BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

[Jacques Ottawa]

wojar wrote:

<quoted text>
If you don't think London, Birmingham, Leeds, Glasgow, etc are not major cities, comparable to cities in the US, UR nuts.

er, wojar, Birmingham, Leeds, Glasgow, etc... you've lost him.

[wojar]

I was listening to conservative right wing AM talk radio today. It was a radio talk show on WTIC in Hartford CT. Even the RWNJs in CT think the conspiracy theories about Newtown (Sandy Hook) are totally whacked out. When something horribly tragic happens in your backyard, and some nut job writing for Pravda says it didn't happen, it proves beyond all shadow of doubt just how whacked out the conspiracy nutballs really are.

[wojar]

Jacques Ottawa wrote:

<quoted text>
er, wojar, Birmingham, Leeds, Glasgow, etc... you've lost him.

And I must say, London has the very best mass transit I have ever seen.

[Jacques Ottawa]

LRS wrote:

<quoted text>
If poops wants to call me Mr. Liar then I'll call him slaveboi. See how simple that is? I never said I had a brother who is doctor. Liar. Other than that, you're correct. And the part that really burns your butt is that it's all true! HaHaHa. jakeleg, is your memory really that bad? Not only I have told you about 100 times but I also JUST posted the answer to your question about you and Slopuke. Wonder if the blind pig can get lucky and find an acorn? I'm not holding my breath. What an insignificant piece of street trash you are. Your dropout opinion doesn't count! LMAO!!! YOU'RE THE EPITOME OF A LOSER! LMAO!!! TaTa gutterboy!

1) I clearly explained the difference (culture lesson, remember?) between liar and Pollack (LRS tm reg'd), the former is a fault, in your case a vice, not racially or ethnically-linked and the latter is an ethnic slur. You don't understand too well, are you, so unwashed and uncouth is your whole being;

2. You wrote that "I never said I had a brother who is doctor. Liar." Well, here is what I actually wrote : "had two beautiful nurse girl friends (ha ha) who had a doctor brother". You don't have to apologize, just write "my bad";

3. Blind pigs find delightful truffles. You wouldn't know what that is, as I believe they don't serve them at Arby's , Dennys, or McDonald's;

4. I do love it when you label me a drepout. I consider the source and I just chuckle.

[Jacques Ottawa]

ha ha , dropout.

[Jacques Ottawa]

wojar wrote:

<quoted text>
And I must say, London has the very best mass transit I have ever seen.

Hmm, I might just disagree. Tried Paris's? The way it criss-crosses Paris and suburbs is well-nigh incredible. And so seamless withing the subway system and its links with suburban trains. I also prefer the Paris fare system. Simpler. Having said that, yes, the "tube" is pretty fantastic. I've never had a chance to try Moscow's, but some say it's tops, not to mention incredible stations that resemble art galleries. I've seen two, but never used the subway.

[Rogue Scholar 05]

Jacques Ottawa wrote:

<quoted text>
Criminals and "crazy" (Rogue tm reg'd) people are not the same thing. And, as far as I know, NZ does not have to release criminals because their jails are full.
You wrote (incredibly) "They think because they are offended, they have the right to knock the sh*t out of you". Well, I was not aware that the Qantas passengers knocked the sh*t out of the guy because of his t-shirt."
I know, I know, there are absolutely no conservative criminals. What do you call, incidentally, all those crooks who robbed shareholders, taxpayers, pensioners, little investors in 2008? All of them were liberals? Criminals? Surely not, as only welfare cheaters are criminals.

There are other ways to knock someone out. You make a false criminal complaint, slash their tires or steal their TEA Party sign!
I did not say that there are no criminals who are Conservatives but they are significantly less likely to commit crimes. And the proof is that it is you Liberals who want to give voting rights back to convicted criminals. Why? BECAUSE THEY VOTE DEMOCRAT!!!

[Rogue Scholar 05]

In the mid-1980's my general had me working with this Alcohol and Drug Counselling Center and I noticed one thing. That almost 100% of the clients also were SMOKERS! Now, why would you think that might be?
Now, using your logic you will claim that I just said all smokers are alcoholics and drug addicts, but I did not say that.
But I do believe that people who smoke have lower additivity rates.
[Harvard] Study Finds Republicans Report Better Health Than Democrats

...the study found that Republicans were 26% less likely to report poor health than Democrats. Republicans were also 15% less likely to be smokers compared with Democrats.
http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/press-releas...

[Rogue Scholar 05]

Now I just love stuff from the Democrat Underground. I was looking up whom is fatter, Democrats or Republicans and I came up with this on the Democrat underground. Of course, Republicans are fatter .... except in certain mountain states.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/...
Now, there is at least two major flaws in the ... survey. First, it goes by state and who they voted for and the next major problem, and the biggest by far, is this is a self evaluation.
And just like alcoholic who lie about their drinking, fat people lie about their weight. And I still think Liberals are much more likely to lie to themselves than do Conservatives.

[Rogue Scholar 05]

Right2Know wrote:

<quoted text>
Yet our fighting military had such a hard time getting their votes in in the last election, who from what I have heard from numerous military people, can not stand usurping King Obummer!
Hmm, votes from our military personnel who would probably vote against him or criminals who would vote for him? Tough decision for the old Libtards! And lets not forget the votes from the illegals, I bet some sort of new law will be passed behind Americas back to allow them to vote as well!

But we need to count every vote. Votes from dead people, illegal aliens, legal aliens, convicted felons, etc.

[Jacques Ottawa]

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

<quoted text>
There are other ways to knock someone out. You make a false criminal complaint, slash their tires or steal their TEA Party sign!
I did not say that there are no criminals who are Conservatives but they are significantly less likely to commit crimes. And the proof is that it is you Liberals who want to give voting rights back to convicted criminals. Why? BECAUSE THEY VOTE DEMOCRAT!!!

So, if I understand you correctly, the passengers with the help of Qantas "made a false criminal complaint, slashed his tires ( I guess her had left his car in the airport parking lot) and stole his TEA Party sign!"

To me, criminals are criminals and I don't sweat it out trying to find out what their religion or political affiliations are. You're caught, you pay. Unfortunately, the rich ones are caught and don't pay - well, not often.

Our imprisoned felons have had the right to vote here for the last 5 years or so. It's stupid as stupid goes. I have no idea why we do this.

[Jacques Ottawa]

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

In the mid-1980's my general had me working with this Alcohol and Drug Counselling Center and I noticed one thing. That almost 100% of the clients also were SMOKERS! Now, why would you think that might be?
Now, using your logic you will claim that I just said all smokers are alcoholics and drug addicts, but I did not say that.
But I do believe that people who smoke have lower additivity rates.
[Harvard] Study Finds Republicans Report Better Health Than Democrats
...the study found that Republicans were 26% less likely to report poor health than Democrats. Republicans were also 15% less likely to be smokers compared with Democrats.
http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/press-releas...

Remember Col Cathcart in Catch 22? He could drink to his heart's delight and have all the women he wanted. But he never had either, instead he preferred shooting at tomato stalks with his .45 in the evening. Hell, figured the good Colonel, why should he make love to beautiful women all night and drink good wine if it won't advance his career? If you haven't caught on, Rogue, Colonel Cathcart = Republicans. They may live a bit longer than democrats, but it also seems so MUCH longer.

Bill Clinton was an insatiable sex machines, as are most democrats. He was also one of the US's greatesty presidents;

GWB had no time for sexual daliances, hell he was "clean" . However, he was probably one of the worst 3 presidents since Washington.

[Jacques Ottawa]

Right2Know wrote:

<quoted text>
Yet our fighting military had such a hard time getting their votes in in the last election, who from what I have heard from numerous military people, can not stand usurping King Obummer!
Hmm, votes from our military personnel who would probably vote against him or criminals who would vote for him? Tough decision for the old Libtards! And lets not forget the votes from the illegals, I bet some sort of new law will be passed behind Americas back to allow them to vote as well!

And the relevance to Rogue's post is?

I wish they divulged who the military voted for. I wager we'd be surprised.

The military, which, as you stated, preferred Romney to Obama, and the brass, knowing as you do that the men and women in uniform will vote Republican, well, you'd think said military brass would make sure the votes got collected and flown home, no? Or are the military brass clueless like you?

[Proud Republican]

Did you guys see the lastest news? The court rules that the President's actions were unconstitutional.
Like we didn't already know that.

[Jacques Ottawa]

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

<quoted text>
But we need to count every vote. Votes from dead people, illegal aliens, legal aliens, convicted felons, etc.

And only the democrats do that, right? I've asked you so many times to prove that allegation. At least 20 times. Still waiting. And don't tell me you did. We know you did not.

What about 90% of gun deaths that are done by criminals? Found any evidence to back that up or do I have to,following your suggestion, scour the internet, all 1 billion pages of it only to find out you made it up? TYhe you'll say, weakly, sheepishly, that it's a red herring.

[Jacques Ottawa]

Okay , Rogue, does this debunk your 90% number (criminals involved in gun deaths)? It's fron your bible too, Wikipedia, so you can't dispute its findings now can you? Oh, 2/3 of deaths were by suicide. That leaves 1/3 for other deaths. 90% by criminals did you say?

Gun violence in the United States

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


In 2009, according to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 66.9% of all homicides in the United States were perpetrated using a firearm.[5] There were 52,447 deliberate and 23,237 accidental non-fatal gunshot injuries in the United States during 2000.[6] Two-thirds of all gun-related deaths in the United States are suicides. Of the 30,470 firearm-related deaths in the United States in 2010, 19,392 (63.6%) were suicide deaths, and 11,078 (36.4%) homicide deaths.[7]

You asked, Rogue. There you are.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_violence_in_the_Uni...

[Jacques Ottawa]

Proud Republican wrote:

Did you guys see the lastest news? The court rules that the President's actions were unconstitutional.
Like we didn't already know that.

This is old news. Did Rogue tell you that this kind of stuff was as criminal as the torture of prisoners? Any more Mickey Mouse stuff you want to lay on Obama? Judging by this last one, it would appear birthers and tea partyers are having a slow day.

[Proud Republican]

Jacques Ottawa wrote:

<quoted text>
This is old news. Did Rogue tell you that this kind of stuff was as criminal as the torture of prisoners? Any more Mickey Mouse stuff you want to lay on Obama? Judging by this last one, it would appear birthers and tea partyers are having a slow day.

Oh, it is old new, huh?

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/01/25/co...

[Proud Republican]

I mean old news, huh?

[Proud Republican]

Jacques Ottawa wrote:

<quoted text>
This is old news. Did Rogue tell you that this kind of stuff was as criminal as the torture of prisoners? Any more Mickey Mouse stuff you want to lay on Obama? Judging by this last one, it would appear birthers and tea partyers are having a slow day.

How is telling the truth being criminal? It came out to read today, so I posted it. It isn't that there is no truth to it, or that I am making lies up about him.