BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story
Therealnews com

West Sayville, NY

#150106 Apr 10, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>Irrelevant. Citizenship is not a states right, it is a Constitutional Law.
Prior to the Civil Rights Act of 1866, the states had the responsibility of making citizens and the 14th Amendment is the Act, just place where it will take an amendment to overturn it.
This PROVES that the Republican Conservative Supreme Court are Activist Jurist.

==========

No other future Supreme Court or any court is allowed to use Bush v Gore as precedent. Bush is truly an illegitimate President. http://tinyurl.com/2ps3e3
George W. Bush's January 20, 2001 inauguration was unconstitutional. This isn't because Bush lost the popular vote. Nor is it because he lost Florida and thus the electoral vote. The U.S. Supreme Court's decision to hear the Florida recount lawsuit, Bush v. Gore, violated the U.S. Constitution. It's a states' rights issue. Elections fall under state law; the highest court that may resolve a legal challenge about an election is a state supreme court. The U.S. Supreme Court--a federal body--didn't have jurisdiction in the case.
http://yalelawjournal.org/2006/11/07/flanders...

==========

Has Bush v. Gore Become the Case That Must Not Be Named?
August 15, 2006 / http://tinyurl.com/qbx2s
At a law school Supreme Court conference that I attended last fall, there was a panel on “The Rehnquist Court.” No one mentioned Bush v. Gore, the most historic case of William Rehnquist’s time as chief justice, and during the Q. and A. no one asked about it. When I asked a prominent law professor about this strange omission, he told me he had been invited to participate in another Rehnquist retrospective, and was told in advance that Bush v. Gore would not be discussed.
The ruling that stopped the Florida recount and handed the presidency to George W. Bush is disappearing down the legal world’s version of the memory hole, the slot where, in George Orwell’s “1984,” government workers disposed of politically inconvenient records. The Supreme Court has not cited it once since it was decided, and when Justice Antonin Scalia, who loves to hold forth on court precedents, was asked about it at a forum earlier this year, he snapped,“Come on, get over it.”
There is a legal argument for pushing Bush v. Gore aside. The majority opinion announced that the ruling was “limited to the present circumstances” and could not be cited as precedent. But many legal scholars insisted at the time that this assertion was itself dictum — the part of a legal opinion that is nonbinding — and illegitimate, because under the doctrine of stare decisis, courts cannot make rulings whose reasoning applies only to a single case.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/15/opinion/15t...

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#150107 Apr 10, 2013
or is it vice-versa? Oh well I doubt it matters.
Therealnews com

West Sayville, NY

#150108 Apr 10, 2013
Wilson wrote:
<quoted text>Cruz, Rubio and Jindal will never sit in the White House, unless circumstances change.
----------
The US Supreme Court can not change the Constitution, all the Supreme Court can do is decide how the framers intended for the Articles and Amendments to be applied, any interpretation outside the scope intended by the framers will be Unconstitutional.
In order to prevent frivolous and ill-conceived changes to the Constitution, the Founding Fathers made the formal process of amending the document difficult.
In simple terms: an Amendment can be added to the Constitution through a super-majority (two-thirds) vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate followed by ratification by three-fourths of the state legislatures. To repeal an existing Amendment to the Constitution requires the addition of a new Amendment -- as was done with the 18th Amendment (prohibition), which was repealed by the 21st Amendment.
It is not within the power of the Supreme Court to change the Constitution. The founders were very wary of investing too much power in the hands of any single person or branch of government. Essentially, the Constitution rules over the Supreme Court, the President, and the Congress -- they are all bound by IT, not the other way around. If the Supreme Court could change the Constitution, too much power would be invested in the judiciary.
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia's obnoxious remark Wednesday about the Voting Rights Act as a "perpetuation of racial entitlement" wasn't the half of it.

Scalia is often held up by self-described "conservatives" as a model jurist, setting the standard for the type of "strict constructionism" or "originalist" interpretation of the Constitution that Republicans would like to see more of on the bench.

Jurists like Scalia, the pretend argument goes, are the antidote to those "liberal activist judges" who don't appreciate the limited authority of the judicial branch and who abuse their position in order to usurp the power of the executive and/or legislative branches by --- gasp!--- "legislating from the bench!"
Learn to Read

North Vernon, IN

#150109 Apr 10, 2013
Wilson wrote:
<quoted text>Cruz, Rubio and Jindal will never sit in the White House, unless circumstances change.
----------
The US Supreme Court can not change the Constitution, all the Supreme Court can do is decide how the framers intended for the Articles and Amendments to be applied, any interpretation outside the scope intended by the framers will be Unconstitutional.

In order to prevent frivolous and ill-conceived changes to the Constitution, the Founding Fathers made the formal process of amending the document difficult.

In simple terms: an Amendment can be added to the Constitution through a super-majority (two-thirds) vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate followed by ratification by three-fourths of the state legislatures. To repeal an existing Amendment to the Constitution requires the addition of a new Amendment -- as was done with the 18th Amendment (prohibition), which was repealed by the 21st Amendment.

It is not within the power of the Supreme Court to change the Constitution. The founders were very wary of investing too much power in the hands of any single person or branch of government. Essentially, the Constitution rules over the Supreme Court, the President, and the Congress -- they are all bound by IT, not the other way around. If the Supreme Court could change the Constitution, too much power would be invested in the judiciary.
Sorry Dufus. Changing your sign-in doesn't make you any less wrong
Grand Birther

Louisville, KY

#150110 Apr 10, 2013
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
Cruz will never be the POTUS, but yes he is eligible.
Glad you feel that way.
If Cruz runs, he WILL get my vote, even though I know that he is not legally eligible.

Thanks to Obama's usurpation, I would vote for Putin's son if he were a Conservative, born in Russia, presented a fraudulent birth certificate proving birth in the US, and had a US citizen Mother.
Hell, I don't think a US parent is even necessary anymore, only being Conservative and a successful fraud.

Yep, payback will be a MF'er!
Learn to Read

North Vernon, IN

#150111 Apr 10, 2013
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>Cruz will never be the POTUS, but yes he is eligible.
According to Dufus Dale's play law he's not even a Citizen.
Grand Birther

Louisville, KY

#150112 Apr 10, 2013
SMEllen1 wrote:
in order to be President of the United States, a person must be a native-born citizen.
Still waiting for your explanation for SR 511 and John McCain'e Panamanian birth.
Yep, I'm SMellen1, SHEEPLE!

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#150113 Apr 10, 2013
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Judges will say anything to avoid the merits of the eligibility issue!
They know what the evidence proves.
It has been that way for 5 years running, and they must be getting tired of looking like the cowardly idiots that they are.
Too bad that your lie can't be proven with a fraudulent birth certificate that contains no raised seal of authentication and a one-of-a-kind error in the registrars stamp.
The original has NEVER been produced in any court!
The fraud was born in Kenya, Poopoo stain!
Obama is not even American, much less Black or Natural Born.
You mean like when Orly insisted the Georgia case be heard on the merits while no defense was presented and you still lost? I’m sure you remember that old empty chair thing don’t cha GB?

“The Court finds the TESTIMONY OF THE WITNESSES, AS WELL AS THE EXHIBITS TENDERED, TO BE OF LITTLE, IF ANY, PROBATIVE VALUE, AND THUS WHOLLY INSUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT PLAINTIFFS’ ALLEGATIONS…. None of the testifying witnesses offered persuasive testimony. Moreover, the Court finds that none of the written submissions tendered by plaintiffs have probative value. GIVEN THE UNSATISFACTORY EVIDENCE PRESENTED BY THE PLAINTIFFS, THE COURT CONCLUDES THE PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS ARE NOT PERSUASIVE.”

Oh my!
Grand Birther

Louisville, KY

#150114 Apr 10, 2013
SMEllen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Re: Raised seal.
(1) Here is the web image of Mitt Romney's birth certificate:
Why bring up Romney? That is your argument?

Savannah Guthrie is a lying Obot and there is no seal to be seen in that photo, SHEEPLE!
Where exactly do you think you see it at with your delusional brain?

Psst, just because a SHEEPLE said it doesn't mean it is true, especially when you can't see it with your own eyes!
Why don't you post a a link to a copy of the LFBC where your LYING EYES think you see it and tell us exactly where on the copy your delusional brain thinks it is located, HOLLA!

Too bad that your lie can't be proven with a fraudulent birth certificate that contains no raised seal of authentication and a one-of-a-kind error in the registrars stamp.
The original has NEVER been produced in any court!
The fraud was born in Kenya, Poopoo stain!
Obama is not even American, much less Black or Natural Born.

Yep, I'm SMellen1, SHEEPLE!
Learn to Read

North Vernon, IN

#150115 Apr 10, 2013
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>Glad you feel that way.
If Cruz runs, he WILL get my vote, even though I know that he is not legally eligible.

Thanks to Obama's usurpation, I would vote for Putin's son if he were a Conservative, born in Russia, presented a fraudulent birth certificate proving birth in the US, and had a US citizen Mother.
Hell, I don't think a US parent is even necessary anymore, only being Conservative and a successful fraud.

Yep, payback will be a MF'er!
Ranted like a tru patriot.
Grand Birther

Louisville, KY

#150116 Apr 10, 2013
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean like when Orly insisted the Georgia case be heard on the merits while no defense was presented and you still lost? I’m sure you remember that old empty chair thing don’t cha GB?
“The Court finds the TESTIMONY OF THE WITNESSES, AS WELL AS THE EXHIBITS TENDERED, TO BE OF LITTLE, IF ANY, PROBATIVE VALUE, AND THUS WHOLLY INSUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT PLAINTIFFS’ ALLEGATIONS…. None of the testifying witnesses offered persuasive testimony. Moreover, the Court finds that none of the written submissions tendered by plaintiffs have probative value. GIVEN THE UNSATISFACTORY EVIDENCE PRESENTED BY THE PLAINTIFFS, THE COURT CONCLUDES THE PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS ARE NOT PERSUASIVE.”
Oh my!
I repeat!
Judges will say anything to avoid the merits of the eligibility issue!
There are none more blind than those who refuse to see!
They know what the evidence proves.
It has been that way for 5 years running, and they must be getting tired of looking like the cowardly idiots that they are.

I'm sure that two mew nuclear power plants for Georgia caused his temporary blindness and willful stupidity.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#150117 Apr 10, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Ranted like a tru patriot.
Trolling like a trew anti-patriot!
Grand Birther

Louisville, KY

#150118 Apr 10, 2013
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
You mean like when Orly insisted the Georgia case be heard on the merits while no defense was presented and you still lost? I’m sure you remember that old empty chair thing don’t cha GB?
“The Court finds the TESTIMONY OF THE WITNESSES, AS WELL AS THE EXHIBITS TENDERED, TO BE OF LITTLE, IF ANY, PROBATIVE VALUE, AND THUS WHOLLY INSUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT PLAINTIFFS’ ALLEGATIONS…. None of the testifying witnesses offered persuasive testimony. Moreover, the Court finds that none of the written submissions tendered by plaintiffs have probative value. GIVEN THE UNSATISFACTORY EVIDENCE PRESENTED BY THE PLAINTIFFS, THE COURT CONCLUDES THE PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS ARE NOT PERSUASIVE.”
Oh my!
I repeat!
Judges will say anything to avoid the merits of the eligibility issue!
There are none more blind than those who refuse to see!
They know what the evidence proves.
It has been that way for 5 years running, and they must be getting tired of looking like the cowardly idiots that they are.

I'm sure that two new nuclear power plants for Georgia caused his temporary blindness and willful stupidity.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#150119 Apr 10, 2013
St Black Pope wrote:
<quoted text>You are kidding, right? I am not an Obama supporter. All congress did was specify the existing law. John McCain was born in the Panama Canal Zone, while his dad was serving in the military. All family members of military personnel on duty are naturalized citizens and the military bases and hospitals and embassies are classified as American soil. My little sister was born in Panama and she can run for president too. I was born in Alaska before it was a state and I too can run for president.
My little sister was born in Munich, Germany in 1956 and she has a DS-1350 to prove it. Does your little sister have a DS-1350?
Certification of Report of Birth (DS-1350)
http://www.travel.state.gov/passport/faq/faq_...
Grand Birther

Louisville, KY

#150120 Apr 10, 2013
Learning to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Ranted like a tru patriot.
Well,.l.. very much!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#150121 Apr 10, 2013
American Lady wrote:
The Great Betrayal - Obama Budget to Cut Social Security
http://current.com/community/94091281_the-gre ...
Tell President Obama: No cuts to Social Security or Medicare
04/08/13
From all reports we’ve seen, President Obama is going to propose a budget plan this week that is unprecedented for a Democratic president. It will propose a cut to Social Security benefits for seniors, veterans and people with disabilities.
http://www.uaw.org/articles/tell-president-ob ...
I "think" THIS will BE ...
more than your lil hearts can STAND ...
at one time.
He's a f-a-i-l-u-r-e ...
Yet the libTARDS
VOTED
for
him ...
NOT once ...
.
.
.
BUT
.
.
.
TWICE!
~~~~~~~~~
Night
:)
Republican Shame wrote:
<quoted text>
Everytime I read one of your incoherent ramblings, I wonder how someone can be as shamefully uneducated to post something that poorly written.
Then I turn my head slightly upwards and to the left, look at your state of origin, and everything suddenly becomes more clear.
Well, do you support Obama's FY2014 budget plan?
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

#150122 Apr 10, 2013
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Why bring up Romney? That is your argument?
Savannah Guthrie is a lying Obot and there is no seal to be seen in that photo, SHEEPLE!
Where exactly do you think you see it at with your delusional brain?
Psst, just because a SHEEPLE said it doesn't mean it is true, especially when you can't see it with your own eyes!
Why don't you post a a link to a copy of the LFBC where your LYING EYES think you see it and tell us exactly where on the copy your delusional brain thinks it is located, HOLLA!
Too bad that your lie can't be proven with a fraudulent birth certificate that contains no raised seal of authentication and a one-of-a-kind error in the registrars stamp.
The original has NEVER been produced in any court!
The fraud was born in Kenya, Poopoo stain!
Obama is not even American, much less Black or Natural Born.
Yep, I'm SMellen1, SHEEPLE!
Re: "Savannah Guthrie is a lying Obot and there is no seal to be seen in that photo, SHEEPLE!"

Answer: YOU are a lying birther. The ring of the seal can be seen just below the Aug 8 and just above the Apr 25.

And for Obama to have been born elsewhere than in Hawaii not only Gutherie, but the two Republican officials (and several Democrats) who confirmed the birth certificate would have to be lying, as would the public Index Data file and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961. And Obama's grandparents would have had to have had enough money to spend the equivalent of $10,000 sending their pregnant only daughter alone (since WND has proven that Obama senior stayed in Hawaii throughout 1961) on a highly risky (since the incidence of stillbirths was high at the time) foreign trip----when there were perfectly fine hospitals in Honolulu, Hawaii.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#150123 Apr 10, 2013
American Lady wrote:
The Great Betrayal - Obama Budget to Cut Social Security

http://current.com/community/94091281_the-gre ...

Tell President Obama: No cuts to Social Security or Medicare
04/08/13

From all reports weÂ’ve seen, President Obama is going to propose a budget plan this week that is unprecedented for a Democratic president. It will propose a cut to Social Security benefits for seniors, veterans and people with disabilities.

http://www.uaw.org/articles/tell-president-ob ...

I "think" THIS will BE ...
more than your lil hearts can STAND ...
at one time.

He's a f-a-i-l-u-r-e ...

Yet the libTARDS
VOTED
for
him ...

NOT once ...
.
.
.
BUT
.
.
.
TWICE!
~~~~~~~~~

Night

:)
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Tell Washington that some of us are intelligent enough to know that when we say we want them to cut spending we understand that the cuts will include programs we like And that as true conservatives we mean what we say
Since when did the Democrats support cutting Social Security? On, I know, when Obama switched his mind!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#150124 Apr 10, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Another Idiotard ends up in ..... Cuba. This idiot, and his current wife, abduct his two kids and disappear on a small sailboat and of all the places they go, is to Cuba.
Most likely Cuba will return to two kids to the U.S. sooner than later but what about the guy and his wife? Will they be allowed to stay in Cuba? I am not sure but even if they are allowed to stay, they will not be treated as tourists.
I know you Libtards think Cuba is a great place to live but only if you have ..... money and they probably don't have much. And when they do return to the U.S., they will spend a long time in prison. His kids will probably be adulats before their day sees the light of day.
Kids abducted in Fla. custody case taken to Cuba
by Doug Stanglin on Apr. 09, 2013, under USA TODAY News
Source: USA TODAY
A Florida couple suspected of kidnapping their two sons from the woman’s parents in Tampa have fled by boat to Cuba, according to Florida authorities.
The boys had been living since last year with their maternal grandparents, who were granted permanent custody a week ago.
The Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office alleges that Joshua Michael Hakken entered his mother-in-law’s house north of Tampa on Wednesday, tied her up and fled with his sons, 4-year-old Cole and 2-year-old Chase.
The Hillsborough Sheriff’s office has issued an arrest warrant for Hakken on charges of kidnapping and several other counts.
He lost custody of his sons last year after a drug possession arrest in Louisiana, and he later tried to take them from a foster home at gunpoint, authorities have said.
Authorities have previously characterized the Hakkens as “anti-government.”
http://tucsoncitizen.com/usa-today-news/2013/...
New update. Last night the Cuban government put all four of them and their dog on a plane bound for Tampa. The man and woman are in jail and the two kids and their dog are back with their grandparents.
When this guy gets out of prison, he sons will probably be adults!

Couple jailed after allegedly abducting their children, fleeing to Cuba - By Mariano Castillo. Patrick Oppmann and Ben Brumfield, CNN, April 10, 2013

Havana, Cuba (CNN)-- An American couple who allegedly kidnapped their two sons and sailed to Havana last week sat in a Florida jail Wednesday after Cuba hastily handed them over to U.S. officials.
Cuban authorities turned over the family of four to the U.S. State Department and the FBI after CNN found them in Havana on Tuesday.
They arrived in Florida early Wednesday, where the two boys, ages 2 and 4, will get a medical exam, according to Hillsborough County Sheriff David Gee.
He said they secured the family dog for the boys, who will be reunited with it later.
http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/10/us/florida-chil...

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#150125 Apr 10, 2013
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
Then what the hell is this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =oW8JtDYtbWwXX
Or this?
WASHINGTON (RNS) President Obama met with Mormon leaders Monday (July 20) and received genealogical information about his family.
The president met with President Thomas Monson of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and Elder Dallin Oaks, who oversees the church’s genealogical program, along with Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev. Reid, a Mormon, set up the meeting, said White House spokesman Jen Psaki.
http://blog.beliefnet.com/news/2009/07/mormon...
Incidentally, even your own living family members can request certain information pertaining to them specifically not be available to you and vise versa.
Anderson Cooper, different name for LRS. Yes, different names, same old fool.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min Yeah 1,110,464
Word (Dec '08) 1 hr andet1987 4,717
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 2 hr TRD 68,490
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 2 hr gcaveman1 46,675
IL Illinois Governor Recall Amendment (Oct '10) 2 hr Blwlgo 1,928
IL Who do you support for Lieutenant Governor in I... (Oct '10) 2 hr Weneedchange 154
Amy 9-18 2 hr PEllen 26
Amy 9-16 9 hr ralph 58
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 10 hr billyh 98,228
•••
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••