BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Full story: Chicago Tribune

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Comments (Page 6,561)

Showing posts 131,201 - 131,220 of167,434
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#148975
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Oh, since the Libtards can not throw out the race card on this issue, they throw out the anti-Semite card. You Libtards are pathetic.
Maybe we don't like Mayor Blooming Idiot because he is a Progressive!!!!

MSNBC: People Don’t Like Mayor Michael Bloomberg, Because He’s Jewish
Posted 10 Hours Ago by Philip Hodges

When liberals can’t answer their opponents’ arguments, we can always depend on them to play the race card. I guess this is why most liberals just aren’t playing with a full deck.
On MSNBC, the panel of “experts” was discussing Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s $12 million gun control ad campaign that will be running ads in 13 states. They wondered whether or not Bloomberg was really the right spokesman for gun control and whether or not he’d be able to convince senators in swing states to vote for more gun control legislation. Maybe someone else needs to spearhead the gun control movement, they mused, to get guns off the streets once and for all. One of the experts on the panel Mike Barnacle chimed in:
”Who, though? Mike Bloomberg, mayor of New York City. I mean, there’s a level of anti-Semitism in this thing directed toward Bloomberg.… It’s out there.”
Al Sharpton agreed:“No doubt about it…. If he was not a big city Jewish man, I think it would be different.”

Read more: http://politicaloutcast.com/2013/03/msnbc-may...

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#148976
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
This from memory : Did Obama not leave his presidential campaign in sept or oct 2008, hurting his election chances, to visit his grandmother in Hawaii? Is that what happened? Not sure, so correct me if I'm wrong , Rogue.
<quoted text>
That was actually a Red Herring for Jacques as he is to lazy, or to ignorant, to use Google. Because if he had he would have found this (and more);
October 20, 2008, 9:21 pm
Obama Leaving Trail to Visit Ailing Grandmother
By MICHAEL POWELL
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/10/20...
Red herring. How about a lie? Red herring does not camouflage your :

1) hate fabrication;
2) Lying on his visit and lying on top of lying by claiming a red herring;
3) Showing more traces of racism by writng "his WHITE grandmother" in capital letters;
4) visceral hate for your president, constantly scouring rotten vile web sites for negative stuff, mostly inventions, on Obama.

Now, your bosom buddy claims that Obama went straight the the registrar's office to destroy all birth records. And you don't even disclaim that. How it must suck to be you, Rogue.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#148977
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Red herring. How about a lie? Red herring does not camouflage your :
1) hate fabrication;
2) Lying on his visit and lying on top of lying by claiming a red herring;
3) Showing more traces of racism by writng "his WHITE grandmother" in capital letters;
4) visceral hate for your president, constantly scouring rotten vile web sites for negative stuff, mostly inventions, on Obama.
Now, your bosom buddy claims that Obama went straight the the registrar's office to destroy all birth records. And you don't even disclaim that. How it must suck to be you, Rogue.
Ah, you still do not get it. There is no president of Rogue Scholar. However, MY COUNTRY has a president!!!
I capitalize "white" because you Libtards will not acknowledge Pres. Obama is of mixed race.
It is not a lie if I did not know it was true or, in this case" I want to prove to you that you are either to lazy, or to ignorant, to use Google.
So, which is it? Lazy or stupid?!?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#148978
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah, you still do not get it. There is no president of Rogue Scholar. However, MY COUNTRY has a president!!!
I capitalize "white" because you Libtards will not acknowledge Pres. Obama is of mixed race.
It is not a lie if I did not know it was true or, in this case" I want to prove to you that you are either to lazy, or to ignorant, to use Google.
So, which is it? Lazy or stupid?!?
FYI, Rogue, I do not use Google a whole lot as I don't very much need to. Everything I write here is from knowledge, memory or personal experience. In the roughly two years I've posted here, you'll never find more than 2 or 3 instances where I have erred and when I have, I've instantly acknowledged it, no problem. I do not STATE things I don't know or am not sure of, the way you do. Example : the Obama visit to his grandmother. You stated he did not visit her. A red herring? I think not. Lie over lie. Does that honour you?
As to straights and gays and blacks and whites, I don't distinguish between those. I only distinbguish what is in peoples' minds and hearts and it's not based on their gender preferences or colour of their skin. You cannot see that, you cannot understand that. You tell me you're white or black, I just shrug. I don't care. You tell me you're gay, I just shrug and wonder why people don't say they're straight. I don't care. You tell me you're Christian, Buddhist, Protestant, Moslem, Jewish, atheist, agnostic, I don't give a hoot as long as you are peaceful and respect your neighbour's opinion on things like abortion, respect him/her if he/she is pro-life or pro-abortion. Seems simple enough, no?
Instead of saying "I didn't know", you use the red herring thing. Do you actually think people here believe that crap? Do you even blush when you lie like that?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#148979
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Oh, since the Libtards can not throw out the race card on this issue, they throw out the anti-Semite card. You Libtards are pathetic.
Maybe we don't like Mayor Blooming Idiot because he is a Progressive!!!!
MSNBC: People Don’t Like Mayor Michael Bloomberg, Because He’s Jewish
Posted 10 Hours Ago by Philip Hodges
When liberals can’t answer their opponents’ arguments, we can always depend on them to play the race card. I guess this is why most liberals just aren’t playing with a full deck.
On MSNBC, the panel of “experts” was discussing Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s $12 million gun control ad campaign that will be running ads in 13 states. They wondered whether or not Bloomberg was really the right spokesman for gun control and whether or not he’d be able to convince senators in swing states to vote for more gun control legislation. Maybe someone else needs to spearhead the gun control movement, they mused, to get guns off the streets once and for all. One of the experts on the panel Mike Barnacle chimed in:
”Who, though? Mike Bloomberg, mayor of New York City. I mean, there’s a level of anti-Semitism in this thing directed toward Bloomberg.… It’s out there.”
Al Sharpton agreed:“No doubt about it…. If he was not a big city Jewish man, I think it would be different.”
Read more: http://politicaloutcast.com/2013/03/msnbc-may...
Logical comment, Rogue. If you and your associates think for a minute that anti-semitism is dead, then think again. Racism, misogyny on a grand scale and anti-semitism are alive and well. And yes, his being Jewish as he leads his anti-gun campaign against the NRA and gun nuts is not an asset. Incidentally, Rogue, a majority now backs stricter gun laws.
LOOPI

Accra, Ghana

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#148980
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

There was an old lady who lived in a shoe
She had so many children...

Jacques Ottawa ran and hid in Canada to avoid child support and the Draft
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#148981
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Re: "Obama can not be BLACK if half of his heritage is WHITE! "

Okay. Half of his heritage is white. He is of mixed race. People who say that he is Black, including him, are referring to old legal and cultural definitions that defined a person as black "if they had one drop of black blood" as one popular quotation had it (see the 1927 musical Showboat).

He certainly has more than one drop of black blood.

And his birth certificate is accurate, as the officials in Hawaii of both parties have repeatedly stated.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#148982
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

LOOPI wrote:
There was an old lady who lived in a shoe
She had so many children...
Jacques Ottawa ran and hid in Canada to avoid child support and the Draft
Ah, the phoney Ghanaian from Kelseyville is back. When were you released and why? Good conduct? LMAO (LRS tm reg'd).

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#148983
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Ellen1 wrote:
Re: "Obama can not be BLACK if half of his heritage is WHITE! "
Okay. Half of his heritage is white. He is of mixed race. People who say that he is Black, including him, are referring to old legal and cultural definitions that defined a person as black "if they had one drop of black blood" as one popular quotation had it (see the 1927 musical Showboat).
He certainly has more than one drop of black blood.
And his birth certificate is accurate, as the officials in Hawaii of both parties have repeatedly stated.
Well, what did Obama check off for the Census? If he checked black, he lied!
Oh, if you tear off the corner of a dollar bill, so long as you have at least 75% of the bill remaining, it is still worth it's face value. If you have 75% or less, it is worth less than it's face value. As far as movies go, I take them with a gain of salt.
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#148984
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, what did Obama check off for the Census? If he checked black, he lied!
Oh, if you tear off the corner of a dollar bill, so long as you have at least 75% of the bill remaining, it is still worth it's face value. If you have 75% or less, it is worth less than it's face value. As far as movies go, I take them with a gain of salt.
Re: "Well, what did Obama check off for the Census? If he checked black, he lied!"

Yes, he did, but then we do not know how he filled out the census form, nor do we know how Romney or Ryan or Bush filled it out---and we don't care, and I don't care how Obama filled out the census form, but you do (which says something about you).

Here, btw, is the census form, and as you can see it allows someone to check off multiple races or to write in the name of "some other race."

http://www.census.gov/dmd/www/pdf/d61a.pdf

But, getting back to the birth certificate: Obama's published birth certificate is still accurate, as the officials in Hawaii of BOTH parties have confirmed.

“Reduce immigration levels”

Since: Dec 06

Kings Mountain, NC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#148985
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Obama Used Social Security Number Assigned To Dead Woman
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

“zero nuclear weapons”

Since: Sep 08

Perryville

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#148986
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Fed Up wrote:
Obama Used Social Security Number Assigned To Dead Woman
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Not another one of those video's again the thing that posted the video is another whacked out birther nut case.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#148987
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Poor Lil Romper Stomper. Looks like getting exposed as the pathetic empty blowhard we all knew him to be was too much for him.

Talk about turning tail and running. What a puss
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#148988
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Fed Up wrote:
Obama Used Social Security Number Assigned To Dead Woman
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Millions of people have errors in their Social Security numbers and/or multiple SS numbers, and the cause was MAINLY data entry errors by SS Administration clerks.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/38678753/How_Many_Soci...

http://www.securityworldnews.com/2010/08/12/2...

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_162-200137...
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#148989
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>Millions of people have errors in their Social Security numbers and/or multiple SS numbers, and the cause was MAINLY data entry errors by SS Administration clerks.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/38678753/How_Many_Soci...

http://www.securityworldnews.com/2010/08/12/2...

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_162-200137...
You and your silly facts. You sure know how to ruin a good rant!
Grand Birther

Greenfield, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#148990
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Looks like not a single birfoon was able to write these simple word, and they thus confirm their deep hatred and bigotry.

"I fully support the right for gay people to be married, and their right to all the benefits associated with married status.

Gender is an infintesimal fraction of what makes a person a person, and I do not care what gender anyone identifies as."

“zero nuclear weapons”

Since: Sep 08

Perryville

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#148991
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Nuclear weapons cuts will make the United States safer
By Kingston Reif | 6 March 2013

Nuclear arms control is back in the news. After paying little public attention to the issue over the long course of his reelection campaign, President Obama said in his February State of the Union address that the United States "will engage Russia to seek further reductions in our nuclear arsenals." A recent report by the Center for Public Integrity revealed that senior Obama administration officials believe the United States can reduce its arsenal of deployed strategic warheads to between 1,000 and 1,100 without harming national security. Those numbers would put the total below levels called for by New START, the treaty that limits the United States and Russia to 1,550 deployed warheads apiece. Meanwhile, numerous high-ranking administration officials have met with their Russian counterparts this year. Further arms control measures were likely on the agenda.

Not surprisingly, many congressional Republicans have expressed opposition to further nuclear reductions. They argue that additional cuts would undermine US security and worry that the Obama administration could reduce the national arsenal outside the auspices of a formal treaty approved by the US Senate

These concerns are misplaced: Further nuclear weapons reductions are squarely in the national interest.

First, as President Obama said in March 2012, "we have more nuclear weapons than we need." Even after New START, he pointed out, the United States would have more than 1,500 deployed nuclear weapons and some 5,000 warheads. Such a large arsenal greatly exceeds any conceivable deterrence requirement and provides Russia with an incentive to maintain a similarly bloated force.

Bilateral reductions below the New START levels would reduce the number of Russian nuclear weapons pointed at the United States. Reductions could also strengthen stability by providing Russian defense planners with less reason to engage in costly worst-case estimates about force requirements. For example, lower US deployed force levels could dissuade Moscow from moving forward with destabilizing nuclear modernization programs -- such as the development of a new heavy intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM). Verifiable limits on reserve warheads and nonstrategic arms would further enhance stability by addressing Russia's large stockpile of such weapons and ensuring that nuclear warheads are actually eliminated as opposed to merely placed in storage.

“zero nuclear weapons”

Since: Sep 08

Perryville

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#148992
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

part 2
Maintaining a nuclear posture and force levels that are still largely based on Cold War-era conditions has many costs. As nuclear security and non-proliferation specialist James Doyle has written, "Given the generally positive nature of the US-Russian relationship, the continued competitive mutual nuclear entanglement hinders the development of truly normalised relations." Keeping an excessive arsenal also costs money; $31 billion per year according to a 2012 study by the Stimson Center. The Pentagon and Energy Department are planning to spend hundreds of billions of dollars over the next decade to build new nuclear delivery systems and warhead-production facilities. Reductions would stem the need for a significant amount of this spending.

Some of those opposed to US nuclear weapons cuts argue that they are irresponsible in light of North Korea's recent missile and nuclear tests and Iran's continued enrichment of uranium. But reducing its number of deployed strategic warheads to 1,000 would leave the United States with far more than enough weapons to deter North Korea, which is believed to possess a total of about 10 nuclear weapons, and Iran, which doesn't have any.

One of the most-repeated arguments against a new round of cuts involves the US nuclear umbrella: Some fear that reducing the American arsenal could cause allies to doubt the US commitment to their defense, thereby tempting them to acquire their own nuclear weapons. However, the continued US maintenance of thousands of nuclear weapons is not necessary to deter the nuclear threats our allies face today. Moreover, further arms control could actually benefit US partners: A US-Russia arms control process that addresses Russian nonstrategic nuclear weapons could reduce the threat posed by these weapons to America's Central European and Baltic allies. Likewise, further reductions in the number of US and Russian nuclear weapons could pave the way for future Chinese participation in the arms control process, which in turn would reduce the Chinese nuclear threat to America's East Asian allies.

Another criticism of further arms control contends that it is dangerous, because Russia likely will not come along unless the United States agrees to limitations on missile defense. It is true that Russia has not yet showed much interest in further nuclear weapons reductions, and that, at least publicly, it has linked further cuts to resolution of its concerns about US missile defenses and high-precision conventional strike capabilities.

But Moscow may still have good reasons to engage. As Brookings Institution arms control experts Steve Pifer and Michael O'Hanlon point out, "The US military can with its current force structure easily stay at the New START limits, while the Russian military must build new missiles to do so. Lowering the limits would offer Moscow a chance to save money. Also of interest to the Russians: Putting all weapons on the table would mean constraining reserve strategic warheads, where the U.S. military has a significant numerical advantage

“zero nuclear weapons”

Since: Sep 08

Perryville

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#148993
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

part 3

In an ideal world, the United States and Russia would pursue a new round of nuclear reductions via a treaty that limits not only deployed strategic forces, but also non-deployed and nonstrategic nuclear warheads, which aren't currently limited by any accord. However, the negotiation of such a treaty will be far more time-consuming and complex than the New START negotiations, which lasted about a year. In the meantime, Russia could deploy a new heavy ICBM, the momentum for further cuts could stall, and the two sides could make down payments on modernization plans that lock in excessively high force levels for decades to come.

To avoid these outcomes, the United States could jump start the process by declaring itself willing to reduce its deployed arsenal below the levels in New START if Moscow is willing to reciprocate. It's a step that could save money, reduce Russia's incentive to build a heavy ICBM, and pave the way for formal negotiations on a new treaty that limits all nuclear warheads. Non-treaty-based reductions have been a long-standing feature of US defense policy under both Republican and Democratic presidents.

As they pursue further weapons reductions, the United States and Russia should also pursue confidence-building and transparency measures that establish mutual trust and could be incorporated in future negotiations. Of particular importance are initiatives that address US concerns about Russia's large stockpile of non-strategic weapons and Russia's concerns about US missile defense and high-precision conventional weapons. Projects that might have that effect would include information sharing, joint experiments and studies, and enhanced dialogue.

The pursuit of further nuclear reductions will not be without significant challenges. Russia's willingness to participate remains uncertain and Republican opposition is congealing. Nonetheless, President Obama should make the push he promised in the State of the Union. If he doesn't, he'll pass up a chance to significantly enhance US security

http://thebulletin.org/web-edition/columnists...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#148994
Mar 27, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Ah, this is a lie, there is NO bullet (ammo) shortage. We have enough ammo to engage in an all out war for at least SIX months. But we will have a shortage of "training ammo" a few months from now. This is no real big deal.
On Aug 30, 1981 I blew out an engine on a Chinook helicopter in S. Korea. It was the only total engine failure I had in my 21 years of flying helicopter. It was a T-55 ASA engine but it was also the second failure in eight days in my unit. As a result they inspected all the other engines in my unit and condemned six more engines.
Now those six engines would be returned to depot for overhaul but the engine on my aircraft and the week prior where trash. So there we had four of out 16 Chinooks without engines. But there were engines available in WAR reserve status. In other words we needed special permission to get those engines shipped and they would not release them. Sooo, for two months we waited for eight engines to be shipped through normal channels.
They have ammo, tires, medicine, MRE's, etc. all in storage but they will not release them as they are WAR reserves. And they will have enough ammo to train with, just not as much as they would like.

U.S. Marines Rattled by Bullet Shortage
27 March 2013

At least one branch of the U.S. military is scrimping and saving every bullet it can while the Department of Homeland Security is on a bullet-buying spree.

Marine Corps Commandant James F. Amos blames sequester budget cuts.

In a video to Marines, he says,“I ask you to save every round, every gallon of gas, that you take every single aspect, or opportunity, in training to get the most bang for the buck.”

Amos said it’s “no time to do business as usual.”

Things have changed. The landscape has changed,” he said.“I need you to be conservative in the way we do business.”

Read more: http://MinuteMenNews.com/2013/03/u-s-marines-...

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 131,201 - 131,220 of167,434
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

68 Users are viewing the Chicago Forum right now

Search the Chicago Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min ritedownthemiddle 1,032,954
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 3 min Frijoles 65,037
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 8 min ScarletandOlive 96,046
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 50 min litesong 42,947
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 1 hr Registered Earth Angel 47,014
Abby 4-17 1 hr RACE 23
Amy 4-17 1 hr Sublime1 17
•••
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••