BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 239673 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#148998 Mar 27, 2013
Oh, who is assign the SS prefix of "999"? Because their are no SS#'s with that prefix. Te military use them for foreign military students in the U.S. Yep, every Vietnamese, German, Dane, Saudi Arabian, Iranian (yes, we use to train them), etc were issue "999" student ID numbers!!!
In the seven years I was a Flight Evaluation pilot at Fort Rucker, AL I flew with about a thousand different students. Sometimes 14 different ones in the same week.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#148999 Mar 27, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Heck, I've heard that Obama has used over a dozen SS#'s over the years! Do you really think the SS Administration issued him all of those???
You've heard that? Was that when Romper was whispering in your ear?

Sorry Rouge - your pathetic fables may get Romper all wet but stack them up against facts and their as empty and impotent as Francis

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#149000 Mar 27, 2013
Liberals like to UNDER estimate the illegal alien problem. Yep, when the truth hurts, they cover it up the best they can!!!

Illegal immigration to the United States
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The illegal immigrant population of the United States in 2008 was estimated by the Center for Immigration Studies to be about 11 million people, down from 12.5 million people in 2007. Other estimates range from 7 to 20 million........

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#149001 Mar 27, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey nebka, that is one opinion but here is another;
Cutting Nuclear Weapons Funding Invites Insecurity, 12 Mar 2013
By David Yonkman, Washington Correspondent
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/nuclear-weap...
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
Now, we have Iran on the edge of deploying their nukes as is North Korea and you think that we can reduce ours and we will be safer? Yes, you and Obama believe that but there are many who think you are foolish.
In the Mid-1930's when German, Italy and Japan were building up their militaries, FDR has his thumb up his azz. And on Dec. 7, 1941 Japan caught us unprepared for war. Japan thought they could bloody our nose and then we would seek peace, but they were wrong. But until we rebuilt our military, we got our azz kicked for about six months. We can not afford to do that in the nuclear age as the next war maybe LOST in 72 hours!
You see, even the Romans two thousand years ago knew that strong military deterred war. Sure, it might not happen next year or the year after, and it may not happen before Obama leaves office, but sooner or later we will pay for not maintaining a DETERRENT!
OMG, only 1,100 ICBs left to defend the US. At an average of 6 nuclear warheads per ICBM, that comes to 6,600 nuclear bombs. And Rogue and those smart Republicans think that is too high a reduction in warheads. We must of course assume that the Russians have an equal number of ICBMs, so that makes 13,200 warheads. China, India, Pakistan, North Korea, Israel, France, the UK also have multiple warhead missiles, and I have no idea how many, but for the hell of it, let's say a combined 2,000 missiles x 6 = 12,000 more nuclear warheads. Total : 15,200. Hmmmm, do you think , Rogue, that maybe, just maybe, we should all start reducing those stockpiles a teeny weeny bit? It's like your 10,000 rounds of ammo hidden under your bed, how many bullets do you need?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#149002 Mar 27, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Heck, I've heard that Obama has used over a dozen SS#'s over the years! Do you really think the SS Administration issued him all of those???
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
You've heard that? Was that when Romper was whispering in your ear?
Sorry Rouge - your pathetic fables may get Romper all wet but stack them up against facts and their as empty and impotent as Francis
Would Rogue mind giving his sources or is LRS?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#149003 Mar 27, 2013
Still poring over Google trying to find Gov Chiles's intentional delay in asking for Washington's aid following Hurricane Andrew, Rogue?

Do you still expect me to find and prove something YOU stated, yet doesn't exist?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#149004 Mar 27, 2013
Fed Up wrote:
Obama Used Social Security Number Assigned To Dead Woman
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =ncXjrirkQM4XX&feature=em- uploademail
Looks like the inteview is taking place in some sort of mall. We have no idea which network reporter is interviewing her. She has no documents, no papers, and quotes no sources.

Hey, why not interview just anyone at all and accept everything anyone says if it suits one's jaundiced outlook on people they don't like. In this case, people they just plain hate, like Obama.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#149005 Mar 27, 2013
My post 149001 . Total : 25 200

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#149006 Mar 27, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
OMG, only 1,100 ICBs left to defend the US. At an average of 6 nuclear warheads per ICBM, that comes to 6,600 nuclear bombs. And Rogue and those smart Republicans think that is too high a reduction in warheads. We must of course assume that the Russians have an equal number of ICBMs, so that makes 13,200 warheads. China, India, Pakistan, North Korea, Israel, France, the UK also have multiple warhead missiles, and I have no idea how many, but for the hell of it, let's say a combined 2,000 missiles x 6 = 12,000 more nuclear warheads. Total : 15,200. Hmmmm, do you think , Rogue, that maybe, just maybe, we should all start reducing those stockpiles a teeny weeny bit? It's like your 10,000 rounds of ammo hidden under your bed, how many bullets do you need?
..........
My post 149001 . Total : 25 200
2,150 active nuclear warheads and I have a link!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_states_w...
No, I have 150,000 rounds of ammo.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#149007 Mar 27, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
Still poring over Google trying to find Gov Chiles's intentional delay in asking for Washington's aid following Hurricane Andrew, Rogue?
Do you still expect me to find and prove something YOU stated, yet doesn't exist?
What parameters are you using to search for it?
You might try Bing!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#149008 Mar 27, 2013
Oh Jacques, did you find this? I did!!!

"It took four days for FEMA to get its first people into South Florida after Andrew."

Why did it take four days? Was it because Gov. Lawton Chiles waited for three days to declare a state disaster and request FEMA? And why would he wait three days?
I will let you look a little longer!!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#149009 Mar 27, 2013
"Within five days the federal government and neighboring states had dispatched 20,000 National Guard and active duty troops to South Dade County to set up temporary housing"

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#149010 Mar 27, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
2,150 active nuclear warheads and I have a link!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_states_w...
No, I have 150,000 rounds of ammo.
I'm surprised that a "military" man such as yourself would think that your country has so few warheads. I may even have underestimated the number of warheads per missile (6) as it seems to be more than that.

Read : en.wikipedia.org/.../Multiple_independently_t... ...

"Purpose

The military purpose of a MIRV is fourfold:
Providing greater target damage for a given ballistic missile payload. Radiation (including radiated heat) from a nuclear warhead diminishes as the square of the distance (called the inverse-square law), and blast pressure diminishes as the cube of the distance. For example at a distance of 4 km from ground zero, the blast pressure is only 1/64th that of 1 km. Due to these effects several small warheads cause much more target damage area than a single large one. This in turn reduces the number of missiles and launch facilities required for a given destruction level - much the same as the purpose of a cluster munition.
With single warhead missiles, one missile must be launched for each target. By contrast with a MIRV warhead, the post-boost (or bus) stage can dispense the warheads against multiple targets across a broad area.
Reduces the effectiveness of an anti-ballistic missile system that relies on intercepting individual warheads.[1] While a MIRV attacking missile can have multiple warheads (3–12 on United States missiles and 3-10 on Russian), interceptors may have only one warhead per missile. Thus, in both a military and an economic sense, MIRVs render ABM systems less effective."

So we are talking over 10,000 warheads for the US alone. The number given by Wikipedia that you supplied (you supply one in a blue moon and it's wrong) is low and may be badly defined. I had not used any source for my number of 6, is why I kept it low.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#149011 Mar 27, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
2,150 active nuclear warheads and I have a link!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_states_w...
No, I have 150,000 rounds of ammo.
150,000 rounds? And you post it? Do you realize now that everyone thinks you're nuts? Least you could do is lend some to those poor bullet-starved marines, ahhhhhh.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#149012 Mar 27, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Oh Jacques, did you find this? I did!!!
"It took four days for FEMA to get its first people into South Florida after Andrew."
Why did it take four days? Was it because Gov. Lawton Chiles waited for three days to declare a state disaster and request FEMA? And why would he wait three days?
I will let you look a little longer!!!!
Frist, you give no reference.

Second, it may have taken 3, 4 days for FEMA to move its derrière, but where does it say it was on account of Chiles's delaying tacticts? Fema is not exactly the fastest-moving bureaucracy in the world, as N.Orleans showed. Show me where it says Chiles delayed the aid. I'll be glad, don't mind at all, to say I was wrong if you come up with it. But you won't. YOU said it, onus is on YOU to find the proof, not me, I didn't say anything about Andrews or Chiles, only asked you to confirm what you accused Chiles of doing, or not doing.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#149013 Mar 27, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
"Within five days the federal government and neighboring states had dispatched 20,000 National Guard and active duty troops to South Dade County to set up temporary housing"
And that proves that Chiles delayed the aid from Washington?
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#149014 Mar 27, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>150,000 rounds? And you post it? Do you realize now that everyone thinks you're nuts? Least you could do is lend some to those poor bullet-starved marines, ahhhhhh.
Now??? I've been certain that Rouge is nuts for quite some time. His bravado re rounds changes nothing (and was likely for Romper's benefit)

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#149015 Mar 27, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Now??? I've been certain that Rouge is nuts for quite some time. His bravado re rounds changes nothing (and was likely for Romper's benefit)
Romper is probably huddling with his council of wise birthers at the moment, no doubt preparing the next birther birfoon offensive in Topix. The council is divided into two groups :

a) The first group will put threats against individuals and countries in words. The aim is to present a threat in language that WE and , in this case, Canada, can easily comprehend. Some of the drafts have leaked and I was able to read one. It goes : "Yeah, that buttflapper and the other one, what's his name again. oh the flaming oil bigot. Oh yeah, dumbazzbastard, we're gonna take 'em for an air boat ride, then get Rogue to join us with his 120,000 rounds of ammunition. We'll have our assault weapons and small pistols for the "coup de grâce, whatever that means, damn Frenchies, then we'll feed 'em to the crocodilies. That'll teach them sissies to be smarter than us";

b) Then, the menace against Canada and that worstest of all enemies...China, Russia, North Korea, Syria? NO. France. Here's LRS's contribution, seconded by American er hmm Pravda Lady : "Yeah, as youse guys know, Canada is in France. Where? In France, not sure where France is, but we'll use my GPS to locate it as we go. That way, we can kill two birds with one stone. All they have are muskets and sabres. We'll use Rogue's arsenal along with his 150,000 rounds. Them frenchies and fu**ing canucks are dead meat. We'll mow 'em down and win the war,'GWB kind of mission accomplished', you'll see. Thst dsmn canuck, he got me so often, but I told him, yessir, got him good too. The firt time, I said fool me once, shame on me and when he got me again, I floored him with : Fool me twice shame on me." LMAO LRS tm reg'd).

Rogue made these two phrases famous, with LRS eagerly cheering him on and agreeing, "spot on" LMAO (LRS tm reg'd).

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#149016 Mar 27, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
2,150 active nuclear warheads and I have a link!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_states_w ...
No, I have 150,000 rounds of ammo.
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm surprised that a "military" man such as yourself would think that your country has so few warheads. I may even have underestimated the number of warheads per missile (6) as it seems to be more than that.
Read : en.wikipedia.org/.../Multiple_independently_t... ...
"Purpose
The military purpose of a MIRV is fourfold:
Providing greater target damage for a given ballistic missile payload. Radiation (including radiated heat) from a nuclear warhead diminishes as the square of the distance (called the inverse-square law), and blast pressure diminishes as the cube of the distance. For example at a distance of 4 km from ground zero, the blast pressure is only 1/64th that of 1 km. Due to these effects several small warheads cause much more target damage area than a single large one. This in turn reduces the number of missiles and launch facilities required for a given destruction level - much the same as the purpose of a cluster munition.
With single warhead missiles, one missile must be launched for each target. By contrast with a MIRV warhead, the post-boost (or bus) stage can dispense the warheads against multiple targets across a broad area.
Reduces the effectiveness of an anti-ballistic missile system that relies on intercepting individual warheads.[1] While a MIRV attacking missile can have multiple warheads (3–12 on United States missiles and 3-10 on Russian), interceptors may have only one warhead per missile. Thus, in both a military and an economic sense, MIRVs render ABM systems less effective."
So we are talking over 10,000 warheads for the US alone. The number given by Wikipedia that you supplied (you supply one in a blue moon and it's wrong) is low and may be badly defined. I had not used any source for my number of 6, is why I kept it low.
Did you read my link? It has the exact number! And it gives a source!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#149017 Mar 27, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Oh Jacques, did you find this? I did!!!
"It took four days for FEMA to get its first people into South Florida after Andrew."
Why did it take four days? Was it because Gov. Lawton Chiles waited for three days to declare a state disaster and request FEMA? And why would he wait three days?
I will let you look a little longer!!!!
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Frist, you give no reference.
Second, it may have taken 3, 4 days for FEMA to move its derrière, but where does it say it was on account of Chiles's delaying tacticts? Fema is not exactly the fastest-moving bureaucracy in the world, as N.Orleans showed. Show me where it says Chiles delayed the aid. I'll be glad, don't mind at all, to say I was wrong if you come up with it. But you won't. YOU said it, onus is on YOU to find the proof, not me, I didn't say anything about Andrews or Chiles, only asked you to confirm what you accused Chiles of doing, or not doing.
No, I deliberately did not leave a link. If I found it, so can you, if you want to!
Oh, I have done military alert notices. You do a load out and then stage and wait for the move out orders!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min VetnorsGate 1,510,389
News Scientists say they have proved climate change ... (Dec '08) 26 min Patriot AKA Bozo 8,084
last post wins! (Apr '13) 3 hr _FLATLINE-------- 2,384
last post wins! (Dec '10) 3 hr _FLATLINE-------- 3,058
Obama has LEAK under sink. 6 hr TruePlumberTroy 43
The Scoop on Weiner. 6 hr Im the Moyle 6
Deporting Seniors. 6 hr I want a Limo 1

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages