyurl.com/qbx2s
At a law school Supreme Court conference that I attended last fall, there was a panel on “The Rehnquist Court.” No one mentioned Bush v. Gore, the most historic case of William Rehnquist’s time as chief justice, and during the Q. and A. no one asked about it. When I asked a prominent law professor about this strange omission, he told me he had been invited to participate in another Rehnquist retrospective, and was told in advance that Bush v. Gore would not be discussed.
The ruling that stopped the Florida recount and handed the presidency to George W. Bush is disappearing down the legal world’s version of the memory hole, the slot where, in George Orwell’s “1984,” government workers disposed of politically inconvenient records. The Supreme Court has not cited it once since it was decided, and when Justice Antonin Scalia, who loves to hold forth on court precedents, was asked about it at a forum earlier this year, he snapped,“Come on, get over it.”
There is a legal argument for pushing Bush v. Gore aside. The majority opinion announced that the ruling was “limited to the present circumstances” and could not be cited as precedent. But many legal scholars insisted at the time that this assertion was itself dictum — the part of a legal opinion that is nonbinding — and illegitimate, because under the doctrine of stare decisis, courts cannot make rulings whose reasoning applies only to a single case.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/15/opinion/15t ...
Hmmm, can you show us where in our Constitution the individual has the right to vote for whom will be president? It isn't there.
Sure, all states has opted to a popular vote at the state level but that does not mean the state can not change the law at any time.
In fact the Florida State Legislature had voted to stop further counting and they were in the process of an emergency vote to throw out the entire popular vote and then the legislature would approve the members of the Electoral College!!!
Oh, the Yale Law review is not written by lawyers but by ... law students. But even if it had, it would still be just another opinion!!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#150189 Apr 10, 2013
Just in case you do not believe me;

World Socialist Web Site
Published by the International Committee of the Fourth International (ICFI)
Republicans to convene Florida legislature to impose Bush electors / By Patrick Martin / 7 December 2000

The Republican leadership of the Florida state legislature is convening a special session on Friday, December 8 to discuss appointing a slate of 25 presidential electors. The extraordinary decision was announced Wednesday evening by Florida Senate President John McKay and Florida House Speaker Tom Feeney.
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2000/12/elec-...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#150190 Apr 10, 2013
What is funny is that you think that Obama is a legitimate president and at the same time think Owl Gore was the president from 2001 to 2009!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#150191 Apr 10, 2013
Oh, it happened before when Colorado's state legislators appointed it's members of the Electoral College in the election of 1876!!!!

Of course the Florida legislature can choose electors -- ours did

Published 10 December 2000 in The Denver Post
Copyright ©2000 by Ed Quillen. All rights reserved.

To forestall that awful fate, the Republicans decided it would be prudent to admit another state to the union, assuming that it could be trusted to send its electoral votes to the proper party.

Thus Colorado's two leading Republicans -- Jerome Bunty Chaffee and Henry Moore Teller, who both wanted to become senators and needed statehood so they could reach that goal -- assured President Grant that the new state would have a Republican legislature, and with the proper wording in the new state constitution, the new state would cast its three electoral votes for the Republican candidate in 1876.

As so it was that Article 27, Section 19 of the Colorado constitution provided that The general assembly shall, at their first session ... provide by act or joint resolution for the appointment by said general assembly of electors in the electoral college.
http://www.edquillen.com/eq2000/20001210p.htm...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#150192 Apr 10, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Oh, the guy who was knifing people at the Lone Star Community College in Houston stopped when his knife broke! He should have bought a better knife!
<quoted text>
Suppose you are carving on a piece of wood with a knife and the blade breaks? You could be injured. I have a few knives and none are fancy but all are of high quality and are used for what they are intended. An example of improper use of a knife would be using a knife as a pry bar. Yet I have seen people do that and often the blade breaks.
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Rogue Moron as usual misses the point and instead blabbers about whittling.
He wonders why no one takes his brilliance seriously.
Tell us Tootzie, do you think O.J. Simpson used a Dime Store pen knife to murder his wife or do you think he use a BIGGER hunting-style knife?
In any event, Jacques probably thinks O.J. also had a penis envy problem!
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#150194 Apr 10, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Oh, the guy who was knifing people at the Lone Star Community College in Houston stopped when his knife broke! He should have bought a better knife!
<quoted text>
Suppose you are carving on a piece of wood with a knife and the blade breaks? You could be injured. I have a few knives and none are fancy but all are of high quality and are used for what they are intended. An example of improper use of a knife would be using a knife as a pry bar. Yet I have seen people do that and often the blade breaks.
<quoted text>
Tell us Tootzie, do you think O.J. Simpson used a Dime Store pen knife to murder his wife or do you think he use a BIGGER hunting-style knife?
In any event, Jacques probably thinks O.J. also had a penis envy problem!
Rogue Moron AGAIN misses the point that he advocates the more efficient killing of humans.

Rogue Moron again replies with an related BS story he thinks is somehow pertinent. This is why Rogue Moron rambles to himself on a birther thread all day every day.

Very sad.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Amy 3.4.15 2 min Sublime1 2
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 6 min TSM 1,191,983
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 8 min Sublime1 99,165
abby03-03 17 min PEllen 8
Abby 3.4.15 23 min Sublime1 1
abby03-02-15 30 min David Morrison 11
Grateful Dead tickets now going for up to 15K f... 31 min Sterkfontein Swar... 1
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 9:47 am PST

Bleacher Report 9:47AM
Insider Buzz: Mutual Interest Between Andre Johnson and Indianapolis Colts
Bleacher Report 8:57 PM
Weighing Pros and Cons of Bears' Top FA Targets
NBC Sports 9:46 PM
Colts agree to terms on extension for long snapper Matt Overton
Bleacher Report 3:59 AM
Weighing the Pros and Cons of Top Free-Agent Targets
Bleacher Report 5:50 AM
Report: Hasselbeck's Contract with Colts Worth $3M