BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#139450 Jan 28, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Both Rogue and LRS believe that it is their right to steal other people's words. To them, plagiarism is the greatest invention. To his credit, Rogue never said as much, though he surely thinks it, but slug LRS actually came out and said it was okay to plagiarize.
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
HaHaHaHa! What a pure dork! Now you claim to know what other's believe. You're definitely a mental case, jakeleg. Seriously.
Yep, Jacques is big on accusing people of something but he will never say whom we plagerized. Oh Jacques, I always give credit and usually a link.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#139451 Jan 28, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
HaHaHaHa! What a pure dork! Now you claim to know what other's believe. You're definitely a mental case, jakeleg. Seriously.
Hey, hey, it's not what I believe, it's what you've SHOWN. I've repeatedly pointed out instances where you clearly plagiarized, did not credit the author. Many times. Finally, hounded by what you knew to be true, you came out and admitted it, right here on Topix, making light of it, and considering plagiarizing to be normal.

Why do you constantly lie and make up stuff? Is it spontaneous, ingrained, or just embedded in your disgusting sinews? Hmmm, I surmise, all of the foregoing. Do you really think, for example, that anyone here would believe, ha ha, that a worthless slug like you would be prosperous and have not one, but TWO (2) beautiful nurse girl friends? Try Ripley's Believe it or Not.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#139452 Jan 28, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
HaHaHaHa! What a pure dork! Now you claim to know what other's believe. You're definitely a mental case, jakeleg. Seriously.
Oh, you made a wise decsion not to pursue typos and errors, if the above is any indication.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#139453 Jan 28, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Right, Mr. Mental Case. LMAO Your call, Captain. Remember? LMAO!
No, you wrote "Your call captain". I corrected it. Look at my above post, btw.

You're tripping all over your errors. Stop it, you look ridiculous. This is like shooting fish in a barrel with one of your beloved assault weapons (oh oh, Rogue will surely correct me and say "assault rifle).
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#139454 Jan 28, 2013
Robert Laity wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama WILL die at some point.
Typical brither poisonous virulent hate. Out of reasoning, arguments and justification, they hope the president will die. LRS was praying AF1 would lose some nuts and bolts. Then, after being repeatedly stomped ony for months, and out of ammunition, he professed the hope that something would go wrong with my plane when I travelled to Vegas. Is it any wonder that these birfoons are the laughing stock of the true Republican party, along with their slighly-less nutty tea partyers.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#139455 Jan 28, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Both Rogue and LRS believe that it is their right to steal other people's words. To them, plagiarism is the greatest invention. To his credit, Rogue never said as much, though he surely thinks it, but slug LRS actually came out and said it was okay to plagiarize.
<quoted text>
Yep, Jacques is big on accusing people of something but he will never say whom we plagerized. Oh Jacques, I always give credit and usually a link.
No you don't always. I've caught you several times. And, you are being totally ridiculous, as you wrote : "Yep, Jacques is big on accusing people of something but he will never say whom we plagerized". Do you even realize how humongously ridiculous that assertion is? How can I say who you are plagiarizing if in fact you ARE plagisarizing? It becomes obvious you and your bosom buddy LRS are doing just that when the text is well crafted, long and errorless. Were you a characted in Catch-22 by any chance?
Justus Liebig

Bristol, CT

#139456 Jan 28, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
No you don't always. I've caught you several times. And, you are being totally ridiculous, as you wrote : "Yep, Jacques is big on accusing people of something but he will never say whom we plagerized". Do you even realize how humongously ridiculous that assertion is? How can I say who you are plagiarizing if in fact you ARE plagisarizing? It becomes obvious you and your bosom buddy LRS are doing just that when the text is well crafted, long and errorless. Were you a characted in Catch-22 by any chance?
Rouge's recent post about senior at Food Lion wa plagiarized. No, it is not necessary to publicly list links to the plagprized content unless he denies it. He was caught in the act, and if he denies it he will get slapped.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#139457 Jan 28, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Both Rogue and LRS believe that it is their right to steal other people's words. To them, plagiarism is the greatest invention. To his credit, Rogue never said as much, though he surely thinks it, but slug LRS actually came out and said it was okay to plagiarize.
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep, Jacques is big on accusing people of something but he will never say whom we plagerized. Oh Jacques, I always give credit and usually a link.
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
No you don't always. I've caught you several times. And, you are being totally ridiculous, as you wrote : "Yep, Jacques is big on accusing people of something but he will never say whom we plagerized". Do you even realize how humongously ridiculous that assertion is? How can I say who you are plagiarizing if in fact you ARE plagisarizing? It becomes obvious you and your bosom buddy LRS are doing just that when the text is well crafted, long and errorless. Were you a characted in Catch-22 by any chance?
Then you should have no problem showing us were I plagiarizer someone's work.
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#139458 Jan 28, 2013
Durable goods orders up 4.6%

We all know Rogue Moron hates seeing good economic news.
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#139459 Jan 28, 2013
Uh oh, birfers!

A tentative deal has been reached on comprehensive immigration reform, including a path to citizenship for the ~11m illegals currently in the country.

I'm really glad that this is happening, because this is an inclusive a country comprised of immigrants (despite the strongest wishes of Birfoons etc.). The GOP no doubt is trying to buy back votes from the Hispanic population.

The likes of Birfoons and other fake conservatives have already spent what little good will the GOP may have had with that voting block.

LOLOLOLOL

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#139460 Jan 28, 2013
Grand Birther wrote:
Durable goods orders up 4.6%
We all know Rogue Moron hates seeing good economic news.
Well Fake GB, why do you assume I hate seeing good news? All I know there is plenty of bad news for Obamanomics.
Our DJIA is still over a thousand point from it's high in Nov. 2007 and that ain't good.
We still have a real unemployment rate of about 11% and 23 million Americans are still unemployed and that ain't good either.
Our poverty rate is over 15% and it has not been that high since 1967, and that is surely not good news.
Does the truth hurt your ears? Now, can you contest any of my points?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#139461 Jan 28, 2013
Robert Laity wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama WILL die at some point.
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Typical brither poisonous virulent hate. Out of reasoning, arguments and justification, they hope the president will die. LRS was praying AF1 would lose some nuts and bolts. Then, after being repeatedly stomped ony for months, and out of ammunition, he professed the hope that something would go wrong with my plane when I travelled to Vegas. Is it any wonder that these birfoons are the laughing stock of the true Republican party, along with their slighly-less nutty tea partyers.
Several points here, Can you explain what he said was hateful? We will all die as some point. He did not wish harm to Obama, did he?
Next, we are all not Republicans. Many of us are Libertarians.
Now, what is a "true" Republican? And what is a true Democrat. You progressives have forced most of the Blue Dog Democrats out of the party. So much for the Bug Tent!!!

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#139462 Jan 28, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah, but all of Bush's were CONSTITUTIONAL. You see, the president can only make recess appointment according to our Constitution, Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution.
In those questionable appointments made by Obumer Boy, Obama did not submit them to Congress at all as he knew the Senate would approve them as they were radicals. So he waited until he thought he could make a recess appointments but a few people in the Senate knew what Obama was up to so they made the minimum effort to keep Congress in session so he could not Constitutional do so.
Yep, Bush recess appointment were Constitutional but those Obummer Boy appoints were not!!! But using your Libarrdian Logic, you equate them as equal.
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Poor Poopo. Can't rebut one of my points.
I agree, Obama has to appeal as this was just one lawsuit and now dozens of more corporations will be embolden to sue.
Now, IMHO, all presidential appoints should be given an up or down vote within 90 days after their appointments are received by the Senate. Unfortunately it does not take much to hold a vote with the current Senate procedures.
By the way, more appointments are held up by Democrats when the president is a Republican than the other way around.
<quoted text>
You still have not said what you think I said was untrue! I do not agree with the Senate. Our Constitution says that the Senate must give advice and consent and how can they if there is no up or down vote? IHMO all political appointees should receive an simple majority up or down voted on within 90 days, period. And I also believe that the Senate should be able to remove any appointee with a 60% up or down vote. You should not have to go through an impeachment trial for appointees. Yes, I still believe in impeachment for politicians who are voted in but I would also like to see recall elections for Senators and Congressmen as all to often the vote opposite of the way they promised.
Well for one thing Rogue I never accuse anyone of lying unless I think they’re intentionally lying. In this case one of us has misunderstood the scope of the decision. It’s my understanding that the court ruled as well THAT RECESS APPOINTMENTS COULD ONLY BE USED FOR POSITIONS THAT BECOME VACANT WHILE THE SENATE IS IN RECESS.

And if that’s the case and Bush actually made 179 recess appointments then the volume alone would suggest that at least some if not all of Bush’s appointments would have been unconstitutional under this ruling as well.

My accusation of silly talk (not lying, your opinion) had to do with your usual libtard radical socialist BS in reference to Obama’s nominees when in fact it’s every consumer protection agency that ruffles your Party’s feathers. Obama keeps backing you idiots in a corner and you keep biting. Which position do you think the majority of the public will take? Think they just may want to be protected against the vulture capitalist your Party is so entrenched protecting?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#139463 Jan 28, 2013
Hey Jacques, can you explain why France needs U.S.A.F. C-17's to transport their military less than 2,000 miles to northern Mali? If France is such a great country, why do the need us for a mission in THEIR sphere of influence?
Mali only gained is freedom from France in 1960 but they still rely on France to some extent. And France relies on Uncle Sugar!

“Reduce immigration levels”

Since: Dec 06

Kings Mountain, NC

#139464 Jan 28, 2013
Pastor Manning: Your President Has No History; All Records Sealed
&fe ature=em-uploademail

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#139465 Jan 28, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
But only 53% pay federal income tax! Yep, 47% are not paying their Fair Share!!!
If you believe it’s fair for Romney to make 22 million and pay no taxes then why wouldn’t it be fair for a stiff making 25 or 30 thousand?
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#139466 Jan 28, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep, Jacques is big on accusing people of something but he will never say whom we plagerized. Oh Jacques, I always give credit and usually a link.
<quoted text>
Then you should have no problem showing us were I plagiarizer someone's work.
I've already done it. Often. I'm sure if we wait long enough, I'll point out another one.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#139467 Jan 28, 2013
Grand Birther wrote:
Durable goods orders up 4.6%
We all know Rogue Moron hates seeing good economic news.
He hasn't talked very much about the DJIA and the two other indexes lately either. Why is that? He has mentioned his broker's correct prediction on Apple stock, but same broker predicted big losses in September, then, when it didn't happen, end of year for the DJIA. Highest in five years right now. Nothing to do with Obama except the next time when it falls, as it is bound to do eventually, hey, it's the stock market!
Grand Birther

Oregon, OH

#139468 Jan 28, 2013
Rogue Moron publicly celebrated every bit of bad economic news last year.

Praised it to the high heavens.

Sang of bad news's glory every time.

Since: Aug 10

Buffalo, NY

#139469 Jan 28, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Then please enlighten us with your vast knowledge.
REally, yopu need me to explain the very plainly stated English words of Bobby Jundal?

Seriously?

If thats the case, you wouldnt be able to follow what i say either!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 9 min USAsince1680 1,153,207
Deat Abby 12-16 10 min Sublime1 62
Amy 12-18 11 min Mister Tonka 3
Abby 12-18 13 min Mister Tonka 3
Obama pardons 2 Illinoisans, including former M... 34 min Le Duped 3
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 56 min PEllen 98,832
CHICAGO BEARS ARE SHYT. Boycott them 1 hr Sublime1 21
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 7:06 am PST

NFL 7:06AM
Charles Tillman: Bears players still have faith in Cutler
NBC Sports 7:20 AM
Will Jimmy Clausen fare better than Jay Cutler as Bears' QB?
NBC Sports 7:35 AM
What do the Bears do with Jay Cutler moving forward?
ESPN 7:40 AM
Sources: Bears 'confused' at coach's discipline
NBC Sports 7:45 AM
Jarrett Payton: Stop talking about Jay Cutler's potential