You wrote : "Perot would not have gotten any of the Obama votes." I bdeleive you meant the Clinton vote. Having said that, I said that Clinton would have gotten 25% of the Perot vote. In other words, Perot or no Perot, I believe it still would've been a Clinton victory by a very slim margin.<quoted text>Perot would not have gotten any of the Obama votes. Perot was a candidate that supported less government control and less government interference in family life. I didn't vote for Perot,but Ross Perot supported personal responsibility and self control. Entrepreneurial spirit does not mean not conservative. Those were not the people that voted for Clinton or Obama. Obama got votes from the type of people that support Jonestown and Jim Jones.
You incredibly wrote : "Obama got votes from the type of people that support Jonestown and Jim Jones." Do you even know what happened at Jonestown? You hate Obama so much that you associate him with his followers? How do you figure? Where do you come up with this? Jones was a religious manipulator and his followers were fanatical religious naives and idiots. Obama is hardly religious and Jones's followers would never be Obama fans as he is anything but religious. Go ahead and criticize his politics, his administration, but geez, don't come up with such virulent hate. What drives anyone to come up with twisted stuff like that? You say crazies should be locked up. Were I a close family member of yours, or your girl friend, I think, following the Jones statement, that I would call the guys in white.