BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Full story: Chicago Tribune

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...
Comments
128,941 - 128,960 of 174,966 Comments Last updated 1 hr ago

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#146432
Mar 10, 2013
 
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
I've totally debunked that grade 1 economic theory of yours several times, Rogue. And, as ususal, you were stuffed, had no comeback, but you just put it away for later, didn't you? And out it comes today, certain that I and others here forgot your silly little mortgager theory. It won't fly. Hell, I remember even using parables with traffic lights and all that to make you understand, all to no avail. Jimmy Carter was president in 1976, for heaven's sake, 25+ yrs prior to GWB. And there was no sign, not even a hint of a housing bubble with Clinton, quite the opposite. Your dear sweet friends that you defend delay, the rich s.o.b.'s who cheat, like the brokers, the mortgage middlemen and the bankers who made ANY loan to ANYone and as recompense cashed in huge bonuses, and not one of them in jail. Do you mean to tell me that the majority of people who over-borrowed are blacks? Your crooked friends profited from NO oversight by GWB aided by Alan Greenspan to make a short term profit, knowing full well that they HAD to be bailed out or else, when the day of reckoning came, as it was sure to do.
Your "lords" of the manor took a good home financing plan and rigged it. And you defend them, hell, you blame Carter who was president 25 years before GSB.
You have to combine Jimmy Carter's laws with Bill Clinton's. Before Bill Clinton, all it said was you could not discriminate but under Bill Clinton's laws it became CRIMINAL!!!
And a bad loan is a hot potato. Once you have it you try and give it away and the last one with it gets burned. Why have we had to bail out Freddie Mac and Fanny Mae?
Federal takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
The federal takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac refers to the placing into conservatorship of government sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by the U.S. Treasury in September 2008. It was one of the financial events among many in the ongoing subprime mortgage crisis.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_takeover...
Yep, they made the same mistakes the banks did, making loans. But as long as they made loans, they had to make loans to every and anyone. Thank you Jimmy F-ing Carter and Bill "Bent Crank" Clinton!
The only way the banks could have gotten out of it is stop making housing loans to everyone.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#146434
Mar 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

FFS- wrote:
<quoted text>You cant really be that stupid, can you?
If anything, Reagan is a Rino in comparison to the nutters running the repub party today
Reagan:
Granted amnesty to illegals
Extended unemployemnt 17 times
INCREASED federal government hiring to lower the unemployment rate, and it worked (imagine if Obama tried that)
Raised taxes 11 times
Increased CORPORATE income taxes & closed loopholes:
“We’re going to make it economical to raise children again. Flatter rates will mean more reward for that extra effort, and vanishing loopholes and a minimum tax will mean that everybody and every corporation pay their fair share.”(sounds kinda like Obama)
Obviously you are a mushroom. You live in a dark closet and people feed you sh*t!
The Democrats controlled the House under Reagan and all they had to do is add things to the budget. Then all he could do is sign it into law or veto the whole thing.
All Tax increases under Reagan were honchoed through the Democrat controlled House!
As far as the flat tax, the idea is to LOWER the tax rate and close loop wholes. Obama just raised the tax rates for the evil rich and now he wants to close loop hole (tax advantages).
You do know Reagan wanted to close the Dept. of Education, Dept. of Labor, OSHA, EPA and Dept. of Energy, don't you? But the Democrat controlled House would not let him.
Reagan was for much smaller government!!!
You are reading way to much Liberal garbage.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#146438
Mar 10, 2013
 
FFS- wrote:
<quoted text>You cant really be that stupid, can you?
If anything, Reagan is a Rino in comparison to the nutters running the repub party today
Reagan:
Granted amnesty to illegals
Extended unemployemnt 17 times
INCREASED federal government hiring to lower the unemployment rate, and it worked (imagine if Obama tried that)
Raised taxes 11 times
Increased CORPORATE income taxes & closed loopholes:
“We’re going to make it economical to raise children again. Flatter rates will mean more reward for that extra effort, and vanishing loopholes and a minimum tax will mean that everybody and every corporation pay their fair share.”(sounds kinda like Obama)
You can't really be that stupid, can you?
Using your Libtardian Logic, Bill Clinton was a CONSERVATIVE. After all, he did sigh into law four of Newt Gingrich's balanced budgets, seven of the point of the Contract with America, the Taxpayer relied Act of 1997 AND DOMA.
You see, any president can only sign into law bill that are passed by Congress. Right now the only thing that is saving Obama is the Democrat controlled Senate.
Oh, why is Bill Clinton against DOMA now when he signed it into law in 1996? DOMA was passed by the Republican controlled Congress and he could have vetoed it, but he didn't!!!

Since: Aug 10

Buffalo, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#146441
Mar 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Obviously you are a mushroom. You live in a dark closet and people feed you sh*t!
The Democrats controlled the House under Reagan and all they had to do is add things to the budget. Then all he could do is sign it into law or veto the whole thing.
All Tax increases under Reagan were honchoed through the Democrat controlled House!
As far as the flat tax, the idea is to LOWER the tax rate and close loop wholes. Obama just raised the tax rates for the evil rich and now he wants to close loop hole (tax advantages).
You do know Reagan wanted to close the Dept. of Education, Dept. of Labor, OSHA, EPA and Dept. of Energy, don't you? But the Democrat controlled House would not let him.
Reagan was for much smaller government!!!
You are reading way to much Liberal garbage.
I knew you would respond with predictable conservative cowardice. Conservatives are so fearful of truth!

So youre saying that whoever controls the house in in charge? Then why dp you whine about obama? LOL

Then of course, being a conservative PANSY, you just make up crap because it fits your needs. REGEAN INCREASED TAXES 11 TIMES BECAUSE HE SAW IT WAS NECESSARY. Can you tell me what the 1986 tax reform bill was called? You know the bill that REAGAN helped right and REAGAN PRAISED when it was signed? Hmmmm what was that called again? OH YEAH......the RONALD REAGAN TAX REFORM BILL. Notince it wasnt callled the "democrats control the house" tax reform bill!

Conservatives are such cowards!

“Now do whats right!”

Since: Jan 09

Doolittle, Mo.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#146443
Mar 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Gabby Giffords’s Husband Buys AR-15
Posted on March 10, 2013
Read more: http://conservativebyte.com/2013/03/gabby-gif ...
<quoted text>
No, didn't forget. The important part is that he bought one! Why don't you also buy one to make your point?
Yep you're right it is the important point, buying the weapons to PUSH for stronger gun control.

No thanks, I'll push for gun control in other ways.

Such as those Sandy Hook parents who had to buy caskets instead of Christmas presents and look into empty bedrooms everynight!

“Now do whats right!”

Since: Jan 09

Doolittle, Mo.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#146444
Mar 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Wahhhhh wahhh wahhhh ALL I did was list the TITLE and I did not post one word from the body of the article. I didn't write the title so why are you coming down on me?
Oh I know, you can't stand the title so you attack me! How infantile.
<quoted text>
You too are two stupid tew realize all I did was post the title and a link to it!
Wrong you were hoping some of your cons would see and repeat the headline without even considering what the CON-SERVATIVE rag would not even list the reason for the purchase.

Typical con ploy, only post part of the story to further their spinning agenda!

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#146445
Mar 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey Poopo, he is YOUR Rex Nutting being DEBUNKED!!!!
The Truth about President Obama’s Skyrocketing Spending Brian DarlingMay 24, 2012
Spending has skyrocketed under President Obama, but of late some are claiming that the opposite is true. Case in point: MarketWatch columnist Rex Nutting wrote,“Obama spending binge never happened,” and Politifact rated this statement “mostly true.”
http://blog.heritage.org/2012/05/24/the-truth...
Yep, repeat a lie often enough, and the Libtards will believe it!
Sorry Rogue, but Heritage debunked nothing. They simply disagreed with Nutting’s numbers and actually so did Factcheck, but that’s beside the point. The assertion is that spending under Obama is way out of control or some kind of inferno and that’s an outright lie.

The second point is no one doubts Obama signed some emergency appropriations in 2009 as we all watched him do it with the stimulus and so forth. The question is how did we reach these spending levels in the first place and the answer is certainly not Obama. You can look at Nutting’s chart, politifacts chart, Haritage chart, Factchecks chart or anyone else’s chart to see how we reached these spending levels and the one thing certain is that on everyone’s chart you’ll see it’s Bush who got us there.

Summary
The truth is that the nearly 18 percent spike in spending in fiscal 2009 — for which the president is sometimes blamed entirely — was mostly due to appropriations and policies that were already in place when Obama took office.
That includes spending for the bank bailout legislation approved by President Bush. Annual increases in amounts actually spent since fiscal 2009 have been relatively modest. In fact, spending for the first seven months of the current fiscal year is running slightly below the same period last year, and below projections.
http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/obamas-spend...

“Nutting and Mitchell hold Obama responsible for only 26 percent of that increase, but we conclude that Obama can “fairly”(open to interpretation) be assigned responsibility for as much as 38 percent”

So yeah, they disagreed with Nutting”s findings as well, but they certainly didn’t agree with yours.

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#146446
Mar 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Now this is typical Libtardian Logic. Just because Bush submitted the FY2009 budget in early 2008, HE IS RESPONSIBLE. But the fact remains is that Speaker San Fran Nan Pelosi REWROTE the budget, the Democrat controlled House and Senate passed it and ..... Pres. OBAMA signed it into law. And that means OBAMA is totally responsible for that budget.
But Rex Nuthead, and all the Libtards, claims the FY2009 Budget was Bush's!!! And that is how they can blame everything on Bush!!!
2009 United States federal budget
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Main article: United States federal budget
The United States federal budget for fiscal year 2009 began as a spending request submitted by President George W. Bush to the 110th Congress. The final resolution was approved by the House on June 5, 2008.[2] The final spending bills for the budget were not signed into law until March 11, 2009 by President Barack Obama, nearly five and a half months after the fiscal year began.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_United_Stat...
Sorry Rogue, but Bush is responsible for what he’s responsible for and he certainly is responsible for the vast majority of spending in the 2009 Budget. ALL CHARTS SHOW OBAMA’S PORTION OF SPENDING FOR 09 AND WHILE SOME NUMBERS MAY DIFFER THE CHART REMAINS THE SAME.

(THE ONE THING CERTAIN IS THAT NO ONE I SUPPOSE EXCEPT YOU COULD POSSIBLY CONCLUDE THAT OBAMA IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ENTIRE 2009 BUDGET)

Fiscal 2009 began Oct. 1, 2008. That was before Obama was elected, and nearly four months before he took office on Jan. 20, 2009.

President Bush signed the massive spending bill under which the government was operating when Obama took office. That was Sept. 30, 2008. As The Associated Press noted, it combined “a record Pentagon budget with aid for automakers and natural disaster victims, and increased health care funding for veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan.”

Bush also signed, on Oct. 3, 2008, a bank bailout bill that authorized another $700 billion to avert a looming financial collapse (though not all of that would end up being spent in fiscal 2009, and OBAMA LATER SIGNED A MEASURE REDUCING TOTAL AUTHORIZED BAILOUT SPENDING TO $475 BILLION).

On Jan. 7, 2009 — two weeks before Obama took office — the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office issued its regular budget outlook, stating:“CBO PROJECTS THAT THE DEFICIT THIS YEAR WILL TOTAL $1.2 TRILLION.”

CBO attributed the rapid rise in spending to the bank bailout and the federal takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac – plus rising costs for unemployment insurance and other factors driven by the collapsing economy (which shed 818,000 jobs in January alone).

Another factor beyond Obama’s control was an automatic 5.8 percent cost of living increase announced in October 2008 and given to Social Security beneficiaries in January 2009. It was the largest since 1982. Social Security spending alone rose $66 billion in fiscal 2009, and Medicare spending, driven by rising medical costs, rose $39 billion
http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/obamas-spend...
American Lady

Danville, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#146447
Mar 10, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

truman wrote:
Ahh...the niave wit of imbeciles.
Gotta love what passes for a funny when it comes to good old slack jawed repubs.

pogo wrote:
So a community organizer, a person who's never had a real job, a radical left wing kook walk and "truman" walk into a bar.

......Two people really, as the first three just describe Obama. Truman kisses Obama's az lovingly, they have a drink and retire to a motel for a night of passionate love-making. Truman emerges pregnant with Obama II, President for Life after Obama I gives up his dictatorship in 2029.
``````````
[could NOT resist]

“zero nuclear weapons”

Since: Sep 08

Perryville

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#146453
Mar 10, 2013
 
LibturdRsocialistTools wrote:
<quoted text>
And your encyclopedia of facts like snopes and factcheck aren't run by idiot socialist tools? Lol! Good job tool!
I have listen to Alex Jones and Corsi. I found them to be raving lunatics saying things like Forgin troups occuping the U.S The NWO is trying to take over the world I could on and on

But why should i this shows what nuts they are

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#146454
Mar 10, 2013
 
Typical Libtardian Logic. These numb nutz claim the the north is warmer than it was in 1982 and they base this one two satellites. The first was launched in 1999 and the other in 2002.
Now I maybe mathematically challenged but was 1982 about 17 years before the first two of these satellites where sent up? Then how could they possibly compare data that was not taken?!? I wonder what Columbo would say?
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Amplified Greenhouse Effect Shifts North's Growing Seasons
March 10, 2013: Vegetation growth at Earth's northern latitudes increasingly resembles lusher latitudes to the south, according to a NASA-funded study based on a 30-year record of ground-based and satellite data sets.
In a paper published Sunday, March 10, in the journal Nature Climate Change, an international team of university and NASA scientists examined the relationship between changes in surface temperature and vegetation growth from 45 degrees north latitude to the Arctic Ocean. Results show temperature and vegetation growth at northern latitudes now resemble those found 4 degrees to 6 degrees of latitude farther south as recently as 1982.
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#146455
Mar 10, 2013
 
President Obama:“My joke writers have been placed on furlough” Posted on March 10, 2013

“As you know, I last attended the Gridiron dinner two years ago. Back then, I addressed a number of topics – a dysfunctional Congress, a looming budget crisis, complaints that I don’t spend enough time with the press. It’s funny, it seems like it was just yesterday,” Obama said.

Read more: http://conservativebyte.com/2013/03/president...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#146456
Mar 10, 2013
 
Some Antarctic facts. Antarctica contains over 99% of all fresh water ice and 61% of all freshwater. And it is growing ten times faster than Arctic sea ice is melting!!!

09/28/2012 Antarctic sea ice reaches greatest extent so late in season, 2nd largest extent on record By Jason

Almost two weeks ago, Arctic sea ice extent shrank to a stunning record low. Yet, at the other end of the planet, Antarctic sea ice is nearing or breaking records for largest extent.

At face value, it’s remarkable to see such contrasting extremes in sea ice cover on opposing sides of our planet. For those unconvinced the Earth is warming, the Antarctic ice boom provides a convenient retort to alarms sounded about the Arctic ice “death spiral.”

But, in reality, it is in­cred­ibly misleading to equate the two records. Statistically, the decline in Arctic sea ice is much more dramatic. Further, the increase in Antarctic sea ice is not directly related to local air temperatures, which are actually going up.

Let’s begin by examining at the state of Antarctic sea ice. There’s no disputing it’s in record territory.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-w...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#146458
Mar 10, 2013
 
FFS- wrote:
<quoted text>I knew you would respond with predictable conservative cowardice. Conservatives are so fearful of truth!
So youre saying that whoever controls the house in in charge? Then why dp you whine about obama? LOL
Then of course, being a conservative PANSY, you just make up crap because it fits your needs. REGEAN INCREASED TAXES 11 TIMES BECAUSE HE SAW IT WAS NECESSARY. Can you tell me what the 1986 tax reform bill was called? You know the bill that REAGAN helped right and REAGAN PRAISED when it was signed? Hmmmm what was that called again? OH YEAH......the RONALD REAGAN TAX REFORM BILL. Notince it wasnt callled the "democrats control the house" tax reform bill!
Conservatives are such cowards!
Well, if you had ever read, and understood, our Constitution, you wood know that the Speaker of the House is second in line for the Presidency. He also controls the purse strings!!!
Just because a bill is call something, does not mean much. Sometimes they name things just to make politicians feel better.
Ever drive through West Virginia and notice how many things were named after Robert Byrd? And they were named well before his death. But in the military, they name things after only after you are dead!!!

“Now do whats right!”

Since: Jan 09

Doolittle, Mo.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#146459
Mar 10, 2013
 
LibturdRsocialistTools wrote:
<quoted text>
Sandy hook was tragic, but making it harder for law abiding citizens to protect themselves or even to buy what ever weapon they desire because it is their Second Amendment Right to do so, is not going to stop a crazy or criminal from taking or stealing from others! Oblunder took an OATH OF OFFICE twice to protect, preserve, and defend the constitution, and limiting our second amendment rights definitely does not fall under this oath he took! Or are you libturds just OK with a POTUS who blatantly lies and misleads you? This is not about sandy hook, it's disgusting that this socialist regime is using the death of small innocent children to push their anti gun anti constitution agenda! Don't be a woosie tool and stand up for your rights as an American too! So if a republican POTUS had purposed these limitations on your constitutional rights would you have just gone along with it? Absolutely not! Stop being a SHEEPLE!
It is about those babies you uncaring fool!

Weapons that are designed to kill as many as possible as quickly as possible are what the these children are crying from the grave!

You cons will be NRA's mouth piece the next time a gun nut takes military type weapons and kills 150 children in a school shooting!

You cons will be NRA's mouth piece the next time a gun nut takes military type weapons and kills 250 children in a school shooting!

ETC.,Etc.,Etc.,Etc.,

You,"Oh it's not about those children"

Yes, it is about those children!

You gun fools have eaten up the NRA's "buy more over prices guns and ammo" since the 1930's. And then you ask why are there so many bad guys with guns on our streets?

Where do you think those bad guys get guns? The gun fairy!

"Buy more over priced guns and ammo becasue our gun dealers and our organization need more money, and to hell with all the dead babies!"

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#146460
Mar 10, 2013
 
CB can see both sides wrote:
<quoted text>Yep you're right it is the important point, buying the weapons to PUSH for stronger gun control.
No thanks, I'll push for gun control in other ways.
Such as those Sandy Hook parents who had to buy caskets instead of Christmas presents and look into empty bedrooms everynight!
Ya know, if Adam Lanza had been in a mental hospital, those children would still be alive.
It was LBJ and Jimmy Carter who let all the loonies out of the mental hospitals but you Libtards blame Ronald Reagan because he closed EMPTY mental hospitals!!!
I blame the deaths of those children on you Libtards who will not keep dangerous mental cases in hospitals.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#146462
Mar 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

CB can see both sides wrote:
<quoted text>It is about those babies you uncaring fool!
Weapons that are designed to kill as many as possible as quickly as possible are what the these children are crying from the grave!
You cons will be NRA's mouth piece the next time a gun nut takes military type weapons and kills 150 children in a school shooting!
You cons will be NRA's mouth piece the next time a gun nut takes military type weapons and kills 250 children in a school shooting!
ETC.,Etc.,Etc.,Etc.,
You,"Oh it's not about those children"
Yes, it is about those children!
You gun fools have eaten up the NRA's "buy more over prices guns and ammo" since the 1930's. And then you ask why are there so many bad guys with guns on our streets?
Where do you think those bad guys get guns? The gun fairy!
"Buy more over priced guns and ammo becasue our gun dealers and our organization need more money, and to hell with all the dead babies!"
Gabby Gifford's shooter, the shooter in the theater at Aurora, CO and the shooter at Sandy Brook all had two things in common. They were all mentally ill and they were DEMOCRATS!
American Lady

Danville, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#146463
Mar 10, 2013
 
726 Users are viewing the US News Forum right now

Search the US News Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks Outrage on...(Mar '12) 1 min American Lady 44,738
The President has failed us (Jun '12) 1 min American Lady 96,537
'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 2 min American Lady 77,169
States with strict gun laws found to have fewer... 2 min Le Jimbo 241
Dems' gun-control bills moving quickly in Colorado 4 min halicon 20
Obama urges Supreme Court to overturn Californi... 4 min Le Jimbo 498
Church Leaders Vow Political Backlash if Gay Ma... 5 min Pietro Armando 3,621
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 15 min John Galt 805,726
Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 18 min xxxooxxx 76,143
See all threads in the US News forum »

@ 9:44PM KY time!

SHOWS it posted ...
http://www.topix.com/forum/us/TC6SGHF806TJRRB...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#146464
Mar 10, 2013
 
Hey CB, did you know that between 2011 and 2012, 6,700 Occutards were arrested but in the past four years only a half dozen TEA Partiers were also arrested? WHY? Because you are Fascists who will beat up anyone who disagrees with you. You'll slash their tires, stone them (Deerborn, MI) and you will commit all kind of crimes at far higher rates than Conservatives.
I have never been arrested. How about you CB?
I have never been the cause of any serious vehicle crashes, how about YOU?
I have never used or abused any drug either legal or illegal, and YOU?

“Now do whats right!”

Since: Jan 09

Doolittle, Mo.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#146465
Mar 10, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ya know, if Adam Lanza had been in a mental hospital, those children would still be alive.
It was LBJ and Jimmy Carter who let all the loonies out of the mental hospitals but you Libtards blame Ronald Reagan because he closed EMPTY mental hospitals!!!
I blame the deaths of those children on you Libtards who will not keep dangerous mental cases in hospitals.
You would! ronnie proberly would too! Both of you would be wrong.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

29 Users are viewing the Chicago Forum right now

Search the Chicago Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 12 min Flacks News 1,082,423
Voting Whites NO LONGER hold majority in Ohio. 18 min WeBlacksOutBirthedWhitey 2
Chicago Train Robbery 22 min StarNazisDontFOOKWithMe 6
Strategy 29 min ItTakesBalls2BNo1 7
Children were thrown to hungry crocodiles 33 min AskACroc-KidsTasteGood 5
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 33 min Uzi 68,415
One kilometre high and counting (Jul '07) 42 min NITiN 19
Amy 7-28 9 hr Sublime1 16
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 15 hr Mister Tonka 97,562
•••

Beach Hazards Statement for Cook County was issued at July 28 at 10:11PM CDT

•••
•••
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••