BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

[Rogue Scholar 05]

Henson Ong at Gun Violence Prevention Public Hearing - Hartford, CT -
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

[Rogue Scholar 05]

Poppo wrote:

<quoted text>
I know the feeling! I gave it to my brother when I came to California. He wanted my Stude but I wasn’t about to give it up. Had a 45 player in the Old’s and wish I had a dollar for every 45 that curled up in that thing. LOL
Strange, I had a friend get a GTO for graduation and never lived to make the walk as well.

And I had a good gunner in 'Nam who was killed in a motorcycle accident shortly after returning home. That's life.
A mature person learns off the mistakes of others and an immature person will not learn from his own.

[Froggy]

nebka wrote:

<quoted text>
You are dummer than a pile of rocks.

And you are still a slimy troll. You are probably a Trekkie too!

[Froggy]

Froggy wrote:
<quoted text>
Have you ever caused a motor vehicle accident?

Poppo wrote:

<quoted text>
No but I certainly learned valuable lesson from one at the tender young age of 24 when my VW Beetle was broadsided by a drunk in a big red Old’s who ran a red light doing about 50. Needless to say my next car was a silver and black Oldsmobile Starfire Convertible.

You gave up a fuel sipping Beetle for a gas guzzling Buick? How Conservative of you!
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

[Froggy]

A person steals guns,(WHICH IS AGAINST THE LAW), shoots and kills his own mother (WHICH IS AGAINST THE LAW), transports these guns loaded (WHICH IS AGAINST THE LAW), brings guns onto school property (WHICH IS AGAINST THE LAW), breaks into the school (WHICH IS AGAINST THE LAW), discharges the weapons within city limits (WHICH IS AGAINST THE LAW), murders 26 people (WHICH IS AGAINST THE LAW), and commits suicide (WHICH IS AGAINST THE LAW).

And there are people in this country that somehow think passing ANOTHER LAW banning guns would protect us from someone like this. If you haven't noticed, people like this are not concerned about breaking laws - they only care about fulfilling their own twisted agenda. The only people that a gun ban law would impact are the LAW ABIDING CITIZENS, which will only serve to cripple the ability to protect ourselves. If you agree with this, please re-post. If not, read it again and see if it does not make a wee bit of sense.

[Froggy]

Run Mr. Taliban
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

[Jacques Ottawa]

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

kjro wrote:
Does it really matter if a person is born in Africa, America, Antarctica, Alaska?
If his intentions are right who gives a shit?
<quoted text>
What exactly do insane birthers do? It was Conservatives that forced Nixon to resign!!!

How crazy is that! The wanted to avoid a humiliating impeachment trial, and Nixon knew it, he was toast. Anyhow, it is rumoured that Kissinger convinced him to quit.

[Jacques Ottawa]

Froggy wrote:

Run Mr. Taliban
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

How stupid of you. Yup, those B2s and B1s and what-for were sure effective at 9/11, barracks suicide attack and embassy-bombing and burning down time. Wake up, stop the gong-ho "dépassé" stupidity. Get on with the times.

[Jacques Ottawa]

Froggy wrote:

A person steals guns,(WHICH IS AGAINST THE LAW), shoots and kills his own mother (WHICH IS AGAINST THE LAW), transports these guns loaded (WHICH IS AGAINST THE LAW), brings guns onto school property (WHICH IS AGAINST THE LAW), breaks into the school (WHICH IS AGAINST THE LAW), discharges the weapons within city limits (WHICH IS AGAINST THE LAW), murders 26 people (WHICH IS AGAINST THE LAW), and commits suicide (WHICH IS AGAINST THE LAW).
And there are people in this country that somehow think passing ANOTHER LAW banning guns would protect us from someone like this. If you haven't noticed, people like this are not concerned about breaking laws - they only care about fulfilling their own twisted agenda. The only people that a gun ban law would impact are the LAW ABIDING CITIZENS, which will only serve to cripple the ability to protect ourselves. If you agree with this, please re-post. If not, read it again and see if it does not make a wee bit of sense.

He did not steal his mother's gun, it (they) were just lying around. She knew he was mentally deficient, yet accompanied him to the shooting range and did not lock up her arsenal. Reckless, stupid of her. He "stole" her unsecured guns (tell me what a mother-teacher is doing with two hand guns AND AN ASSAULT RIFLE with a 50-bullet magazine). Tell me , tell us, for what reason she would have all that armament. You meant to tell me she needed an assault rifle or weapon or gun with a 50-bullet magazine to protect her little self? A teacher?Yyou'd allow a dangerous whacked-out person like that teach your kids? The rest is history, which began with a kindergarten teacher, legal owner of three guns who took her slightly intellectually-incapacitated son with her to the rifle range and left her guns lying around. Bravo, Rogue. You should be a spokesman for Adolf Lapierre.

[LRS]

wojar wrote:

<quoted text>
The only questions are why birfoons insist on a fable being a crime, with no reasonable motive, no reasonable evidence, and no reasonable opportunity.
That's not funny, it's pathetic.
<quoted text>

The only question is the one you just avoided. Why do you feel the need to defend the man on a daily basis? Hmmm?

[LRS]

Jacques Ottawa wrote:

<quoted text>
He did not steal his mother's gun, it (they) were just lying around. She knew he was mentally deficient, yet accompanied him to the shooting range and did not lock up her arsenal. Reckless, stupid of her. He "stole" her unsecured guns (tell me what a mother-teacher is doing with two hand guns AND AN ASSAULT RIFLE with a 50-bullet magazine). Tell me , tell us, for what reason she would have all that armament. You meant to tell me she needed an assault rifle or weapon or gun with a 50-bullet magazine to protect her little self? A teacher?Yyou'd allow a dangerous whacked-out person like that teach your kids? The rest is history, which began with a kindergarten teacher, legal owner of three guns who took her slightly intellectually-incapacitated son with her to the rifle range and left her guns lying around. Bravo, Rogue. You should be a spokesman for Adolf Lapierre.

Let us know when you find Utopia. Tree-hugging, hypocritical SAP!

[Fed Up]

Obama's Psychopathic Narcissism / Megalomania
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

The Unfolding of the Green Police State
http://www.thedailysheeple.com/the-unfolding-...

[Grand Birther]

Deadliest sniper in history shot to death at shooting range while armed.

But Rogue Moron types with cowboy fantasies are going to protect themselves? Lol

http://www.star-telegram.com/2013/02/02/45960...

[LRS]

Here's the original post:

Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Pathetic commie loser. Dylan Thomas wrote that. He would vomit on your kind.

LRS wrote:
Dang classy of ya there sparky. I believe "loser" would be appropriate.

Now, what "typo" are you saying I "pounced on"? Hmmm?

[LRS]

Grand Birther wrote:

Deadliest sniper in history shot to death at shooting range while armed.
But Rogue Moron types with cowboy fantasies are going to protect themselves? Lol
http://www.star-telegram.com/2013/02/02/45960...

Are you making a joke over the deaths of two people? That's about your speed. puke stain

[LRS]

Grand Birther wrote:

Deadliest sniper in history shot to death at shooting range while armed.
But Rogue Moron types with cowboy fantasies are going to protect themselves? Lol
http://www.star-telegram.com/2013/02/02/45960...

Too damn bad it wasn't you.

[LRS]

Grand Birther wrote:

Deadliest sniper in history shot to death at shooting range while armed.
But Rogue Moron types with cowboy fantasies are going to protect themselves? Lol
http://www.star-telegram.com/2013/02/02/45960...

Worthless POS.

[Frank]

Poppo wrote:

<quoted text>
Jobs are not a Republican priority Cmor. Never have been. Deregulation and giving tax breaks to the rich are. And neither do they care about deficit reduction which is simply a smoke screen to cover their attack on entitlements. Fact is Republicans have no clue how to govern a nation and most Americans with the exception of “mostly” old white men have come to realize that.
From the day of Obama’s first inauguration Republicans were plotting to destroy his presidency and could care less if they destroyed the country in the process as they continue to invent one bogus crisis after another; and as you plainly saw the electorate wasn’t about to reward them for that. And while you continue to live in your delusionary bubble you may also note exit polling showed the majority of the electorate still remembers whose policies caused this calamity. Apparently
The ignorant birfoon never knew.

Jobs have always been a priority for The Republicans. Welfare is a priority of Obama. In four years Obama has done nothing to decrease the unemployment rate.

[Jacques Ottawa]

Frank wrote:

<quoted text>Jobs have always been a priority for The Republicans. Welfare is a priority of Obama. In four years Obama has done nothing to decrease the unemployment rate.

That so? It went from GWB 10.5% to today's 7.9%. Almost 3 points in spite of the 2nd worst economic mess left for an incoming president in the history of the nation.

[Frank]

Learn to Read wrote:

<quoted text>
Birfoon fantasy is to flush the Constitution - we would be concerned about that if you weren't all so pethetic and clueless

Obama is the only one that has been trying to destroy The Constitution. The Executive Office does not have the authority to make laws according to The Constitution. Go to line forty-six of The Constitution and it clearly states that only Congress has the authority to make laws,yet Obama has consistently done ever thing in his power to usurp The Constitution. Last year Congress only passed 81 laws,Obama used his power and his administration to force over 3500 on the people of this country.