BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#138838 Jan 24, 2013
George W Bush wrote:
Hey, does anyone remember all of the hearings and media coverage after my pathetic failure to secure all of these embassies?
Jan. 22, 2002 - American Consulate in Calcutta, India. Gunmen, 5 dead.
June 14, 2002 - American Consulate in Karachi, Pakistan. Car bomb, 12 dead.
Feb. 28, 2003 - American embassy in Islamabad, Pakistan. Gunmen, 2 dead.
June 30, 200 - American embassy in Tashkent, Uzbekistan. Suicide bomber, 2 dead.
Dec. 6, 2004 - American compound in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Gunmen, 9 dead.
March 2, 2006 - American consulate in Karachi, Pakistan. Car bomb, 2 dead.
Sept. 12, 2006 - American embassy in Damascus, Syria. Gunmen, 4 dead.
March 18, 2008 - American consulate in Istanbul, Turkey. Mortar attack, 2 dead.
Sept. 17, 2008 - American embassy in Sanaa, Yemen. Car bomb, 16 dead.
Remember that????????
Neither do I.
I lied, 54 died....
and without a single news story on any of them.
ACHIEVEMENT UNLOCKED 54G -
8 years of embassy attack cover-ups
Oh oh, duck, profanity and name-calling on the way. They hate facts.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#138839 Jan 24, 2013
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
Mainly because civilization for the most part has outgrown the bronze aged god creation myths but the killer text yet remains as the absolute word of god for the true believers.
In the Old Testament the Mosaic Law specifies no less than thirty-six capital offenses calling for execution by stoning, burning, decapitation, or strangulation. Included in the list are idolatry, magic, blasphemy, violation of the sabbath, murder, adultery, bestiality, incest and “pederasty”(sex between two males) Guess the good lord didn’t mind so much the woman to woman thang. LOL
So you're saying most people in the world no longer believe in their religion? That's a whole bunch of people who have recently lost their faith, no? Perhaps you should tell the Christians, Jews and Islamists of this late breaking news! You don't know what you're talking about. Big surprise!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#138840 Jan 24, 2013
What a brilliant move by the "Zero" to give Egypt a few of our F-16s! Nothing like helping out a friend in need, huh Zero? I'm sure your pals, the Muslim Brotherhood, are very grateful. Impeach this boneheaded fool.

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

#138841 Jan 24, 2013
Jacques,
The one common thread in all those senseless attacks is Islam.
Islam is dragging the world down, I say.
It is Jihad. It is holy war sanctioned by the Koran.
Learn to Read

Chicago, IL

#138842 Jan 24, 2013
Only 1,457 days until Obama leaves office

Tic tic tic
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#138843 Jan 24, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Ha ha, you really hate it when I mention Obama's victory. You are such a loser, you cannot even digest his brilliant win.
If Rogue thinks Woods and Mickelson are okay to avoid paying higher taxes, why is it not ok to criticize their strategy? It's not my business to do anything about it, and even if I were American, it would make no difference, I can certainly comment on it all I want and it's extremely ignorant of you to tell me that I can't on a public open forum and loaded, to boot, with Canadian advertising.
Based on your logic (logic???) what business do YOU have to mention North Africa? And more importantly, how relevant is its bombing to Woods and Mickelson and CA taxes? You got lost again, eh boy?
The bombng has alrerady started anyhow. Ever been to Mali? Ever been on the ground? Ever seen Mali? Ever spoken to a Malian. Know the history of Mali? Best you read up a bit before talking bombing
You haters have failed to mention that Mali has asked for international aid to repulse those fanatical Islamists, AlQaeda. You conveniently ignore tha fact that the Algerian army wiped out 30 of 35 AlQaeda hostage takers, executed, on the spot, those that weren't killed. Your ignorance knows no bounds.
You're a fool. North Africa was in the news yesterday. And the only reason you've been mouthing off about the golfers is because they're rich! If they weren't you wouldn't mention them. And you accuse others of being hate-filled? What a joke. You're the most hateful person on this forum. I should study up on Mali? Why? If it's an AQ launching zone then I say wipe it out. Too bad for your brothers in arms! Tic Toc, Tic Toc, Tic Toc!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#138844 Jan 24, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
Only 1,457 days until Obama leaves office
Tic tic tic
That would be if he makes it that long! LMAO Tic Toc, Tic Toc, Tic Toc!
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#138845 Jan 24, 2013
Black Sexy Samba wrote:
<quoted text>
hey pops...you wanna ride on my butt?
Nothing more need be added
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#138846 Jan 24, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, why was the last time the Catholic Church killed a gay guy?
Oh, you do know Thomas Paine was active in the French revolution and he saw no problem with cutting the heads of those evil rich people. Nice guy Thomas was. And a flaming hypocrite.
From Wiki: He wrote the Rights of Man (1791), in part a defense of the French Revolution against its critics.
<quoted text>
Actually that was a Red Herring as I knew you, or Jacques, would NEVER answer the FIRST sentence!
So Poopo, can you answer my first sentence?
Oh, this is for everyone else, Thomas Paine wrote Rights of Man in 1791 and the Reign of Terror, as Poppo says, did not start until the FOLLOWING year.
Yes, he was arrested by the French, imprisoned in Paris, then released in 1794.. No, the French did not execute him!
Now, how about attempting to answer my FIRST sentence!
A red herring!!!! Do you not realise how everyone here, why, even your birther ilk, are laughing at you? You're a joke, and yes, funny, even. You proved you know zilch about Thomas Paine and the French AND Amereican revolution.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#138847 Jan 24, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, why was the last time the Catholic Church killed a gay guy?
Oh, you do know Thomas Paine was active in the French revolution and he saw no problem with cutting the heads of those evil rich YOUple. Nice guy Thomas was. And a flaming hypocrite.
From Wiki: He wrote the Rights of Man (1791), in part a defense of the French Revolution against its critics.
<quoted text>
Actually that was a Red Herring as I knew you, or Jacques, would NEVER answer the FIRST sentence!
So Poopo, can you answer my first sentence?
Oh, this is for everyone else, Thomas Paine wrote Rights of Man in 1791 and the Reign of Terror, as Poppo says, did not start until the FOLLOWING year.
Yes, he was arrested by the French, imprisoned in Paris, then released in 1794.. No, the French did not execute him!
Now, how about attempting to answer my FIRST sentence!
Why don't you try this on for size with reference to your first sentence, Rogue?

www.petertatchell.net/religion/vatican.htmw

which says :

When Will The Vatican Apologise To Gays?

It's time the Pope got down on his knees and apologised for the Catholic persecution of lesbians and gay men.

The Vatican last week offered a mealy-mouthed, half-baked apology to Jewish people for the role of "some" Catholics during the Nazi era. It pointedly refused to condemn the failure of leading clerics, including Pope Pius XII, to speak out against Nazism. Nor was there any acknowledgement that the Catholic Church backed the Jew-murdering regime in Croatia, or that after the war Church officials in Rome helped Nazi war criminals escape to South America. In short, the Vatican's so-called apology white-washed Catholic collusion with fascism.

If the Pope cannot give an unequivocal apology for Church anti-semitism, the likelihood of an apology for homophobia is less than zero. Unrepentant and heartless as ever, the Vatican shows not a shred of remorse for the Church's past and present persecution of lesbians and gay men.

In medieval times, "abominable sodomites" were burnt at the stake on the orders of Papal Inquisitors. As recently as the early nineteenth century, homosexuals were still being strung up on gallows all over Britain - with the blessing of the Catholic Church. This persecution isn't over yet. The Vatican is still crucifying queers.

The Catholic Catechism condemns homosexual acts as a "grave depravity", "intrinsically disordered" and "contrary to natural law".

In 1992, the Vatican officially rejected the concept of lesbian and gay "human rights", asserting that there is "no right" to homosexuality. It added that the civil liberties of homosexuals can be "legitimately limited". While condemning "unjust" discrimination, the Catholic leadership declared that some forms of anti-gay discrimination are "not unjust" and may even be "obligatory".

Denouncing homosexuality as an "aberrant deviation", four years ago the Pope condemned proposals by the European Parliament to remove discrimination as an "attack on the family". Simultaneously, the Catholic leader in England, Cardinal Basil Hume, refused to support an equal age of consent, later justifying his stance with the claim that the Church cannot endorse human rights for "acts which she teaches are morally wrong".

In 1996, the Vatican newspaper, L'Osservatore, explicitly urged Catholics to vote against political candidates who back equal rights for lesbians and gay men, describing homosexual equality as a "deviant trend".

When will we get an Papal apology for Catholic homophobia? Probably never. If the Vatican won't say sorry, perhaps Cardinal Hume will? Over to you Basil.

Metropolis, 26 March 1998.

© Copyright Peter Tatchell, 1998. All rights reserved.



LRS

Shreveport, LA

#138848 Jan 24, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
A red herring!!!! Do you not realise how everyone here, why, even your birther ilk, are laughing at you? You're a joke, and yes, funny, even. You proved you know zilch about Thomas Paine and the French AND Amereican revolution.
Personally, I laugh at you and the other skinflaps. Just sayin'
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#138849 Jan 24, 2013
George W Bush wrote:
Hey, does anyone remember all of the hearings and media coverage after my pathetic failure to secure all of these embassies?
Jan. 22, 2002 - American Consulate in Calcutta, India. Gunmen, 5 dead.
June 14, 2002 - American Consulate in Karachi, Pakistan. Car bomb, 12 dead.
Feb. 28, 2003 - American embassy in Islamabad, Pakistan. Gunmen, 2 dead.
June 30, 200 - American embassy in Tashkent, Uzbekistan. Suicide bomber, 2 dead.
Dec. 6, 2004 - American compound in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Gunmen, 9 dead.
March 2, 2006 - American consulate in Karachi, Pakistan. Car bomb, 2 dead.
Sept. 12, 2006 - American embassy in Damascus, Syria. Gunmen, 4 dead.
March 18, 2008 - American consulate in Istanbul, Turkey. Mortar attack, 2 dead.
Sept. 17, 2008 - American embassy in Sanaa, Yemen. Car bomb, 16 dead.
Remember that????????
Neither do I.
I lied, 54 died....
and without a single news story on any of them.
ACHIEVEMENT UNLOCKED 54G -
8 years of embassy attack cover-ups
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
And in how many of those incident was the embassy over-run and the ambassador assassinated?
Let's see, the last American ambassador that was assassinated was when ..... Jimmy Carter was president! Hmmmm.
Bravo, Rogue, Bravo GWB. Hey, that's a lot of attacks on U.S. installations/embassies. NINE(9). Obama, ONE (1)

Oh, isn't that great. None were over-run. And, victory, no ambassadors were assassinated. Oops, 54 killed. But hey, they're not ambassadors or even Americans, so it's it's just collateral damage, right, Rogue?
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#138850 Jan 24, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Why don't you try this on for size with reference to your first sentence, Rogue?
www.petertatchell.net/religion/vatican.htmw
which says :
When Will The Vatican Apologise To Gays?
It's time the Pope got down on his knees and apologised for the Catholic persecution of lesbians and gay men.
The Vatican last week offered a mealy-mouthed, half-baked apology to Jewish people for the role of "some" Catholics during the Nazi era. It pointedly refused to condemn the failure of leading clerics, including Pope Pius XII, to speak out against Nazism. Nor was there any acknowledgement that the Catholic Church backed the Jew-murdering regime in Croatia, or that after the war Church officials in Rome helped Nazi war criminals escape to South America. In short, the Vatican's so-called apology white-washed Catholic collusion with fascism.
If the Pope cannot give an unequivocal apology for Church anti-semitism, the likelihood of an apology for homophobia is less than zero. Unrepentant and heartless as ever, the Vatican shows not a shred of remorse for the Church's past and present persecution of lesbians and gay men.
In medieval times, "abominable sodomites" were burnt at the stake on the orders of Papal Inquisitors. As recently as the early nineteenth century, homosexuals were still being strung up on gallows all over Britain - with the blessing of the Catholic Church. This persecution isn't over yet. The Vatican is still crucifying queers.
The Catholic Catechism condemns homosexual acts as a "grave depravity", "intrinsically disordered" and "contrary to natural law".
In 1992, the Vatican officially rejected the concept of lesbian and gay "human rights", asserting that there is "no right" to homosexuality. It added that the civil liberties of homosexuals can be "legitimately limited". While condemning "unjust" discrimination, the Catholic leadership declared that some forms of anti-gay discrimination are "not unjust" and may even be "obligatory".
Denouncing homosexuality as an "aberrant deviation", four years ago the Pope condemned proposals by the European Parliament to remove discrimination as an "attack on the family". Simultaneously, the Catholic leader in England, Cardinal Basil Hume, refused to support an equal age of consent, later justifying his stance with the claim that the Church cannot endorse human rights for "acts which she teaches are morally wrong".
In 1996, the Vatican newspaper, L'Osservatore, explicitly urged Catholics to vote against political candidates who back equal rights for lesbians and gay men, describing homosexual equality as a "deviant trend".
When will we get an Papal apology for Catholic homophobia? Probably never. If the Vatican won't say sorry, perhaps Cardinal Hume will? Over to you Basil.
Metropolis, 26 March 1998.
© Copyright Peter Tatchell, 1998. All rights reserved.
Then write the Pope!
Learn to Read

Chicago, IL

#138851 Jan 24, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>That would be if he makes it that long! LMAO Tic Toc, Tic Toc, Tic Toc!
Threatening or just more fables? Pathetic in either case
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#138852 Jan 24, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you expound upon your comment about the NRA being thuggish. Now, compared to the 6,700 Occupiers who have been arrested between 2011 and 2012, how many NRA members have been arrested in the past 100 years?
I think you need to look up the definition of "thug"!
thug
/TH&#601;g/
Noun
A violent person, esp. a criminal.
A member of a religious organization of robbers and assassins in India, suppressed by the British in the 1830s.
Yep, sounds like the NRA to me!!!
Do the occupyers> have valid reasons for "occupying"? YES
Doesd the NRA have even ONE valid reason for occupyiny anything^ NO

Thug. Good definition. But does anyone have to do anythng directly to be labelled a thug? I think not. Does the promotion of firearms for every living American,(no permit or training required), firearms that have killed some many innocent victims, from Columbine to Houston and so many before that, not constitute a form of thuggery? Hitler, I believe, never killed anyone personally, but does that exempt him from being called a thug and murderer?
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#138853 Jan 24, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Threatening or just more fables? Pathetic in either case
Threat? Try impeachment for failing to uphold the Constitution! Now, please go learn something, anything! Bonehead
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#138854 Jan 24, 2013
Jacques Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Do the occupyers> have valid reasons for "occupying"? YES
Doesd the NRA have even ONE valid reason for occupyiny anything^ NO
Thug. Good definition. But does anyone have to do anythng directly to be labelled a thug? I think not. Does the promotion of firearms for every living American,(no permit or training required), firearms that have killed some many innocent victims, from Columbine to Houston and so many before that, not constitute a form of thuggery? Hitler, I believe, never killed anyone personally, but does that exempt him from being called a thug and murderer?
What is the NRA occupying? I think you have a woody for Hitler!
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#138855 Jan 24, 2013
Grand Birther wrote:
<quoted text>
Howdy, birfoon.
Here's the latest update on being the losingest losers in the history of losing:
Constitution:198 :: Birthers:0
Please keep tolling your pretend clock for whatever reason you've dreamt up, and we'll keep on making fun of you.
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Final Countdown.....tic toc, tic toc, tic toc!!
tic toc, tic toc, tic toc!!= "can you hear us coming?" HA HA
Grand Birther

United States

#138856 Jan 24, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Final Countdown.....tic toc, tic toc, tic toc!!
Howdy, Big Ben Birfoon.

Are you doing the final countdown to the ultimate dissolution of the Republican Party? Watching their very public self destruction is pretty hilarious.
Jacques Ottawa

Toronto, Canada

#138857 Jan 24, 2013
LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
So you're saying most people in the world no longer believe in their religion? That's a whole bunch of people who have recently lost their faith, no? Perhaps you should tell the Christians, Jews and Islamists of this late breaking news! You don't know what you're talking about. Big surprise!
Do you take great pride in your abject ignorance? Please compare church attendance between the 60s and today. Same thing for Jews, ask any rabbi about synagogue attendance today. As for the Moslems, give 'em time, they started late, they/ll catch up in a couple hundred years.

Some day you'll understand that the more one is educated, the less one believes in these religious fairy tales designed to scare and enslave poor believers. If there is a god, believe me, he's staying as far as he possibly can from organised religion.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 20 min J RULES 71,244
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 44 min Patriot 1,155,778
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 3 hr Religionthebiglie 51,284
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 4 hr OzRitz 49,316
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 5 hr moe 98,875
Is Vanessa Hudgens A PORN-STAR ?? (Oct '07) 8 hr Jenny Derin 187
Holiday Greetings 9 hr Scrooge and Cratchit 2
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 4:00 am PST

Bleacher Report 4:00AM
Breaking Down Colts' Game Plan vs. Titans
Bleacher Report 5:00 AM
Can't-Miss Picks and Matchup Guide
Bleacher Report 8:09 AM
Breaking Down Bears' Game Plan vs. Vikings
NBC Sports 9:15 AM
Lance Briggs "happy" with Robbie Gould's comments
Bleacher Report11:45 AM
Complete Week 17 Preview for Vikings vs. Bears