BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Full story: Chicago Tribune

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Comments (Page 6,269)

Showing posts 125,361 - 125,380 of167,519
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#142059
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
No, I asked YOU, as everything I wrote is in the Bible, uncontested, and said bible was annointed as the word of God. If yuo read it as you pretend you did, what say you about the massacres of babies, not to mention women, children, old people, as depicted in the bible? One example : God stopped the sun so Joshua's killing of all things that moved could go on unabated. Tell us about the sun going around the earth (God didn't know how his own creation moved around?) and the massascre of the entire population, including babies and yes, animals. Ask God? Why? We have His bible. Why don't you explain that one?
Yes, I know, I carried on about happenings that are inarguably in the bible, and that makes me an atheist, I guess. Incidentally,; why does a so-called atheist (Rogue tm reg'd) know the bible better than you?
Listen up dingbat! Last time I explain this for you. Simply reading a book doesn't mean you understand what it says. Your lack of understanding of the Bible is profound! Again, you waste no time in attacking religion. Such a pathetic loser. skintag

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#142060
Feb 12, 2013
 
Jacques Dufault wrote:
<quoted text>
And signed and/or vetoed by...?
Of the $62 billion Hurricane Sandy relief bill passed by Congress and signed into law, about $20 billion had nothing to do with any state involved with Hurricane Sandy. That is called PORK.
You see, all of the extra shit was inserted by the Democrats in the Senate and the Republican controlled House either had to pass it as is, amended it or just vote it down. The Dems know that if they did not pass it, the Republicans would looks bad, so they passed it and Obama signed it into law.
Both sides do it but that does not make it right. It bloats our spending and deficits. Like I said both sides do it but the Dems. do most of it.
I am sure Jacques would like me to give him a number but all I can do is guestimate 60-90%. The rest is done by ... Country Club RINOs.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#142061
Feb 12, 2013
 
Full Auto Slingshot Minigun!
http://www.youtube.com/watch... #!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#142062
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Me, a reading comprehension problem? You mean, that the Repubs have zilch waiting in the wings for 2016 except maybe Gov Christie, so disgusted with his party, he may turn Dem and try for VP candidate under Clinton or Biden? I have a reading comprehension? You mean I misread your NINE (9) presidential predictions? LAMAO. And, it's not NINE (9), it's TEN (10). I forgot money launderer front and hairpiece Trump. Ha ha, oh, loved that Press "soirée: where Obama, to use LRS lingo, STOMPED him. That was hard to watch. Hmm, NOT.
I loved the part when Omammie was forced to decline! LMAO!!! A U.S. president who wouldn't show his BC for $5M! His legacy is forever tainted.
Jacques Dufault

Toronto, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#142063
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Awww, poor wittle jakeleg is calling people names again. Isn't he cute when he's upset? LMAO
Calling names? Are those names sex-related, are those names vulgar, are those names dirty, are those names profanity names, do those names refer to private body parts, like all the names you use?
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#142064
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Jacques Dufault wrote:
<quoted text>
Calling names? Are those names sex-related, are those names vulgar, are those names dirty, are those names profanity names, do those names refer to private body parts, like all the names you use?
Name calling is name calling. No brainchild? LMAO dope

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#142065
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

1

LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Listen up dingbat! Last time I explain this for you. Simply reading a book doesn't mean you understand what it says. Your lack of understanding of the Bible is profound! Again, you waste no time in attacking religion. Such a pathetic loser. skintag
But Muslim peoples are good.
Jacques Dufault

Toronto, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#142066
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, just like Jesus would be disgusted with birthers, specially the likes of communist American atheist-Prava-loving Lady and anti-American, un-American and bible ignoramus LRS.
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Awww, poor wittle jakeleg is calling people names again. Isn't he cute when he's upset? LMAO
PS. Hmm, let's enumerate these names that constitute my name calling:

-BIRTHERS : It's what YOU're proud to call yourselves, no? ;
-COMMUNIST : A name you use all the time to disparage opponents;
-AMERICAN : That's name-calling?;
-ATHEIST : Your birther buddy Rogue uses it all the time. Tell him;
-PRAVDA : Well, now, does your bosom buddy American er hmm Pravda Lady not use Pravda as a ready and recommended reference?;
-ANTI-AMERICAN : You call me that all the time. Why can't I do the same? And difference is, I'm not un and anti-American. YOU are.;
-Un-AMERICAN : See above

So, LRS, did you say I used name-calling? Was I not just copying you and your birfoon birther stooges?

"Can you hear us coming?" ha ha. Please tell us why you neve use that phrase any more. Pretty please.
Jacques Dufault

Toronto, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#142067
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Oh goody, we can all go home now. Several points here again. All businesses, both large and small, make QUARTERLY tax payments. Soooo, the fourth quarter is paid in ... January. What is important is the Quarterly average!!!
Next, we spend $60 billion a day and $3 billion will last about .... one and a quarter of an hour. But Libtards will suck it up and claim Obamanomics is wurkin'!!!
U.S. posts $3 billion budget surplus for January
(Reuters)- The budget posted a surprise surplus in January for the first time in five years, as the Treasury likely benefited from a windfall when payroll tax cuts expired.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/12/us-... text>
When you read that piece, and comprehend what you read, let me know and then maybe you can carry on an intellectual honest discussion.
YOU tell me that maybe I can carry on an intellectual honest discussion? Ha ha.

Frist, try to understand what you pasted or copied from some right-wing source. Then, instead of mouthing insipid bland replies like the above, try to discuss what I wrote, as I did yours. You did not understand what you advanced, but I did. Try again.
Jacques Dufault

Toronto, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#142068
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you have any idea how legislation is passed in Washington DC? I would try and explain it to you but you being a Libtard will either not understand it or it will not matter to you. But the fact that the costs have TRIPLED since Obama entered the White House means what to you?
I am sick and tired of Liberals think we owe people everything they want. Can you name any other country that gives cell phones to poor people?
I know perfectly well how legislation is passed in Washington. I just told you in my last post, congress and the senate pass it, the president signs or vetoes. Vetoes can be overridden with a 2/3 majority. What was the majority at that time, could it have overridden the veto? I've explained how YOUR legislative process works, now please explain how the Canadian one works. And the French one, and the British one and so forth. I can explain all of them, can you?

Now, costs have tripled in 4 years, not 3. And, when Obama took over , the nation was tipping over, jobs , houses, cars, were lost, foreclosed, don't you remember? So, yes, fewer people could afford to pay for a phone yet desperately needed them to find work, to keep in touch with families, friends, and for emergencies. Reagan's programme was therefore continued and it's a good one. And it's funded by the phone companies, is it not? Asking, as I'm not sure.

I don't know if other countries do this. We do. Others? I don't know. What if no other country does it? Does that mean you're not doing the right thing?
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#142069
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Jacques Dufault wrote:
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, just like Jesus would be disgusted with birthers, specially the likes of communist American atheist-Prava-loving Lady and anti-American, un-American and bible ignoramus LRS.
<quoted text>
PS. Hmm, let's enumerate these names that constitute my name calling:
-BIRTHERS : It's what YOU're proud to call yourselves, no? ;
-COMMUNIST : A name you use all the time to disparage opponents;
-AMERICAN : That's name-calling?;
-ATHEIST : Your birther buddy Rogue uses it all the time. Tell him;
-PRAVDA : Well, now, does your bosom buddy American er hmm Pravda Lady not use Pravda as a ready and recommended reference?;
-ANTI-AMERICAN : You call me that all the time. Why can't I do the same? And difference is, I'm not un and anti-American. YOU are.;
-Un-AMERICAN : See above
So, LRS, did you say I used name-calling? Was I not just copying you and your birfoon birther stooges?
"Can you hear us coming?" ha ha. Please tell us why you neve use that phrase any more. Pretty please.
Yes, I did say you call people names. And you do. Copycat, huh? Tell me something I didn't already know. Really jakeleg, you're a bigger dope than I ever imagined. skintag
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#142070
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jacques Dufault wrote:
<quoted text>
I know perfectly well how legislation is passed in Washington. I just told you in my last post, congress and the senate pass it, the president signs or vetoes. Vetoes can be overridden with a 2/3 majority. What was the majority at that time, could it have overridden the veto? I've explained how YOUR legislative process works, now please explain how the Canadian one works. And the French one, and the British one and so forth. I can explain all of them, can you?
Now, costs have tripled in 4 years, not 3. And, when Obama took over , the nation was tipping over, jobs , houses, cars, were lost, foreclosed, don't you remember? So, yes, fewer people could afford to pay for a phone yet desperately needed them to find work, to keep in touch with families, friends, and for emergencies. Reagan's programme was therefore continued and it's a good one. And it's funded by the phone companies, is it not? Asking, as I'm not sure.
I don't know if other countries do this. We do. Others? I don't know. What if no other country does it? Does that mean you're not doing the right thing?
Why would America ever need to compare itself to anyone? We have no reason to as the world looks to us! LMAO!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#142071
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

1

How come you're so far from home jakeleg?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#142072
Feb 12, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jacques Dufault wrote:
<quoted text>
I know perfectly well how legislation is passed in Washington. I just told you in my last post, congress and the senate pass it, the president signs or vetoes. Vetoes can be overridden with a 2/3 majority. What was the majority at that time, could it have overridden the veto? I've explained how YOUR legislative process works, now please explain how the Canadian one works. And the French one, and the British one and so forth. I can explain all of them, can you?
Now, costs have tripled in 4 years, not 3. And, when Obama took over , the nation was tipping over, jobs , houses, cars, were lost, foreclosed, don't you remember? So, yes, fewer people could afford to pay for a phone yet desperately needed them to find work, to keep in touch with families, friends, and for emergencies. Reagan's programme was therefore continued and it's a good one. And it's funded by the phone companies, is it not? Asking, as I'm not sure.
I don't know if other countries do this. We do. Others? I don't know. What if no other country does it? Does that mean you're not doing the right thing?
We were not talking about how laws are passed in other countries. We were talking about America.
Yes, both sides insert pork into bills that if the president vetoes, he will be blamed. A classic case is Hurricane Sandy relief. Out of the $62 billion approved about $20 B had nothing to do with Sandy. But if the Republican controlled House did not pass it, they would claim that the Republicans were holding up the relief.
Both sides do it but the majority is done by Liberals.
Jacques Dufault

Toronto, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#142073
Feb 12, 2013
 
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Abe was planning on ushering all the slaves down to Central America after they were freed. He was afraid they would revolt.
How about giving us a source on this? Or will you say you alrrady did, even before you just wrote it? Or is this a red herring?Hmmm
Jacques Dufault

Toronto, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#142074
Feb 12, 2013
 
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Listen up dingbat! Last time I explain this for you. Simply reading a book doesn't mean you understand what it says. Your lack of understanding of the Bible is profound! Again, you waste no time in attacking religion. Such a pathetic loser. skintag
Strange. As I wrote before, I don't mind anyone butting in to a conversation, it's a forum after all. But, and this is the second time in less than 24 hours, you answer a post that has been directed at Rogue, in the forst person, following a discussion on the subject. You reply like you were ...Rogue. Just wonderin'.

Oh, tell me where I took the bible out of context, where I attacked religion. Do it now.
Jacques Dufault

Toronto, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#142075
Feb 12, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Of the $62 billion Hurricane Sandy relief bill passed by Congress and signed into law, about $20 billion had nothing to do with any state involved with Hurricane Sandy. That is called PORK.
You see, all of the extra shit was inserted by the Democrats in the Senate and the Republican controlled House either had to pass it as is, amended it or just vote it down. The Dems know that if they did not pass it, the Republicans would looks bad, so they passed it and Obama signed it into law.
Both sides do it but that does not make it right. It bloats our spending and deficits. Like I said both sides do it but the Dems. do most of it.
I am sure Jacques would like me to give him a number but all I can do is guestimate 60-90%. The rest is done by ... Country Club RINOs.
Can you supply a short list of the "pork" and who inserted it in? Or will I again wait weeks for a reply, only for you to say (lie) taht you did reply.
Jacques Dufault

Toronto, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#142076
Feb 12, 2013
 
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Listen up dingbat! Last time I explain this for you. Simply reading a book doesn't mean you understand what it says. Your lack of understanding of the Bible is profound! Again, you waste no time in attacking religion. Such a pathetic loser. skintag
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
But Muslim peoples are good.
Two things :

1. Relevance please?
2. Show me where and when I said Muslim people are good.

Incidentally, are you trying to tell us that all Christians are good and all Muslims are bad? Really?
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#142077
Feb 12, 2013
 
Jacques Dufault wrote:
<quoted text>
How about giving us a source on this? Or will you say you alrrady did, even before you just wrote it? Or is this a red herring?Hmmm
And you claim to know American History? LMAO! You do know what google is, right? Good! Then get off your lazy, worthless azz and do your own research. skintag
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#142078
Feb 12, 2013
 
Jacques Dufault wrote:
<quoted text>
Strange. As I wrote before, I don't mind anyone butting in to a conversation, it's a forum after all. But, and this is the second time in less than 24 hours, you answer a post that has been directed at Rogue, in the forst person, following a discussion on the subject. You reply like you were ...Rogue. Just wonderin'.
Oh, tell me where I took the bible out of context, where I attacked religion. Do it now.
I told you the other day, I am all posters. LMAO

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 125,361 - 125,380 of167,519
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••