I have asked Jacques three times already to clarify why guns sold in other states had anything to do with the gun violence in Shitcago especially that Wash. DC is at it's gun violence rate is at a %50 YEAR LOW!!!
You still don't get it. Washington DC is mostly a ghetto and most of the rich people live in certain area so that is not the reason why gun crime is at a 50 year low.<quoted text>
And I have already answered that. There seems to be something wrong with your readng un-skills and/or comprehension. I said yesterday that Chicago (hell, I said it last week and the week before that) was surrounded by cities and states that had lax gun purchase laws, they just brought them into Chicago, is all. I even said to you that Toronto had the same problem wiht gun smuggling across the border. As to Washngton, I never brought it up,YOU did. But seeing as you did, I did give my explanation as to why I THOUGHT gun crimes were down, namely that Washington surroundings are more affluent than Chicago surroundings, therefore probably fewer guns are sold, and people who are well off, and there are more there, don't commit as many crimes.
The problem with Shitcago is the cops will not go into a project unless they have to where as in DC the cops patrol the high crime areas. In Atlanta the cops also avoid the ghettos and the crime rates are high. But when there is a sports game or concert down town, there are 20 cops at every MARTA stop. WHY?
Well, the rich people want to stay rich and they run the sport, concerts, etc. and if the customers and if the customers won't come because of the high crime rate, the rich people loose money.
Now people who live in projects deserve police protection too but they usually don't get it so that is when you have little girls getting shot in the back like what happened in Shitcago four weeks ago. It is not a gun problem per say, it is a law enforcement problem.