BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Full story: Chicago Tribune

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...
Comments
124,861 - 124,880 of 174,860 Comments Last updated 3 hrs ago

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#141735
Feb 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Thank gawd, thank gawd Obama has saved us from the next Ice Age.

Administration’s New Climate Report: Next Ice Age ‘Has Now Been Delayed Indefinitely’
February 8, 2013 By Terence P. Jeffrey

( CNSNews.com )- A federal advisory committee appointed by the Obama administration to produce a report on climate change says that if Earth’s climate were still “primarily controlled by natural factors”—rather than by man-made global warming—then the next ice age would occur within the next 1,500 years.

But now, because of humans, the committee says, the next ice age has been "delayed indefinitely."
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/administratio...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#141736
Feb 11, 2013
 
Texas College Students Could Soon Pack Heat
Posted on February 11, 2013

Students with concealed handgun licenses could soon carry guns on Texas college campuses.

More than a dozen state senators have signed on to Senate Bill 182, also known as the “Campus Personal Protection Act.”

The bill’s primary author, Senator Brian Birdwell,said the bill is about preserving the 2nd Amendment.

“This affords CHL holders, one of the most lawful group of citizens in our state, to be able exercise that 2nd amendment right to go on to the campus of higher learning to be able defend themselves and protect their right to self-preservation, God forbid, some act of evil be perpetrated,” Birdwell said.

If passed, the bill would allow CHL holders to bring concealed weapons onto public universities. Private universities could choose to go gun-free.

Read more: http://conservativebyte.com/2013/02/texas-col...
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#141737
Feb 11, 2013
 
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Another "late" "oh I should've said that then" reply, eh boy? Ha ha. Any original potatoes in there?
Is it as cheap and tasteless as dumbazzbastard, dumbazzbitch, buttflapper, eh, potato-cellar boy? How's your humour coming along?
But, but, but jakeleg doesn't use such words! skintag

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#141738
Feb 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep, repeat a lie often enough, and the the Libtards will believe it is true.
Forbes MagazineOP/ED | 7/17/2012
That Scientific Global Warming Consensus...Not!
Since 1998, more than 31,000 American scientists from diverse climate-related disciplines, including more than 9,000 with Ph.D.s, have signed a public petition announcing their belief that “…there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate.” Included are atmospheric physicists, botanists, geologists, oceanographers, and meteorologists.
So where did that famous “consensus” claim that “98% of all scientists believe in global warming” come from? It originated from an endlessly reported 2009 American Geophysical Union (AGU) survey consisting of an intentionally brief two-minute, two question online survey sent to 10,257 earth scientists by two researchers at the University of Illinois. Of the about 3.000 who responded, 82% answered “yes” to the second question, which like the first, most people I know would also have agreed with.
://www.forbes.com/sites/larryb ell/2012/07/17/that-scientific -global-warming-consensus-not/
Sorry, the 97% figure concerns active publishing climate researchers, not simply people holding a degree in the sciences. Many, if not most, of the 31,000 claimed as scientists are nothing but people who hold only a bachelors degree in the sciences and who have never performed any research at all. A survey that includes as "scientists" veterinarians and physicians is totally worthless insofar as the consensus among CLIMATE SCIENTISTS is concerned.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#141739
Feb 11, 2013
 
Ha ha ha ha.

0f the alleged 31,000 "scientists" who doubt the consensus opinion of real climate scientists, over 28,000 are in fields mostly unrelated to climate studies.

Really, why do they include electrical and mechanical engineers? Nothing to do with climatology.

But that number, 31,000 looks really nice if you're a gullible fool.
Learn to Read

Sussex, WI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#141740
Feb 11, 2013
 
FFS- wrote:
<quoted text>AS IF BIRTHERISM ISNT JUST STUPID ENOUGH....NOW WE HAVE A LEFT-HANDED CONSPIRACY?

Hahahahahahahahahahah

Holy cow! LMAO
Hey. God told the Doc that Satan is left-handed. Why Satan needs hands or to write anything I'm not sure but if Doc heard one of the voices from his closet tell him that then it must be so
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#141741
Feb 11, 2013
 
UN Climate Report and who contributed:

http://www.foxnews.com/science/2013/01/23/lea...
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#141743
Feb 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no reply to a sick person like you, except maybe call 911, and ensure the paramedics have several straightjackets available, plus plenty of masking tape
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
"He who knows nothing is closer to the truth
than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors."
~~Thomas Jefferson
Still can't write your own stuff, right?

Nonethelss, and the relevance to my post is?
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#141744
Feb 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Fed Up wrote:
China Invading America NOW (2012) The Silent Takeover!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
AND THE LIB-TARDS SAY WE DON'T HAVE A SPENDING PROBLEM!
No prob. Asault weapons and guns await those poor Chinese invaders. Wait 'til they have a taste of birther tea partyer NRA KKK freaks' lead.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#141745
Feb 11, 2013
 
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
But, but, but jakeleg doesn't use such words! skintag
Right, he does not. He never ever does, and what's more is never ever vulgar. If he is, he wants proof. Let's have it.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#141746
Feb 11, 2013
 
wojar wrote:
Ha ha ha ha.
0f the alleged 31,000 "scientists" who doubt the consensus opinion of real climate scientists, over 28,000 are in fields mostly unrelated to climate studies.
Really, why do they include electrical and mechanical engineers? Nothing to do with climatology.
But that number, 31,000 looks really nice if you're a gullible fool.
It even includes birthers, which makes the list even more suspicious.
Justus Liebig

Bristol, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#141747
Feb 11, 2013
 
Bawny Fwank wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
And where is your source for the 95% who agree with man-made Global Warming?
Oh, they sent out surveys to about 12,000 scientists but only about 3,000 responded of which about 95% agreed that Global Warming was man-made. But you assume that 95% of the 9,000 who did not reply also believed in man-made GW. But what if 100% of those 9,000 did not? That would mean less than 25% agreed with man-made GW.
Typical Libtard Logic. everyone agrees with me?!?
<quoted text>
Again, where is YOUR source that 95-97% of all climate scientists agree that Global Warming is man-made!!!
Skeptical Science just says that 97% agree but they do not name THEIR source. They also say that since 97% agree, they should not be challenged!
They listed at least 3 sources. Try reading for a change.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#141748
Feb 11, 2013
 
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Right, he does not. He never ever does, and what's more is never ever vulgar. If he is, he wants proof. Let's have it.
No need for me to prove it. You already did in your post! skintag

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#141749
Feb 11, 2013
 
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
Why Thank you Popo ...
THAT shows ME you DID read at least 'part' of it!
IF you mix dog breeds, they come out mongrels don't they ...???
America is known for paying BIG bucks for "pure-bred" ...
WHY not the SAME attitude FOR humans ...!!!
No one’s going to pay big bucks for you AL but they will for Halle Berry.

I doubt white folk worried about racial purity while they were having sex with their slaves nor did they care about the purity of any other race. Now when it’s time for a reach around you want to cry foul. Well it’s too late for that. You stared it and there’s no way you’re going to stop it. Of course you can continue to marry your cousins and brothers like you’ve been doing.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#141750
Feb 11, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Huh, NOAA says there is a 70% chance of snow but that they will also get a inch of snow! How can you get an inch of snow if the chance of snow is not 100%?!? And you Libtards think NOAA is smart but Joe Bastardi is stupid?!?
He [Joe Bastardi] is critical of National Weather Service forecasts:
Look at this: TONIGHT...MOSTLY CLOUDY. SNOW LIKELY THIS EVENING...THEN A CHANCE OF SNOW AFTER MIDNIGHT. TOTAL ACCUMULATION AROUND AN INCH. BRISK WITH LOWS IN THE MID 20S. NORTH WINDS 10 TO 20 MPH WITH GUSTS UP TO 30 MPH. CHANCE OF SNOW 70 PERCENT. I continue to marvel at NOAA forecasts. Does anyone in the NWSFO understand they put out forecasts that make no sense? Why not at least make sense? Now I do have a disagreement with them as to snow totals, for instance at the Jersey Shore where I think they wind up closer to 3 than 1, but that is not my problem. My problem is the darn forecast says they will get an inch, that it is a fact that there will be an inch, but then has SNOW LIKELY THIS EVENING. How the heck can it only be likely? It has to snow to accumulate an inch, doesn't it? How is there a 70% chance of snow, but you say it will accumulate an inch? How can it accumulate an inch, if there is a chance it doesn't fall (30%)?
—Joe Bastardi, Accuweather.com Professional, December 5, 2007
NOAA realizes that most people with a few functioning neurons would understand that the expectation of an inch accumulation is contingent.

I'm not surprised that Bastardi got sh!t-canned.

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#141751
Feb 11, 2013
 
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
"He who knows nothing is closer to the truth
than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors."
~~Thomas Jefferson
And after that shameful attempt at superiority she quotes Jefferson of all people. What do you know about this AL? LOL
http://www.imdb.com/media/rm348233216/tt02069...
American Lady

Danville, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#141753
Feb 11, 2013
 
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
No one’s going to pay big bucks for you AL but they will for Halle Berry.
I doubt white folk worried about racial purity while they were having sex with their slaves nor did they care about the purity of any other race. Now when it’s time for a reach around you want to cry foul. Well it’s too late for that. You stared it and there’s no way you’re going to stop it. Of course you can continue to marry your cousins and brothers like you’ve been doing.
IF that's not "RACISM" in it's highest form, I do not KNOW what is!

IF I went and SLEPT with every JERK in Hollywood, I could have gotten those BIG bucks to.

You ARE a pervert of the HIGHEST order!

Abraham did NOT marry his sister!
American Lady

Danville, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#141754
Feb 11, 2013
 
God warned us, through Paul

For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own likings, and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander into myths
(2 Timothy 4:3, 4)


Truth is not Racist

Facts are not Hate

One: Kind After Kind

In the Creation account in Genesis, God established the law of kind after his kind ten times.

Let the earth put forth vegetation, plants yielding seed, and fruit trees bearing fruit in which is their seed, each according to its kind, upon the earth. Again God said, Let the earth bring forth living creatures according to their kinds: cattle and creeping things and beasts of the earth according to their kinds.

Most people don't stop to think about what this means, "according to their kinds". The word "kind" used throughout the Genesis account of creation is the Hebrew word "miym." It's Strong's #4327 and means to portion out; a sort, i.e. species.

The creation story can't be more clear. God creates. When He creates living things, plants and animals, He creates them after their own kind or species. Then He pronounces them good.

http://www.saveyourheritage.com/what_god_says...
American Lady

Danville, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#141755
Feb 11, 2013
 
Only someone who was of Adam's kind, Adam's "species," would have been fit to be his wife. God performed the first marriage right there in the Garden of Eden. And He did it between people of the same race that He specifically created to be the perfect fit.

It doesn't get any better than that
God was the first racist.
American Lady

Danville, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#141756
Feb 11, 2013
 
For I the Lord do not change
Malachi 3:6

If it was a sin for Israel to marry foreign wives in the days of Ezra and Nehemiah, then it's a sin to marry outside of our race today.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

21 Users are viewing the Chicago Forum right now

Search the Chicago Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 38 min Incognito4Ever 1,081,627
One kilometre high and counting (Jul '07) 42 min TW_sugar_daddio 17
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 3 hr JOEL COOL DUDE 68,391
Word (Dec '08) 3 hr andet1987 4,585
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 4 hr andet1987 4,561
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 4 hr truth 48,928
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 7 hr TRD 68,037
•••

Beach Hazards Statement for Cook County was issued at July 27 at 10:14PM CDT

•••
•••
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••