BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 237647 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#144887 Feb 28, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Oh, some time during the summer of 1971 I was taking two MACV (green Berets) to Saigon and there was a mix-up which my call sign, Warlord 531, and Dean 531 and as a result I was directed by the controller to drop off my two NCO's at the VIP pad.
Meanwhile Dean 531 was redirected to the #2 pad. As my two passenger were debarking I noticed a half dozen soldier walking towards my aircraft and then a LT ran out and directed them around the front of my aircraft to the #2 pad. That was when I noticed it was Gen. Abrams!!!
Yep, do to a mix-up with call signs my two NCO's got VIP treatment as Gen. Abrams go #2!!! I turned to my copilot and said something about someone getting in trouble!
Do we have to read and read and read over and over again your adventures in Vietnam and the good deeds you've been doing all over the United States up 'til yesterday? Do you see me and others tell about our lives and careers here on Topix?Ðo you think you're the only man alive who ever turned a good deed?
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#144888 Feb 28, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
As expected the pencil-necked, zit-faced, ignorant dweeb backs down! LMAO
Gee, could anyone else see this coming? ala slopuke....Hee Hee Hee (around here, we have a name for little boys that go hee hee hee but Topix doesn't care for it). LMAO
Little boys do NOT go Hee Hee Hee when they see you coming, that's for sure. They run for it.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#144889 Feb 28, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Little boys do NOT go Hee Hee Hee when they see you coming, that's for sure. They run for it.
slopuke does. LMAO
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#144890 Feb 28, 2013
My post 144886 Corr : F-14, not F-13. Have to correct, that kind of typo is the only thing Rogue can now cling to.

More :(Wikipedia) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-14_Tomcat_operational...

American withdrawal from Saigon (1975)

Main article: Operation Frequent Wind

The Tomcat made its combat debut during Operation Frequent Wind, the evacuation of American citizens from Saigon, in April 1975. F-14As from Fighter Squadron 1 (VF-1) and VF-2, operating from the USS Enterprise (CVN-65), flew combat air patrols over South Vietnam to provide fighter cover for the evacuation route.[2]

Can you hear us laughing?
American Lady

Danville, KY

#144891 Feb 28, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Little boys do NOT go Hee Hee Hee when they see you coming, that's for sure. They run for it.
You 'finally' admitted it.
YOU "run" ...

Hee Hee Hee ...
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#144892 Feb 28, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
My post 144886 Corr : F-14, not F-13. Have to correct, that kind of typo is the only thing Rogue can now cling to.
More :(Wikipedia) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-14_Tomcat_operational...
American withdrawal from Saigon (1975)
Main article: Operation Frequent Wind
The Tomcat made its combat debut during Operation Frequent Wind, the evacuation of American citizens from Saigon, in April 1975. F-14As from Fighter Squadron 1 (VF-1) and VF-2, operating from the USS Enterprise (CVN-65), flew combat air patrols over South Vietnam to provide fighter cover for the evacuation route.[2]
Can you hear us laughing?
Yes, but that is normal for a raving lunatic! hee hee hee, ha ha ha, ho ho ho..... They're coming to take you away jakeleg....haha hehe! LMAO!
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#144893 Feb 28, 2013
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
You 'finally' admitted it.
YOU "run" ...
Hee Hee Hee ...
Yes, and even though I'm not a little boy, seeing this "thing" coming, I'd run like the wind.

I'm sure LRS will thank you for your helpful intervention. LMAO (LRS tm reg'd)
American Lady

Danville, KY

#144894 Feb 28, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, and even though I'm not a little boy, seeing this "thing" coming, I'd run like the wind.
I'm sure LRS will thank you for your helpful intervention. LMAO (LRS tm reg'd)
Yep! We knew a REAL man scared you :)
WHY?
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#144895 Feb 28, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
My post 144886 Corr : F-14, not F-13. Have to correct, that kind of typo is the only thing Rogue can now cling to.
More :(Wikipedia) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-14_Tomcat_operational ...
American withdrawal from Saigon (1975)
Main article: Operation Frequent Wind
The Tomcat made its combat debut during Operation Frequent Wind, the evacuation of American citizens from Saigon, in April 1975. F-14As from Fighter Squadron 1 (VF-1) and VF-2, operating from the USS Enterprise (CVN-65), flew combat air patrols over South Vietnam to provide fighter cover for the evacuation route.[2]
Can you hear us laughing?
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, but that is normal for a raving lunatic! hee hee hee, ha ha ha, ho ho ho..... They're coming to take you away jakeleg....haha hehe! LMAO!
Grateful for your above post's relevance to MY above above post? LMAO (LRS tm reg'd).

Oh, also explain why you didn't seize the opportunity to back up Rogue's assertion that the F-14 did not fly combat missions? Seems this was the time, no? Oh, you googled it? I see. I understand.

Is is really really, and I mean really possible for someone like you to be such a sorry loser? And what is more, you are a multi-faceted loser, namely a poor loser, a sore loser, an ignorant loser, a traitor loser, a lying loser, a boorish loser, a vulgar loser, a "profanity" loser, a tea party loser, a birther birfoon loser and a loser loser. How it must suck to be a total loser like you. And you're American er hmm also loser Lady's, aka patriot ha ha warrior's aka sloopy loser's wing man? Ha ha, what a joke, hope God is her/his co-pilot. What a joke you two or three or one or whatever are.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#144896 Feb 28, 2013
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep! We knew a REAL man scared you :)
WHY?
Is he as real a MAN as you are?
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#144897 Feb 28, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
My post 144886 Corr : F-14, not F-13. Have to correct, that kind of typo is the only thing Rogue can now cling to.
More :(Wikipedia) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-14_Tomcat_operational...
American withdrawal from Saigon (1975)
Main article: Operation Frequent Wind
The Tomcat made its combat debut during Operation Frequent Wind, the evacuation of American citizens from Saigon, in April 1975. F-14As from Fighter Squadron 1 (VF-1) and VF-2, operating from the USS Enterprise (CVN-65), flew combat air patrols over South Vietnam to provide fighter cover for the evacuation route.[2]
Can you hear us laughing?
Oh, that's not a typo. That's a sign of ignorance.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#144898 Feb 28, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
My post 144886 Corr : F-14, not F-13. Have to correct, that kind of typo is the only thing Rogue can now cling to.
More :(Wikipedia) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-14_Tomcat_operational ...
American withdrawal from Saigon (1975)
Main article: Operation Frequent Wind
The Tomcat made its combat debut during Operation Frequent Wind, the evacuation of American citizens from Saigon, in April 1975. F-14As from Fighter Squadron 1 (VF-1) and VF-2, operating from the USS Enterprise (CVN-65), flew combat air patrols over South Vietnam to provide fighter cover for the evacuation route.[2]
Can you hear us laughing?
<quoted text>
Grateful for your above post's relevance to MY above above post? LMAO (LRS tm reg'd).
Oh, also explain why you didn't seize the opportunity to back up Rogue's assertion that the F-14 did not fly combat missions? Seems this was the time, no? Oh, you googled it? I see. I understand.
Is is really really, and I mean really possible for someone like you to be such a sorry loser? And what is more, you are a multi-faceted loser, namely a poor loser, a sore loser, an ignorant loser, a traitor loser, a lying loser, a boorish loser, a vulgar loser, a "profanity" loser, a tea party loser, a birther birfoon loser and a loser loser. How it must suck to be a total loser like you. And you're American er hmm also loser Lady's, aka patriot ha ha warrior's aka sloopy loser's wing man? Ha ha, what a joke, hope God is her/his co-pilot. What a joke you two or three or one or whatever are.
You're just jealous because your own comrades won't cover you! Can't say I blame them. There is no honor among punks! LMAO!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#144899 Feb 28, 2013
And the story continues to grow! Impeach this fool!

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/02/28/wh...
Forum

Hobbs, NM

#144900 Feb 28, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
The Democrat Party and the Ku Klux Klan: Aside from the multiple Klan members who have served in elected capacity within the high ranks of the Democrat Party, the political party itself has a lengthy but often overlooked history of involvement with the Ku Klux Klan. Though it has been all but forgotten by the media, the Democrat National Convention of 1924 was host to one of the largest Klan gatherings in American history. Dubbed the "Klanbake convention" at the time, the 1924 Democrat National Convention in New York was dominated by a platform dispute surrounding the Ku Klux Klan. A minority of the delegates to the convention attempted to condemn the hate group in the party's platform, but found their proposal shot down by Klan supporters within the party. As delegates inside the convention voted in the Klan's favor, the Klan itself mobilized a celebratory rally outside. On July 4, 1924 one of the largest Klan gatherings ever occurred outside the convention on a field in nearby New Jersey. The event was marked by speakers spewing racial hatred, celebrations of their platform victory in the Democrat Convention, and ended in a cross burning.
http://gopcapitalist.tripod.com/democratrecor...
Chinese? What a waste of time.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#144901 Feb 28, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
You're just jealous because your own comrades won't cover you! Can't say I blame them. There is no honor among punks! LMAO!
They don't have to. They know. But you covered Rogue on the F-14 fiasco (or yourself for that matter) yet are no longer doing so. Care to tell us why? LMAO (LRS tm reg'd)
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#144902 Feb 28, 2013
LRS wrote:
And the story continues to grow! Impeach this fool!
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/02/28/wh...
Foxnews.com again?

Ha ha , I've been warned thus : "Please refrain from posting profanity or offensive material.
Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator"

Must be your moniker. They see your name, automatic warning LMAO (LRS tm reg'd)

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#144903 Feb 28, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
I wonder if the White House is getting ready for another Saturday Night Massacre?
BOB WOODWARD: A 'Very Senior' White House Person Warned Me I'd 'Regret' What I'm Doing
Brett LoGiurato | Feb. 27, 2013,
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/bob-woodward-o...
Rogue even the Daily Caller has called Woodward out on his fabrication and misrepresentation of events. Why do you keep posting this nonsense? Woodward was wrong and he’s been proven wrong. Woodward mouth is no prayer book and his words are not gospel.

“Predictably, conservatives latched onto this, as it confirmed our suspicion about the Obama Administration’s “Chicago-style” of politics. A lot of mainstream journalists bought into this, too — reflexively believing anything the great Bob Woodward says.
Of course, Woodward (who was expert at trolling for publicity before the internet even existed), benefits greatly from the publicity (nothing sells books like controversy)”
http://dailycaller.com/2013/02/28/bob-woodwar...

Reagan often took umbrage at media coverage. When The Washington Post's Bob Woodward published a hospital-bed interview with William Casey after the CIA director's death, Reagan wrote: "He's a liar & he lied about what Casey is supposed to have thought of me."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/...
Forum

Hobbs, NM

#144904 Feb 28, 2013
Why are they going to Mexico?

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#144905 Feb 28, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
No, I said exactly what I intended to say. Who mentioned "popularity" polls? He will be remembered as the worst president ever. Again, too bad.
Right, too bad your Party is polling at 29 percent and 71 percent of the populace agrees with Obama’s approach to a balanced budget. Pretty hard being the worst anything when the country agrees with you Mr. Liars.

“Seventy-one percent of voters, including majorities of Republicans (52 percent), Democrats (83 percent) and independents (78 percent), favor a combination of cutting major programs and increasing taxes”
http://publicreligion.org/newsroom/2012/11/ne...
American Lady

Danville, KY

#144906 Feb 28, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Is he as real a MAN as you are?
He's a REAL man!
But I'm NOT!
I'm American LADY ... <<<
Lady ... get it?

;0)

of a lady; ladylike; feminine.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/lady

The feminine gender.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/feminine

gender
What do we mean by "sex" and "gender"?

Sometimes it is hard to understand exactly what is meant by the term "gender", and how it differs from the closely related term "sex".

"Sex" refers to the biological and physiological characteristics that define men and women.

"Gender" refers to the socially constructed roles, behaviours, activities, and attributes that a given society considers appropriate for men and women.

To put it another way:

"Male" and "female" are sex categories, while "masculine" and "feminine" are gender categories.

Some examples of sex characteristics :

Women menstruate while men do not
Men have testicles while women do not
Women have developed breasts that are usually capable of lactating, while men have not
Men generally have more massive bones than women

http://www.who.int/gender/whatisgender/en/

OverKILL I know :)

Got it?
GOOD!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min Nostrillis Waxman 1,497,791
Finally help for Citizens 30 min Let Freedom Ring 1
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 56 min Mothra 63,374
Are democrats destroyed? 1 hr Susanm 326
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 1 hr Susanm 10,362
Four letter word game (Dec '11) 1 hr GEORGIA 2,481
News Scientists say they have proved climate change ... (Dec '08) 1 hr Patriot AKA Bozo 8,008

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages