BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#149671 Apr 5, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Now Jacques. try and attack the MESSAGE and not the messenger if you can.
Both Dr. Michael Mann (the tree ring guy) and Dr. James Hansen (the urban heat island guy) have used faulty science and have been fully exposed as radical lefties with an agenda. REAL scientist' agendas have to do with subjective science, not objective pseudo-science!
ICESAT Data Shows Mass Gains of the Antarctic Ice Sheet Exceed Losses Posted on September 10, 2012 by Anthony Watts
Mass Balance of the Antarctic Ice Sheet 1992-2008 from ERS and ICESat: Gains exceed losses Presented by Jay Zwally, NASA Goddard, USA ISMASS 2012 is an activity of the renewed SCAR/IASC ISMASS expert group, which focuses on the mass balance of ice-sheets and their contribution to sea level changes. The workshop is sponsored by ICSU, SCAR, IASC, WCRP, IGS, and IACS with support from CliC and APECS. Video recording and editing provided by Kristin Poinar, Mai Winstrup, and Jenny Baeseman
Mass Gains of the Antarctic Ice Sheet Exceed Losses
Zwally, H. Jay; Li, Jun; Robbins, John; Saba, Jack L.; Yi, Donghui; Brenner, Anita; Bromwich, David
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/09/10/icesat-...
I`ve yet to attack Hansen or Mann or the message.

Oh, how about this? Which century?

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Oh, NASA-MSFC has said the Earth has cooled one degree centigrade so far this century!!!

Jacques from Ottawa wrote :
Which century please?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#149672 Apr 5, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Now Jacques. try and attack the MESSAGE and not the messenger if you can.
Both Dr. Michael Mann (the tree ring guy) and Dr. James Hansen (the urban heat island guy) have used faulty science and have been fully exposed as radical lefties with an agenda. REAL scientist' agendas have to do with subjective science, not objective pseudo-science!
ICESAT Data Shows Mass Gains of the Antarctic Ice Sheet Exceed Losses Posted on September 10, 2012 by Anthony Watts
Mass Balance of the Antarctic Ice Sheet 1992-2008 from ERS and ICESat: Gains exceed losses Presented by Jay Zwally, NASA Goddard, USA ISMASS 2012 is an activity of the renewed SCAR/IASC ISMASS expert group, which focuses on the mass balance of ice-sheets and their contribution to sea level changes. The workshop is sponsored by ICSU, SCAR, IASC, WCRP, IGS, and IACS with support from CliC and APECS. Video recording and editing provided by Kristin Poinar, Mai Winstrup, and Jenny Baeseman
Mass Gains of the Antarctic Ice Sheet Exceed Losses
Zwally, H. Jay; Li, Jun; Robbins, John; Saba, Jack L.; Yi, Donghui; Brenner, Anita; Bromwich, David
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/09/10/icesat-...
You still do not distinguish between sea and land ice.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#149673 Apr 5, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Ya know I have been watching the Whale Wars saga and one of the things I have noticed that the whales are followed by the whalers and the Sea Shepherds follow both and they move around depending of the El Nino Oscillation.
During an El Nino, everyone is in the Southern Indian Ocean but when there is a LA Nina, everyone is in the Southern Pacific. WHY? Well, they all follow the whale's food source which is krill.
You see krill need warm water and when there ia an El Nino the warmer Antarctic waters are in the Southern Indian Ocean. But when there is a La Nina,mit is the Southern Pacific.
And it just so happens that most of the sea ice study is in the .... Southern Pacific. So when there is a La Nina and the sea ice retreats in the Southern Pacific, the Libytards jump up and down and claim it is .... Global Warming. But when there is an EL Nino and the sea ice grows in the Southern Pacific and that is when the Libytards are ... silent (crickets chirping).
You see, they can only blame Global Warming for anything and will never admit it when things do not pan out as planned.
It is like the first female soldier I had to council over getting pregnant. She claimed she did not know how she got pregnant but she got pregnant the way all women get pregnant!
So, Rogue, you must be the first ~savant~ to equate global temperatures with the manner in which a woman gets pregnant.

Now, YOU counselled a woman about how to or how to not get pregnant. Wow. You are the all-purpose Lone Ranger or cavalry, as I`ve yet to see anyone help so many people in distress, from waitresses to men and women soldiers, to people stranded on the road, nice ~~in their place~~ clean black folks at a picnic, and not to mention dressing down those pesky generals and full colonels.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#149674 Apr 5, 2013
Yep, our Labor Participation Rate is the lowest since the Jimmy Carter Recession ....... but it not not Obama's fault?!? Yes sir-ree, you Libytards gulp the red kool aide!

Labor Participation Rate Keeps Falling While Millions of Jobs Go Unfilled Posted: 04/05/2013

The labor participation rate for March fell to 63.3 percent -- a new 34 year low, according to numbers released today by the U.S. Department of Labor. The Bureau of Labor Statistics also shows a very troubling picture for people aged 20 to 24 looking for work with unemployment at more than 13 percent for these young workers.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/heidi-golledge/...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#149675 Apr 5, 2013
Yep, there are 6.5 million FEWER Americans employed right now than when Obama entered the White House and is ia someone else's fault. You Libytards will never point your fingers at Obama!!!
All Hail Obama!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#149676 Apr 5, 2013
Yep, unemployment rate is down to 7.6% and that is good. But the ONLY reason why it is that low is because SEVEN million Americans have given up looking for work.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#149677 Apr 5, 2013
Oh, did you notice how the stock market has reacted to the "good" unemployment numbers?

Stocks plunge after jobs growth disappoints
Stocks open sharply lower on Wall Street after US jobs growth disappoints investors

By Steve Rothwell, AP Markets Writer | Associated Press

http://news.yahoo.com/stocks-plunge-jobs-grow...

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#149678 Apr 5, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Yep, our Labor Participation Rate is the lowest since the Jimmy Carter Recession ....... but it not not Obama's fault?!? Yes sir-ree, you Libytards gulp the red kool aide!
Labor Participation Rate Keeps Falling While Millions of Jobs Go Unfilled Posted: 04/05/2013
The labor participation rate for March fell to 63.3 percent -- a new 34 year low, according to numbers released today by the U.S. Department of Labor. The Bureau of Labor Statistics also shows a very troubling picture for people aged 20 to 24 looking for work with unemployment at more than 13 percent for these young workers.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/heidi-golledge/...
Oh boy, Rogue, how you must be drooling. Salivting even. A great day fOr you AND all Obama haters. Bad job news and, icing on the cake, DJIA is down. Now, if only the US could default, you'd be, why, you'd be dancing in the streets, just like you did the morning of November 7. Hmmm, NOT.

Looks like you'll need more immigrants to fill those job vacancies, Rogue, seeing as you don't have the locals to fill them.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#149679 Apr 5, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Yep, there are 6.5 million FEWER Americans employed right now than when Obama entered the White House and is ia someone else's fault. You Libytards will never point your fingers at Obama!!!
All Hail Obama!!!
But you will, for every little conceivable petty ill.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#149680 Apr 5, 2013
Oh goody, not only has Obama requested that the COLA be readjusted for military disability payments, he is now requesting it for social security payments!!!
Might I make a suggestion. Cap federal emlpoyee pay rates until such a time as the are the same as the private sector!!!
Or, if you post an federal position and you have 100 applicants, you cut the pay for that position. Likewise if you get only a few applications, you INCREASE pay. I know supply and demand is foreign to you Libytards, but it works every time it is tried.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#149681 Apr 5, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Oh, did you notice how the stock market has reacted to the "good" unemployment numbers?
Stocks plunge after jobs growth disappoints
Stocks open sharply lower on Wall Street after US jobs growth disappoints investors
By Steve Rothwell, AP Markets Writer | Associated Press
http://news.yahoo.com/stocks-plunge-jobs-grow...
Can't contain yourself, can you, Rogue? I know, I know, must be hard. At last you can break those dancing shoes in now.

While we're at it, Rogue, would you mind comparing the DJIA average with where it stood spring of 2009 and now, and well, why not, where it stood Jan 01 2013 and now. Thank you.

PS : And unemployment figures, what they showed September 2009 and the present. Oh, I know, today's numbers are "cooked". Of course, GWB's and all other presidents' numbers were never "cooked". One can imagine if that GWB legacy 10.2% in Sept 2009 was cooked, what the real number was compared to Obama's 7.8% cooked number.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#149682 Apr 5, 2013
Oh, just in case you don't know, in South Korea their surname is the first name, like "Kim". The majority surname in Korea is "Kim" with 18.9 million Kim's, the come "Lee" with 6.8 million and then "Park" with 3.9 million.
So, if you were in an officers club and you called "Miss Kim", half the women would look at you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Korean_f...

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#149683 Apr 5, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Oh, just in case you don't know, in South Korea their surname is the first name, like "Kim". The majority surname in Korea is "Kim" with 18.9 million Kim's, the come "Lee" with 6.8 million and then "Park" with 3.9 million.
So, if you were in an officers club and you called "Miss Kim", half the women would look at you.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Korean_f...
Gee, thanks for the lesson. I bet everyone here is surprised that there are a lot of Kims in Korea, north and south. You come out with such interesting facts, Rogue. Hmmm, there goes Mohamad. Do you think that's a popular Muslim name? DOH! Wonder how many Joe Smiths in the US and Canada?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#149685 Apr 5, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Gee, thanks for the lesson. I bet everyone here is surprised that there are a lot of Kims in Korea, north and south. You come out with such interesting facts, Rogue. Hmmm, there goes Mohamad. Do you think that's a popular Muslim name? DOH! Wonder how many Joe Smiths in the US and Canada?
Well yes, there seems to be a lot of Mohammeds out there!
And in Latin countries there are a lot of Heyzooz's (Jesus) out there too!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#149686 Apr 5, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Can't contain yourself, can you, Rogue? I know, I know, must be hard. At last you can break those dancing shoes in now.
While we're at it, Rogue, would you mind comparing the DJIA average with where it stood spring of 2009 and now, and well, why not, where it stood Jan 01 2013 and now. Thank you.
PS : And unemployment figures, what they showed September 2009 and the present. Oh, I know, today's numbers are "cooked". Of course, GWB's and all other presidents' numbers were never "cooked". One can imagine if that GWB legacy 10.2% in Sept 2009 was cooked, what the real number was compared to Obama's 7.8% cooked number.
Yes, Obama cooks his data. During the Bush administration about of a third of the unemployment numbers were revised UPWARDS, another third were revised DOWNWARDS and about a third remained unchanged.
But under Obama, about 90% have been revised UPWARDS!!!
Now this month they revised the unemployment rate for the previous month, Feb. 2013, down from 7.7% to 7.6%. This is a rare exception for Obama ...... but now that he can not be reelected again, it doesn't matter!!!

"On the other hand, though the unemployment rate dropped from 7.7% to 7.6%, this change looks to be almost entirely due to a decline in the labor participation rate, as nearly half a million people decided to drop out of the labor force altogether."

Read more: http://business.time.com/2013/04/05/u-s-econo...

Oh damn, it's that pesky Labor Participation Rate again. Just ignore it as it really doesn't mean anything. I mean, just because peogle are so depressed looking for work, they just stopped looking, it is really meaningless.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#149687 Apr 5, 2013
Oh Jacques, do you remember the unemployment numbers for Sep. 2012? They knew California did not submit their numbers, they released the federal numbers anyway. I mean, California being such a small and insignificant state probably would not effect the numbers, would it? And just before an election, why that is not a motive to cook the unemployment data books, is it?
Yep, in Aug. 2012 the unemployment rate was 8.1% but in Sep. in had dropped to 7.8%. And then Oct. 2012 it had gone back up to 7.9%!!!
Oh, just when was the October numbers released? Hummmm, November 9th. And just when was the elections?!? November 5th? How convenient, AFTER the election!!! Naw, no cooking of the books here!!!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#149688 Apr 5, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, Obama cooks his data. During the Bush administration about of a third of the unemployment numbers were revised UPWARDS, another third were revised DOWNWARDS and about a third remained unchanged.
But under Obama, about 90% have been revised UPWARDS!!!
Now this month they revised the unemployment rate for the previous month, Feb. 2013, down from 7.7% to 7.6%. This is a rare exception for Obama ...... but now that he can not be reelected again, it doesn't matter!!!
"On the other hand, though the unemployment rate dropped from 7.7% to 7.6%, this change looks to be almost entirely due to a decline in the labor participation rate, as nearly half a million people decided to drop out of the labor force altogether."
Read more: http://business.time.com/2013/04/05/u-s-econo...
Oh damn, it's that pesky Labor Participation Rate again. Just ignore it as it really doesn't mean anything. I mean, just because peogle are so depressed looking for work, they just stopped looking, it is really meaningless.
Okay, I think I got it, Rogue. All of Obama's predecessors used different sets of calculations to arrive at the unemployment rate. For sure, Wilson, Hoover, FDR, Truman, Eisenhower, JFK, LBJ, Nixon, Carter, Reagan, GHB, Clinton, they all used true numbers, but this bugger Obama, yessireee, he cooks the books, the only one to do it. Is there no limit to what this despotic dictator Obama can do? Is there no way to stop him? After all, he inherited a balanced budget from GWB, banks were thriving, the mortgage market was cruising along, brokerage houses were so prosperous, they were handing out bonuses like there was no tomorrow, the DJIA was hitting new highs, wars had been won (see : Mission accomplished) in Afghanistan and Iraq and occupation of those two countries was going splendidly, all terrorist attacks thwarted, peace for all Afghans and Iraqis. Yes, Rogue, how could Obama take over such a successful administration and screw it all up the way he did?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#149689 Apr 5, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Yep, there are 6.5 million FEWER Americans employed right now than when Obama entered the White House and is ia someone else's fault. You Libytards will never point your fingers at Obama!!!
All Hail Obama!!!
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
But you will, for every little conceivable petty ill.
Ah, 6.5 million people being unemployed is "petty"??? Petty you!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#149690 Apr 5, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Yep, our Labor Participation Rate is the lowest since the Jimmy Carter Recession ....... but it not not Obama's fault?!? Yes sir-ree, you Libytards gulp the red kool aide!
Labor Participation Rate Keeps Falling While Millions of Jobs Go Unfilled Posted: 04/05/2013
The labor participation rate for March fell to 63.3 percent -- a new 34 year low, according to numbers released today by the U.S. Department of Labor. The Bureau of Labor Statistics also shows a very troubling picture for people aged 20 to 24 looking for work with unemployment at more than 13 percent for these young workers.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/heidi-golledge/ ...
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh boy, Rogue, how you must be drooling. Salivting even. A great day fOr you AND all Obama haters. Bad job news and, icing on the cake, DJIA is down. Now, if only the US could default, you'd be, why, you'd be dancing in the streets, just like you did the morning of November 7. Hmmm, NOT.
Looks like you'll need more immigrants to fill those job vacancies, Rogue, seeing as you don't have the locals to fill them.
Well, just what jobs are available? Spanish interpreters?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#149691 Apr 5, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Oh Jacques, do you remember the unemployment numbers for Sep. 2012? They knew California did not submit their numbers, they released the federal numbers anyway. I mean, California being such a small and insignificant state probably would not effect the numbers, would it? And just before an election, why that is not a motive to cook the unemployment data books, is it?
Yep, in Aug. 2012 the unemployment rate was 8.1% but in Sep. in had dropped to 7.8%. And then Oct. 2012 it had gone back up to 7.9%!!!
Oh, just when was the October numbers released? Hummmm, November 9th. And just when was the elections?!? November 5th? How convenient, AFTER the election!!! Naw, no cooking of the books here!!!
Hmmm, then between Sept and Nov, unemployment went down O.2% Okay, what is wrong with that? Was the election not Nov 6? Today's the 5th, Friday. If the figures had not been released today, Friday, when would it be done? Monday the 8th? Do you get it now? The election was Monday November 6. Figures canNOT be release at least 5 working days into the month, and proof of that, look when they ARE released every month. Again, election being Nov 6, how could figures come out Friday Nov 3? How?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min sonicfilter 1,192,190
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 10 min reality 51,535
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 22 min Graham Cracker 51,370
Drones and the ISIS wunnerful folks. 58 min R Drones AUTOMATONS 10
Grateful Dead tickets now going for up to 15K f... 1 hr DEAD STAY DEAD 2
Amy 3.4.15 2 hr RACE 6
Abby 3.4.15 3 hr Mister Tonka 4
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 9:47 am PST

Bleacher Report 9:47AM
Insider Buzz: Mutual Interest Between Andre Johnson and Indianapolis Colts
Bleacher Report 8:57 PM
Weighing Pros and Cons of Bears' Top FA Targets
NBC Sports 9:46 PM
Colts agree to terms on extension for long snapper Matt Overton
Bleacher Report 3:59 AM
Weighing the Pros and Cons of Top Free-Agent Targets
Bleacher Report 5:50 AM
Report: Hasselbeck's Contract with Colts Worth $3M