BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Jan 8, 2009 Read more: Chicago Tribune 186,025
The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Read more
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#150179 Apr 10, 2013
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>You are a lying birther.
Lying. Birther. Kind of redundant

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#150180 Apr 10, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
PS : You know, Rogue, most of the mass killers of school children, theatre goers, workplace colleagues, university students and staff, most of those nuts pretty much describe you to a "T". Frustrated, unknowing ultra-right-wing blind followers, non-achieving envious loners, gun adorators, yes, gun adorators, that is the key. Were I living in your neighbouring, Rogue, I'd steer clear.
Ultra right? Try Looney-Lefties!!!
Next, they were all crazy? And some of the victims where college students. Why most of the shooters where college students!!!
Wrond, wrong and wrong. Three strikes, your out!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#150181 Apr 10, 2013
Huuummmm, this is another Obama scheme which is intended to go after the rich people but will actually go after the average-Joes trying to get ahead.
Now, suppose Rush Limbaugh flies his business jet to Las Vegas and it costs him $10,000 for the trip. So now it is $10,010?!?
But let's say you are trying to get a commercial pilots licence and you rent a Cessna 152 at $75 an hour. And then you add another $100?!? Who do you think can easily pay the $100 per flight?
Or how about the person who likes in Alaska and there are no roads, to hike 100 miles through the snow may take over a week, but now a $100 flight in your Maule M-7 is now $200!!!
Obama has a brain the size of a Shitcago rat!

AOPA warns user fee proposal could cripple GA
Association pledges to work with Congress, GA community to oppose fees - By AOPA Communications staff

The White House on April 10 released a budget proposal that includes a $100-per-flight user fee—a charge AOPA warns could be disastrous for general aviation.
http://www.aopa.org/advocacy/articles/2013/13...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#150182 Apr 10, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Care to tell us what happened between Feb 2008 and April 2009, Rogue? That little bottom falling out, called a recession, remember? How much of that budget increase did GWB himself account for by signing the first 500 billion dollar bailout WHILE STILL PRESIDENT in October-November 2008?
You think people are like you, that they don't read, that they don't get to the bottom of things, that their sole interests are guns and waffle houses, why, cultured extreme fighting and "wrassssling", why not?
The hard times came, Rogue, and they are still around and you can thank your idol GWB for 95% of it.
Yes, Bush signed it into law, so. Bill Clinton signed four of Newt Gingrich's balanced budgets into law, seven of the points of the Contract with America into law as well as the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 into law. Bush-41 also signed the law banning CFC into law. It does not mean he approved of the law, but he had little choice.
Now, you say GWB is responsible for 95% of it. Can you expand that a little? You know, like cause and effect. Ya know, like the eruption of Mount Pinatubo in June 1991 caused the larger than normal Ozone Hole over the North Pole!!!
No president can sign any law that is not first approved by ..... Congress!!!
If the Republicans had controlled Congress from 2007 until 2011, we would be far better off than we are now!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#150183 Apr 10, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
American er hmm Lady : "In a Christian world this would NEVER have happened".
You mean the inquisition, just to mention one of a thousand horrors, would never have happened in a Christian world? Was that not a Christian world then? Do you know of Isabel la Catolica?
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
MY mistake.
I "thought" WE had grown MORE "civilized" since then!
Since there has been FREE education in America!
Jacques is anti-Christians. Muslims .... good, Christians .... badddd. I wonder if Jacques can figure out why there are no gays in Muslim countries? Why in Mali, if you even look gay, you get executed!!!

French Troops Save 2 Gay Mali Men From Execution
by Jason St. Amand / Staff Writer / Feb 6, 2013

Two men from Mali who were scheduled to be executed for allegedly having gay sex were saved by the French military, Gay Star News reports.

Islamist extremists took over northern territories .........
http://www.edgeboston.com/...

Eye nose, eye nose, Jacques will claim Mali is a Christian nation but the Muslims control the Northern territories!!!!
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#150184 Apr 10, 2013
Ellen1 wrote:
Replying to "Justice Dale."
Re: "As you know Howard was the father of the citizenship clause and I would like for you to find me one indication that he used english common law for his framing.(ratified in 1868) "
Answer: Dream on about Howard being "the father of the citizenship clause. At most he was ONE of the fathers.
Over on the Senate side, the author of the citizenship clause was Senator Lyman Trumball.
And here is what Lyman Trumball said:
“By the terms of the Constitution he must have been a citizen of the United States for nine years before he could take a seat here, and seven years before he could take a seat in the other House ; and, in order to be President of the United States, a person must be a native-born citizen. It is the common law of this country, and of all countries, and it was unnecessary to incorporate it in the Constitution, that a person is a citizen of the country in which he is born. I read from Paschale's Annotated Constitution, note 274:‘All persons born in the allegiance of the king are natural born subjects, and all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural born citizens. Birth and allegiance go together.’ Such is the rule of the common law, and it is the common law of this country as well as of England. There are two exceptions, and only two, to the universality of its application. The children of ambassadors are, in theory, born in the allegiance of the powers the ambassadors represent, and slaves, in legal contemplation, are property, and not persons.”—Sen. Trumbull, Cong. Globe. 1st Session, 42nd Congress, pt. 1, pg. 575 (1872)
Irrelevant! The law was put in place and ratified in 1868 and not one mention of English common law was indicated.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#150185 Apr 10, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
What happens if you have only one good hand? Military aircrews are issued automatic knives because of that very reason. And that is also why traditionally aircrews are armed with revolvers.
Ever try and charge an autoloading pistol with one hand? I know you haven't, but if you had ever handled, let's say a M1911A1, how would you manipulate the slide with only one good hand?
Can you show us anywhere in the Second Amendment that gives anyone the right to decide what arm you can or can not own/carry?
What does "shall not be infringed." mean to you? As far as I am concerned, most weapon laws passed after about 1920 are unconstitutional no matter what our Supreme Court has ruled.
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
The military is the military, Rogue. We are talking ordinary civilians here now. Infringed? Are you part of a militia?
What is this fascination with human-killing weapons? Ever tried reading a book, going to a concert, movie, theatre, watch an opera, a symphony orchestra, a rock or rap or folk or C&W show? A sporting event, the Marlins maybe or Dolphins or Heat? A bit of a change from your penis proxies, the guns.
Have you ever scene a one handed civilian before? And where does it say in our Second Amendment you must be in a militia to own any "arm"? And do you think a one-armed woman has a penis problem?
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#150186 Apr 10, 2013
Therealnews com wrote:
<quoted text>
This PROVES that the Republican Conservative Supreme Court are Activist Jurist.
==========
No other future Supreme Court or any court is allowed to use Bush v Gore as precedent. Bush is truly an illegitimate President. http://tinyurl.com/2ps3e3
George W. Bush's January 20, 2001 inauguration was unconstitutional. This isn't because Bush lost the popular vote. Nor is it because he lost Florida and thus the electoral vote. The U.S. Supreme Court's decision to hear the Florida recount lawsuit, Bush v. Gore, violated the U.S. Constitution. It's a states' rights issue. Elections fall under state law; the highest court that may resolve a legal challenge about an election is a state supreme court. The U.S. Supreme Court--a federal body--didn't have jurisdiction in the case.
http://yalelawjournal.org/2006/11/07/flanders...
==========
Has Bush v. Gore Become the Case That Must Not Be Named?
August 15, 2006 / http://tinyurl.com/qbx2s
At a law school Supreme Court conference that I attended last fall, there was a panel on “The Rehnquist Court.” No one mentioned Bush v. Gore, the most historic case of William Rehnquist’s time as chief justice, and during the Q. and A. no one asked about it. When I asked a prominent law professor about this strange omission, he told me he had been invited to participate in another Rehnquist retrospective, and was told in advance that Bush v. Gore would not be discussed.
The ruling that stopped the Florida recount and handed the presidency to George W. Bush is disappearing down the legal world’s version of the memory hole, the slot where, in George Orwell’s “1984,” government workers disposed of politically inconvenient records. The Supreme Court has not cited it once since it was decided, and when Justice Antonin Scalia, who loves to hold forth on court precedents, was asked about it at a forum earlier this year, he snapped,“Come on, get over it.”
There is a legal argument for pushing Bush v. Gore aside. The majority opinion announced that the ruling was “limited to the present circumstances” and could not be cited as precedent. But many legal scholars insisted at the time that this assertion was itself dictum — the part of a legal opinion that is nonbinding — and illegitimate, because under the doctrine of stare decisis, courts cannot make rulings whose reasoning applies only to a single case.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/15/opinion/15t...
The USSC has been overstepping the boundaries of the US Constitution for over 114+ years, the latest one was when Roberts interpreted that a fine was a tax, this is not how the bill was written.
The USSC is conservative?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#150187 Apr 10, 2013
Oh, do you know who Jack Roosevelt "Jackie" Robinson was named after? No, not the DEMOCRAT FDR but the Republican Teddy Roosevelt!!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#150188 Apr 10, 2013
Therealnews com wrote:
<quoted text>
This PROVES that the Republican Conservative Supreme Court are Activist Jurist.
==========
No other future Supreme Court or any court is allowed to use Bush v Gore as precedent. Bush is truly an illegitimate President. http://tinyurl.com/2ps3e3
George W. Bush's January 20, 2001 inauguration was unconstitutional. This isn't because Bush lost the popular vote. Nor is it because he lost Florida and thus the electoral vote. The U.S. Supreme Court's decision to hear the Florida recount lawsuit, Bush v. Gore, violated the U.S. Constitution. It's a states' rights issue. Elections fall under state law; the highest court that may resolve a legal challenge about an election is a state supreme court. The U.S. Supreme Court--a federal body--didn't have jurisdiction in the case.
http://yalelawjournal.org/2006/11/07/flanders ...
==========
Has Bush v. Gore Become the Case That Must Not Be Named?
August 15, 2006 / http://tinyurl.com/qbx2s
At a law school Supreme Court conference that I attended last fall, there was a panel on “The Rehnquist Court.” No one mentioned Bush v. Gore, the most historic case of William Rehnquist’s time as chief justice, and during the Q. and A. no one asked about it. When I asked a prominent law professor about this strange omission, he told me he had been invited to participate in another Rehnquist retrospective, and was told in advance that Bush v. Gore would not be discussed.
The ruling that stopped the Florida recount and handed the presidency to George W. Bush is disappearing down the legal world’s version of the memory hole, the slot where, in George Orwell’s “1984,” government workers disposed of politically inconvenient records. The Supreme Court has not cited it once since it was decided, and when Justice Antonin Scalia, who loves to hold forth on court precedents, was asked about it at a forum earlier this year, he snapped,“Come on, get over it.”
There is a legal argument for pushing Bush v. Gore aside. The majority opinion announced that the ruling was “limited to the present circumstances” and could not be cited as precedent. But many legal scholars insisted at the time that this assertion was itself dictum — the part of a legal opinion that is nonbinding — and illegitimate, because under the doctrine of stare decisis, courts cannot make rulings whose reasoning applies only to a single case.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/15/opinion/15t ...
Hmmm, can you show us where in our Constitution the individual has the right to vote for whom will be president? It isn't there.
Sure, all states has opted to a popular vote at the state level but that does not mean the state can not change the law at any time.
In fact the Florida State Legislature had voted to stop further counting and they were in the process of an emergency vote to throw out the entire popular vote and then the legislature would approve the members of the Electoral College!!!
Oh, the Yale Law review is not written by lawyers but by ... law students. But even if it had, it would still be just another opinion!!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#150189 Apr 10, 2013
Just in case you do not believe me;

World Socialist Web Site
Published by the International Committee of the Fourth International (ICFI)
Republicans to convene Florida legislature to impose Bush electors / By Patrick Martin / 7 December 2000

The Republican leadership of the Florida state legislature is convening a special session on Friday, December 8 to discuss appointing a slate of 25 presidential electors. The extraordinary decision was announced Wednesday evening by Florida Senate President John McKay and Florida House Speaker Tom Feeney.
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2000/12/elec-...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#150190 Apr 10, 2013
What is funny is that you think that Obama is a legitimate president and at the same time think Owl Gore was the president from 2001 to 2009!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#150191 Apr 10, 2013
Oh, it happened before when Colorado's state legislators appointed it's members of the Electoral College in the election of 1876!!!!

Of course the Florida legislature can choose electors -- ours did

Published 10 December 2000 in The Denver Post
Copyright ©2000 by Ed Quillen. All rights reserved.

To forestall that awful fate, the Republicans decided it would be prudent to admit another state to the union, assuming that it could be trusted to send its electoral votes to the proper party.

Thus Colorado's two leading Republicans -- Jerome Bunty Chaffee and Henry Moore Teller, who both wanted to become senators and needed statehood so they could reach that goal -- assured President Grant that the new state would have a Republican legislature, and with the proper wording in the new state constitution, the new state would cast its three electoral votes for the Republican candidate in 1876.

As so it was that Article 27, Section 19 of the Colorado constitution provided that The general assembly shall, at their first session ... provide by act or joint resolution for the appointment by said general assembly of electors in the electoral college.
http://www.edquillen.com/eq2000/20001210p.htm...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#150192 Apr 10, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Oh, the guy who was knifing people at the Lone Star Community College in Houston stopped when his knife broke! He should have bought a better knife!
<quoted text>
Suppose you are carving on a piece of wood with a knife and the blade breaks? You could be injured. I have a few knives and none are fancy but all are of high quality and are used for what they are intended. An example of improper use of a knife would be using a knife as a pry bar. Yet I have seen people do that and often the blade breaks.
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Rogue Moron as usual misses the point and instead blabbers about whittling.
He wonders why no one takes his brilliance seriously.
Tell us Tootzie, do you think O.J. Simpson used a Dime Store pen knife to murder his wife or do you think he use a BIGGER hunting-style knife?
In any event, Jacques probably thinks O.J. also had a penis envy problem!
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#150194 Apr 10, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Oh, the guy who was knifing people at the Lone Star Community College in Houston stopped when his knife broke! He should have bought a better knife!
<quoted text>
Suppose you are carving on a piece of wood with a knife and the blade breaks? You could be injured. I have a few knives and none are fancy but all are of high quality and are used for what they are intended. An example of improper use of a knife would be using a knife as a pry bar. Yet I have seen people do that and often the blade breaks.
<quoted text>
Tell us Tootzie, do you think O.J. Simpson used a Dime Store pen knife to murder his wife or do you think he use a BIGGER hunting-style knife?
In any event, Jacques probably thinks O.J. also had a penis envy problem!
Rogue Moron AGAIN misses the point that he advocates the more efficient killing of humans.

Rogue Moron again replies with an related BS story he thinks is somehow pertinent. This is why Rogue Moron rambles to himself on a birther thread all day every day.

Very sad.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#150195 Apr 10, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Oh, the guy who was knifing people at the Lone Star Community College in Houston stopped when his knife broke! He should have bought a better knife!
<quoted text>
Suppose you are carving on a piece of wood with a knife and the blade breaks? You could be injured. I have a few knives and none are fancy but all are of high quality and are used for what they are intended. An example of improper use of a knife would be using a knife as a pry bar. Yet I have seen people do that and often the blade breaks.
<quoted text>
Tell us Tootzie, do you think O.J. Simpson used a Dime Store pen knife to murder his wife or do you think he use a BIGGER hunting-style knife?
In any event, Jacques probably thinks O.J. also had a penis envy problem!
Ahh , the penis obsession once more surfaces. How about your Clinton penis envy and your Lewinski cigar sucking envy? How deprived you must feel. "Clinton had it, why not me"?, you no doubt feel.

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#150196 Apr 10, 2013
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
I repeat!
Judges will say anything to avoid the merits of the eligibility issue!
There are none more blind than those who refuse to see!
They know what the evidence proves.
It has been that way for 5 years running, and they must be getting tired of looking like the cowardly idiots that they are.
I'm sure that two new nuclear power plants for Georgia caused his temporary blindness and willful stupidity.
I suppose any excuse is better than none GB. The judge didn’t avoid the merits, he simply found as do everyone else save the birfoon your assertions are baseless and your case is devoid of merit.

You qwazy dude!

Make me laugh long time.

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#150197 Apr 10, 2013
American Lady wrote:
THIS is what "the LEFT & their ilk" believe in.
`````
Gosnell Worker: Baby Screamed During Live-Birth “Abortion”
Today’s testimony during the murder trial of abortion practitioner Kermit Gosnell was no less shocking than previous days. Today, a former employee described how she heard a baby scream during a live-birth abortion.
Abortion clinic employee Sherry West described an incident which “really freaked (her) out” and related to the jury how she heard a child who was born alive following an abortion scream.
http://www.lifenews.com/2013/04/08/gosnell-wo...
```
Court going on now.
Plus; take the Arias trial.
Time & money being wasted on the human dregs of society. Money WE do not have.
libTARDS! doing what THEY do best!
In a Christian world this would NEVER have happened. It IS because we took God out of our schools, courthouses, etc.
No God fearing people, NO knowledge!
imo
No God no peace.
Know God Know peace.
If mere mortals can dispatch the gods at will then who needs them AL. By what magic has the gods been eradicated from the schools and courts? I heard tell your god was everywhere. Can you not say a silent prayer to your god in school thereby not offending the other gods?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#150198 Apr 10, 2013
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Rogue Moron AGAIN misses the point that he advocates the more efficient killing of humans.
Rogue Moron again replies with an related BS story he thinks is somehow pertinent. This is why Rogue Moron rambles to himself on a birther thread all day every day.
Very sad.
Did you know that Jackie Kennedy ordered the kitchen help to save all the leftover wine during a State dinner, mixed it with fresh wine and served again during the next White House occasion.
I wonder what Michele does?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#150199 Apr 10, 2013
What the Secret Service thought of Past Presidents and First Ladies
From the Secret Service/Very interesting snippets from Ronald Kessler’s book about our presidents.
JOHN & JACQUELINE KENNEDY
*A philanderer of the highest order.*
*She ordered the kitchen help to save all the left-over wine during a State dinner, mixed it with fresh wine and served again during the next White House occasion.*
LYNDON & LADYBIRD JOHNSON
*Another philanderer of the highest order. In addition, LBJ was as crude as the day is long. Both JFK and LBJ kept a lot of women in the White House for extramarital affairs, and both had set up “early warning systems” to alert them if/when their wives were nearby. Both Kennedy & Johnson were promiscuous and oversexed men.*
*She was either naive or just pretended to “not know” about her husband’s many liaisons.*
RICHARD & PAT NIXON
*A “moral” man but very odd, weird, paranoid, etc. He had horrible relationship with his family, and in a way, was almost a recluse.*
*She was quiet most of the time.*
SPIRO AGNEW
* Nice, decent man, everyone in the Secret Service was surprised by his downfall.*
GERALD & BETTY FORD
*A true gentlemen who treated the Secret Service with respect and dignity. He had a great sense of humor.*
*She drank a lot!*
JIMMY & ROSALYN CARTER
*A complete phony who would portray one picture of himself to public and very different in private, e..g., would be shown carrying his own luggage, but the suitcases were always empty; he kept the empty ones just for photo ops. Wanted the people to see him as pious and a non-drinker, but he and his family drank alcohol a lot! He had disdain for the Secret Service, and was very irresponsible with the “football” with nuclear codes. He didn’t think it was a big deal and would keep military aides at a great distance. Often did not acknowledge the presence of Secret Service personnel assigned to serve him.*
*She mostly did her own thing.*
RONALD & NANCY REAGAN
*The real deal — moral, honest, respectful, and dignified. They treated Secret Service and everyone else with respect and honor. Thanked everyone all the time. He took the time to know everyone on a personal level.* One “favorite” story that has circulated among the Secret Service personnel was an incident early in his Presidency, when he came out of his room with a pistol tucked on his hip. The agent in charge asked:“Why the pistol, Mr. President” He replied,“In case you boys can’t get the job done, I can help.” It was common for him to carry a pistol. When he met with Gorbachev, he had a pistol in his briefcase. Upon learning that Gary Hart was caught with Donna Rice, Reagan said,“Boys will be boys, but boys will not be Presidents.”[He obviously either did not know or forgot JFK's and LBJ's sexcapades!]*
*She was very nice but very protective of the President; and the Secret Service was often caught in the middle. She tried hard to control what the President ate, and he would say to the agent,“Come on, you gotta help me out.” The Reagans drank wine during State dinners and special occasions only; otherwise, they shunned alcohol; the Secret Service could count on one hand the times they were served wine during their “family dinner”. For all the fake bluster of the Carters, the Reagans were the ones who lived life as genuinely moral people.*

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 25 min Brian_G 51,899
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 58 min woodtick57 1,208,344
News Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 2 hr rabbee yehoshooah... 71,710
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 5 hr ritedownthemiddle 52,446
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 6 hr Penceative people 99,316
Last word + 2 (Mar '12) 8 hr Red_Forman 828
Word (Dec '08) 8 hr Red_Forman 5,163
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]