BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 225509 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

truman

Boise, ID

#140271 Feb 2, 2013
American Lady wrote:
"I have not yet begun to fight" - John Paul Jones
WE have NOT yet begun to FIGHT ... AL
So that obviously is the best you can do to reply to Poppos post hahah.
SHow a Birther up for the liars they are and that is all you get.
What a pathetic race of ciphers.

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#140272 Feb 2, 2013
Jacquie Ottatwit wrote:
http://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/2011/0...
This is a pretty good read!
Exhibit "B"
United States District Court For The Eastern District of Pennsynvania
Affidavit Of Reverend Kweli Shuhubia
Bishop McRae asked Mrs. Obama specificly, "Where you present when your grandson Barack Obama was born in Kenya?"
This was asked to her in translation twice, and both times she specifically replied, "Yes".
It appeared Mrs. Obama's relatives and her grandson, handling the translation, had obviously been versed to counter such facts with the purported information from the American news media that Obama was born in Hawaii. Dispute this, Mrs. Sarah Hussein Obama was very adamant that her grandson Barack Hussein Obama, was born in Kenya, and she that was present and witnessed his birth in Kenya, NOT THE UNITED STATES.
When Mrs. Obamas grandson attempted to counter his grandmothers clear response to the question, verifying the birth of Senator Obama in Kenya, Bishop McRae asked her grandson, how she could be present at Barack Obama's birth if the senator was born in Hawaii, but the grandson would not answer the question, instead HE repeatedly tried to insert that, "No, no, no. He was in the United States!"
But during the conversation, Mrs. Sarah Hussein Obama NEVER changed her reply that she was indeed present when Senator Barack Obama was born in Kenya.
Well boo hoo Mr. Poopoo platter!
Another thing I initially missed from your post is the lie which was actually told on both affidavits.

McRae Affidavit:
In the ensuing public conversation, I asked Ms. Obama specifically, "Were you present when your grandson Barack Obama was born in Kenya?" This was asked to her in translation twice, and both times she specifically replied, "Yes! Yes she was! She was present when Obama was born".

Shuhubia Affidavit:
Bishop McRae asked Ms. Obama specifically,“Were you present when your grandson Barack Obama was born in Kenya?” This was asked to her in translation twice, and both times she specifically replied,“Yes”.

Well now we know from the tape and transcript the question was only asked once which shows conclusively they’re not just ordinary liars but sworn liars.
http://barackryphal.blogspot.com/2010/06/mcra...

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#140273 Feb 2, 2013
McRae/Shuhubia Affidavit Comparison

You may recall that in Berg v. Obama, two affidavits were filed relating to the infamous telephone conversation with Sarah Obama. One affidavit was from Ron McRae, and the other was from the pseudonymous "Kweli Shuhubia".

It should be noted upfront that there are several glaring deficiencies in the latter affidavit. First, "Kweli Shuhubia" is a pseudonym, and not a real name. Second, nowhere in the affidavit does it mention that the name is fake. Third, the document is not notarized. Fourth, the document is not actually signed at all; the 'signature' is actually just a jpeg of an unintelligible signature cut-and-pasted onto the document. Fifth, unlike McRae's affidavit, Shuhubia's is not hand-dated; the alleged date of signature is pre-printed on the form.

But there is another facet of the Shuhubia document that I believe has long been overlooked: most of it is copied, wholesale, from McRae's affidavit. Shuhubia's description of the conversation is almost word-for-word identical to McRae's, with only occasional minor changes and the necessary shifts between first and third person.
http://barackryphal.blogspot.com/2010/06/mcra...

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#140274 Feb 2, 2013
I forgot to add,“You’re still a fool Cmor”

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#140275 Feb 2, 2013
truman wrote:
<quoted text>
So that obviously is the best you can do to reply to Poppos post hahah.
SHow a Birther up for the liars they are and that is all you get.
What a pathetic race of ciphers.
AL like every birfoon is nothing save a keyboard phantom fighter with masochistic tendencies ecstatically charging on to the next beat down.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#140276 Feb 2, 2013
truman wrote:
<quoted text>You delusional mental patients can throw all the histrionics you want,it doesnt matter how badly you want it to be true...it never will be.
Though the word 'Birther" will be a National Punchline for decades.
You're just ticked off because you were conned twice and didn't have a clue! Go eat some spuds.
Jacques Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#140277 Feb 2, 2013
Froggy wrote:
Froggy wrote:
<quoted text>
Reagan was a witness who was called to give sworn testimony. If he had testified against some murderer, would that have been okay with you?
Does it bother you that we executed the communist spies Ethel Greenglass and Julius Rosenberg for giving atomic bomb secrets to the Soviets?
We all know you are a communist.
<quoted text>
I should have divided it into two paragraphs.
No sillytard, Reagan did not rat out the Rosenbergs.
For some reason you Libtards think it is okay to give false sworn testimony which mean you think it is okay to lie to take care of your buddies and to lie to falsely convict an innocent person.
Yep, the end justifies the means to you commies!
Sarcastic was I.I know Reagan didn't...
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#140278 Feb 2, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Sarcastic was I.I know Reagan didn't...
Just making crap up again?
Jacques Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#140279 Feb 2, 2013
Grand Birther wrote:
America, you8 were told that Obama was a wannabe dictator and usurper and refused to see what was right in front of your eyes.
On Monday, renowned author and humanitarian Dr. Jim Garrow made a shocking claim about what we can expect to see in Obama's second term.
Garrow made the following Facebook post:
I have just been informed by a former senior military leader that Obama is using a new “litmus test” in determining who will stay and who must go in his military leaders. Get ready to explode folks.“The new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US citizens or not.” Those who will not are being removed.
Is this what a true Natural Born Citizen would do?
As per numerous past wild claims, will you be around to comment when all of the above does not come to pass?
Jacques Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#140280 Feb 2, 2013
Jacquie Ottatwit wrote:
<quoted text>
Excuses excuses! A president should salute the flag of their country! PERIOD! You would excuse Obummer crupping all over the flag live on national TV while shooting a hadicped minority child with special needs and kissing the feet of a Talban terrorist!
I've scoured dictionaries, thesauruses, etc to find the appropriate description for a pig like you, but all I've been able to find is that I've just insulted pigs. NO ununiformed head of state on this planet salutes anything, much less the flag. Reagan, the non-soldier but movie war hero started that, I've just heard. I remember non-American friends asking me why Clinton was saluting his helicopter drivers as he boarded and unboarded Marine 1. And so you see him "crupping" the flag while shooting what your idol Rogue labels "tards"? Sick, and you still "Hail Hitler", what a sad joke.
Jacques Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#140281 Feb 2, 2013
Robert Laity wrote:
The BC is a forgery.
And you are the real McCoy. You are, the Cletus real McCoy. Ha ha.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#140282 Feb 2, 2013
Bad timing or sending a message? Israel strikes Syria, days later, the U.S. says it is willing to begin talks with Iran (if they're serious). Looks like "O" is trying to send a message to me! Chances of Iran being serious, zilch. Chances this administration "still" begins talks with them, pretty damn good.
Jacques Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#140283 Feb 2, 2013
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
The president and everyone else should follow proper protocol Cmor not some ignorant birfoons opinion.
“The answer is quite simple. The President of the United States is a civilian. He is not a member of the US Military and is therefore not entitled to salute. The military salute is a privilege earned by honorable service in the military. It is also a privilege that can be taken away. Military prisoners are stripped of the privilege of saluting. While the President is constitutionally the CINC, he is not a member of the military”
“Some presidents, like both Bushes, Carter, Kennedy and Reagan have earned the right to salute as veterans of our military forces. Other's like Clinton and Obama did not”
http://www.texasgopvote.com/military-salute/i...
You’re still a fool Cmor!
"“Some presidents, like both Bushes, Carter, Kennedy and Reagan have earned the right to salute as veterans of our military forces." I guess, but when they do, at least here, don't they have to wear something, even token, military? Our veterans, with all their medals and legion head gear, do salute and rightly so. But does wearing a suit and tie, no military medals, entitle the president to salute? Oh, if Reagan was military, it was very little of, no?
Jacques Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#140284 Feb 2, 2013
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
KiSS my "Go to HELL"
-N-
LiKe it, PUNK!
;0)
Ever-religious American er hmm Pravda Lady. Our father...
Jacques Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#140285 Feb 2, 2013
American Lady wrote:
"I have not yet begun to fight" - John Paul Jones
WE have NOT yet begun to FIGHT ... AL
Correction, you have. And so far, It's The House, the Senate, the Supreme Court, the Governors, McCain, Palin, Bushes, Romney, Ryan, Rice, Grove, Cheney, Powell, etc plus courts in almost every state, approx 795 - 0. Don't give up, ha ha. Keep everyone laughing.
Jacques Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#140286 Feb 2, 2013
American Lady wrote:
"I have not yet begun to fight" - John Paul Jones
WE have NOT yet begun to FIGHT ... AL
And how dare you sully John Paul Jones's name thus? The poor fellow must being doing orbits in his grave, what with beign quoted by a Pravda/Putin adorating communist.
Jacques Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#140287 Feb 2, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Just making crap up again?
No, you are. Reagan had nothing to do with the Rosenburgs. Had he, it would've made his stoolpigeoning worthwhile. It was sarcasm, a joke, but you birthers are not too too hot at wit and sarcasm, now are you?
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#140288 Feb 2, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you are. Reagan had nothing to do with the Rosenburgs. Had he, it would've made his stoolpigeoning worthwhile. It was sarcasm, a joke, but you birthers are not too too hot at wit and sarcasm, now are you?
How well a joke goes over depends on the talent of the one telling the joke. Humor is not your forte, at all. BTW, I haven't mentioned Reagan or the Rosenburgs.?.?.?
Jacques Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#140289 Feb 2, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
How well a joke goes over depends on the talent of the one telling the joke. Humor is not your forte, at all. BTW, I haven't mentioned Reagan or the Rosenburgs.?.?.?
Of course you have not. That's because you butted in on a conversation I was having with Froggy aka Rogue. But again, feel free to butt in, it's a forum, everyone's supposed to give his/her two cents' worth, no?
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#140290 Feb 2, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course you have not. That's because you butted in on a conversation I was having with Froggy aka Rogue. But again, feel free to butt in, it's a forum, everyone's supposed to give his/her two cents' worth, no?
Ah well, you've butted in plenty of times. Not a lot we can do about it anyway. Now, you weren't thinking I was Rogue again, were you?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 hr VetnorsGate 1,431,719
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 5 hr VN Vet 61,476
Word (Dec '08) 6 hr PEllen 6,743
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 6 hr PEllen 9,523
Four letter word game (Dec '11) 6 hr PEllen 2,060
Double Word Game (Dec '11) 6 hr PEllen 3,181
last post wins! (Apr '13) 6 hr They cannot kill ... 1,660

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages