I repeat!<quoted text>
You mean like when Orly insisted the Georgia case be heard on the merits while no defense was presented and you still lost? Im sure you remember that old empty chair thing dont cha GB?
The Court finds the TESTIMONY OF THE WITNESSES, AS WELL AS THE EXHIBITS TENDERED, TO BE OF LITTLE, IF ANY, PROBATIVE VALUE, AND THUS WHOLLY INSUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT PLAINTIFFS ALLEGATIONS . None of the testifying witnesses offered persuasive testimony. Moreover, the Court finds that none of the written submissions tendered by plaintiffs have probative value. GIVEN THE UNSATISFACTORY EVIDENCE PRESENTED BY THE PLAINTIFFS, THE COURT CONCLUDES THE PLAINTIFFS CLAIMS ARE NOT PERSUASIVE.
Judges will say anything to avoid the merits of the eligibility issue!
There are none more blind than those who refuse to see!
They know what the evidence proves.
It has been that way for 5 years running, and they must be getting tired of looking like the cowardly idiots that they are.
I'm sure that two mew nuclear power plants for Georgia caused his temporary blindness and willful stupidity.