Please indicate where and when I ever said that gun owners were deviant.And do it,don't ask me to look for it as it doesn't exist and YOU brought it up, so prove it.Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
No,to be a deviant you must be out of the normal like homosexuals and lesbians make up less than 10% of our population.
And some may say the Progressives are abnormal as they make up less than 25% of all voters.
Why,you think 85 million Americans who own firearms are deviants! That's right, there are more gun owners than either progressives or LGBT's! But we don't want to kill people. But we will if it is between our families or THEM!
Dad Shoots and Kills 2 Armed Thugs to Protect His Family
We just ran a story about a 21-year-old who shot and killed 1 out of 3 intruders in his Texas home which saved his parents’life. These kinds of events probably happen all the time,but we rarely hear about them in the mainstream media. They intentionally leave them out so that their viewers are left with a skewed version of reality that gives the impression that all we have is a bunch of armed criminals committing violent crimes against defenseless people. And their focus is not so much on the criminal, but on the gun.They try to scare their audience with pictures of the gun that was used, the size of the magazine and how much ammo he had. They might even throw in a picture of the others guns he had in his possession just because.
All we hear are the stories of murder,kidnapping, rape, child molestation, robbery, etc. And the media especially love it when the victim of one of these crimes happens to be black, and the criminal happens to be white. Then they get to talk nonstop about racism. But they wouldn’t dare even mention the crime if it happened to be black-on-white violence. Because that actually wouldn’t be called violence; it would be called slave reparations.
They don’t want to mention the good stories because then their viewers might get the sense that a gun is not always a murder weapon. It can be an effective and vital tool for self-defense.
Like this recent case in Virginia. Three armed criminals broke into a family’s home in the middle of the night:
“The incident happened around 3:30 in the morning when the trio kicked in the front door. The young father told the local CBS affiliate that ‘it sounded like a car running into the side of the house.’ The crash woke him and his two-year old son, who was sleeping next to him, up. The father then grabbed his gun, which was located nearby, and when he saw the armed intruders, opened fire.”
The 25-year-old dad shot and killed 2 of the 3 intruders, and the third bolted out the door. The man then called 911, and the police have been trying to find the third man, but have been unable to locate him. Now, since the man wasn’t able to kill the third criminal, he and his family are going to move because they don’t want the survivor coming after them again.
There’s nothing wrong with the mainstream media publicizing murders and rapes. Citizens should be aware of those crimes. But they should also publicize far and wide these types of situations where the victim was able to defend himself and bring justice to the criminal.
Read more: http://politicaloutcast.com/2013/02/dad-shoot...
You wrote: "Dad Shoots and Kills 2 Armed Thugs to Protect his Family"
Well and good. And I write "Nutball crazed fool easily grabs his mother's gun and assault weapon that are just lying around, obviously, and kills 26 people, 20 of them children. Crazed ex cop and marine kills police officer and wife plus a second cop, etc etc. " Rogue, you're a foolish man (there is no lower epitheth in Africa),blinded by the NRA and gun nut clubs. I'll give you 100 examples of awful gun killings to one of your idiotic examples of someone protecting someone.
Sorry,had to cut your last paragraph,Topix said I was over.