Poor Rogue! Do you get a kick out just being silly? Obama was simply challenging the pro forma sham (gaveling in and going home) to prevent recess appointments and nothing more. The case will be appealed and will actually be beneficial to both Party’s if the decision is overturned; as neither Party can appreciate the other Party blocking all their nominations without really being in session.<quoted text>
Ah, but all of Bush's were CONSTITUTIONAL. You see, the president can only make recess appointment according to our Constitution, Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution.
In those questionable appointments made by Obumer Boy, Obama did not submit them to Congress at all as he knew the Senate would approve them as they were radicals. So he waited until he thought he could make a recess appointments but a few people in the Senate knew what Obama was up to so they made the minimum effort to keep Congress in session so he could not Constitutional do so.
Yep, Bush recess appointment were Constitutional but those Obummer Boy appoints were not!!! But using your Libarrdian Logic, you equate them as equal.
Get a grip man, you’re talking nonsense.