BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 239271 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#146416 Mar 10, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Just another troll remark. Can't attack the message, attack the messenger!
Poor Rogue Moron is too illiterate to function. That's why he pointlessly rambles here all day.

The message was one of violence, Rogue Moron, as is often yours. My reply was a poignant as can be.

Please keep your weak troll replies to yourself.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#146417 Mar 10, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
The housing bubble is to blame for the economic downturn and that was caused by Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton. When bankers refused to make loans to unqualified people, the blacks who were unqualified sued the bankers for racial discrimination. And lawyers like Barrack Obama represented them.
The banks, knowing they would lose because of the law Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton wrote those laws started to approve SUB-PRIME loans. And the banks, knowing they were bad investment, sold them. But because some stupid people bought them, they blamed the banks.
Why does anyone sell anything? Because they no longer want them. It is up to the buyer to figure out why they are selling it. If the owner of the house is moving to a new city, that is a good reason. But if the house has termites, black mold, etc., you should be aware.
In the early 1970's Alabama had a law that said there had to be a termite inspection before you could sell it. A friend of mine bought a house and a few months later he found ... termites. So he went back to the seller. the law at the time said there had to be a termite inspection but it did not say the seller had to tell him what the inspection found so my friend got stuck with the repair bills. They have changed the law since then. But that is why the buyer must be aware!!!
And stop blaming other people because you were stupid!!!
I've totally debunked that grade 1 economic theory of yours several times, Rogue. And, as ususal, you were stuffed, had no comeback, but you just put it away for later, didn't you? And out it comes today, certain that I and others here forgot your silly little mortgager theory. It won't fly. Hell, I remember even using parables with traffic lights and all that to make you understand, all to no avail. Jimmy Carter was president in 1976, for heaven's sake, 25+ yrs prior to GWB. And there was no sign, not even a hint of a housing bubble with Clinton, quite the opposite. Your dear sweet friends that you defend delay, the rich s.o.b.'s who cheat, like the brokers, the mortgage middlemen and the bankers who made ANY loan to ANYone and as recompense cashed in huge bonuses, and not one of them in jail. Do you mean to tell me that the majority of people who over-borrowed are blacks? Your crooked friends profited from NO oversight by GWB aided by Alan Greenspan to make a short term profit, knowing full well that they HAD to be bailed out or else, when the day of reckoning came, as it was sure to do.

Your "lords" of the manor took a good home financing plan and rigged it. And you defend them, hell, you blame Carter who was president 25 years before GSB.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#146418 Mar 10, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Gabby Giffords’s Husband Buys AR-15
Posted on March 10, 2013
Read more: http://conservativebyte.com/2013/03/gabby-gif ...
<quoted text>
No, didn't forget. The important part is that he bought one! Why don't you also buy one to make your point?
I've tried, we've tried, lord knows, Rogue. He bought it to show how easily just about anyone can buy a killer assault rifle. Got it now? I think he even had a pic taken.

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

#146419 Mar 10, 2013
Jacques,
This is agonizing.
The guy's an astronaut, for Christ's sake. What's he trying to prove, anyway?
That he has a mental deficit or something?
loose
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#146420 Mar 10, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
jakeleg, Canada is asking for you to off yourself immediately. I second the motion. Hurry up now, the world will be 100 times better off without you wasting precious resources. LMAO! squid
LRS on playing touch football : "Okay, two things, guys. This is MY ball. This guy from another neighbourhood is too good. Either we ask him to leave or I quit and leave with my ball. Also, and even though I'm the worst player on our team, I know, I know, I suck, if you don't let me play, I walk out with my ball. Take it or leave it".

Why doesn't it say Kelseyville under your moniker?
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#146421 Mar 10, 2013
LRS wrote:
Obumbler is a crybaby! Waa Waa Waa
A very mature and adult comment.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#146422 Mar 10, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey Libtards, ALL I did was list the TITLE and I did not post one word from the body of the article. I didn't write the title so why are you coming down on me?
Oh I know, you can't stand the title so you attack me! How infantile.
Just don't post it. Unless INDICATED otherwise, what you post is whaat and who you are. DOH!
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#146423 Mar 10, 2013
loose cannon wrote:
Jacques,
This is agonizing.
The guy's an astronaut, for Christ's sake. What's he trying to prove, anyway?
That he has a mental deficit or something?
loose
No, he's trying to prove to intelligent people that gun lobbying nuts and the NRA are dangerous. And he's succeeding admirably well with , yes, intelligent people. The dumb ones are shooting at tin cans and missing and howling and drinking Bud Light and eating pork rinds. Cin Cin and bon appétit.

Since: Aug 10

Hollis Center, ME

#146424 Mar 10, 2013
Poor birther, you still have a black president
Entertainer

United States

#146425 Mar 10, 2013
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#146426 Mar 10, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Wahhhhh wahhh wahhhh ALL I did was list the TITLE and I did not post one word from the body of the article. I didn't write the title so why are you coming down on me?
Oh I know, you can't stand the title so you attack me! How infantile.
Rogue Moron like to play pretend. That is why he's a birfoon.

Rogue Moron is pretending he didn't selectively leaving out the crux of the article to suit his silly fantasy. Rogue Moron is pretending this exchange never happened:

CB can see both sides wrote:
<quoted text>"As a illustration of the need for more stringent gun laws."
I'm sure you forgot to mention that little fact.

“zero nuclear weapons”

Since: Sep 08

Perryville

#146427 Mar 10, 2013
Nut Case wrote:
<quoted text>
Do some research
If the info comes from places like infowars or WND they are ran by paranoid lunatics.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#146428 Mar 10, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Gabby Giffords’s Husband Buys AR-15
Posted on March 10, 2013
Read more: http://conservativebyte.com/2013/03/gabby-gif ...

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Again you shoot the messenger and not the message. Do you think one of your sources will even mention that he bought an AR-15 for any reason? Oh, I did go to your links both neither of them worked!!!
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
1. None of my "so called" sources posted this, negatively, positively or otherwise;
2. No wonder my link didn't work, I didn't supply. I just quote from the nazi link YOU supplied, word for word. What say you?
And your links aren't Nazi links?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#146429 Mar 10, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Wahhhhh wahhh wahhhh ALL I did was list the TITLE and I did not post one word from the body of the article. I didn't write the title so why are you coming down on me?
Oh I know, you can't stand the title so you attack me! How infantile.
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Rogue Moron like to play pretend. That is why he's a birfoon.
Rogue Moron is pretending he didn't selectively leaving out the crux of the article to suit his silly fantasy. Rogue Moron is pretending this exchange never happened:
CB can see both sides wrote:
<quoted text>"As a illustration of the need for more stringent gun laws."
I'm sure you forgot to mention that little fact.
You too are two stupid tew realize all I did was post the title and a link to it!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#146430 Mar 10, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Gabby Giffords’s Husband Buys AR-15
Posted on March 10, 2013
Read more: http://conservativebyte.com/2013/03/gabby-gif ...
<quoted text>
No, didn't forget. The important part is that he bought one! Why don't you also buy one to make your point?
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
I've tried, we've tried, lord knows, Rogue. He bought it to show how easily just about anyone can buy a killer assault rifle. Got it now? I think he even had a pic taken.
Are you saying that Gabby Gifford's husband is either a convicted felon or mentally ill?

Since: Aug 10

Hollis Center, ME

#146431 Mar 10, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
nebka wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes i know that. I am a very Liberal Democrat and i admire President Lincoln for his courage and Leadership.
In today's world President Abe Lincoln would not be considered a Republican. In fact he would look upon today's Republican Party with disdain
as would Reagan
<quoted text>
nebka was wrong but you are right. Reagan was a CONSERVATIVE Republican and the Country Club RINO's have been running the GOP ever since he left office.
You cant really be that stupid, can you?

If anything, Reagan is a Rino in comparison to the nutters running the repub party today

Reagan:

Granted amnesty to illegals

Extended unemployemnt 17 times

INCREASED federal government hiring to lower the unemployment rate, and it worked (imagine if Obama tried that)

Raised taxes 11 times

Increased CORPORATE income taxes & closed loopholes:
“We’re going to make it economical to raise children again. Flatter rates will mean more reward for that extra effort, and vanishing loopholes and a minimum tax will mean that everybody and every corporation pay their fair share.”(sounds kinda like Obama)

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#146432 Mar 10, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
I've totally debunked that grade 1 economic theory of yours several times, Rogue. And, as ususal, you were stuffed, had no comeback, but you just put it away for later, didn't you? And out it comes today, certain that I and others here forgot your silly little mortgager theory. It won't fly. Hell, I remember even using parables with traffic lights and all that to make you understand, all to no avail. Jimmy Carter was president in 1976, for heaven's sake, 25+ yrs prior to GWB. And there was no sign, not even a hint of a housing bubble with Clinton, quite the opposite. Your dear sweet friends that you defend delay, the rich s.o.b.'s who cheat, like the brokers, the mortgage middlemen and the bankers who made ANY loan to ANYone and as recompense cashed in huge bonuses, and not one of them in jail. Do you mean to tell me that the majority of people who over-borrowed are blacks? Your crooked friends profited from NO oversight by GWB aided by Alan Greenspan to make a short term profit, knowing full well that they HAD to be bailed out or else, when the day of reckoning came, as it was sure to do.
Your "lords" of the manor took a good home financing plan and rigged it. And you defend them, hell, you blame Carter who was president 25 years before GSB.
You have to combine Jimmy Carter's laws with Bill Clinton's. Before Bill Clinton, all it said was you could not discriminate but under Bill Clinton's laws it became CRIMINAL!!!
And a bad loan is a hot potato. Once you have it you try and give it away and the last one with it gets burned. Why have we had to bail out Freddie Mac and Fanny Mae?
Federal takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
The federal takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac refers to the placing into conservatorship of government sponsored enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by the U.S. Treasury in September 2008. It was one of the financial events among many in the ongoing subprime mortgage crisis.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_takeover...
Yep, they made the same mistakes the banks did, making loans. But as long as they made loans, they had to make loans to every and anyone. Thank you Jimmy F-ing Carter and Bill "Bent Crank" Clinton!
The only way the banks could have gotten out of it is stop making housing loans to everyone.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#146434 Mar 10, 2013
FFS- wrote:
<quoted text>You cant really be that stupid, can you?
If anything, Reagan is a Rino in comparison to the nutters running the repub party today
Reagan:
Granted amnesty to illegals
Extended unemployemnt 17 times
INCREASED federal government hiring to lower the unemployment rate, and it worked (imagine if Obama tried that)
Raised taxes 11 times
Increased CORPORATE income taxes & closed loopholes:
“We’re going to make it economical to raise children again. Flatter rates will mean more reward for that extra effort, and vanishing loopholes and a minimum tax will mean that everybody and every corporation pay their fair share.”(sounds kinda like Obama)
Obviously you are a mushroom. You live in a dark closet and people feed you sh*t!
The Democrats controlled the House under Reagan and all they had to do is add things to the budget. Then all he could do is sign it into law or veto the whole thing.
All Tax increases under Reagan were honchoed through the Democrat controlled House!
As far as the flat tax, the idea is to LOWER the tax rate and close loop wholes. Obama just raised the tax rates for the evil rich and now he wants to close loop hole (tax advantages).
You do know Reagan wanted to close the Dept. of Education, Dept. of Labor, OSHA, EPA and Dept. of Energy, don't you? But the Democrat controlled House would not let him.
Reagan was for much smaller government!!!
You are reading way to much Liberal garbage.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#146438 Mar 10, 2013
FFS- wrote:
<quoted text>You cant really be that stupid, can you?
If anything, Reagan is a Rino in comparison to the nutters running the repub party today
Reagan:
Granted amnesty to illegals
Extended unemployemnt 17 times
INCREASED federal government hiring to lower the unemployment rate, and it worked (imagine if Obama tried that)
Raised taxes 11 times
Increased CORPORATE income taxes & closed loopholes:
“We’re going to make it economical to raise children again. Flatter rates will mean more reward for that extra effort, and vanishing loopholes and a minimum tax will mean that everybody and every corporation pay their fair share.”(sounds kinda like Obama)
You can't really be that stupid, can you?
Using your Libtardian Logic, Bill Clinton was a CONSERVATIVE. After all, he did sigh into law four of Newt Gingrich's balanced budgets, seven of the point of the Contract with America, the Taxpayer relied Act of 1997 AND DOMA.
You see, any president can only sign into law bill that are passed by Congress. Right now the only thing that is saving Obama is the Democrat controlled Senate.
Oh, why is Bill Clinton against DOMA now when he signed it into law in 1996? DOMA was passed by the Republican controlled Congress and he could have vetoed it, but he didn't!!!

Since: Aug 10

Hollis Center, ME

#146441 Mar 10, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Obviously you are a mushroom. You live in a dark closet and people feed you sh*t!
The Democrats controlled the House under Reagan and all they had to do is add things to the budget. Then all he could do is sign it into law or veto the whole thing.
All Tax increases under Reagan were honchoed through the Democrat controlled House!
As far as the flat tax, the idea is to LOWER the tax rate and close loop wholes. Obama just raised the tax rates for the evil rich and now he wants to close loop hole (tax advantages).
You do know Reagan wanted to close the Dept. of Education, Dept. of Labor, OSHA, EPA and Dept. of Energy, don't you? But the Democrat controlled House would not let him.
Reagan was for much smaller government!!!
You are reading way to much Liberal garbage.
I knew you would respond with predictable conservative cowardice. Conservatives are so fearful of truth!

So youre saying that whoever controls the house in in charge? Then why dp you whine about obama? LOL

Then of course, being a conservative PANSY, you just make up crap because it fits your needs. REGEAN INCREASED TAXES 11 TIMES BECAUSE HE SAW IT WAS NECESSARY. Can you tell me what the 1986 tax reform bill was called? You know the bill that REAGAN helped right and REAGAN PRAISED when it was signed? Hmmmm what was that called again? OH YEAH......the RONALD REAGAN TAX REFORM BILL. Notince it wasnt callled the "democrats control the house" tax reform bill!

Conservatives are such cowards!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 15 min Yeah 1,508,079
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 52 min They cannot kill ... 10,491
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 1 hr Mister Tonka 105,049
managers at Steak N Shake sell Passports 11 hr Nuri Harrigan dik... 1
Graduation in Detroit. 17 hr Another Chance 1
News Scientists say they have proved climate change ... (Dec '08) 18 hr Dudley 8,065
News Man charged with shooting near 26/Cal courthouse 19 hr former democrat 1

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages