BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#144914 Feb 28, 2013
LRS wrote:
And the story continues to grow! Impeach this fool!

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/02/28/wh ...
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Impeach Woodward?
Why?
Granted "I think you will regret staking out that claim" is hardly a "threat" but don't we give journalists a pass for embellishing a bit? Hardly seems like something we'd impeach a reporter over
You really think that Bob Woodward was the first case? Did you read that article? NO, because if you had you'd have realize that Obama is one nasty ghetto thug!
Ha know, Nixon just talked about using the IRS to go after people but Obama is DOING IT!!!
Jacques Ottawa

Mississauga, Canada

#144915 Feb 28, 2013
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
That's your tale ...
I sit on mine :)
Yeah, sitting on your tail. LMAO (LRS tm reg'd)

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#144916 Feb 28, 2013
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
He's a REAL man!
But I'm NOT!
I'm American LADY ... <<<
Lady ... get it?
;0)
of a lady; ladylike; feminine.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/lady
The feminine gender.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/feminine
gender
What do we mean by "sex" and "gender"?
Sometimes it is hard to understand exactly what is meant by the term "gender", and how it differs from the closely related term "sex".
"Sex" refers to the biological and physiological characteristics that define men and women.
"Gender" refers to the socially constructed roles, behaviours, activities, and attributes that a given society considers appropriate for men and women.
To put it another way:
"Male" and "female" are sex categories, while "masculine" and "feminine" are gender categories.
Some examples of sex characteristics :
Women menstruate while men do not
Men have testicles while women do not
Women have developed breasts that are usually capable of lactating, while men have not
Men generally have more massive bones than women
http://www.who.int/gender/whatisgender/en/
OverKILL I know :)
Got it?
GOOD!
Transvestite Lady give a lecture on femininity. How entertaining. She also gives fist sandwiches, or so she says.

Busted, birfoon.
Jacques Ottawa

Mississauga, Canada

#144917 Feb 28, 2013
Re your post 144910, not enough room left to respond. You wrote, in part, yes you did, incredibly : "No,to be a deviant you must be out of the normal like homosexuals and lesbians "

Please refer me to something, anything, but let it be authoritative and based on science, that states that to be homosexual (the term refers to both genders, Rogue) is deviant and therefore, in your very words, "out of the normal".

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#144918 Feb 28, 2013
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
Rogue even the Daily Caller has called Woodward out on his fabrication and misrepresentation of events. Why do you keep posting this nonsense? Woodward was wrong and he’s been proven wrong. Woodward mouth is no prayer book and his words are not gospel.
“Predictably, conservatives latched onto this, as it confirmed our suspicion about the Obama Administration’s “Chicago-style” of politics. A lot of mainstream journalists bought into this, too — reflexively believing anything the great Bob Woodward says.
Of course, Woodward (who was expert at trolling for publicity before the internet even existed), benefits greatly from the publicity (nothing sells books like controversy)”
http://dailycaller.com/2013/02/28/bob-woodwar...
Reagan often took umbrage at media coverage. When The Washington Post's Bob Woodward published a hospital-bed interview with William Casey after the CIA director's death, Reagan wrote: "He's a liar & he lied about what Casey is supposed to have thought of me."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/...
"even the Daily Caller"? That implies there are more, but even CNN disagrees!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#144919 Feb 28, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
LRS wrote:
And the story continues to grow! Impeach this fool!
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/02/28/wh ...
<quoted text>
You really think that Bob Woodward was the first case? Did you read that article? NO, because if you had you'd have realize that Obama is one nasty ghetto thug!
Ha know, Nixon just talked about using the IRS to go after people but Obama is DOING IT!!!
How does one impeach a WH staffer such as Sperling?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#144920 Feb 28, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Do we have to read and read and read over and over again your adventures in Vietnam and the good deeds you've been doing all over the United States up 'til yesterday? Do you see me and others tell about our lives and careers here on Topix?Đo you think you're the only man alive who ever turned a good deed?
Sorry your life is so boring!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#144921 Feb 28, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
My post 144886 Corr : F-14, not F-13. Have to correct, that kind of typo is the only thing Rogue can now cling to.
More :(Wikipedia) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-14_Tomcat_operational...
American withdrawal from Saigon (1975)
Main article: Operation Frequent Wind
The Tomcat made its combat debut during Operation Frequent Wind, the evacuation of American citizens from Saigon, in April 1975. F-14As from Fighter Squadron 1 (VF-1) and VF-2, operating from the USS Enterprise (CVN-65), flew combat air patrols over South Vietnam to provide fighter cover for the evacuation route.[2]
Can you hear us laughing?
AGAIN, F-14's were not used "IN" the Vietnam War. They made no attempt to protect South Vietnam. They were prevented by acts of Congress. Their sole purpose was to escort U.S. aircraft and they rules of engagement stated that!
After August 1973 the U.S. military was PROHIBITED from assisting the South Vietnamese!
It is like you who thinks that the one third of adult Americans who own guns are deviants but the less that ten percent who are GBT's are not deviants?!?
Learn to Read

Chicago, IL

#144922 Feb 28, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>LRS wrote:
And the story continues to grow! Impeach this fool!

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/02/28/wh ...

You really think that Bob Woodward was the first case? Did you read that article? NO, because if you had you'd have realize that Obama is one nasty ghetto thug!
Ha know, Nixon just talked about using the IRS to go after people but Obama is DOING IT!!!
I don't think Woodward was threatened at all. If that's what you call a threat then you must have some very polite thugs in your neighborhood

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#144923 Feb 28, 2013
Let me tell you about Libtardian Logic. In December I went to Walmart to buy a Ruger 10/22 as a Christmas gift. But I listed it as a gift to my 41 year old daughter and they told me I could not do that but I could give it to my 13 y/o grandson.
What idiot would give a rifle to a 13 y/o kid? And Walmart would not let me redo my statement after it was rejected.
When I went up to Georgia for the holidays I tried to find another one with the plans of getting my daughter to fill out the application but they were are sold out. I will try again in April for his 14th B-day.
Oh, it was my plan to wrap the rifle separately form the magazine giving the rifle to my g-son and the magazine to my daughter as you can't shoot it without the magazine and my daughter can lock the magazine up easier than the rifle.
Jacques Ottawa

Mississauga, Canada

#144924 Feb 28, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry your life is so boring!
Well, I don't bore people with my so-called boring life. But you sure do.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#144925 Feb 28, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Please indicate where and when I ever said that gun owners were deviant.And do it,don't ask me to look for it as it doesn't exist and YOU brought it up, so prove it.
You wrote: "Dad Shoots and Kills 2 Armed Thugs to Protect his Family"
Well and good. And I write "Nutball crazed fool easily grabs his mother's gun and assault weapon that are just lying around, obviously, and kills 26 people, 20 of them children. Crazed ex cop and marine kills police officer and wife plus a second cop, etc etc. " Rogue, you're a foolish man (there is no lower epitheth in Africa),blinded by the NRA and gun nut clubs. I'll give you 100 examples of awful gun killings to one of your idiotic examples of someone protecting someone.
Sorry,had to cut your last paragraph,Topix said I was over.
Well, I won't demand you give me 100 examples but I will demand TEN!
When I have to cut something to make it fit I usually do a line of periods to indicate that something was deleted.
Jacques Ottawa

Mississauga, Canada

#144926 Feb 28, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
AGAIN, F-14's were not used "IN" the Vietnam War. They made no attempt to protect South Vietnam. They were prevented by acts of Congress. Their sole purpose was to escort U.S. aircraft and they rules of engagement stated that!
After August 1973 the U.S. military was PROHIBITED from assisting the South Vietnamese!
It is like you who thinks that the one third of adult Americans who own guns are deviants but the less that ten percent who are GBT's are not deviants?!?
Stop twisting and turning in the wind. I never mentioned the notion of used or not used "IN" the Vietnam war. I said they flew combat. I referred you to numerous web sites that said they did. Why do you argue with them? Why were they escorting U.S. aircraft? Were those aircraft in danger of being attacked? No? then why the escort? Well, Rogue, they WERE at risk of being attacked and any plane that escorted them were on a combat mission. Why do I , of all people, have to tell you that?

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#144927 Feb 28, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
"even the Daily Caller"? That implies there are more, but even CNN disagrees!
Only if you’re a senile old fool would it imply such a thing. Here is the threat Rogue.

“I know you may not believe this,(but as a friend), I think you will regret staking out that claim ... My apologies again for raising my voice on the call with you. Feel bad about that and truly apologize”

Woodward reply

“Gene: You do not ever have to apologize to me. You get wound up because you are making your points and you believe them. This is all part of a serious discussion. I for one welcome a little heat; there should more given the importance. I also welcome your personal advice”

Now how does Woodward justify this exchange by what he told Wolf Blitzer?

"It makes me very uncomfortable to have the White House telling reporters, you're going to regret doing something that you believe in," he told Wolf Blitzer. The White House told The Huffington Post that Sperling was merely trying to tell Woodward he would regret writing something that was inaccurate.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/27/wood...
Jacques Ottawa

Mississauga, Canada

#144928 Feb 28, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Let me tell you about Libtardian Logic. In December I went to Walmart to buy a Ruger 10/22 as a Christmas gift. But I listed it as a gift to my 41 year old daughter and they told me I could not do that but I could give it to my 13 y/o grandson.
What idiot would give a rifle to a 13 y/o kid? And Walmart would not let me redo my statement after it was rejected.
When I went up to Georgia for the holidays I tried to find another one with the plans of getting my daughter to fill out the application but they were are sold out. I will try again in April for his 14th B-day.
Oh, it was my plan to wrap the rifle separately form the magazine giving the rifle to my g-son and the magazine to my daughter as you can't shoot it without the magazine and my daughter can lock the magazine up easier than the rifle.
This guy gives guns at Christ Mass, as he likes to call it. I'm sure that Jesus, in his manger with his virgin mother and Joseph would have marvelled at this gift of peace. A gun. What better choice for peace on earth?
Jacques Ottawa

Mississauga, Canada

#144929 Feb 28, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, I won't demand you give me 100 examples but I will demand TEN!
When I have to cut something to make it fit I usually do a line of periods to indicate that something was deleted.
Hey,hey, I said, stated that I deleted a paragraph. I was honest as it is never my intent to cut, delete or, like birthers do, LRs for one, edit stuff out.

100 examples of what? Or TEN of what? You want me to find ten examples of when I said gun owners were deviants, even though I never said so, not even once? YOU said I wrote they were deviants. Now kindly prove it. NOW.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#144930 Feb 28, 2013
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>Only if youÂ’re a senile old fool would it imply such a thing. Here is the threat Rogue.

“I know you may not believe this,(but as a friend), I think you will regret staking out that claim ... My apologies again for raising my voice on the call with you. Feel bad about that and truly apologize”

Woodward reply

“Gene: You do not ever have to apologize to me. You get wound up because you are making your points and you believe them. This is all part of a serious discussion. I for one welcome a little heat; there should more given the importance. I also welcome your personal advice”

Now how does Woodward justify this exchange by what he told Wolf Blitzer?

"It makes me very uncomfortable to have the White House telling reporters, you're going to regret doing something that you believe in," he told Wolf Blitzer. The White House told The Huffington Post that Sperling was merely trying to tell Woodward he would regret writing something that was inaccurate.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/27/wood...
Apology is not a word Birfoons comprehend
American Lady

Danville, KY

#144931 Feb 28, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Apology is not a word Birfoons comprehend
WE know what the word defines ...
We just have NO reason to DO it!

libTARDS "do" tho!:)

Starting WHEN ...???
The 32nd of May, I guess :)
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#144934 Feb 28, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey,hey, I said, stated that I deleted a paragraph. I was honest as it is never my intent to cut, delete or, like birthers do, LRs for one, edit stuff out.
100 examples of what? Or TEN of what? You want me to find ten examples of when I said gun owners were deviants, even though I never said so, not even once? YOU said I wrote they were deviants. Now kindly prove it. NOW.
You couldn't be a bigger liar, there chief! What a piece of work you are jakeleg. Not good for a damn thing and dumber than a dirt clod. Now, would you be so grateful as to explain your relevance in this universe? cowtick!
Maude

Floral Park, NY

#144935 Feb 28, 2013
Robert Laity wrote:
Obama is a Criminal deviant.
I appplaud you Robert Laity.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min swizzler 1,127,020
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 1 hr Bite Me 50,643
very cute unuasual pix 4 hr ALL GOOD 1
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 5 hr Mandela 68,666
omnipods boxes for sale 5 hr thanxlord 1
Amy 10-24 5 hr Mister Tonka 12
Mrs. Bush: History will vindicate her husband (Jun '08) 6 hr Anonymous91 54,522
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago Jobs

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]