You : "Yep, repeat a lie often enough, and the the Libtards will believe it is true." LoL. I never gave any number. I only repeated what LRS stated. He came up with the 95%,notme. Can't you read? I rarely discuss global warming, as I'm not knowing in the matter, and all I can do is rely on the scientific community. Why can't you do that?<quoted text>
Yep, repeat a lie often enough, and the the Libtards will believe it is true.
Forbes MagazineOP/ED | 7/17/2012
That Scientific Global Warming Consensus...Not!
Since 1998, more than 31,000 American scientists from diverse climate-related disciplines, including more than 9,000 with Ph.D.s, have signed a public petition announcing their belief that “…there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate.” Included are atmospheric physicists, botanists, geologists, oceanographers, and meteorologists.
So where did that famous “consensus” claim that “98% of all scientists believe in global warming” come from? It originated from an endlessly reported 2009 American Geophysical Union (AGU) survey consisting of an intentionally brief two-minute, two question online survey sent to 10,257 earth scientists by two researchers at the University of Illinois. Of the about 3.000 who responded, 82% answered “yes” to the second question, which like the first, most people I know would also have agreed with.
://www.forbes.com/sites/larryb ell/2012/07/17/that-scientific -global-warming-consensus-not/
Do you see the difference between you and me? You have an axe to grind, I don't. Iblet the information on climate come to me, weigh it, figure where they come from, look around and agree or half-agree with the one that's most convincing. Whereas, just to prove that intelligent people and scientists are wrong, you scour the internet looking for disclaimers on climate change. Fair enough, your privilege, but it seeps of negativism. Those 31,000 scientists are 31,000 out of how many? Do you know? Seems impressive, 31,000, but do you know how many claim the opposite, namely, that there is global warming? Why don't you scour the internet for that instead of wallowing in denial?