BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 207553 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

“Now do whats right!”

Since: Jan 09

Doolittle, Mo.

#146444 Mar 10, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Wahhhhh wahhh wahhhh ALL I did was list the TITLE and I did not post one word from the body of the article. I didn't write the title so why are you coming down on me?
Oh I know, you can't stand the title so you attack me! How infantile.
<quoted text>
You too are two stupid tew realize all I did was post the title and a link to it!
Wrong you were hoping some of your cons would see and repeat the headline without even considering what the CON-SERVATIVE rag would not even list the reason for the purchase.

Typical con ploy, only post part of the story to further their spinning agenda!

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#146445 Mar 10, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey Poopo, he is YOUR Rex Nutting being DEBUNKED!!!!
The Truth about President Obama’s Skyrocketing Spending Brian DarlingMay 24, 2012
Spending has skyrocketed under President Obama, but of late some are claiming that the opposite is true. Case in point: MarketWatch columnist Rex Nutting wrote,“Obama spending binge never happened,” and Politifact rated this statement “mostly true.”
http://blog.heritage.org/2012/05/24/the-truth...
Yep, repeat a lie often enough, and the Libtards will believe it!
Sorry Rogue, but Heritage debunked nothing. They simply disagreed with Nutting’s numbers and actually so did Factcheck, but that’s beside the point. The assertion is that spending under Obama is way out of control or some kind of inferno and that’s an outright lie.

The second point is no one doubts Obama signed some emergency appropriations in 2009 as we all watched him do it with the stimulus and so forth. The question is how did we reach these spending levels in the first place and the answer is certainly not Obama. You can look at Nutting’s chart, politifacts chart, Haritage chart, Factchecks chart or anyone else’s chart to see how we reached these spending levels and the one thing certain is that on everyone’s chart you’ll see it’s Bush who got us there.

Summary
The truth is that the nearly 18 percent spike in spending in fiscal 2009 — for which the president is sometimes blamed entirely — was mostly due to appropriations and policies that were already in place when Obama took office.
That includes spending for the bank bailout legislation approved by President Bush. Annual increases in amounts actually spent since fiscal 2009 have been relatively modest. In fact, spending for the first seven months of the current fiscal year is running slightly below the same period last year, and below projections.
http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/obamas-spend...

“Nutting and Mitchell hold Obama responsible for only 26 percent of that increase, but we conclude that Obama can “fairly”(open to interpretation) be assigned responsibility for as much as 38 percent”

So yeah, they disagreed with Nutting”s findings as well, but they certainly didn’t agree with yours.

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#146446 Mar 10, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Now this is typical Libtardian Logic. Just because Bush submitted the FY2009 budget in early 2008, HE IS RESPONSIBLE. But the fact remains is that Speaker San Fran Nan Pelosi REWROTE the budget, the Democrat controlled House and Senate passed it and ..... Pres. OBAMA signed it into law. And that means OBAMA is totally responsible for that budget.
But Rex Nuthead, and all the Libtards, claims the FY2009 Budget was Bush's!!! And that is how they can blame everything on Bush!!!
2009 United States federal budget
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Main article: United States federal budget
The United States federal budget for fiscal year 2009 began as a spending request submitted by President George W. Bush to the 110th Congress. The final resolution was approved by the House on June 5, 2008.[2] The final spending bills for the budget were not signed into law until March 11, 2009 by President Barack Obama, nearly five and a half months after the fiscal year began.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_United_Stat...
Sorry Rogue, but Bush is responsible for what he’s responsible for and he certainly is responsible for the vast majority of spending in the 2009 Budget. ALL CHARTS SHOW OBAMA’S PORTION OF SPENDING FOR 09 AND WHILE SOME NUMBERS MAY DIFFER THE CHART REMAINS THE SAME.

(THE ONE THING CERTAIN IS THAT NO ONE I SUPPOSE EXCEPT YOU COULD POSSIBLY CONCLUDE THAT OBAMA IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ENTIRE 2009 BUDGET)

Fiscal 2009 began Oct. 1, 2008. That was before Obama was elected, and nearly four months before he took office on Jan. 20, 2009.

President Bush signed the massive spending bill under which the government was operating when Obama took office. That was Sept. 30, 2008. As The Associated Press noted, it combined “a record Pentagon budget with aid for automakers and natural disaster victims, and increased health care funding for veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan.”

Bush also signed, on Oct. 3, 2008, a bank bailout bill that authorized another $700 billion to avert a looming financial collapse (though not all of that would end up being spent in fiscal 2009, and OBAMA LATER SIGNED A MEASURE REDUCING TOTAL AUTHORIZED BAILOUT SPENDING TO $475 BILLION).

On Jan. 7, 2009 — two weeks before Obama took office — the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office issued its regular budget outlook, stating:“CBO PROJECTS THAT THE DEFICIT THIS YEAR WILL TOTAL $1.2 TRILLION.”

CBO attributed the rapid rise in spending to the bank bailout and the federal takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac – plus rising costs for unemployment insurance and other factors driven by the collapsing economy (which shed 818,000 jobs in January alone).

Another factor beyond Obama’s control was an automatic 5.8 percent cost of living increase announced in October 2008 and given to Social Security beneficiaries in January 2009. It was the largest since 1982. Social Security spending alone rose $66 billion in fiscal 2009, and Medicare spending, driven by rising medical costs, rose $39 billion
http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/obamas-spend...
American Lady

Danville, KY

#146447 Mar 10, 2013
truman wrote:
Ahh...the niave wit of imbeciles.
Gotta love what passes for a funny when it comes to good old slack jawed repubs.

pogo wrote:
So a community organizer, a person who's never had a real job, a radical left wing kook walk and "truman" walk into a bar.

......Two people really, as the first three just describe Obama. Truman kisses Obama's az lovingly, they have a drink and retire to a motel for a night of passionate love-making. Truman emerges pregnant with Obama II, President for Life after Obama I gives up his dictatorship in 2029.
``````````
[could NOT resist]

“zero nuclear weapons”

Since: Sep 08

Perryville

#146453 Mar 10, 2013
LibturdRsocialistTools wrote:
<quoted text>
And your encyclopedia of facts like snopes and factcheck aren't run by idiot socialist tools? Lol! Good job tool!
I have listen to Alex Jones and Corsi. I found them to be raving lunatics saying things like Forgin troups occuping the U.S The NWO is trying to take over the world I could on and on

But why should i this shows what nuts they are

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#146454 Mar 10, 2013
Typical Libtardian Logic. These numb nutz claim the the north is warmer than it was in 1982 and they base this one two satellites. The first was launched in 1999 and the other in 2002.
Now I maybe mathematically challenged but was 1982 about 17 years before the first two of these satellites where sent up? Then how could they possibly compare data that was not taken?!? I wonder what Columbo would say?

Amplified Greenhouse Effect Shifts North's Growing Seasons
March 10, 2013: Vegetation growth at Earth's northern latitudes increasingly resembles lusher latitudes to the south, according to a NASA-funded study based on a 30-year record of ground-based and satellite data sets.
In a paper published Sunday, March 10, in the journal Nature Climate Change, an international team of university and NASA scientists examined the relationship between changes in surface temperature and vegetation growth from 45 degrees north latitude to the Arctic Ocean. Results show temperature and vegetation growth at northern latitudes now resemble those found 4 degrees to 6 degrees of latitude farther south as recently as 1982.
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#146455 Mar 10, 2013
President Obama:“My joke writers have been placed on furlough” Posted on March 10, 2013

“As you know, I last attended the Gridiron dinner two years ago. Back then, I addressed a number of topics – a dysfunctional Congress, a looming budget crisis, complaints that I don’t spend enough time with the press. It’s funny, it seems like it was just yesterday,” Obama said.

Read more: http://conservativebyte.com/2013/03/president...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#146456 Mar 10, 2013
Some Antarctic facts. Antarctica contains over 99% of all fresh water ice and 61% of all freshwater. And it is growing ten times faster than Arctic sea ice is melting!!!

09/28/2012 Antarctic sea ice reaches greatest extent so late in season, 2nd largest extent on record By Jason

Almost two weeks ago, Arctic sea ice extent shrank to a stunning record low. Yet, at the other end of the planet, Antarctic sea ice is nearing or breaking records for largest extent.

At face value, it’s remarkable to see such contrasting extremes in sea ice cover on opposing sides of our planet. For those unconvinced the Earth is warming, the Antarctic ice boom provides a convenient retort to alarms sounded about the Arctic ice “death spiral.”

But, in reality, it is in­cred­ibly misleading to equate the two records. Statistically, the decline in Arctic sea ice is much more dramatic. Further, the increase in Antarctic sea ice is not directly related to local air temperatures, which are actually going up.

Let’s begin by examining at the state of Antarctic sea ice. There’s no disputing it’s in record territory.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-w...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#146458 Mar 10, 2013
FFS- wrote:
<quoted text>I knew you would respond with predictable conservative cowardice. Conservatives are so fearful of truth!
So youre saying that whoever controls the house in in charge? Then why dp you whine about obama? LOL
Then of course, being a conservative PANSY, you just make up crap because it fits your needs. REGEAN INCREASED TAXES 11 TIMES BECAUSE HE SAW IT WAS NECESSARY. Can you tell me what the 1986 tax reform bill was called? You know the bill that REAGAN helped right and REAGAN PRAISED when it was signed? Hmmmm what was that called again? OH YEAH......the RONALD REAGAN TAX REFORM BILL. Notince it wasnt callled the "democrats control the house" tax reform bill!
Conservatives are such cowards!
Well, if you had ever read, and understood, our Constitution, you wood know that the Speaker of the House is second in line for the Presidency. He also controls the purse strings!!!
Just because a bill is call something, does not mean much. Sometimes they name things just to make politicians feel better.
Ever drive through West Virginia and notice how many things were named after Robert Byrd? And they were named well before his death. But in the military, they name things after only after you are dead!!!

“Now do whats right!”

Since: Jan 09

Doolittle, Mo.

#146459 Mar 10, 2013
LibturdRsocialistTools wrote:
<quoted text>
Sandy hook was tragic, but making it harder for law abiding citizens to protect themselves or even to buy what ever weapon they desire because it is their Second Amendment Right to do so, is not going to stop a crazy or criminal from taking or stealing from others! Oblunder took an OATH OF OFFICE twice to protect, preserve, and defend the constitution, and limiting our second amendment rights definitely does not fall under this oath he took! Or are you libturds just OK with a POTUS who blatantly lies and misleads you? This is not about sandy hook, it's disgusting that this socialist regime is using the death of small innocent children to push their anti gun anti constitution agenda! Don't be a woosie tool and stand up for your rights as an American too! So if a republican POTUS had purposed these limitations on your constitutional rights would you have just gone along with it? Absolutely not! Stop being a SHEEPLE!
It is about those babies you uncaring fool!

Weapons that are designed to kill as many as possible as quickly as possible are what the these children are crying from the grave!

You cons will be NRA's mouth piece the next time a gun nut takes military type weapons and kills 150 children in a school shooting!

You cons will be NRA's mouth piece the next time a gun nut takes military type weapons and kills 250 children in a school shooting!

ETC.,Etc.,Etc.,Etc.,

You,"Oh it's not about those children"

Yes, it is about those children!

You gun fools have eaten up the NRA's "buy more over prices guns and ammo" since the 1930's. And then you ask why are there so many bad guys with guns on our streets?

Where do you think those bad guys get guns? The gun fairy!

"Buy more over priced guns and ammo becasue our gun dealers and our organization need more money, and to hell with all the dead babies!"

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#146460 Mar 10, 2013
CB can see both sides wrote:
<quoted text>Yep you're right it is the important point, buying the weapons to PUSH for stronger gun control.
No thanks, I'll push for gun control in other ways.
Such as those Sandy Hook parents who had to buy caskets instead of Christmas presents and look into empty bedrooms everynight!
Ya know, if Adam Lanza had been in a mental hospital, those children would still be alive.
It was LBJ and Jimmy Carter who let all the loonies out of the mental hospitals but you Libtards blame Ronald Reagan because he closed EMPTY mental hospitals!!!
I blame the deaths of those children on you Libtards who will not keep dangerous mental cases in hospitals.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#146462 Mar 10, 2013
CB can see both sides wrote:
<quoted text>It is about those babies you uncaring fool!
Weapons that are designed to kill as many as possible as quickly as possible are what the these children are crying from the grave!
You cons will be NRA's mouth piece the next time a gun nut takes military type weapons and kills 150 children in a school shooting!
You cons will be NRA's mouth piece the next time a gun nut takes military type weapons and kills 250 children in a school shooting!
ETC.,Etc.,Etc.,Etc.,
You,"Oh it's not about those children"
Yes, it is about those children!
You gun fools have eaten up the NRA's "buy more over prices guns and ammo" since the 1930's. And then you ask why are there so many bad guys with guns on our streets?
Where do you think those bad guys get guns? The gun fairy!
"Buy more over priced guns and ammo becasue our gun dealers and our organization need more money, and to hell with all the dead babies!"
Gabby Gifford's shooter, the shooter in the theater at Aurora, CO and the shooter at Sandy Brook all had two things in common. They were all mentally ill and they were DEMOCRATS!
American Lady

Danville, KY

#146463 Mar 10, 2013
726 Users are viewing the US News Forum right now

Search the US News Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Trayvon Martin Shooting Death Sparks Outrage on...(Mar '12) 1 min American Lady 44,738
The President has failed us (Jun '12) 1 min American Lady 96,537
'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate (Oct '10) 2 min American Lady 77,169
States with strict gun laws found to have fewer... 2 min Le Jimbo 241
Dems' gun-control bills moving quickly in Colorado 4 min halicon 20
Obama urges Supreme Court to overturn Californi... 4 min Le Jimbo 498
Church Leaders Vow Political Backlash if Gay Ma... 5 min Pietro Armando 3,621
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 15 min John Galt 805,726
Evolution vs. Creation (Jul '11) 18 min xxxooxxx 76,143
See all threads in the US News forum »

@ 9:44PM KY time!

SHOWS it posted ...
http://www.topix.com/forum/us/TC6SGHF806TJRRB...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#146464 Mar 10, 2013
Hey CB, did you know that between 2011 and 2012, 6,700 Occutards were arrested but in the past four years only a half dozen TEA Partiers were also arrested? WHY? Because you are Fascists who will beat up anyone who disagrees with you. You'll slash their tires, stone them (Deerborn, MI) and you will commit all kind of crimes at far higher rates than Conservatives.
I have never been arrested. How about you CB?
I have never been the cause of any serious vehicle crashes, how about YOU?
I have never used or abused any drug either legal or illegal, and YOU?

“Now do whats right!”

Since: Jan 09

Doolittle, Mo.

#146465 Mar 10, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ya know, if Adam Lanza had been in a mental hospital, those children would still be alive.
It was LBJ and Jimmy Carter who let all the loonies out of the mental hospitals but you Libtards blame Ronald Reagan because he closed EMPTY mental hospitals!!!
I blame the deaths of those children on you Libtards who will not keep dangerous mental cases in hospitals.
You would! ronnie proberly would too! Both of you would be wrong.

“Now do whats right!”

Since: Jan 09

Doolittle, Mo.

#146466 Mar 10, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Hey CB, did you know that between 2011 and 2012, 6,700 Occutards were arrested but in the past four years only a half dozen TEA Partiers were also arrested? WHY? Because you are Fascists who will beat up anyone who disagrees with you. You'll slash their tires, stone them (Deerborn, MI) and you will commit all kind of crimes at far higher rates than Conservatives.
I have never been arrested. How about you CB?
I have never been the cause of any serious vehicle crashes, how about YOU?
I have never used or abused any drug either legal or illegal, and YOU?
I care about the children who's body tissues were scraped off school walls. How about you?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#146467 Mar 10, 2013
The FIST wrote:
<quoted text>
I think you have absorbed too much cesium 137 in your lifetime. This may explain your mental illness.
Yea, in 1965 our family got our first color TV. It cost $600 and was full of vacuum tubes and it was toasty. Our cat used to sleep on top of it and she died of cancer at age eight!
Meanwhile our family would gather around to watch the Ed Sullivan show. We had eight kids in the family, our parents would get the easy chairs, the oldest three would sit on the couch, the middle aged kids would sit in front of us and our baby brother would lie down with his hands holding up his head as he was only a few feet from the TV. All of us are Conservatives,,,,,, except for our baby brother is a flaming atheist, pot smoking, Libtard. The only explanation is the TV fried his brains!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#146468 Mar 10, 2013
Oh, Labor Day weekend 2002 my baby brother married his girl friend of ten years. It was an atheist wedding and his best man was a .... lesbian. In fact there were three lesbian couples and one gay couple at the wedding.
I had taken my 11 year old granddaughter. It was one of those don't ask, don't tell moments! When she was 15 y/o I asked her about the wedding of Uncle Steve and she said she had figured out out the lesbian best man!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#146469 Mar 10, 2013
My mother moved from Florida to Kansas six and a half years ago because of failing eye sight. She lives in am Independent Living home near my oldest sister.
It is 1,300 miles each way and I visit my mother two or three times a year. My baby brother, the Libtard, lives in Denver just 450 miles from our mother and he has visited her just three times in the same six and a half years. How sad!
Oh, just like at his wedding, I can socialize without talking about politics but he can't. Sad, very sad.
Jacques Ottawa

Mississauga, Canada

#146470 Mar 10, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Gabby Giffords’s Husband Buys AR-15
Posted on March 10, 2013
Read more: http://conservativebyte.com/2013/03/gabby-gif ...
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Again you shoot the messenger and not the message. Do you think one of your sources will even mention that he bought an AR-15 for any reason? Oh, I did go to your links both neither of them worked!!!
<quoted text>
And your links aren't Nazi links?
I wrtoe : "1. None of my "so called" sources posted this, negatively, positively or otherwise" There WERE no links in this instance. There is something seriously wrong with you.

I rarely post links unless asked as everything comes from the ole noggin, got it? And when asked, you get them instantly, often from your bible, Wikipedia, as proof. As for you, you owe me so many I've lost count.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 9 min TheIndependentMaj... 1,346,894
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 24 min PEllen 101,413
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 25 min Brian_G 57,278
Carolyn Hax 2-10-16 or so 27 min PEllen 1
last post wins! (Apr '13) 32 min Red_Forman 610
Amy from 2006 2-10-16 32 min PEllen 1
Abby 2-10-16 35 min PEllen 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages