BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 207638 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#148070 Mar 22, 2013
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
No Grand Jury was used in this case Mr. Liars so there’s no way of knowing whether they would have thrown the book at him or no, but that’s not the point. The question was why did he (Zimmerman) lie about his finances at the bail hearing? That sir has nothing to do with the Martin kid and goes directly to Zimmerman’s credibility.
The one thing the thread was totally unaware of Mr. Liars is the personal relationship you seem to have had with the Martin kid.
Again, did he LIE? Did he know that that money was available to him? If he did not, he did not lie. And he has not been charged with perjury, has he?
You want to see a person lying?

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#148071 Mar 22, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Obumbler was never properly vetted!
http://www.redstate.com/2012/09/21/vetting-ob...
Here’s the deal Mr. Liars. You and your birfoon cohorts have had over six years to vet Obama and have come up with zilch. The not properly vetted thing should be pretty stale by now even for the ignorant birfoon who appears to have no limit as to how high he’s willing to raise the bar for this president.

The fact is Obama was vetted by the press and his opponents the same as any other president and his qualification status decisively determined years before he ever ran for POTUS.

That you prefer to believe your own lies is a personal malady common to the birfoon for which at this time there appears to be no cure. The good news is that plain old everyday common sense seems to be the vaccine.

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#148072 Mar 22, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, did he LIE? Did he know that that money was available to him? If he did not, he did not lie. And he has not been charged with perjury, has he?
You want to see a person lying?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =_ZfrLTD1PZ0XX
I don’t know if he lied or not Rogue. Try googling this.

“Judge Kenneth Lester said Zimmerman engaged in a "material falsehood" about his finances”
Jacques Ottawa

Mississauga, Canada

#148073 Mar 22, 2013
john wrote:
You guys are all nut jobs. These people know when I haven't paid a parking ticket. Do you think the repubs would really just on talking about it? Do you think if they had a chance that he really wasn't born here that he would be president? To me what you are saying is that the repub's are idiots.
John : "To me what you are saying is that the repub's are idiots"

Roger that. Yes
Jacques Ottawa

Mississauga, Canada

#148074 Mar 22, 2013
Robert Laity wrote:
Obama is a Fraud,traitor and spy!
Fraud and traitor we've heard before. Now comesa new one : Spy. Well, why not? And add anti-Christ to the mixture.
Jacques Ottawa

Mississauga, Canada

#148075 Mar 22, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Sad murder in Bruswick, GA yesterday. Two ghetto kids shoot a toddler in a stroller during a robbery attempt. One's estimated age is 13-15 and the other 10-12. Sad, very sad!
And this is what the Welfare system has given us.
Baby killed, mother shot in Brunswick, Ga.
6:39 PM, Mar 21, 2013
BRUNSWICK, Ga.(WJXT/CNN)- The search is on for a young suspect in the shooting of a mother and her baby in the small, coastal community of Brunswick, Ga.
Police say the 13-month-old baby was killed while riding in a stroller Thursday morning. The mother was also shot multiple times but is expected to survive.
Officers believe the gunman is between 13 and 15-years-old. They say he was with another boy who was a couple of years younger.
It's not known if the mother and child were the intended targets.
http://www.ksdk.com/news/article/370772/28/Ba...
Oh, the mother was white, the father who was not there appears to be Hispanic but the the shooter and his accomplice are black.
Again with skin colour. Oh, Rogue, er, hmm, got any idea where those children got their gun? How come you make no mention of that? Just guessing here, but maybe from their parents who, in turn, just maybe, just walked into a gun store one day, driver's licence in hand, and...bought a gun and left it lying around? Maybe? But, hey, the colour of their skin or whether or not they are latinos is a lot more important to you.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#148076 Mar 22, 2013
Nine year old explains money.
http://media.swissamerica.com/features/mp4/si...
Jacques Ottawa

Mississauga, Canada

#148077 Mar 22, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, did he LIE? Did he know that that money was available to him? If he did not, he did not lie. And he has not been charged with perjury, has he?
You want to see a person lying?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =_ZfrLTD1PZ0XX
Lie? I thought you'd show GWB stating that there were WMD in Iraq.

Now, Rogue, let's examine the "lies" of both Clinton and GWB and their consequences.

Clinton : Of course he lied. He lied to cover up his womanizing and infidelity. Most men will initially do that, go in denial when caught. No excuses, he lied bare-faced. He knows it, everyone knows it. Consequences of his lying?: Ruined marriage, his daughter is put to shame and congress's business is interrupted, sadly, by impeachment procedures. A few million dollars in lawyers, etc, I suppose. Anything else? Nope. Clinton still considered one of best US presidents;

GWB : Of course he lied. He lied to cover up real reason of invasion of Iraq - to avenge his father after Saddam apparently tried to have him killed. No excuses, he lied bare-faced. Consequences of his lying?: I could go on all day. Let's just say, 4,800 GIs killed, 30,000 wounded, many very seriously, both physically and psychologically. Over 120,000 Iraqis killed, military and civilian. Infrastructure, precious monuments, ruins, destroyed forever. Entry into Iraq of Taliban, Al Qaeda and Iranians, all of whom were NOT THERE when evil Saddam was in power. Persecution of Christians and Jews following invasion. Damage to relations with other countries. Increased terrorist activities in Iraq, almost one a day since invasion. Cost of Iraq adventure, minimum $1 trillion, and when one factors domestic and foreign costs, most likely 2 to 3 billion dollars. Etc.

So, Rogue, which of the Clinton or GWB lies were the most damaging to the nation and the world?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#148078 Mar 22, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Again with skin colour. Oh, Rogue, er, hmm, got any idea where those children got their gun? How come you make no mention of that? Just guessing here, but maybe from their parents who, in turn, just maybe, just walked into a gun store one day, driver's licence in hand, and...bought a gun and left it lying around? Maybe? But, hey, the colour of their skin or whether or not they are latinos is a lot more important to you.
Is the truth evil? The fact is, is that about half of all violent crimes are committed by blacks who make up only 12% of our population. The question is WHY?
The south side of New Brunswick, GA is a predominate black ghetto. In fact, the entire town of New Brunswick is a black majority community!

From Wiki: The racial makeup of the city {New Brunswick] was 59.8% African American, 36.4% White, 0.3% Native American, 0.4% Asian, <0.1% Pacific Islander, 1.7% from other races, and 1.4% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 1.8% of the population.

Now, do you remember this incident in New Brunswick a few months ago?

Brunswick man trying to sell firearm shot by customer, police say
2 men and 16-year-old charged in the shooting.
Posted: December 5, 2012 -
Read more at Jacksonville.com : http://jacksonville.com/news/crime/2012-12-05...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#148079 Mar 22, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Lie? I thought you'd show GWB stating that there were WMD in Iraq.
Now, Rogue, let's examine the "lies" of both Clinton and GWB and their consequences.
Clinton : Of course he lied. He lied to cover up his womanizing and infidelity. Most men will initially do that, go in denial when caught. No excuses, he lied bare-faced. He knows it, everyone knows it. Consequences of his lying?: Ruined marriage, his daughter is put to shame and congress's business is interrupted, sadly, by impeachment procedures. A few million dollars in lawyers, etc, I suppose. Anything else? Nope. Clinton still considered one of best US presidents;
GWB : Of course he lied. He lied to cover up real reason of invasion of Iraq - to avenge his father after Saddam apparently tried to have him killed. No excuses, he lied bare-faced. Consequences of his lying?: I could go on all day. Let's just say, 4,800 GIs killed, 30,000 wounded, many very seriously, both physically and psychologically. Over 120,000 Iraqis killed, military and civilian. Infrastructure, precious monuments, ruins, destroyed forever. Entry into Iraq of Taliban, Al Qaeda and Iranians, all of whom were NOT THERE when evil Saddam was in power. Persecution of Christians and Jews following invasion. Damage to relations with other countries. Increased terrorist activities in Iraq, almost one a day since invasion. Cost of Iraq adventure, minimum $1 trillion, and when one factors domestic and foreign costs, most likely 2 to 3 billion dollars. Etc.
So, Rogue, which of the Clinton or GWB lies were the most damaging to the nation and the world?
AGAIN, you can not prove Bush lied about WMD in Iraq!!! To lie, one must know what he is saying is untrue!!! Your assumption that Bush lied is based on your hatred of G.W. Bush, and nothing more!
Jacques Ottawa

Mississauga, Canada

#148082 Mar 22, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Is the truth evil? The fact is, is that about half of all violent crimes are committed by blacks who make up only 12% of our population. The question is WHY?
The south side of New Brunswick, GA is a predominate black ghetto. In fact, the entire town of New Brunswick is a black majority community!
From Wiki: The racial makeup of the city {New Brunswick] was 59.8% African American, 36.4% White, 0.3% Native American, 0.4% Asian, <0.1% Pacific Islander, 1.7% from other races, and 1.4% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 1.8% of the population.
Now, do you remember this incident in New Brunswick a few months ago?
Brunswick man trying to sell firearm shot by customer, police say
2 men and 16-year-old charged in the shooting.
Posted: December 5, 2012 -
Read more at Jacksonville.com : http://jacksonville.com/news/crime/2012-12-05...
Er, Rogue, killing was done with a gun. A gun, Rogue. I pointed out that you did not mention this weapon, and how the children got their hands on THE GUN, and now you come back with statistics and skin colour again. The gun didn't kill, the kids did. Suuuuure. And the person who died of a drug overdose didn't really kill himself, noooo, the drug did it. Keep fantasizing, Rogue. Ever thought of getting a job as a spokersperson for the NRA or the John Birch society?
Zippy

Jacksonville, FL

#148083 Mar 22, 2013
American Lady wrote:
Ex-CIA Operative: Obama Never Properly Vetted
http://www.newsmax.com/US/barack-obama-presid...
Obama’s Nuclear Weapons Drawdown Could Run Afoul of the Law
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/newswidget/obama-nucle...
But, but, but, Obama is the most transparent president we ever had. I know cause he said so!!!
Learn to Read

Columbus, IN

#148084 Mar 22, 2013
Robert Laity wrote:
Obama is a Fraud,traitor and spy!
Bobbie is stuck on stupid
Jacques Ottawa

Mississauga, Canada

#148085 Mar 22, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
AGAIN, you can not prove Bush lied about WMD in Iraq!!! To lie, one must know what he is saying is untrue!!! Your assumption that Bush lied is based on your hatred of G.W. Bush, and nothing more!
No, it's not. I don't hate the man. Hate is a stupid reason if thaat is the only reason and there are so many here. Of the 11 Security council members, fully 9 voted against. Of the permanent 5, fully 3 voted against going into Iraq. That is why GWB moved into Iraq WITHOUT UN approval. And no more of that BS that Germany, Russia etc approved. They most assuredly did not, as most of the world KNEW there were no WMD, foremost Hans Blix who headed the inspection missions. See also very comprehensive WMD reprot by thousands of investigators.

What of the consequences of GWB and Clinton lies? You have no comment? Not even one? As the president of the United States of America, are you trying to tell us that the CIA lied to GWB? Really? If that premise is correct, do you realise the seriousness of that accusation? That the CIA would like to the president in order to pursue its agenda? And why did GWB and his flunkies not believe the rest of the world, the majority of countries, allies and non-allies, that kept repeating that there were no WMDs?
Jacques Ottawa

Mississauga, Canada

#148086 Mar 22, 2013
Zippy

Jacksonville, FL

#148087 Mar 22, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
Well dah, did you read the first sentence? What does "after the 2003 invasion of Iraq" mean to you?
We are talking about BEFORE the war. Monday morning quarterbacking is just that. Calling the plays after they have been played.
Again, the question is "Did Bush know what he was saying was untrue?"
Again, you are so blinded by your hatred of G.W. Bush, you will never see the truth!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#148088 Mar 22, 2013
Yep, you just mention Bush, Cheney, Rush Limbaugh, etc. and the Libtards start foaming at the mouth.
Jacques Ottawa

Mississauga, Canada

#148089 Mar 22, 2013
Zippy wrote:
<quoted text>
Well dah, did you read the first sentence? What does "after the 2003 invasion of Iraq" mean to you?
We are talking about BEFORE the war. Monday morning quarterbacking is just that. Calling the plays after they have been played.
Again, the question is "Did Bush know what he was saying was untrue?"
Again, you are so blinded by your hatred of G.W. Bush, you will never see the truth!
Rogue is now ZIPPY? How about a Charlie Brown kind of name, like FLASH? LMAO (LRS tm reg'd).

It is NOT Monday morning quarterbacking, as the UN inspection team numerous times told the world there were NO WMDs pre-invasion, the majority of countries, allies and foes alike, said there were NO WMDs, the security council said there were NO WMDs, your best and closest ally, Canada, told you there were NO WMDs. The post-invasion inspections up to 2004, 11 YEARS OF INSPECTIONS, confirmed what the world and the UN told GWB BEFORE the invasion.

Your accusation of my hate of GWB is childish and proof-less. It is not an adult and intelligent counter-argument. I hated the Stalins and Hitlers of this world, yes, as they intentionally killed millions. GWB had many killed, and at what cost, but he lied, and then bumbled into it, did not realize the horror he had unleashed. I don't hate him, just feel sorry for him as how the hell can he sleep? The US is still feeling, andwill for a long time, the after-effects of that stupid invasion in deaths, maimings, damaged foreign relations and financial catastrophe. Do talk to me about Clinton's and GWB's consequences. You continue avoiding the subject, for some reason.
Jacques Ottawa

Mississauga, Canada

#148090 Mar 22, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Yep, you just mention Bush, Cheney, Rush Limbaugh, etc. and the Libtards start foaming at the mouth.
Saw that clip of Tim's restaurant on NBC last night. Touching indeed, and what parents Tim has!

Now Rogue, do you realise, every time you use the word "Libtards" (Rogue tm reg'd) like you just did up there, that you do not so much as demean and insult liberals, but rather, you demean and insult people like Tim, as we must assume that being retarded is a bad and shameful thing.

Bravo, Rogue. Should you ever visit Tim's restaurant, will you ever tag a liberal as a "libtard" in front of Tim, his parents and his appreciative customers?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#148091 Mar 22, 2013
I have read a few of Damn Linker's writing and he does not seem to ever been a Conservative nor is there any indication he ever was a Republican. Oh, please not that he later on says "consider myself a Republican"!
I have never been a MEMBER of the Republican Party but I WAS registered as a Republican. I re-registered as a NPA about 2003 and it had nothing to do with war in Iraq. It had to do with the Country Clubbers who still dominate the RNC. I re-registered as a Republican over a year ago so I could vote in the Republican primaries but I do not consider myself as a Republican.
Sooo, I wonder why Damon Linker has just now made this announcement? I have no idea but I seriously doubt if it had anything to do with the war in Iraq!

Why I am no longer a Republican
By Damon Linker | The Week –

"But thanks in large part to the Iraq war, I no longer consider myself a Republican or a man of the right."
http://news.yahoo.com/why-am-no-longer-republ...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min RoxLo 1,347,814
abby2-12-16 36 min RACE 1
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 43 min Russell797 57,317
Double Word Game (Dec '11) 57 min RACE 1,846
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 58 min RACE 7,322
Word (Dec '08) 59 min RACE 5,650
last post wins! (Apr '13) 3 hr Red_Forman 621
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages