ŕYour reply has you foaming at the mouth, and it's all twisted, crooked and made-up. You ignore facts, you ignore findings, you ignore statistics and you somehow lump in Vietnam and the after-war slaughter which, incidentally, I condemned here two days ago, and underlined the fact that Saddam was a tyrant who killed but was a tyrant we knew and much less threatening than what we have now.<quoted text>
Sooo the U.N. did not find any WMD before the war resumed. Then what was the 27 U.N. mandates about? The U.N. inspectors where being held up by the Iraqis. At one point they were enroute to a site when an Iraqi intentionally had a head-on collision with the lead vehicle.
And Saddamn and nothing to do with killing people? And the Mahdi Army, funded by Iran, had nothing to do with people being killed? Al Qaeda, who moved in after the fall of Saddamn, had nothing to do with any killing? Bush did not cause the Iraqi civil war.
You probably blame Nixon for the slaughter of a half million unarmed civilians in South Vietnam after the Vietnam War ended
You of all people deny that Obama was elected and is your president. Shouold we therefore be surprised that you deny that the invasion and occupation of Iraq was a disaster, a total unmitigated disaster based on lies and fabrications? Throw in Afghanistan where Obama had to finish GWB's mission, namely to capture or kill BinLaden.