BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Full story: Chicago Tribune

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...
Comments
128,761 - 128,780 of 177,414 Comments Last updated 3 hrs ago
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#146173 Mar 8, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Er, care to re-read your "right to 'bare'(sic) arms" post? Read, LRS, read your six last words reproduced from your post below :
Jaquesoff Ottatwit wrote:
<quoted text>
Jacques-@$$, Another pathetic socialist insight from the Libtard tool! We Americans, that would not be you, lol, have the right to LIFE, LIBERTY AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS! Obummers duty is to shut up and do what we the people tell him to do, protect our country from harm, and protect, preserve, and defend the constitution. Thus the right to bare arms
Your very words repeated : "Thus the right to BARE arms". The ignorance is indescribable.
LMAO! The only ignorance being shown here is by you, moron. I made no such post! LMAO! jakeleg thinks I'm yet ANOTHER poster, how many is that now jakeleg? 20, 30? Fool.
Jacques Ottawa

Mississauga, Canada

#146174 Mar 8, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
How many were not counted because they've given up looking? 100G? That number is meaningless. Fool.
How many were not counted in previous administrations? Same statistical system has been employed for decades. Why should Obama be the one to change it to his detriment?

And the DJIA index is also cooked? Strange on how you never comment on such things.

Things are looking up in the U.S. Sorry about that, and it's happening under Obama. Deal with it. Oh, someone mentioned the other day, you or Rogue, same difference, that the U.S.dollar was down against other currencies. Triumphantly bellowed it. Sorry to burst your balloon, guys, at the end of today's trading, it was up. Gee whiz, all good news. Doldrums for birther birfoons and tea partyers and House boycotters. How about the way Obama split those Republicans? What a week.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#146182 Mar 8, 2013
COYOTE :CALIFORNIA vs. TEXAS

THE COYOTE.....

California:

The Governor of California is jogging with his dog along a nature trail. A coyote jumps out and attacks the Governor's dog, then bites the Governor.

1. The Governor starts to intervene, but reflects upon the movie "Bambi" and then realizes he should stop because the coyote is only doing what is natural.

2. He calls animal control. Animal Control captures the coyote and bills the State $200 testing it for diseases and $500 for relocating it.

3. He calls a veterinarian. The vet collects the dead dog and bills the State $200 testing it for diseases.

4. The Governor goes to hospital and spends $3,500 getting checked for diseases from the coyote and on getting his bite wound bandaged.

5. The running trail gets shut down for 6 months while Fish & Game conducts a $100,000 survey to make sure the area is now free of dangerous animals.

6. The Governor spends $50,000 in state funds implementing a "coyote awareness program" for residents of the area.

7. The State Legislature spends $2 million to study how to better treat rabies and how to permanently eradicate the disease throughout the world.

8. The Governor's security agent is fired for not stopping the attack. The State spends $150,000 to hire and train a new agent with additional special training re: the nature of coyotes.

9. PETA protests the coyote's relocation and files a $5 million suit against the State.

TEXAS:

The Governor of Texas is jogging with his dog along a nature trail. A Coyote jumps out and attacks his dog.

1. The Governor shoots the coyote with his State-issued pistol and keeps jogging. The Governor has spent $0.50 on a .45 ACP hollow point cartridge.

2. The Buzzards eat the dead coyote.

And that, my friends, is why California is broke and Texas is not.

Jacques Ottawa

Mississauga, Canada

#146183 Mar 8, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
That's pure bullshyt! Liar! You suckazz wannabe American.
Now now,calm down. Resort to name-calling and profanity, it's more you LMAO (LRS tm reg'd)

“Reduce immigration levels”

Since: Dec 06

Kings Mountain, NC

#146184 Mar 8, 2013
Orly Taitz serves subpoenas to Congress on Obama s eligibility Adam Kokesh
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Jacques Ottawa

Mississauga, Canada

#146186 Mar 8, 2013
Jaquesoff Ottatwit wrote:
So Jacques-@$$, you're going by "Jacques Ottawa", but you're from Mississauga, shouldn't you be "Jacques Mississauga"? What happened to Jacques from Ottawa? Did coward draft dodging Jacques-off have a nervous breakdown and then you took over? O dear God! Two pathetic freakishly obsessive American want to be's from Canada spewing their socialist mantra!
First off, all this going from moniker to moniker is frying what is left of your brain. "Right to bare arms" LMAO (LRS tm reg'd). Although it would make not an iota of difference whether I was in Ottawa or Mississauga, what's it to you, btw?,(it's approx 350 miles south of here) I am firmly in Ottawa. Been to Mississauga once, years ago. I can describe Ottawa and its history in detail from memory for you, but apart from Mississauga's incredible 87-yr-old female mayor, I am not that familiar with it. You want me in Mississauga? Okay, put me there. What difference will that make?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#146187 Mar 8, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Why does a non-American have to teach you your own history? 
The Democratic party was founded around 1860, so that when Lincoln was elected, it was still in its infancy. If Lincoln were alive today, do you really think he would rub shoulders with the likes of Sarah Palin, Paul Ryan, Mitt Romney, GWB, Cheney, etc? LMAO (LRS tm reg'd). He would be a democrat, becasue Lincoln was a decent man who cared for his people. Make no mistake.
Ah, The DEMOCRAT Party was founded in "1860"? Then what political party was Andrew Jackson? And Abe Lincoln was not a Democrat!

Democratic

Fifteen members of the Democratic Party have served as president, governing for a total of 85 years. Five served at least two full terms (Franklin Roosevelt was elected four times; he served three full terms and died during his fourth) and five served one full term. Three succeeded to the presidency after the death of their predecessor (of which two were subsequently elected to a full term [i.e., Harry Truman and Lyndon Johnson]) and one, Andrew Johnson, did not seek election). John F. Kennedy was assassinated before his first term was finished and Barack Obama is currently in office.

Andrew Jackson (1829-1837)
Martin Van Buren (1837–1841)
James K. Polk (1845–1849)
Franklin Pierce (1853–1857)
James Buchanan (1857–1861)
Andrew Johnson (1868)[n 2]
Grover Cleveland (1885–1889),(1893–1897)
Woodrow Wilson (1913–1921)
Franklin D. Roosevelt (1933–1945)
Harry S. Truman (1945–1953)
John F. Kennedy (1961–1963)
Lyndon B. Johnson (1963–1969)
Jimmy Carter (1977–1981)
Bill Clinton (1993–2001)
Barack Obama (2009–present)

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#146188 Mar 8, 2013
And the Republican Party was founded in 1854. It was founded as ANTI-SLAVERY being it's major goal. It was the Democrat Party that was the party of SLAVERY!!!

From Wiki:
The Republican Party (also called the GOP, or "Grand Old Party") is one of the two major contemporary political parties in the United States, the other being the Democratic Party. Founded by anti-slavery activists in 1854, it dominated politics nationally for most of the period from 1860 to 1932. There have been 18 Republican presidents, the first being Abraham Lincoln, serving from 1861-1865, and the most recent being George W. Bush, serving from 2001-2009.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#146189 Mar 8, 2013
You do know Jefferson Davis was a Democrat, don't you?
I just love Libtardian revisionary history.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#146190 Mar 8, 2013
I can't tell you how many Libtards have told me that the Democrat Party became the Republican Party and the Republican Party became the Democrat Party. But no one can tell me exactly when this time-melt happen?
Oh fact, in 1860 Abe Lincoln ran as our first Republican president but in 1864 he ran as a "National Unionist"!
Maybe you confused this with the Republicans and Democrats switching parties?

National Union Party (United States)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The National Union Party was the name used by the Republican Party for the national ticket in the 1864 presidential election, held during the Civil War. State Republican parties did not usually change their name.
The temporary name was used to attract War Democrats who would not vote for the Republican Party. The party nominated incumbent President Abraham Lincoln and former Democrat Andrew Johnson, who were elected in a landslide.

“zero nuclear weapons”

Since: Sep 08

Perryville

#146191 Mar 8, 2013
Jaquesoff Ottatwit wrote:
<quoted text>
Jacques-@$$ what was Lincoln, demoRat or RepublicCAN? Quick do a google search! And lets see back when it was the RepubliCANs who wanted a smaller gov. Against the Federalist who wanted bigger government run by the "better" people of society, what eventually won out? Quick do another pathetic google search! Same with your pathetic socialist Obummer, his type of bigger gov. and elitist type demoRats will also fade into a footnote! One of Americas most revered and well known RepububliCANs was Lincoln! Obummer will be renowned for dividing a nation, his socialist agenda, and attracting freakishly idiotic stalkers a from Mississauga Canada!
Tool!
Hey nimrod President Lincoln is ranked in the top 5 of great presidents He was president during a turbulent time in our history.

His actions saved the union you need to read the Gettysburg Address

Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.
Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation, so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.
But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate, we can not consecrate, we can not hallow this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us—that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion—that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain—that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom—and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.

Can you conperhend the meaning behind these words???

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#146196 Mar 8, 2013
Jaquesoff Ottatwit wrote:
<quoted text>
So oblunder has spent over 6trillion to get the economy and unemployment just over what Bush left it at Four plus years ago? Lol! That quite the plan!
Actually it was 8 trillion dollars but Bernanke printed $1.5 T and bought back $1.5 Federal Reserve bonds from the U.S. banks under QEI and QEII. Boy, I wish I could print just one million dollars and buy a new house, new car, etc. but I think they would throw me in prison!
I know, I know, Libtards hate big banks. But when Obama became president we had 10 major banks and now we have just SIX BIGGER banks with control 56-58% of our banking!!!
Silly Libtards, Obama is taking them for a ride and they have no idea where he is taking them!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#146197 Mar 8, 2013
Now this is probably where the Libtards got confused with who is what. But claiming the Democrats became the Republicans is like saying Gays became Lesbians.

Democratic-Republican Party
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Democratic-Republican Party was the political party organized by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison in 1791-93. It stood in opposition to the Federalist Party and controlled the Presidency and Congress, and most states, from 1801 to 1824, during the First Party System. It split after the 1824 presidential election into two parties: the Democratic Party and the short-lived National Republican Party (later succeeded by the Whig Party, many of whose adherents eventually founded the modern Republican Party).
Most contemporaries called it the Republican Party. Today, political scientists typically use the hyphenated version while historians usually call it the "Republican Party" or the Jeffersonian Republicans, to distinguish it from the modern Republican Party, which was founded in 1854 and named after Jefferson's party.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#146198 Mar 8, 2013
or maybe this;

From Wiki: One remnant [of the Democratic-Republican Party] followed Andrew Jackson and Martin Van Buren into the new Democratic Party by 1828.

No wonder Democrats have comprehension problems.

“zero nuclear weapons”

Since: Sep 08

Perryville

#146199 Mar 8, 2013
Jaquesoff Ottatwit wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey bing-guy-dong, I agree he was great, he was a R E P U B L I C A N!
Can you comprehend the meaning of he was a Republican?
LOL! That really rattles your wittle Libtard brain doesn't it!
Yes i know that. I am a very Liberal Democrat and i admire President Lincoln for his courage and Leadership.

In today's world President Abe Lincoln would not be considered a Republican. In fact he would look upon today's Republican Party with disdain

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#146202 Mar 8, 2013
OMG, Fox New's Shep Smith, a Liberal, admitted that the Korean War never "technically ended"!!!
I wonder when the Libtards on this form will figure that out!!

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#146207 Mar 8, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Nice link, slaveboy! Try one that actually works. LMAO
The facts won’t change no matter what link I use Mr. Liars. These guys get corporate jets in lieu of food stamps, but apparently you don’t have a problem with your “hard earned” tax dollars being spent on them.
http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2011/03/ten_g...

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#146209 Mar 8, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's not forget the moochers who don't pay their fair share. Ain't that right slaveboy? LMAO Again, you should remain silent on all tax matters.
Are you mentally retarded or something Mr. Liars? You don’t know a thing about me or my tax liability and everyone on this tread knows it. So why do you persist in displaying such obvious idiocy on a public forum?

Obama just signed the “Violence Against Woman Act” so I suppose you’ll no longer be able to beat up on your mom with impunity.

Same thing!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#146211 Mar 8, 2013
nebka wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes i know that. I am a very Liberal Democrat and i admire President Lincoln for his courage and Leadership.
In today's world President Abe Lincoln would not be considered a Republican. In fact he would look upon today's Republican Party with disdain
How do you know? We Conservative are for equal rights. But what we are not for is socialism. Especially those of you who believe in "Social Justice" which takes away from one group or people to give to another group of people.
Slavery was wrong bu however that blacks got to America, their descendants are far better off here in America than if they were in Africa. Have you ever heard of the Dark Continent? Do you know that only 20% of all Africans have electricity? And only half of those have reliable electricity. Just look at this picture and compared Europe to Africa!!!

http://www.economist.com/node/9660077
Jacques Ottawa

Mississauga, Canada

#146212 Mar 8, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah, The DEMOCRAT Party was founded in "1860"? Then what political party was Andrew Jackson? And Abe Lincoln was not a Democrat!
Democratic
Fifteen members of the Democratic Party have served as president, governing for a total of 85 years. Five served at least two full terms (Franklin Roosevelt was elected four times; he served three full terms and died during his fourth) and five served one full term. Three succeeded to the presidency after the death of their predecessor (of which two were subsequently elected to a full term [i.e., Harry Truman and Lyndon Johnson]) and one, Andrew Johnson, did not seek election). John F. Kennedy was assassinated before his first term was finished and Barack Obama is currently in office.
Andrew Jackson (1829-1837)
Martin Van Buren (1837–1841)
James K. Polk (1845–1849)
Franklin Pierce (1853–1857)
James Buchanan (1857–1861)
Andrew Johnson (1868)[n 2]
Grover Cleveland (1885–1889),(1893–1897)
Woodrow Wilson (1913–1921)
Franklin D. Roosevelt (1933–1945)
Harry S. Truman (1945–1953)
John F. Kennedy (1961–1963)
Lyndon B. Johnson (1963–1969)
Jimmy Carter (1977–1981)
Bill Clinton (1993–2001)
Barack Obama (2009–present)
Andrew Jackson was Democratic-Republican. The Democratic party was formed from a scission in 1860.

I never said Lincoln was a Democrat. I said he'd be a democrat TODAY, certainly not wanting to associate with such a bunch of hopeless losers.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 min No Surprize 1,100,635
IL Illinois Governor Recall Amendment (Oct '10) 17 min Corrupt Democrats 1,911
ISIS Plans to Blow Up an Entire American City a... 18 min deutscher Nationa... 46
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 35 min KiMare 49,542
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 35 min JOEL 69,014
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 1 hr 40ish 4,675
Are ISIS and Obama in Cahoots??? 3 hr joey 4
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 13 hr edogxxx 97,938
•••
•••
Chicago Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••