BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 225570 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

lamer

Hopkins, MN

#142575 Feb 15, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes. You certainly are
more 1 line post with zero content to back up anything you say. you repubs have moved so far right it is a cakewalk breaking down your arguments. So please continue with your crazy conspiracy theories, hate of science, and short term memory of facts as you lose elections and we'll keep on doing what we have been doing...
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#142576 Feb 15, 2013
lamer wrote:
<quoted text>
more 1 line post with zero content to back up anything you say. you repubs have moved so far right it is a cakewalk breaking down your arguments. So please continue with your crazy conspiracy theories, hate of science, and short term memory of facts as you lose elections and we'll keep on doing what we have been doing...
LMAO!!!!!!!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#142577 Feb 15, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes. You certainly are
lamer wrote:
<quoted text>
more 1 line post with zero content to back up anything you say. you repubs have moved so far right it is a cakewalk breaking down your arguments. So please continue with your crazy conspiracy theories, hate of science, and short term memory of facts as you lose elections and we'll keep on doing what we have been doing...
Progressives believe anyone right of them is a Conservative. To include Blue Dog Demo,,,,, ah Independents. I almost forget, there are no Blue Dogs left in the Democrat Party!
lamer

Hopkins, MN

#142579 Feb 15, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes. You certainly are
<quoted text>
Progressives believe anyone right of them is a Conservative. To include Blue Dog Demo,,,,, ah Independents. I almost forget, there are no Blue Dogs left in the Democrat Party!
Can you please show me any one time anywhere in all of topics i have refered to anyone as a "conservative" much lesss "blue dogs" "red dems" or anything else along those lines.

Keep grasping at straws but i think and choose my words wisely before spitting out a bunch of garbage. And yet again, none of that has ANYTHING to do with the topix at hand you orginially quoted me on. AGain, you have zero to back up your nonsense but continue to carry on...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#142580 Feb 15, 2013
lamer wrote:
oh, and i forgot to mention, it's the FBI that looks into computer hacking cases, not our cyber command. I guess we can plan to expand the FBI then since the hacking of blogs is such a big deal all of a sudden..
Ah, the FBI does not look into computer hacking cases? Under AG Holder, only if the computer is a lefty one.
lamer

Hopkins, MN

#142581 Feb 15, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah, the FBI does not look into computer hacking cases? Under AG Holder, only if the computer is a lefty one.
again, your post does not make sense. And you are now saying the FBI doesnt investigate federal computer crimes? I think that is what you are trying to say but your lack of context can only lead one to assume...

How any of this has anything to do with the topix we were talking about, i have no idea. But i have a feeling your not here to have a converstation.

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#142582 Feb 15, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Who was talking about auto insurance or an expired/suspended license? Yes, I'm fully aware of Roberts the traitor. If a person doesn't have insurance, do you think they'll be able to pay the fine? Highly doubtful. So, you think they'll throw you in jail for that? Really? Wow, what a healthcare bill, huh? Right now, the bill says no individual is required to participate in any Federal Insurance Program and will not be penalized. Yep, that's how it is written. Why don't you do a little reading slaveboi.
Participation does not start til 14 Mr. Liars, but those already insured are reaping many benefits from the bill as we speak. I believe your confusion stems from the fact your state has opted out of the Medicaid expansion portion of Obamacare which I doubt will remain the case much longer since the Federal government will be footing 100 percent of a cost the state would normally be paying for Medicaid anyway.

The problem lies (as with most Republican governors) is they would have to expand the program to federal guidelines which is currently 133 percent of the poverty line. In your state this would extend Medicaid coverage to those making $14,856 or less which in your state is currently at about $10,000 for a single individual. At any rate these are people who won’t be fined regardless. Eventually the hospitals will force your governor to accept the expansion just as they did in Arizona because they desperately need the money.

You on the other hand will either get health insurance or pay a fine and unlike the setup in California the IRS will be handling the collection. Judge Roberts saw to that. LOL
Bawny Fwank

Jacksonville, FL

#142584 Feb 15, 2013
Shakalaka wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you GAY? Cause you need to find yourself a man of your own and stop inquiring about mine.
Do you have a light-bulb butt?
Jaques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#142586 Feb 15, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
We import about half of our crude oil. The only crude oil exported, that I know of, goes to Japan. Oil is oil. Sure some will take a little extra to process but it still ends up as finished products.
Yes, we do export finished petroleum but the fact is, we are still a net importer of crude oil.
Tar sand oil is heavy crude oil so we pay less for it. West Texas Light, Sweet crude being the benchmark. "Light" means you can get more gasoline with less processing and "Sweet" means it has less sulfur in it which also means less processing.
Some of the nastiest crude oil comes fro Venezuela which is heavy and sour. But we still import it, don't we.
As far as pollution risk, gasoline is by far the worst. It has high vapor pressure (it evaporates fast) and it has nasty additives. Heavy crude oil is one of the lowest pollution hazards as it has a very low vapor pressure and has no additives. If it spills, it is much easier to clean up.
But you being an ignorant bigot, do not understand what I just said.
I know, I know, I'm an oil bigot and ignorant. Now, the conclusion of the above gibberish remains what I posted and stated, namely that the big oil guys, your friends, are running a 1.5 thousand mile pipeline north to south, endangering life, nature and the environment (and there have been spills, will be more) to convey dirty oil that will profit the big oil companies (your friends)as they will refine the oil for a huge profit, with not a drop for U.S. domestic consumption.
Your above post is a "découpage" of various sources which you do not understand, any more than you understand what a bigot is. Only way to do that is to reflect upon yourself.

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#142587 Feb 15, 2013
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
I hope Poopoo stain enjoys his death at the hands of Muslim extremists.
On the other hand, death from starvation or slavery in death camps may get to him 1st.
Sorry GB, I’m not a doomsday prepper or a delusionary idiot.

You funny man GB!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#142588 Feb 15, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes. You certainly are
lamer wrote:
<quoted text>
more 1 line post with zero content to back up anything you say. you repubs have moved so far right it is a cakewalk breaking down your arguments. So please continue with your crazy conspiracy theories, hate of science, and short term memory of facts as you lose elections and we'll keep on doing what we have been doing...
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Progressives believe anyone right of them is a Conservative. To include Blue Dog Demo,,,,, ah Independents. I almost forget, there are no Blue Dogs left in the Democrat Party!
lamer wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you please show me any one time anywhere in all of topics i have refered to anyone as a "conservative" much lesss "blue dogs" "red dems" or anything else along those lines.
Keep grasping at straws but i think and choose my words wisely before spitting out a bunch of garbage. And yet again, none of that has ANYTHING to do with the topix at hand you orginially quoted me on. AGain, you have zero to back up your nonsense but continue to carry on...
Did you just say that Republicans "have moved so far right"? The Country Club RINOs are in charge of the RNC and TEA Partiers and Libertarians are of the fringes. Bush-41 and Bush-43 are Country Clubber RINOs.
Jaques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#142589 Feb 15, 2013
American Lady wrote :

Abraham did NOT marry his sister!
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
And here is the proof. I’m sure AL would be flabbergasted to learn the “pure breed” is in fact a mixture of other breeds.
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
And here she totally lost me. LOL
I agree with AL. Abraham Lincoln did NOT marry his sister. But the other Abraham, the "father of us all", sure as hell did. He even gave her away in prostitution to the Pharaoh as he knew he'd not have long to live if the Pharaoh, who pined for Sarah, would make short work of her coward husband-brother, er, whatever.

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#142590 Feb 15, 2013
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Why should anyone read your post? You are just a LIAR like Obama!
Are you even really Black, or is that just a picture of a real Black man that you are using?
Are you ready to be a slave again, Poopoo stain?
Really GB? Has it really come to that dude? Now I really am disappointed. LOL
Jaques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#142591 Feb 15, 2013
Bawny Fwank wrote:
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
No one’s going to pay big bucks for you AL but they will for Halle Berry.
Well, if you like you women with big butts like Barrack does. But I wonder how much Michele charged Barrack?
Explain : "I wonder how much Michele charged Barrack?"

You have nothing negative to say about Obama today, so you pick on his wife and her "big butt". How low, how vulgar, how mean, how birther-like.

Ms Obama is a woman who takes her responsibilities seriously. Like some women, she could, if she let herself go like so many, balloon and have wide hips. But she is obviously careful, nures her physique admirably, gives sage advice on nutrition and exercise to youngsters and whatever you say, she is gorgeous in every way.

But here's what a bigot (now you know what bigot means) like you does not understand. Even if she was not attractive, would she be fair game for the likes of you, Rogue, fair game to be attacked, not for her huband the president's ideas, no, but because she has a "BIG BUTT" and her husband likes that? There is no depth too low for the likes of vulgar birthers like you. Even the work "bigot" flatters you.
Jaques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#142592 Feb 15, 2013
PS : And you can't even spell your president's name correctly.
Jaques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#142593 Feb 15, 2013
Fed Up wrote:
Investigator: Obama's DHS Cyber Army Targets Anti-Obama Sites
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =BbGjGn-zlG4XX&feature=pla yer_embedded
The USURPER is following Hitlers playbook to the letter.
You, a Hitler adorator, want sane people to share your love for Adolf?
Jaques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#142594 Feb 15, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
You have no clue about the causes of the Civil War, do you? dumbazz
You simply have...no clue.

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#142595 Feb 15, 2013
HappyValentinesDay wrote:
<quoted text>
Sounds just like a Libtard, thinks they are entitled to military weapons so they can wipe out any American who practices their right to freedom of speech! Y
And you see nothing wrong with your line of thinking because this is exactly what your leader has purposed, using drones to take out Americans without a fair trial!
So it's OK for libtards to have military drones but the rest of Americans you want to limit their rights to bear arms?
HEIL Obummer!
Any American citizen, who aids, abets, cavorts with, fights with or has allegiance to al-Qaeda or like terrorist organizations has forfeited their rights of due process as an American citizen. Therefore, as an enemy combatant on foreign soil, they are subject to the same rules of war that apply to any terrorist organization. In this case, the end justifies the means.

That’s a liberal concept Cmor? Really?
Jaques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#142596 Feb 15, 2013
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
I hope Poopoo stain enjoys his death at the hands of Muslim extremists.
On the other hand, death from starvation or slavery in death camps may get to him 1st.
Ahhh, the Kentuckian GB, invoking his favourite outcome, the "final solution".
lamer

Hopkins, MN

#142597 Feb 15, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes. You certainly are
lamer wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Progressives believe anyone right of them is a Conservative. To include Blue Dog Demo,,,,, ah Independents. I almost forget, there are no Blue Dogs left in the Democrat Party!
<quoted text>
Did you just say that Republicans "have moved so far right"? The Country Club RINOs are in charge of the RNC and TEA Partiers and Libertarians are of the fringes. Bush-41 and Bush-43 are Country Clubber RINOs.
The tea party is in the fringes? Im sure most repubs wish that but back in 2010 that "fringe" group won more seats than your "center" group. It was about an even split in the 2012 elections amoung repubs in the "fringe" and "center" group. Not to mention the civil war going on now between the tea party and the center. YOu can say they are a fringe group but they sure look like they are wielding more power than that.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min My New Alias RULES 1,431,932
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 34 min CrunchyBacon 103,621
Four letter word game (Dec '11) 1 hr GEORGIA 2,065
Double Word Game (Dec '11) 1 hr GEORGIA 3,186
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 1 hr RACE 9,533
Word (Dec '08) 1 hr boundary painter 6,746
Song Titles Only (group/artist in parenthesis m... (Mar '10) 1 hr boundary painter 8,577

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages