You ARE obsessed with sodomy, gay things, Clinton's penis and so forth, aren't you? Did I mention sodomy in my post, or anything even approaching that? I asked a question pertaining to gay rights.<quoted text>
Typical straw man argument. There is no law that says PRIVATE organizations can not indiscriminate against homosexuals.
Oh, it is still a violation in the UCMJ to commit sodomy and currently an Army general is under a court martial of which sodomy is one charge and if he is convicted, that charge along is FIVE YEARS at Fort Leavenworth and if it is forced sodomy, it is life w/o parole.
Army General Charged with Forcible Sodomy During Tour in Afghanistan
Sorry, but I have to conclude that you are just plain dumb. Stubborn-dumb. Why?
1. "Typical straw man argument." , you write. Er, any argument with my first three points?;
2. Crux of the matter, bottom line. In point 4, I posed a question. I did not present an argument nor made a statement. It was a question.
3. You mix gay with sodomy. Why? If the general had simply committed rape on a female, what would be the difference? Can the general be prosecuted for being gay or for sodomy?
If I were the general on trial, I sure as hell would not want you as my attorney. However, I would be praying you'd be the D.A.