BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 240352 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Jacques Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#139099 Jan 25, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
In the mid-1980's my general had me working with this Alcohol and Drug Counselling Center and I noticed one thing. That almost 100% of the clients also were SMOKERS! Now, why would you think that might be?
Now, using your logic you will claim that I just said all smokers are alcoholics and drug addicts, but I did not say that.
But I do believe that people who smoke have lower additivity rates.
[Harvard] Study Finds Republicans Report Better Health Than Democrats
...the study found that Republicans were 26% less likely to report poor health than Democrats. Republicans were also 15% less likely to be smokers compared with Democrats.
http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/press-releas...
Remember Col Cathcart in Catch 22? He could drink to his heart's delight and have all the women he wanted. But he never had either, instead he preferred shooting at tomato stalks with his .45 in the evening. Hell, figured the good Colonel, why should he make love to beautiful women all night and drink good wine if it won't advance his career? If you haven't caught on, Rogue, Colonel Cathcart = Republicans. They may live a bit longer than democrats, but it also seems so MUCH longer.

Bill Clinton was an insatiable sex machines, as are most democrats. He was also one of the US's greatesty presidents;

GWB had no time for sexual daliances, hell he was "clean" . However, he was probably one of the worst 3 presidents since Washington.

Jacques Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#139100 Jan 25, 2013
Right2Know wrote:
<quoted text>
Yet our fighting military had such a hard time getting their votes in in the last election, who from what I have heard from numerous military people, can not stand usurping King Obummer!
Hmm, votes from our military personnel who would probably vote against him or criminals who would vote for him? Tough decision for the old Libtards! And lets not forget the votes from the illegals, I bet some sort of new law will be passed behind Americas back to allow them to vote as well!
And the relevance to Rogue's post is?

I wish they divulged who the military voted for. I wager we'd be surprised.

The military, which, as you stated, preferred Romney to Obama, and the brass, knowing as you do that the men and women in uniform will vote Republican, well, you'd think said military brass would make sure the votes got collected and flown home, no? Or are the military brass clueless like you?
Proud Republican

Falls Church, VA

#139101 Jan 25, 2013
Did you guys see the lastest news? The court rules that the President's actions were unconstitutional.
Like we didn't already know that.
Jacques Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#139102 Jan 25, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
But we need to count every vote. Votes from dead people, illegal aliens, legal aliens, convicted felons, etc.
And only the democrats do that, right? I've asked you so many times to prove that allegation. At least 20 times. Still waiting. And don't tell me you did. We know you did not.

What about 90% of gun deaths that are done by criminals? Found any evidence to back that up or do I have to,following your suggestion, scour the internet, all 1 billion pages of it only to find out you made it up? TYhe you'll say, weakly, sheepishly, that it's a red herring.
Jacques Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#139103 Jan 25, 2013
Okay , Rogue, does this debunk your 90% number (criminals involved in gun deaths)? It's fron your bible too, Wikipedia, so you can't dispute its findings now can you? Oh, 2/3 of deaths were by suicide. That leaves 1/3 for other deaths. 90% by criminals did you say?

Gun violence in the United States

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


In 2009, according to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 66.9% of all homicides in the United States were perpetrated using a firearm.[5] There were 52,447 deliberate and 23,237 accidental non-fatal gunshot injuries in the United States during 2000.[6] Two-thirds of all gun-related deaths in the United States are suicides. Of the 30,470 firearm-related deaths in the United States in 2010, 19,392 (63.6%) were suicide deaths, and 11,078 (36.4%) homicide deaths.[7]

You asked, Rogue. There you are.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_violence_in_the_Uni...
Jacques Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#139104 Jan 25, 2013
Proud Republican wrote:
Did you guys see the lastest news? The court rules that the President's actions were unconstitutional.
Like we didn't already know that.
This is old news. Did Rogue tell you that this kind of stuff was as criminal as the torture of prisoners? Any more Mickey Mouse stuff you want to lay on Obama? Judging by this last one, it would appear birthers and tea partyers are having a slow day.
Proud Republican

Falls Church, VA

#139105 Jan 25, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
This is old news. Did Rogue tell you that this kind of stuff was as criminal as the torture of prisoners? Any more Mickey Mouse stuff you want to lay on Obama? Judging by this last one, it would appear birthers and tea partyers are having a slow day.
Oh, it is old new, huh?

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/01/25/co...
Proud Republican

Falls Church, VA

#139106 Jan 25, 2013
I mean old news, huh?
Proud Republican

Falls Church, VA

#139107 Jan 25, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
This is old news. Did Rogue tell you that this kind of stuff was as criminal as the torture of prisoners? Any more Mickey Mouse stuff you want to lay on Obama? Judging by this last one, it would appear birthers and tea partyers are having a slow day.
How is telling the truth being criminal? It came out to read today, so I posted it. It isn't that there is no truth to it, or that I am making lies up about him.
Proud Republican

Falls Church, VA

#139108 Jan 25, 2013
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
Not at all unusual for a loser to feel that way. Imagine how John McCain and Mitt Romney felt.
I am sure they will not feel as bad as you will feel when your Obama Care isn't working for you like you thought it would.
Proud Republican

Falls Church, VA

#139109 Jan 25, 2013
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
And the little live moochers make you even sicker.
then you must make your ownself pretty damn sick, dude.
Jacques Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#139110 Jan 25, 2013
Proud Republican wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, it is old new, huh?
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/01/25/co...
Rogue alrady beat you to it this morning, and answered and described as trivial and insignificant by yours truly. Rogue is like you, but his hate for Obama seems stronger and he therefore finds the negative much faster than you. You must be new at this, a new birther, what. Do like Rogue, go to google, type in that little rectangle : "Today's negative and trivial stories on Obama and his administration, and as a bonus, any bad stuff on Pelosi, both Clintons and Joe Biden and oh, yes, that traitor, chief justice John Roberts. No stories need be true and please avoid facts, we birthers are allergic to those" That's get you volumes of what you think, sigh, is interesting stuff.
Ellen1

Dedham, MA

#139112 Jan 25, 2013
Proud Republican wrote:
Did you guys see the lastest news? The court rules that the President's actions were unconstitutional.
Like we didn't already know that.
Not THE court, the uS Supreme Court, but A court, an ordinary US Federal Appeals Court. Obama can and probably will appeal to the next higher court and then, if necessary, to the US Supreme Court. and, btw, this relates only to appointments on a labor relations panel.
Ellen1

Dedham, MA

#139113 Jan 25, 2013
Right2Know wrote:
<quoted text>
Snore, snore, snore! What was that? LOL!
Blather on brainwashed Libtard King Obummer minion!
So you have that official public conformation and documentation from the hospital listed on King Obummers alleged LFBC from Hawaii, that even the gov. of Hawaii couldn't find any proof of yet? LOL!
Oh what about that SS# from Connecticut that belonged to Bernelle?
Though not!
Silly bizarre, nonsense, hateful, deranged, questions! LOL! Someone is a little unhinged, you forgot to blame Bush too!
Obama has shown his birth certificate twice, the short form and the long form, and the officials in Hawaii of BOTH parties including the former Republican governor have repeatedly confirmed the facts on it, and they are further confirmed by the public Index Data file and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers in 1961 by the DOH of Hawaii.

Re: "So you have that official public conformation and documentation from the hospital..."

Answer: A state birth certificate is legal proof by itself; confirmation by a hospital is not required. However, the hospital did show say this:

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2011/04/kapiol...

And it also published this:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/52083178/Kapiolani-...

Re: "even the gov. of Hawaii couldn't find any proof of yet?"

Answer. That was made up by birthers. Governor Abernathy never said it.(And three Republican officials and several Democrats said that they had in fact seen it, right in the files, where it is supposed to be, and its existence is further confirmed by the Index Data and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961).

Re: "Oh what about that SS# from Connecticut..."

The Connecticut SS number was caused by a data entry error. SS numbers were generated by the zip code of the applicant’s address. Obama’s address in Hawaii was in zip code 96814, and the zip code for Danbury, CT. is 06814.

Millions of people have errors in their social security numbers and/or multiple social security numbers caused mainly by data entry errors:

http://www.cnbc.com/id/38678753/How_Many_Soci...

http://www.securityworldnews.com/2010/08/12/2...

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_162-200137...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#139115 Jan 25, 2013
Does anyone want to guess what political party she is affiliated with?

January 25, 2013 at 7:45 am

California Councilwoman: You Can Be Shot By An Unloaded Gun!
This California Councilwoman opposes open carry of unloaded handguns as people can even be shot by ‘unloaded guns!’

Read more: http://conservativevideos.com/2013/01/califor...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#139116 Jan 25, 2013
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Not THE court, the uS Supreme Court, but A court, an ordinary US Federal Appeals Court. Obama can and probably will appeal to the next higher court and then, if necessary, to the US Supreme Court. and, btw, this relates only to appointments on a labor relations panel.
Obama has to appeal to the USSC because that lawsuit involved only one corporation and there are a dozen other corporations out there that have similar grievances. And, until the USSC gives an injunction, those three people are out of a job and off the Labor Board!!!
I also understand Obama made one other similar appointment to some other possition and that to is in jeopardy.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#139117 Jan 25, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
This is old news. Did Rogue tell you that this kind of stuff was as criminal as the torture of prisoners? Any more Mickey Mouse stuff you want to lay on Obama? Judging by this last one, it would appear birthers and tea partyers are having a slow day.
There you go again miss-quoting me. I said no such thing and you know it. What I did say was that you Libtards wanted to try Bush's lawyers for giving him bad legal advice and if it was okay to do it to Bush's lawyers, then we should do the same for Obama's lawyers which gave him illegal advice.
Jacques Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#139118 Jan 25, 2013
WereRYourfacts wrote:
<quoted text>
Many people have "errors"! And no human being does more so than King Obummer! One or two "errors" could possibly be explained or excused away, but with a dozen or more, they call that fishy and fraud!
What is it with birthers, they can't even spell their monikers correctly? How do you take someone seriously who can't even spell his own chosen name? And then there's that other one...Bruser, lol. Or something.

I can understand some mistakes in texts, hey, why not, I make them too, but to not write one's own name correctly?
Jacques Ottawa

Brampton, Canada

#139119 Jan 25, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
There you go again miss-quoting me. I said no such thing and you know it. What I did say was that you Libtards wanted to try Bush's lawyers for giving him bad legal advice and if it was okay to do it to Bush's lawyers, then we should do the same for Obama's lawyers which gave him illegal advice.
Oh no? What you say to this?:

Rogue Scholar wrote :

The White House Lawyers you advised Pres. Obama should be charged with criminal misconduct. ALL actions taken by the Labor Board should be found null and void.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#139120 Jan 25, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
Okay , Rogue, does this debunk your 90% number (criminals involved in gun deaths)? It's fron your bible too, Wikipedia, so you can't dispute its findings now can you? Oh, 2/3 of deaths were by suicide. That leaves 1/3 for other deaths. 90% by criminals did you say?
Gun violence in the United States
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In 2009, according to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 66.9% of all homicides in the United States were perpetrated using a firearm.[5] There were 52,447 deliberate and 23,237 accidental non-fatal gunshot injuries in the United States during 2000.[6] Two-thirds of all gun-related deaths in the United States are suicides. Of the 30,470 firearm-related deaths in the United States in 2010, 19,392 (63.6%) were suicide deaths, and 11,078 (36.4%) homicide deaths.[7]
You asked, Rogue. There you are.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_violence_in_the_Uni...
When you compare comparable land masses and populations you get the real numbers. Your numbers are BS, like I've been saying.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 6 min Julia 1,521,955
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 25 min Roger 10,581
News Why Aren't There More Gender-Neutral, Trans-Fri... 1 hr max 1
Michael Hahn, Kim Goldman Hahn, The OJ Simpson ... (Apr '06) 7 hr guest 397
Obumbler Back To Community Organizing 7 hr CIA and FBI 6
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 14 hr Rose of Tralee 105,130
Newbie HELP needed!!! 15 hr AmandaPTownGirl 3

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages